You are on page 1of 6

Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists

The Science of Beer

ISSN: 0361-0470 (Print) 1943-7854 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujbc20

Enzymic Hydrolysis of Brewers' Spent Grain

N. Prentice & J. M. Refsguard

To cite this article: N. Prentice & J. M. Refsguard (1978) Enzymic Hydrolysis of Brewers' Spent
Grain, Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 36:4, 196-200, DOI: 10.1094/
ASBCJ-36-0196

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1094/ASBCJ-36-0196

Published online: 06 Feb 2018.

Submit your article to this journal

Citing articles: 2 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at


http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujbc20
Enzymic Hydrolysis of Brewers' Spent Grain 1/2

N. PRENTICE and J. M. REFSGUARD, 3 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Barley and Malt Laboratory, Madison, WI
53705
ABSTRACT the production of 1 mg of amino nitrogen per hour as measured by
Nesslerization (11).
Enzyme hydrolytic products of brewers' spent grain (SG) have a
representative composition of: 9.6% total lipid,4.3%ash, 31% protein, 9% Control of Microbial Growth
c e l l u l o s e , 12% s t a r c h and /3-glucans, 19% p e n t o s a n s In all experiments at 50° C, microbial growth was not evident for
(xylose:arabinose: 12:7), and 16% lignin. Treatment of commercial dried,
milled SG (CSG) with a crude cellulase preparation hydrolyzed all of the at least 6 hr. For longer reaction times microbial growth was
starch and /?-glucans, about two-thirds of the cellulose and one-half of the controlled either with 0.02% NaN 3 in the reaction mixtures or by
pentosans into the constituent monosaccharides. The cellulase did not the use of autoclaved SG suspensions and enzyme solutions that
effectively hydrolyze the cellulose and pentosans in pilot wet, unmilled had been filtered through a sterile 0.54 membrane filter (Millipore
SG (PSG). In about 6 hr, a protease hydrolyzed up to 87% of the protein in Corp., Bedford, MA 01730).
CSG and PSG to soluble products, 85% of which had a molecular weight
less than 3500. After treatment of the CSG with crude cellulase plus
protease, about 53% was hydrolyzed to form soluble nutrients. Enzyme Sources
Key words: Brewery by-product, Soluble products, Utilization Cellulase. The cellulase used was Onazuka SS from Trichoderma
viride (Yakult Biochemicals Co., Ltd., Tokyo) (14). Preliminary
work with several commercial cellulases showed that Onazuka SS
was the most active on SG under our experimental conditions.
Cellulase activity: 175 FPU/mg, 11 X 103 FPU/mg N; 300
ne of the voluminous residuals of brewing is the "spent grain" SGU/mg, 19 X 103 SGU/mg N
O (SG) that remains after mashing. Nutritionally, the grain is far
from spent since the protein level may be 30% or greater (20).
Laminaranase activity: 180 U/mg, 11 X 103 U/mg N
Amyloglucosidase activity: 2.66 U/mg, 166 U/mg N
Because SG contains large amounts of fibrous materials, it is Xylanase activity: 400 U/mg, 25 X 103 U/mg N
marketed primarily as ruminant feed. Recently, attention has Cellobiase activity: 272 U/mg, 1.7 X 103 U/mg N
focused on the importance of fiber in diets (21), and bread is Amyloglucosidase. The p r e p a r a t i o n used was
produced (17) in which protein and fiber are increased by "Amyloglucosidase, Grade II" from the Sigma Chemical Co., St.
replacement of about 15% of the wheat flour by finely milled SG. Louis, MO 63178.
This report describes the gross chemical composition of SG and Amyloglucosidase activity: 364 U/mg, 10.3 X 103 U/mg N
the susceptibility of carbohydrate and protein components to Laminaranase activity: 250 U/mg, 7.1 X 103 U/mg N
enzymic hydrolysis. Xylanase activity: 290 U/mg N
0-Glucanase activity: 55 X 103 U/mg, 1.5 X 10" U/mg N
EXPERIMENTAL Cellulase activity: 0 FPU
Protease. The protease used was derived from Streptomyces
Samples griseus (Type VI, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis). Other proteases
