You are on page 1of 3

Quality Assurance Rubric

Course Title: __________________________________________ Term: ____________________________________________

Instructional Designer: __________________________________ Date Reviewed (MM/DD/YYYY):_______________________

Cohesive Design
Course is organized, easy to navigate, and has a consistent structure designed to facilitate student success.

Critical Elements Exemplary Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Course Design & Organization Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – Structure, format, and timeline are Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
The overall design of the training AND – delivers content in a communicated with learners at the rating due to issues noted below:
is communicated clearly with creative and/or engaging way. beginning of the training.
learners at the beginning of the
session.

Learning Objectives     Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” - States objectives clearly and Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Objectives are clearly stated and AND - delivers a logical learning explains what learners will do by rating due to issues noted below: 
explain what learners will do by path for the outcome.  the end of the session.
the end of the session.

Accessibility & Usability Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – All content in assessments is Some of the content within the
Training facilities, materials, and AND – incorporates the Universal accessible. assessments is not accessible.
technology demonstrate a Design for Learning (UDL)
commitment to accessibility for all Guidelines and provides
learners. alternative assessment options.
Content
The instructional materials are diverse, varied, meaningful, and accessible.

Critical Elements Exemplary Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Instructional Materials Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – Utilizes materials that are relevant Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Materials are relevant to the AND – Utilizes materials that are to and support training objectives. rating due to issues noted below:
objectives and support learner engaging, relevant to, and support
success. training objectives.

Activities Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – Provides learners with authentic Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Activities provide learners with AND – Provides learners with practice with real-world examples. rating due to issues noted below: 
multiple ways to interact with the multiple opportunities for authentic
content. practice with real-world examples.

Technology Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – Technology promotes Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Technology promotes and AND – actively engages learners achievement of learning rating due to issues noted below: 
supports learning objectives. in meaningful and real-world objectives.
technology situations.

Accessibility & Usability Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – All content in assessments is Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Training facilities, materials, and AND – incorporates the Universal accessible. rating due to issues noted below: 
technology demonstrate a Design for Learning (UDL)
commitment to accessibility for all Guidelines and provides
learners. alternative assessment options.
Assessment
Assessments are directly related to content, are meaningful, and provide accurate measurements of understanding.

Critical Elements Exemplary Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Learner Support Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – Opportunities to track learning are Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Opportunities for learning are AND – Opportunities to track designed to provide multiple rating due to issues noted below:
scaffolded throughout the training learning are varied, engaging, and opportunities throughout the
sessions. provide a wide range of course.
opportunities throughout the
course.

Assessment Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – Assessments provide Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
(Summative Assessment) AND – provides clear and measurable criteria that connect rating due to issues noted below: 
Final assessment measures descriptive measurable criteria to the content and grading
learner’s mastery of the training (e.g., rubric) that connects directly policy.
objectives. to the content, is made available
to students, and maps directly to
course grading policy.

Accessibility & Usability Meets criteria for “Satisfactory” – All content in assessments is Does not achieve a “Satisfactory”
Training facilities, materials, and AND – incorporates the Universal accessible. rating due to issues noted below: 
technology demonstrate a Design for Learning (UDL)
commitment to accessibility for all Guidelines and provides
learners. alternative assessment options.

Action Plan:

*Note: This rubric is designed to reflect best practices according to Quality Matters’ Continuing and Professional Education Rubric, second edition.

You might also like