The lecturer argues that none of the concerns that provided by expertise are an issue.

This contradict the reading passage’s argument that the ways to prevent reptile’s extinct is not

viable.

First of all, the lecturer claims that overpopulation can be solved by creating location

increasing capacity. For example, when people relocate sand lizards, they can send them to

the land where no existed competent. Or creating the stuffs that encourage the specie’s

adaptation also can use for overpopulation problem. This goes against the author’s thought

that relocation can bring backfire as the reptile experience overcrowding and starvation.

Second, the speaker points out that diseases can be avoided. For example, spreading

the new species to different areas can prevent new disease. Furthermore, inspector’s regular

visit can identify infected and remove the species before it spread. This cast doubt on the

writer’s point that relocation can cause the spread of disease.

Finally, the speaker asserts that protecting the reptiles from get injured and killed can

be avoided by simply methods. Putting a water supplier into the cage can resolve dehydration

problem. Moreover, using some stuff to hide the reptile can easily use for conservation from

predators. This counter writer’s idea that reptiles may be injured and killed while they are

being captured.