Dried Commercial Spent Grain (CSG). CSG from a malt-corn were less effective under our experimental conditions. (Activity: 7
mash was obtained from a brewery. The CSG, containing about 2% U/mg, 82 U / m g N )
trub and dried to about 7% moisture at about 45° C, was milled in a
Udy cyclone mill (Udy Analyzer Co., Boulder, CO). Hop extract Chemical Analyses
was used in wort preparation. Nitrogen, Crude Fiber, Ash, Lipids, Moisture and Lignin. SG
Wet Pilot Spent Grain (PSG). The wet SG from the pilot plant samples were analyzed for nitrogen, crude fiber, ash and moisture
mashing procedure described by Burkhart, Dickson and Hunt (6) by standard methods (1). Enzyme nitrogen was determined by
was frozen until use. PSG contained no trub. Johnson's method (11). Nonpolar lipids were extracted from the
SG with diethyl ether, and the SG residue was extracted with water-
Enzyme Activities saturated H-butanol. After removal of the water and n-butanol, the
All activities were determined in the presence of excess substrate residue was extracted with diethyl ether. This ether-soluble
and of enzyme concentrations with activity expressed as a linear material represented the polar lipids. Lignin was determined by the
function of product yield. The procedures are outlined in Table I. standard method of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists
For carbohydrases a unit of activity was defined as the production (2). Briefly, 5 g of SG was refluxed with 100 ml IN H2SO4
of 1 Mg glucose equivalent per hour as measured by reducing power containing 2 g of cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide for 1 hr. The
(12). For cellulase this unit of activity with filter paper substrate (8) solid residue from this treatment is called "acid-detergent fiber."
was the filter paper unit (FPU), and when the substrate was SG, the Cellulosic materials in the dried acid-detergent fiber were extracted
unit was the spent grain unit (SOU). A unit of protease activity was by treatment at 20° C with 72% H2SO4 for 3 hr. The washed and
dried residue (crude lignin and ash) was weighed and ash was
'Cooperative investigations, Barley and Malt Laboratory and College of determined by ignition. The loss in weight during ignition was
Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53705. calculated as crude lignin.
Mention of a trademark or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or Amino Acids. Samples were hydrolyzed for 22 hrat 1W°Cin6N
warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does notimply its HC1 in tubes that had been flushed with nitrogen, evacuated and
approval to the exclusion of other products that also may be suitable.
The Barley and Malt Laboratory is supported in part by a grant from the Malting sealed. Analyses were made with a Beckman Model 121 amino acid
Barley Improvement Association. analyzer (16).
Presented at the 44th Annual Meeting, Toronto, May 1978.
'Research Chemist and Physical Science Aide, respectively. Carbohydrates
This article is in the public domain and not copyrightable. It may be freely Acid Hydrolyses. Starch, /3-glucans and pentosans were
reprinted with customary crediting of the source. The American Society of hydrolyzed by refluxing 14 g of milled SG in 500 ml of IN H2SO4
Brewing Chemists, Inc., 1978. for 4 hr. Cellulose was hydrolyzed by the method of Saeman,
196
No. 4 ASBC JOURNAL 197
Moore and Millett (18). Aliquotes of the hydrolysates were Both dialyzable and nondialyzable portions were analyzed for
neutralized with BaCOs and centrifuged. Supernatant solutions nitrogen.
were assayed for individual sugars by the method of Brobst, Scobell
and Steele (5), and starch plus /3-glucans was calculated from the Carbon Treatment of Protein Hydrolysates
glucose obtained. This value was corrected for residual maltose in The 1,500 ml supernatant was treated with 15 g of Darco G-60.
the SG, which was removed by aqueous extraction of a separate Absorbance of the solution before and after treatment was
portion of the SG and assayed similarly. determined at 500 nm. Nitrogen content was determined before and
