Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract: It is known that the mechanical properties of low-plasticity silt are similar to those of sand, and yet silts are frequently used
as coastal reclamation materials in many cities and industrial areas and will thus be susceptible to liquefaction. Samples of a low-plasticity
silt have been tested under monotonic and cyclic loading under isotropic and anisotropic stress conditions to characterize liquefaction,
cyclic failure, and to develop an empirical model describing its cyclic strength. A sedimentation technique produced samples that had the
Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by New York University on 05/17/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved.
highest susceptibility to liquefaction. Contractive behavior of monotonically loaded samples was triggered when the stress path reached
an initial phase transformation 共IPT兲 in both compression and extension tests. The samples became dilative after reaching a phase
transformation 共PT兲 point. The cyclic shear behavior of the silt samples prepared using the sedimentation method and consolidated at
various initial sustained deviator stress ratios was examined in terms of two different failure criteria: a double amplitude axial strain
a,DA = 5% for reversal conditions; or axial plastic strain a,P = 5% for nonreversal. For isotropically consolidated samples the initial phase
transformation determined from undrained monotonic extension tests was the boundary between stable and contractive behavior. For
anisotropically consolidated samples failure was defined by a bounding surface formed by undrained monotonic compression tests. An
empirical model was developed relating the number of cycles to failure under conditions of both liquefaction and cyclic mobility to the
initial anisotropic sustained deviator stress and cyclic deviator stress ratio.
DOI: 10.1061/共ASCE兲1090-0241共2006兲132:6共716兲
CE Database subject headings: Geotechnical engineering; Earthquake engineering; Liquefaction; Cyclic strength; Silts; Artificial
islands; Land reclamation; Foundations.
Introduction could be fully liquefied. They also found that the cyclic strength
of each material decreased with increasing initial drained shear
Seismically induced liquefaction of sand has long been recog- stress, which is similar to clay soils as observed by Hyodo et al.
nized as a phenomenon causing serious damage to foundations 共1994b兲, and is the reverse of the behavior observed in sands by
and structures, and the study of sand liquefaction has been devel- Vaid and Chern 共1983a,b兲. Silt behavior can therefore be seen to
oped as a field in geotechnical engineering mainly by researchers be transitional between that of fine sands and clay. Little research
from the United States and Japan. Their research work has in- has been carried out on the liquefaction characteristics of these
cluded field observations, laboratory experiments, model tests, materials, yet silts are frequently used for coastal reclamation in
and theoretical studies. Silty materials are also known to liquefy. many cities and industrial areas, particularly in Japan. In the large
Although high-plasticity silt is often treated as clay, it is known earthquakes of Chibaken-Tohooki in 1987 and Loma Prieta in
that the mechanical properties of lower plasticity silts can be 1989 it was found that sand boils induced by liquefaction con-
similar to those of sand. For example, Soong et al. 共2004兲 tested tained a large proportion of silt particles 共Mori et al. 1988;
three materials: Keuper marl, a silty clay with sand 共plasticity Morimoto et al. 1988; Mori and Numata 1990兲. Since then, it has
index I p = 19兲; Arakawa clay, a clayey and sandy silt 共I p = 17兲; and been recognized that silt as well as sand can be liquefied during
DL clay, a clay silt 共I p = 0兲. These materials had silt contents of an earthquake. In the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake, the liq-
between 65 and 95%. When subjected to cyclic simple shearing uefaction of silt was observed in reclaimed coastal areas such as
all of the materials could be taken to cyclic failure defined as a Kobe Port Island 共JSCE 1995兲. Studies on the liquefaction of silts
double amplitude shear strain of 10%, but only the nonplastic silt 共Adachi 1996; Yamamuro and Lade 1997兲 suggested that sand
containing nonplastic silt particles tended to be more liquefiable
1
Reader, Dept. of Civil and Structural Engineering, Univ. of Sheffield,
than clean sands.
Mappin St., Sheffield S1 3JD, U.K. E-mail: a.f.l.hyde@sheffield.ac.uk The cyclic shear behavior of sands is greatly influenced by
2
Senior Research Associate, Dept. of Geography, Univ. of Durham, their initial density and confining pressure. Sands can behave in
South Rd., Durham DH1 3LE, U.K. E-mail: toru.higuchi@durham.ac.uk either a contractive or dilative manner depending on their initial
3
Professor, Dept. of Urban and Civil Engineering, Ibaraki Univ., conditions. Castro 共1975兲 and Castro and Poulos 共1977兲 divided
4-12-1 Nakanarusawa, Hitachi, Ibaraki 316 8511, Japan. E-mail: the pattern of failure of saturated sands subjected to cyclic load-
yasuhara@civil.ibaraki.ac.jp ing into liquefaction for contractive and cyclic mobility for dila-
Note. Discussion open until November 1, 2006. Separate discussions tive samples. Additionally, Vaid and Chern 共1985兲, Sladen et al.
