You are on page 1of 1

Hi my name is Ravy, I’m the 4 th speaker of the oppose team against the

motion which is “Animal testing should be banned.”

In conclusion, some people think that animals should have their power and
should not sacrifice, some people also have considered that animal should
sacrifice themselves for the sake of human resources. This motion has been
Argued for a long time but we can see that human need animal to confirm
their life style, creating new stuff or new medical etc. In addition, we only
get some animal among a million or a thousand million to confirm a medical
like medicines or a vaccine. My 2nd and 3rd speaker also come up with a lot
of fact that can clear everything. As I know my 2 nd speaker come up with a
major advance in treating conditions imagine if scientists using human for
testing what will happened? Human life is worth more compare to animals.
Isn’t using animal much better? Also, some animal has an antivirus compare
to human. So, it much help full then human being. Should we ban animal
from testing or just continued? I think that everyone will consider it well!

You might also like