Enzymic Hydrolyses. Glucose produced from starch by after treatment.
amyloglucosidase was determined by the glucose oxidase-
peroxidase method (9). Sugars released from SG by cellulase and Experimental Replication
amyloglucosidase were assayed directly (5). All experiments, including the amino acid analysis, were done in
duplicate or triplicate. Deviations of individual results within 3% of
Enzymic Treatments the corresponding means were accepted.
Appropriate substrate and enzyme blanks were done with each
experiment and results were adjusted for these values. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Cellulase. SG (10 g) was suspended in 100 ml 0.01M acetate
buffer, pH 4.8,containing2X 10 ,4X 10 4 ,9X 10 4 ,18X 10 4 and36X Chemical Analyses
10" FPU of cellulase. Suspensions were agitated (150 rpm) at 50° C The compositions of CSG and PSG were similar, as shown by
for three, six and nine days. After incubation, enzyme activity was chemical analysis (Table II). The variations in lipid and starch plus
destroyed by 5 min at 100° C, and sugars in the filtrate were assayed. /J-glucan may reflect differences in mashing conditions. The PSG
Amyloglucosidase. Duplicate 10-g portions (dry basis) of CSG was prepared from a 70% malt/30% corn mixture, but the ratio in
and one portion each of 3.6 X 104 U and 7.3 X 104 U of amylo- the CSG preparation is not known. A difference in these
glucosidase were agitated at 150 rpm at the optimum temperature proportions may affect the level of starch plus /J-glucan residue.
of 50° C (3) in 250 ml of 0.01M acetate buffer, pH 4.3, for The high level of dietary fiber supports the potential for the use of
four days. The suspensions were heated for 5 min at 100° C and SG in bread formulation (17).
filtered, and the sugars in the filtrate were determined. PSG was
treated similarly except that 5.5 X 104 U and 73 X 104 U of enzyme Enzymic Treatment of CSG
were used. Carbohydrates. Treatment of CSG with 36 X 104 FPU of
Protease. SG(10g)and 175—700 U of enzyme were suspended in cellulase for three to nine days produced the hydrolytic products
350 ml of water and agitated in a rotary shaker at 50°C for three listed in Table III. The yield of glucose was 18% after six days'
days. The pH was maintained at 7.5 by periodically adding as much incubation. Yields of xylose and arabinose were about 6% and 4%,
as 4 ml 0.27V NaOH solution. The mixture was centrifuged at 25,000 respectively, and represent about half the total pentosans. The
X g, and the solid portion was dried overnight at 105° C, then milled lower levels of enzyme were not effective, even after nine days'
in a Udy cyclone mill. Solid and corresponding liquid fractions incubation. After nine days' incubation at the highest level of
were assayed for nitrogen at one, two and three days. enzyme treatment, an addition of 9 X 104 FPU of cellulase did not
In some experiments, 100 g of SG was incubated with 350,1,050, measurably increase hydrolysis.
and 1,750 U of protease and corresponding amounts of water for Because no low-molecular-weight hydrolytic products of
periods to 24 hr. Periodically 10 ml of supernatant was removed for cellulose other than glucose were present, the enzyme preparation
determination of dissolved nitrogenous constituents. must have cellotriase, cellotetraase and other similar enzymes in
addition to the demonstrated 272 U/ mg of cellobiase. Similarly, the
Dialysis of Protein Hydrolysates pentosanases of the enzyme preparation were responsible for
Subsamples of each supernatant were dialyzed exhaustively complete hydrolysis of about one-half of the pentosans to xylose
against distilled water with Spectraphor membrane tubing, 3,500 and arabinose.
molecular weight cutoff (Spectrum Medical Industries, Inc., Los Considering the 12% starch plus /J-glucan and 9% cellulose
Angeles 60916), and with Visking membrane tubing, 10,000 (Table II), the 18% yield of glucose (Table III) is probably derived
molecular weight cutoff (Union Carbide Co., New York 10017). from the starch, /3-glucan, and about two-thirds of the cellulose.