must be submitted for individual papers. To extend the closing date by
共1985兲, and Mohamad and Dobry 共1986兲 found the initial sus-
one month, a written request must be filed with the ASCE Managing
Editor. The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review and pos-
tained shear stress due to anisotropic consolidation—or in other
sible publication on October 5, 2004; approved on November 2, 2005. words, the weight of overlying structures—to be an important
This paper is part of the Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental factor in differentiating the behavior of sands between contractive
Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 6, June 1, 2006. ©ASCE, ISSN 1090-0241/ and dilative. Vaid and Chern 共1983a兲 and Hyodo et al. 共1989,
2006/6-716–735/$25.00. 1991, 1994a兲 suggested that the cyclic shear strength of loose
have not been investigated for silt. The soil fabric, or structure, is
characterized by the orientation and arrangement of the individual
soil grains and the contact planes between the grains 共Vaid et al. Fig. 1. Particle size distribution curve
1985兲. Mulilis et al. 共1977兲 found that the samples having the
highest distribution of normal to tangential contact planes in the
direction parallel to the major principal stress exhibited the high- material was creamy white and its calcium carbonate 共CaCO3兲
est dynamic strength. Since any reconstituted samples have a content was 98.5%. The material was stored in plastic bags to
structure different from the in-situ soil fabric, the effect of the avoid absorbing moisture until required.
sample preparation method should not be neglected. The method A particle-size analysis was performed on representative batch
by which reconstituted soil test samples are prepared can have a samples using a Malvern laser diffraction particle size analyzer.
significant effect on the cyclic strength of the samples 共Ladd The particle-size distribution curve for this material is shown in
1977; Mulilis et al. 1977; Seed 1979; Adachi 1996兲. In cyclic Fig. 1. This showed the material to contain 69.2% silt-sized par-
triaxial tests for three different sands, Ladd 共1977兲 found that soil ticles. The basic properties were as follows: specific gravity
samples prepared by wet tamping could have a cyclic strength as Gs = 2.71; wL = 24%; w P = 18%; PI = 6%. According to the Unified
much as 100% greater than those prepared by dry deposition. Soil Classification System 共BS 5930: 1981兲 the limestone was
Mulilis et al. 共1977兲 noted that samples prepared by pluviation classified as ML—that is, a silt of low compressibility and plas-
through water had a cyclic strength 10% greater than samples ticity. This material was very close to the A-line that provides an
prepared by pluviation through air. On the other hand, for arbitrary division between silts and clays. It will be shown later,
vibrated-moist samples the cyclic strength was 55⬃ 75% greater however, that its shearing and cyclic loading characteristics were
than vibrated-dry samples, and moist-rodded samples were found quite unlike those of clays.
to have the highest cyclic strength and were from 61⬃ 108% Consolidation and monotonic strain-controlled triaxial tests
stronger. They demonstrated that each different sample prepara- were carried out on 38⫻ 76 mm samples prepared by three dif-
tion method produced a sample with a slightly different soil fabric ferent methods: one-dimensional 共1D兲 preconsolidation; sedimen-
and, therefore, different cyclic strength. The material used in this tation 共Psed = 40 kPa兲; and light sedimentation 共Psed = 10 kPa兲.
work was the silt fraction of a limestone rock flour and attempts These different sample preparation methods were attempted in the
were made to develop an ideal sample preparation method for the process of seeking an ideal sample reconstitution technique to
study of its liquefaction characteristics. study the liquefaction of silt—that is a liquefiable deposition
Various researchers have related cyclic behavior of sands to
monotonic phase transformation points or critical stress ratios.
Early work by Ishihara et al. 共1975, 1976兲 and Tatsuoka and
Ishihara 共1974a,b兲 testing Fuji River sand compared un-
drained monotonic and cyclic behaviors. The tests performed in-
cluded both drained and undrained cyclic triaxial tests, with an
emphasis on testing loose samples. Liquefaction was triggered
where the stress ratio became equal to the angle of phase trans-
formation. Ishihara et al. 共1975兲 first defined a concept of phase
transformation as a threshold stress ratio at which the sand as a
solid was transformed into a liquefied state. Alarcon-Guzman et
al. 共1988兲 noted that a transition occurred on a critical stress ratio
共CSR兲 line that coincided with the initial peak point of the stress
path. They, along with Sladen et al. 共1985兲, Vaid and Chern
共1985兲, and Mohamad and Dobry 共1986兲, also proposed a linkage
between monotonic and cyclic behavior of granular materials
using this CSR line.
Fig. 3. Isotropic consolidation tests for 1D consolidated and sedimented limestone with superposition of the critical state line 共from Moradi 1998兲
structure was required. All samples were tested undrained with then extruded and sealed in three 38-mm diameter, 100-mm long
pore pressure measurement. To allow the pore pressure to reach thin-walled sample tubes for later assembly in the triaxial cell.
equilibrium during the monotonic loading tests the samples were The silt prepared using the 1D preconsolidation method had dila-
compressed or extended at an axial strain rate of 0.1%/min. tive shear characteristics similar to dense sand with a high com-
One-dimensional consolidation was carried out by consolidat- pressive stiffness. This was due to the high 1D consolidation
ing a slurry mixed to twice the liquid limit under a vertical stress pressure of 80 kPa required to produce a sample that could
of 80 kPa using a piston in a steel cylinder of a 105 mm internal be handled. The samples were also highly variable due to friction
diameter. Samples with an average moisture content of 21% were in the consolidation tubes and sample disturbance during
Fig. 4. Deviator stress versus axial strain for sedimented samples 共Psed = 40 kPa兲
preparation—that is, they were easily damaged while the top The amount of slurry used depended on the negative head
platen, membrane, and O-rings were being assembled. It was felt of water used 共i.e., 210 g for Psed = 40 kPa, and 200 g for
that this method of preparation did not produce samples that were Psed = 10 kPa兲. Thus, the height and initial void ratio of samples
representative of silt placed as a coastal fill material, which would were easily controlled. The average moisture content was found
often be pluviated under water and then consolidated by an over- to be about 24% for Psed = 40 kPa and 26% for Psed = 10 kPa, in-
burden. A simple sedimentation technique was therefore devel- dicating that this method produced much looser samples than the
oped for the preparation of looser liquefiable samples. In the 1D preconsolidation water content of 21%.
sedimentation technique a membrane was fitted to the triaxial cell The loose sedimented samples required very careful handling.
base and supported by a split former as shown in Fig. 2. A de- A hollowed aluminum top cap was placed on the sample and to
aired slurry 共w = 48%兲 was poured into the mold and water was minimize disturbance a top drainage line was not used, and only a
drawn through a porous disc at the base of the sample using a single O-ring was placed over the membrane around the top cap.
negative head of water of either 1 m 共10 kPa兲 or 4 m 共40 kPa兲. The drainage valve was opened to hold the sample using 1 m
negative head of water, and the split mold was removed with loading, but this was found to result in slight play as the deviator
great care. In order to connect the top cap to the loading ram stress moved from compression to extension and was abandoned.
approximately 2 mL of resin mixed with hardener was poured The sample preparation technique did not allow the use of lubri-
into a hollow in the sample top cap. The proportions of the mix cated end platens.
were set to harden after 20 min. The cell lid was fastened in place All samples for monotonic and cyclic triaxial testing were con-
and the internal load cell with a threaded stub on its base was solidated in the triaxial cell under a back pressure of 200 kPa to
lowered into the resin-filled hollow of the sample top cap, making ensure full saturation and rapid pore pressure response. The aver-
sure that the load cell did not register any load. The load cell was age B value 共Skempton 1954兲 for all samples was 0.98, and any
maintained in this position for 20 min until the resin hardened. samples that did not have a B value of at least 0.96 were
Initially a bayonet push fit connection had been used for axial discarded.
Fig. 8. Deviator stress versus axial strain for various initial sustained deviator stresses
Fig. 9. Anisotropically consolidated monotonic stress paths with various initial sustained deviator stresses
Isotropic Consolidation 0.0053, and 0.0049 for 1D, Psed = 40, and Psed = 10 kPa,
respectively.
In Fig. 3 the isotropic consolidation characteristics for the sedi-
mented samples are compared with those for samples prepared
using 1D consolidation. Two isotropic consolidation tests for Isotropically Consolidated Undrained Monotonic
sedimented samples of Psed = 40 and 10 kPa were carried out in a Shear
triaxial cell up to an effective confining pressure of 1.8 MPa
共1,800 kPa兲. Moradi 共1998兲 carried out a high-pressure isotropic A series of undrained monotonic triaxial tests was conducted
consolidation test for the same material using a wire-reinforced on samples prepared using the sedimentation method
triaxial cell up to an effective confining pressure of 4.8 MPa. The 共Psed = 40 kPa兲 in a hydraulic stress path cell with sample dimen-
sample for his test was initially 1D consolidated from a slurry at sions of 38⫻ 76 mm 共Bishop and Wesley 1975兲. The samples
an initial mean normal effective stress p⬘ = 80 kPa. The results were consolidated under effective confining pressures of 100,
from this test are also included in Fig. 3, together with the pro- 300, and 600 kPa, and sheared at an axial strain rate of
jection of the critical state line. 0.1% per minute. Test durations were therefore about 190 min,
The sedimentation technique produced much looser samples which was regarded as sufficiently slow to ensure pore pressure
with the specific volume increasing with decreasing initial effec- equilibrium in a silty material with a minimum B value of 0.96.