TABLE I
Procedures for Enzyme Assays

Enzyme Assay" Substrate Buffer pH Time Volume of Reaction


(hr) Mixture (ml)

0-1,4-Glucan glucohydrolase 150 mg filter paper 0.1M acetate 4.8 4 2.2


(cellulase) 3.2.1.4 100 mg SG" 0.01M acetate 4.8 4 11.0
<*-l,4-Glucan glucohydrolase 12.5 mg soluble 0.01 M acetate 4.8 0.25 1.5
(amyloglucosidase) starch
/3-I,3(4)-Glucan glucanohydrolase 6.75 mg laminaran 0.0 \M acetate 4.7 4 2.0
(laminaranase) 3.2.1.6
/3-1,4-Xylan xylanohydrolase 6.75 mg xylan 0.0 \M acetate 4.7 4 2.0
(xylanase) 3.2.1.8
/3-D-Glucoside glucohydrolase 34 mg cellobiose 0.1 Af acetate 4.6 1 4.2
(cellobiase) 3.2.1.21
/3-1,4-Glucan glucanohydrolase 25 mg barley 0.02A/ acetate 5.0 1 2.5
(/3-glucanase, gumase) 3.2.1.4 /3-glucan
Peptidyl peptide 250 mg SO" O.IM phosphate 8.0 16 10.0
hydrolase (protease) 3.4.4
"Enzyme assay and nomenclature of the International Union of Biochemistry (10).
"SG = Spent grain.
198 HYDROLYSIS OF SPENT GRAIN Vol. 36
Chemical analysis of the residue (after digestion with cellulase) 1.2% arabinose based on the CSG weight. Thus, the total yield of
revealed a cellulose residue that represented about 2% of the CSG. glucose from treatment of CSG first with amyloglucosidase (13%)
This is further supported by the quantities of glucose released by and then with cellulase (4%) approached the 18% yield from long
treatment of CSG with amyloglucosidase. Both levels of treatment incubation with the cellulase preparation alone (Table III).
afforded a 13% yield of glucose, which is comparable to 12% yield Removal of starch, gums and pentosans by refluxing in IN
from the starch and /3-glucans by acid hydrolysis (Table II). Since HiSOt before treatment with cellulase produced results similar to
essentially all the glucose released by this amyloglucosidase derives prior treatment with amyloglucosidase (Table IV). Again, 4.4% of
from starch and /3-glucans, the amyloglucosidase in the cellulase the original weight of the SG appeared as glucose, which represents
preparation probably converted the starch completely to glucose about one-half of the total cellulose.
also. Pure amyloglucosidase does not hydrolyze amylopectin Proteases. Table V shows the proteolysis of CSG during a three-
completely unless traces of a-amylase are present. Unless highly day period. The upper limit of hydrolysis (80—87%) was
purified, fungal amyloglucosidase preparations contain a-amylase, approached after one day when 10 g of CSG and at least 350 U (50
and the crude preparations convert starch completely to glucose mg) of enzyme were used. From an economic aspect, this indicates
(22). that appreciable quantities of expensive enzyme and lengthy
After the protein of the SG was removed by treatment with incubations may be needed to attain near complete protein
protease and the solid residue was treated with cellulase, yields of hydrolysis. Some benefit seemed to be gained by larger scale
sugars from carbohydrase activity were essentially the same as incubations. When 100 g of CSG was incubated with 1,750 U (250
those obtained without protease treatment. Similarly, prior mg) of protease, this level of hydrolysis could be attained in about 6
extraction of lipid had no effect. hr.
After removal of starch and /8-glucans by amyloglucosidase, In an experiment in which 80% of the CSG protein was
incubation of CSG with two successive 4.4 X 104 FPU of cellulase solubilized (Table VI), the soluble protein fraction was not
produced from the cellulose a quantity of glucose representing 4% significantly enriched in any of the essential amino acids relative to
of the original weight of the CSG (Table IV). Some of the pentosans the original CSG. About 80% of the amino acids, except cystine,
also were hydrolyzed, as indicated by release of 2.8% xylose and arginine and glutamic acid, appeared in the soluble fraction. Since
amide nitrogen appeared to be high in the solubilized protein as
indicated by the high level of ammonia from the soluble protein, the
TABLE II glutamic and aspartic acid amides may have been proportionately
Composition of Spent Grains" higher in the soluble than in the insoluble protein. In addition, some
amide nitrogen in the insoluble protein may have been hydrolyzed
Constituent PSG" CSG' by amidases in the protease preparation and thus appeared as
(% Dry Basis) ammonia in the soluble fraction.