tive consolidation stress Psed. The consolidation line for sedi- Mesri and Ali 共1999兲 tested a glacial clay under similar conditions
mented samples did not appear to reach the normal consolidation and showed that a test duration of 150 min was sufficient for pore
line 共NCL兲. The limestone silt had a small particle size and sand- pressure equalization. Stress–strain curves from monotonic und-
like characteristics; thus, the consolidation yield stress was likely rained compression and extension tests under various confining
to be in excess of the maximum stress applied—in this case of pressures are presented in Fig. 4. There was a point of flexure in
1.8 MPa. compression and an initial peak in extension at very low strains
The consolidation line for the 1D consolidated sample tested 共0.2⬃ 0.5% 兲. This was followed by hardening after the point of
by Moradi 共1998兲 lies parallel to the critical state line for a mean flexure in compression and strain softening followed by harden-
normal effective stress greater than 4 MPa, indicating that the ing behavior after the initial peak in extension. Failure in exten-
consolidation curve may have reached the normal consolidation sion and compression, defined as the peak deviator stress, oc-
line. Using Moradi’s 共1998兲 data the slope of the normal consoli- curred at strains of 兩8.7⬃ 11.1% 兩 and there was then a decrease in
dation line 共兲 was estimated to be 0.058 and the back projected deviator stress after the failure with a tendency to approach a
specific volume v at a mean normal effective stress of 1 kPa was constant critical state value at large strains.
defined as N and had a value of 1.83. Comparison of the consoli- The initial peak point seen in the stress–strain curves in Fig. 4
dation curves over the range of effective consolidation pressures where strain softening was initiated is located close to the initia-
up to 1,000 kPa reveals that samples prepared using the sedimen- tion of contractive behavior on the corresponding stress paths in
tation technique tended to lie on the wet/loose side of the critical Fig. 5. Vaid and Chern 共1985兲 who sheared sands cyclically and
state while those initially prepared using the 1D consolidation monotonically termed such a state as the critical stress ratio
mold lay largely on the dry/dense side of critical 共Schofield and 共CSR兲. The CSR points are plotted on the stress paths as initial
Wroth 1968兲. The swelling and recompression lines were reason- phase transformation 共IPT兲 points. It should be noted that, though
ably linear for each preparation method with slopes of 0.0037, the definitions for CSR and IPT may be the same for contractive
CC25-178 0.178 106.2 samples prepared using the 1D preconsolidation method and then
CC25-217 0.217 78.1 isotropically consolidated to 150, 300, and 450 kPa. One exten-
CC25-227 0.227 50.0 sion test was carried out at an effective confining stress of
CC25-248 0.248 34.1 300 kPa; otherwise, the tests were all compressive. The results are
⬘ = 91.7 kPa; qs / pc⬘ = 0.25; cyclic reversal
3c
presented for comparison purposes in Fig. 6. These samples were
very dense and were much further to the dry side of the critical
CC25-264 0.264 20.1
state compared with the sedimented samples. Thus the stress
CC25-308 0.308 14.1
paths show extremely dilative behavior after the PT point and
CC25-347 0.347 7.2
both the peak and critical state strengths are higher. Despite this
CC25-398 0.398 3.0
the slopes of the IPT 共0.63 and 0.58兲 and PT 共1.16 and 0.95兲 lines
⬘ = 83.3 kPa; qs / pc⬘ = 0.5; cyclic nonreversal
3c were similar to those for the sedimented samples, and the stress
CC50-099 0.099 358.0 ratios in each case were independent of initial effective consoli-
CC50-147 0.147 52.2 dation pressure.
CC50-196 0.196 22.1
CC50-197 0.197 29.2
CC50-207 0.207 18.2
CC50-216 0.216 19.3 Anisotropically Consolidated Undrained Monotonic
CC50-247 0.247 8.3 Shear
CC50-295 0.295 3.3
CC50-341 0.341 3.2 It has been shown that the sample preparation method using the
⬘ = 75 kPa; qs / pc⬘ = 0.75; cyclic nonreversal
3c sedimentation technique produced samples that were more con-
tractive than those from the 1D preconsolidation method. How-
CC75-118 0.118 115.2
ever, to increase the susceptibility to liquefaction for the purpose
CC75-147 0.147 78.3
of this study a further modification was made to the preparation
CC75-177 0.177 35.3
technique. The negative head of water Psed to be used for the
CC75-227 0.227 19.3 sedimentation of silt particles was reduced to 10 kPa from
CC75-247 0.247 12.2 40 kPa. It was thought that this technique would produce a par-
CC75-336 0.336 4.1 ticle structure that was initially similar to that at a depth of about
CC75-395 0.395 2.2 1 m below an inundated soil such as might be found in newly
⬘ = 66.7 kPa; qs / pc⬘ = 1.0; cyclic nonreversal
3c reclaimed land. Samples prepared by this method 共Psed = 10 kPa兲
CC100-100 0.100 1,135 were then consolidated both isotropically and with various initial
CC100-146 0.146 138.2 static shear stresses for the main testing program.
CC100-196 0.196 48.1 There are many cases of practical interest in which soil ele-
CC100-235 0.235 30.3 ments are subjected to an initial sustained shear stress such as that
CC100-246 0.246 27.2 imposed on the subsoil by an overlying structure. In the case of
CC100-296 0.296 17.3 earthquake shaking, these soil elements are then subjected to ad-
CC100-346 0.346 9.1 ditional 共cyclic兲 shear stress due to shear waves propagating ver-
CC100-395 0.395 5.3
tically upward from the bedrock. Therefore, the existence of an
initial sustained shear stress cannot be neglected for the undrained
CC100-491 0.491 2.4
behavior of soils, and its influence has been studied by a number
of researchers 共Lee and Seed 1967; Vaid and Chern 1983a; Hyodo
et al. 1994a; Yasuhara et al. 1997, 1998; Yasuhara and Toyota
soils 共e.g., loose and medium dense sands兲, the CSR cannot be 1997兲. It was thought therefore that an investigation of the und-
defined for a completely dilative material such as dense sand. rained monotonic shear behavior of anisotropically consolidated
However, the IPT defined as the initial turning point in the stress– silt would help in understanding its anisotropic cyclic loading
strain curve may be found even in dense sands. It is clear that the behavior. As shown in Fig. 7, prior to testing, samples were first
stress ratio at the IPT for the isotropically consolidated samples is subjected to various isotropic confining pressures ⬘3c 共100, 92,
identical irrespective of confining pressure as can be seen in 83, 75, and 67 kPa兲 and then the axial stress was increased in
Fig. 5. The effective stress ratios at the IPT, 共q / p⬘兲IPT, for com- increments of 5 kPa every 5 min, allowing drainage of the sample
Fig. 10. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.217; qs / p⬘c = 0兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.217; qs / p⬘c = 0兲
until a prescribed stress state was reached under a constant ⬘3c. lay above the water table. The initial sustained deviator stress
Variation of the axial stress applied at this stage gave an initial ratio defined as qs / p⬘c was equal to 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1. It
sustained deviator stress qs共=2 · max兲 of 0, 25, 50, 75, and should be noted that the stress condition qs / p⬘c = 0 was for isotro-
100 kPa. The mean normal effective stress p⬘c was calculated as pic consolidation.
Fig. 8 shows the relationship between deviator stress and axial
共qs + 3⬘3c兲 strain for the anisotropically consolidated samples. The stress–
p⬘c = 共1兲
3 strain curves showed marked initial peaks in compression, which
became less clear in extension with increasing initial sustained
and the combination of ⬘3c and qs for the five series of tests was deviator stress qs. For samples that exhibited initial peak points
chosen to keep the p⬘c constant equal to 100 kPa. The mean nor- the zone between the initial phase transformation point and the
mal effective stress of 100 kPa would be equivalent to the effec- phase transformation point was characterized by the deviator
tive stress conditions for a soil element at about 10 m depth if the stress, reducing until for a brief period strains increased without a
soil were below the water table, or 5 – 10 m if any part of the soil change in stress. These zones were similar to a quasi-steady state
Fig. 11. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.393; qs / p⬘c = 0兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.393; qs / p⬘c = 0兲
共QSS兲 defined for sands by Alarcon-Guzman et al. 共1988兲 and dation points shown in Fig. 7. In the compression tests, the effec-
Ishihara 共1993兲 and immediately preceded the PT points for the tive stress paths shown in Fig. 9 initially rose vertically and
anisotropically consolidated samples. After passing through the slightly to the right. Five diagonal lines rising from the initial
QSS, samples exhibited strain hardening behavior and failed at states at tan−13 drawn on the graph indicate the direction of the
moderate strains of 10.5⬃ 15.6% in compression and −4.3⬃ total stress paths. Examining the stress paths it can be seen that
−8% in extension. In the compression tests, the higher the qs, the the less anisotropically the samples were consolidated, the greater
earlier the sample failed. The total axial strain at failure, consist- the positive excess pore pressure that was generated by the time
ing of that developed under the initial drained shear stress the paths reached the IPT point. In the case of the isotropically
added to that from the peak under monotonic shearing was consolidated sample 共qs = 0兲 the excess pore pressure was 25 kPa,
approximately 15%, irrespective of the degree of anisotropic while that for qs = 100 kPa was as little as 3 kPa. It should be
consolidation. noted that unlike the isotropically consolidated samples, the IPT
The stress paths for the undrained monotonic shear tests in did not occur at a constant stress ratio 共q / p⬘兲IPT. After the initial
both extension and compression commenced at the final consoli- phase transformation point in compression, the samples became
Fig. 12. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.178; qs / p⬘c = 0.25兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.178; qs / p⬘c = 0.25兲
more contractive with a drop in the deviator stress q. The values oping slight negative excess pore pressures before reaching the
of deviator stress ratio at the PT, 共q / p⬘兲 PT, were very similar IPT. As for the compression side, the values of the deviator stress
irrespective of the magnitude of qs. The average value for the five ratio at the IPT, 共q / p⬘兲IPT, increased with increasing qs. After the
samples was 1.39, which was close to the critical state value IPT the samples showed contractive behavior with positive excess
q / p⬘ = 1.50. The constant value of PT stress ratio suggests that the pore pressure until the PT was achieved at a = −1.6% ⬃ −3.1%.
effects of the anisotropy have largely been removed by this stage. The extension tests for qs = 75 and 100 kPa were performed using
After passing the PT the samples became dilative and reached a a bayonet push fit connecting device between the sample top cap
peak. The peak values of the deviator stress ratio, 共q / p⬘兲 f , were and the loading ram instead of the resin connection. Slight play in
again similar to each other, and the average value was 1.52. The this mechanism caused a short noncontact period when the paths
stress paths in the compression tests dropped toward the critical crossed the “q = 0” axis. As a result the values of 共q / p⬘兲 PT for
state 共q / p⬘ = 1.50兲 after failure. qs = 75 and 100 kPa in extension were slightly lower than those
In the extension tests the stress paths went downward devel- for qs = 0, 25, and 50 kPa.