Lipid TABLE IV
Nonpolar 6.0 8.6 Hydrolysis of Starch-Depleted
Polar 0.7 1.0 Commercial Spent Grains with Cellulase"
Ash 4.3 4.3
Protein (N X 6.25) 36.0 31.0
13.0
Sugars (% of SGb)
Crude fiber 15.0
Nitrogen free extract 42.0 44.0 Method Glucose Xylose Arabinose
Cellulose 11.0 9.0
Starch and /3-glucansd 6.7 12.0 Amyloglucosidase
Pentosan e 21.0 19.0 1st application of cellulase' 3.0 2.8 1.2
Lignin 19.0 16.0 2nd application of cellulase 1.0 0.9 0.2
Dietary fiber' 46.0 43.0 Refluxed with IN H 2 SO 4 d 4.4 0.6
"Values are means of triplicate determinations. "10 g (dry wt) CSG was depleted of starch before cellulase
b
PSG = Pilot wet, unmilled spent grain. application.
C
CSG = Commercial dried, milled spent grain. h
Values are means of four replications.
d
Corrected for residual maltose. "Each application: 4.4 X 104 FPU, five days' incubation, 50°C.
c
Xylose:arabinose = 14:7 for PSG, 12:7 for CSG. d
Reflux time = 4 hr.
'Dietary fiber = 100 - (Lipid + ash + protein + starch and
/3-glucans).

TABLE V
Proteolysis of Commercial Spent Grain°'b
TABLE III
Hydrolysis of Spent Grains (10 g Dry Basis)
with Cellulase (36 X 104 FPU) Enzyme Incubation Protein Protein
Level Time Hydrolyzed Solubilized
(Days) (%) (g)
Incubation Sugars (% of SGb)
SG" (Days) Glucose Arabinose Xylose 175 1 69 1.4
2 78 1.2
CSGC 3 12 3.0 3.1 3 81 1.4
6 18 4.0 6.1
9 18 4.1 6.4 350 1 82 2.3
2 84 2.3
d
PSG 3 4.7 2.5 3.5 3 83 2.4
6 5.0 2.5 3.7
9 4.0 2.8 3.4 700 1 78 2.3
"SG = Spent grain. 2 82 2.4
3 87 2.5
^Values are means of duplicates.
'CSG = Commercial dried, milled spent grain. "10 g of commercial spent grain (3.1 g of protein) dry basis.
d b
PSG = Pilot wet, unmilled spent grain. Values are means of triplicates.
No. 4 ASBC JOURNAL 199
TABLE VI
Distribution of Commercial Spent Grain Protein Nitrogen after Proteolysis2

Individual Amino
Amino Acid N Acid N in
In Spent Grain In Solid Residue In Supernatant Supernatant
(g/100 g N) (20 g N) (80 g N) (%)
Lysine 4.0 1.0 4.3 81
Histidine 4.0 0.9 2.9 76
Ammonia 12.4 2.2 15.3 87
Arginine 8.9 1.5 4.2 74
Aspartic acid 4.1 0.9 3.3 79
Threonine 2.5 0.6 2.4 80