Fig. 13. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.347; qs / p⬘c = 0.25兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.347; qs / p⬘c = 0.25兲
Cyclic Loading obtained by cyclic simple shear tests. Using cyclic triaxial tests
the writers have therefore attempted to provide qualitative guid-
The liquefaction strength of a saturated sand is commonly evalu- ance on the effects of anisotropic consolidation on the cyclic
ated by undrained cyclic triaxial tests with two-way loading in strength of low-plasticity silty fills.
compression and extension. It is accepted that the in situ strain
conditions in an earthquake are better represented by simple shear
tests; however, Hosono and Yoshimine 共2004兲, using a hollow Cyclic Test Program
cylinder apparatus, compared cyclic tests with an initial static
shear stress under triaxial and simple shear conditions and con- In order to simulate the stress conditions during earthquakes for
cluded that the change in liquefaction strength for simple shear anisotropically consolidated soils, a number of undrained cyclic-
was 75–85% of that for triaxial tests. Thus cyclic triaxial testing loading tests were performed using a modified computer-
is capable of providing qualitative conclusions similar to those controlled closed-loop cyclic triaxial system manufactured by
Fig. 14. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.147; qs / p⬘c = 0.50兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.147; qs / p⬘c = 0.5兲
ELE International Ltd. The system consisted of a triaxial cell, a the actuator were controlled by an electropneumatic valve. The
loading frame fitted with a double acting actuator connected to a system’s actuator was also modified to have a displacement trans-
pneumatic servovalve, and a computer control and data acquisi- ducer mechanically coupled to the actuator piston, enabling dis-
tion system 共CDAS兲. The triaxial cell was equipped with a pore placement control in addition to force control. A command signal
pressure transducer, immersible load cell, deformation transducer, containing the amplitude and frequency information from the
and two pneumatic servovalves for control of cell and back pres- CDAS was compared with the actual feedback signal of force or
sure fitted with pressure transducers for each valve. All the pres- displacement. The difference between these signals was used to
sure transducers and load cells were calibrated monthly using a adjust the servovalve to regulate the flow of air pressure to elimi-
hydraulic dead weight tester. The three pneumatic servovalves nate the error. Thus, the control loop was closed electronically.
had clean air pressure supplied from a constant pressure reservoir. Although the system was controlled using a feedback signal from
Computer software processed the data, monitoring, logging, and the load cell, the area of the sample was not simultaneously cal-
sending control commands. Loads transmitted to the specimen by culated. Hence, the deviator stress still tended to decrease when
Fig. 15. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.216; qs / p⬘c = 0.5兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.216; qs / p⬘c = 0.5兲
the sample underwent large strains, but much less than with open- better control of the loading system and acquisition of data al-
loop systems. The measurement of cyclic shear strength of the silt though, this value was 10⬃ 20 times lower than the typical fre-
using a closed-loop compared with open-loop loading systems quency range for earthquake excitations. Although tests were not
was discussed by Higuchi et al. 共2000兲. carried out at lower frequencies it was considered that the rela-
The samples were prepared using the light sedimentation tively low frequency of loading combined with an average B
method 共Psed = 10 kPa兲 and isotropically and anisotropically con- value for all samples of 0.98 was sufficient to ensure pore pres-
solidated under a mean normal effective stress p⬘c = 100 kPa with sure equilibrium during cyclic loading. The test series for the
various initial sustained deviator stress ratios qs / p⬘c = 0, 0.25, 0.5, undrained triaxial cyclic loading is shown in Table 1 together with
0.75, and 1 共Fig. 7兲. The cyclic tests were conducted at various the corresponding cyclic deviator stress and number of cycles to
cyclic stress levels qcyc / p⬘c ranging 0.099⬃ 0.491, where qcyc was failure.
defined as the single-amplitude cyclic deviator stress. The fre- Failure due to cyclic loading was defined by development of a
quency of the cyclic loading was set to 0.1 Hz for the purpose of specified level of strain. However, the type of failure depended on
Fig. 16. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.247; qs / p⬘c = 0.5兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.247; qs / p⬘c = 0.5兲
whether samples were subjected to stress reversal under cyclic serviceability. A double amplitude axial strain a,DA = 5% rapidly
loading. Complete liquefaction only occurred under stress rever- led to liquefaction failure, while an axial plastic strain a,P = 5%
sal conditions. In the case of nonreversal, samples generated large was followed by excessive flow deformation.
axial strains under reduced but still nonzero effective stress con-
ditions. Two separate criteria were therefore used to define failure
Stress–Strain Behavior
depending on whether samples were subjected to principal stress
reversal or not. In the case of reversal a double amplitude axial Figs. 10共a兲, 11共a兲, 12共a兲, 13共a兲, 14共a兲, 15共a兲, 16共a兲, 17共a兲, and
strain a,DA = 5% was used, and for nonreversal conditions an 18共a兲 show typical relationships between the deviator stress and
axial plastic strain a,P = 5% was defined as failure. Although axial strain under cyclic loading with the monotonic results su-
these definitions are completely different they each defined con- perimposed. The cyclic stress–strain curves for isotropically con-
ditions which, if replicated in situ, would lead to a rapid loss of solidated samples 共qs / p⬘c = 0兲 in Figs. 10共a兲 and 11共a兲 remained
Fig. 17. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.227; qs / p⬘c = 0.75兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.227; qs / p⬘c = 0.75兲
largely parallel to the monotonic curve until a strain level equiva- qs / p⬘c = 0.25 with stress reversal, the stress–strain loops became
lent to that at the initial peak point in the monotonic extension test large after the strain level reached the initial peak point obtained
was reached. This was the same as the IPT in extension. At this from the monotonic compression test as shown in Fig. 13共a兲.
point the strain amplitude suddenly increased and the samples Fig. 12共a兲, 14共a兲, 15共a兲, 16共a兲, 17共a兲, and 18共a兲, for anisotrop-
failed within a few cycles, reaching a,DA = 5%. Such a rapid ac-
ically consolidated samples 共qs / p⬘c = 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1兲 show
cumulation of axial strain, characteristic of loose sands, was
nonreversal loading conditions. In this case the plastic strain rate
termed flow deformation by Vaid and Chern 共1983a兲 and is now
more commonly known as liquefaction failure. increased after the a,P reached the same strain level as the initial
The stress–strain data for anisotropically consolidated peak point in a monotonic compression test. The rate of accumu-
samples, Figs. 12共a兲, 13共a兲, 14共a兲, 15共a兲, 16共a兲, 17共a兲, and 18共a兲, lation became a maximum when a,P exceeded the strain level
can be divided into that for reversal and nonreversal cyclic that was equivalent to the quasi-steady state or IPT in the mono-
loading. In tests for anisotropically consolidated samples at tonic compression test. Vaid and Chern 共1983b兲 suggested that
Fig. 18. 共a兲 Cyclic deviator stress versus axial strain, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.246; qs / p⬘c = 1兲; 共b兲 cyclic effective
stress path, with superposition of monotonic test data 共qcyc / p⬘c = 0.246; qs / p⬘c = 1兲
this flow deformation may be arrested as soon as the sample pression and extension test results. It can be seen that the cyclic
strained sufficiently to initiate dilation with further straining. Al- loading moved the effective stress paths of the samples toward the
though this phenomenon, termed “limited flow deformation” by critical state line 共CSL兲 defined by the ultimate values of p⬘ and q
Vaid and Chern 共1985兲, was used to explain the cyclic behavior of at strains in excess of 22% in the monotonic triaxial tests. The
loose sand, there was also some evidence of a slowing in the types of cyclic stress paths observed in the tests can be catego-
strain rate for the silt samples shown in Figures 12共a兲, 14共a兲,
rized into three, depending on their consolidation and loading
15共a兲, and 18共a兲.
conditions:
1. Isotropic and reversal 共qs / p⬘c = 0; qcyc ⬎ qs兲;
Cyclic Stress Paths 2. Anisotropic and reversal 共qs / p⬘c ⬎ 0; qcyc ⬎ qs兲; and
Figs. 14共b兲, 15共b兲, 16共b兲, 17共b兲, and 18共b兲 show typical effective 3. Anisotropic and nonreversal 共qs / p⬘c ⬎ 0; qcyc ⬍ qs兲.
cyclic stress paths with a superposition of the monotonic com- Each type of path is schematically illustrated in Fig. 19.
Fig. 23. Relationship between number of cycles to failure, cyclic deviator stress ratio, and initial sustained deviator stress ratio
level ground during earthquakes.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ.
dam, The Netherlands.
Eng. 105共2兲, 201–255.
Hyodo, M., Murata, H., Yasufuku, N., and Fujii, T. 共1989兲. “Undrained
Seed, H. B., and Hon, M. 共1987兲. “Design problems in soil liquefaction.”
cyclic shear strength and deformation of sands subjected to initial
J. Geotech. Eng., 113共8兲, 827–845.
static shear stress.” Proc., 4th Int. Conf. on Soil Dynamics and Earth- Skempton, A. W. 共1954兲. “The pore-pressure coefficients A and B.”
quake Engineering, Mexico City, Mexico, 81–103, Computational Geotechnique, 4共4兲, 143–147.
Mechanics, Southampton, U.K. Sladen, J. A., D’Hollander, R. D., and Krahn, J. 共1985兲. “The liquefaction
Hyodo, M., Murata, H., Yasufuku, N., and Fujii, T. 共1991兲. “Undrained of sands, a collapse surface approach.” Can. Geotech. J., 22共4兲,
cyclic shear strength and residual strain of saturated sand by cyclic 564–578.
triaxial tests.” Soils Found., 31共3兲, 60–76. Soong, B., Yasuhara, K., and Murakami, S. 共2004兲. “Cyclic and post-
Hyodo, M., Tanimizu, H., Yasufuku, N., and Murata, H. 共1994a兲. “Und- cyclic strength and stiffness of silty soils with initial static shear stress
rained cyclic and monotonic triaxial behaviour of saturated loose in direct simple shear tests.” Geotech. Test. J., 27共6兲, 607–613.
sand.” Soils Found., 34共1兲, 19–32. Tatsuoka, F., and Ishihara, K. 共1974a兲. “Drained deformation of sand
Hyodo, M., Yamamoto, Y., and Sugiyama, M. 共1994b兲. “Undrained cyclic under cyclic stresses reversing direction.” Soils Found., 14共3兲, 51–65.
shear behaviour of normally consolidated clay subjected to initial Tatsuoka, F., and Ishihara, K. 共1974b兲. “Yielding of sand in triaxial com-
static shear stress.” Soils Found., 34共4兲, 1–12. pression.” Soils Found., 14共2兲, 63–76.
Ishihara, K. 共1993兲. “Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes.” Vaid, Y. P., and Chern, J. C. 共1983a兲. “Effect of static shear on resistance
Geotechnique, 43共3兲, 351–415. to liquefaction.” Soils Found., 23共1兲, 47–60.
Ishihara, K., Lysmer, J., Yasuda, S., and Hirao, H. 共1976兲. “Prediction of Vaid, Y. P., and Chern, J. C. 共1983b兲. “Mechanism of deformation during
liquefaction in sand deposits during earthquakes.” Soils Found.,
cyclic undrained loading of saturated sands.” Int. J. Soil Dyn. Earth-
16共1兲, 1–16.
quake Eng. 2共3兲, 171–177.
Ishihara, K., Tatsuoka, F., and Yasuda, S. 共1975兲. “Undrained deformation
Vaid, Y. P., and Chern, J. C. 共1985兲. “Cyclic and monotonic undrained
and liquefaction of sand under cyclic stresses.” Soils Found., 15共1兲,
response of saturated sands.” Proc., Advances in the Art of Testing
29–44.
Japan Society of Civil Engineers 共JSCE兲. 共1995兲. “Emergency report Soils under Cyclic Conditions, ASCE, New York, 120–147.
on damages in Hanshin Great earthquake.” JSCE, Tokyo, Japan Vaid, Y. P., Chern, J. C., and Tumi, H. 共1985兲. “Confining pressure, grain
共in Japanese兲. angularity, and liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Eng., 111共10兲, 1229–1235.
Ladd, R. S. 共1977兲. “Specimen preparation and cyclic stability of sands.” Yamamuro, J. A., and Lade, P. V. 共1997兲. “Static liquefaction of very
J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 103共6兲, 535–547. loose sands.” Can. Geotech. J., 34共6兲, 905–917.
Lee, K. L., and Seed, H. B. 共1967兲. “Cyclic stress conditions causing Yasuhara, K., Murakami, S., Yokokawa, S., Toyota, N., and Hyde, A. F.
liquefaction of sands.” J. Geotech. Eng. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. L. 共1997兲. “Cyclic softening of degradation of a plastic silt with initial
93共SM1兲, 47–70. shear stress.” Proc., Int. Symp. in Nagoya on Deformation and Pro-
Mesri, G., and Ali, S. 共1999兲. “Undrained shear strength of a glacial clay gressive Failure in Geomechanics, Pergamon, Tarrytown, N.Y.,
overconsolidated by dessication.” Geotechnique, 49共2兲, 181–198. 617–622.
Mohamad, R., and Dobry, R. 共1986兲. “Undrained monotonic and cyclic Yasuhara, K., Hyde, A. F. L., Toyota, N., Murakami, S., and Yokokawa,
triaxial strength of sand.” J. Geotech. Eng., 112共10兲, 941–958. S. 共1998兲. “Cyclic and post-cyclic stiffness and degradation of a plas-
Moradi, G. 共1998兲. “Symmetrical and non-symmetrical cyclic triaxial tic silt with initial sustained shear stress.” Geotechnique, Pre-failure
loading of silt.” Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Bradford, U.K. Deformation of Geomaterials, Part II, 373–382, Thomas Telford Ltd.,
Mori, S., and Numata, A. 共1990兲. “Site investigation of liquefaction and London.
sand boil occurred during Loma Prieta earthquake.” Proc., 25th Japan Yasuhara, K., and Toyota, N. 共1997兲. “Effects of initial static shear stress
National Conf. on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, on post-cyclic degradation of a plastic silt.” Proc., 14th ICSMFE,
67–70 共in Japanese兲. Vol. 1, 439–442, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.