Serine 3.4 0.8 3.0 79


Glutamic acid 13.5 2.3 12.8 85
Proline 9.8 1.7 6.9 80
1/2 Cystine 1.1 0.2 0.6 75
Glycine 4.0 1.0 3.1 76
Alanine 5.3 1.2 5.2 81
Valine 3.8 0.9 3.2 78
Methionine 1.2 0.2 1.0 83
Isoleucine 2.6 0.6 2.3 79
Leucine 6.7 1.3 6.0 82
Tyrosine 1.6 0.3 1.3 81
Phenylalanine 3.0 0.7 2.5 78

Recovery, Kjeldahl N basis, ' 92 92 100


"100 g of spent grain (dry basis) hydrolyzed with 1,750 U of protease for 5 hr at 50° C; > of the Kjeldahl N solubilized. Values are
means of duplicates.

Dialysis of the solubilized protein hydrolytic products through The increasing world population and threat of food shortages
casings with 10,000 and 3,500 molecular weight limits showed that have stimulated efforts to produce edible proteins (15). Mashing is
molecular weights were less than 10,000 for 92% of the products designed to optimize carbohydrate hydrolysis, but the hydrolysis of
and less than 3,500 for 82%. Decolorization with carbon before the barley reserve proteins occurs at a much slower rate (13). As a
dialysis removed 7% of the nitrogenous constituents but did not result, these reserve proteins, especially the prolamine hordein, are
alter the molecular weight distribution. Absorbance at 500 nm was the main components of the SG. Of the barley protein groups
decreased from 0.62 to 0.25 (pale yellow). (albumin, globulin, prolamine and glutelin), on a percent of protein
basis, the prolamine fraction contains less of the essential amino
Enzymic Treatment of PSG acids lysine, arginine, threonine, valine, methionine, leucine and
Treatment of PSG with 36 X 10" FPU of cellulase for three to phenylalanine than each of the other three protein groups (7).
nine days produced the hydrolytic products shown in Table III. Nevertheless, because of the high protein level in SG, the essential
Comparison of Tables II and III indicates that PSG carbohydrates, amino acids compare favorably with some foods such as whole
particularly the pentosans, are less susceptible than those in CSG to wheat flour (17), on a sample weight basis. The bland solution of
hydrolysis by the cellulase preparation. Although total glucose enzymically hydrolyzed carbohydrate and protein from a by-
expected from the starch, /J-glucans and cellulose in PSG was about product such as SG may provide potential uses for these nutrients.
18% (Table II), a maximum of 5% was obtained (Table III). The Imaginative and efficient nutritional uses for by-products of
expected yield of pentosans was 21% (Table II), but only 6% was brewing should provide an answer to claims that the use of grain in
obtained (Table III). By contrast, the glucose expected from CSG brewing deprives the world of needed food (19).
was 21% (Table II), and about 18% was obtained (Table III).
Similarly, 19% pentosans were expected from CSG (Table II) and Acknowledgment
about 10% was obtained after enzyme hydrolysis (Table III). When
PSG was dried at 45° C and milled, its susceptibility to We wish to thank George Robbins and James Gilbertson for determining
carbohydrase was similar to that of CSG. amino acids.
The starch and /3-glucan in PSG were somewhat less susceptible
Literature Cited
to hydrolysis by amyloglucosidase than that in CSG. CSG and PSG
have 12% and 6.7% (dry basis) starch plus /3-glucan, respectively 1. AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CEREAL CHEMISTS. Approved
(Table II). While all of this in CSG appeared to be hydrolyzed by methods of the AACC(7thed.).Methods46-12,32-15,08-01 and 44-
amyloglucosidase, application of 5.5 X 104 U and 73 X 104 U of 15; all approved April 1961. The Association: St. Paul, MN (1962).
amyloglucosidase to PSG afforded 4 and 5.1%, respectively, as 2. ASSOCIATION OF OFFICIAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS.
glucase from starch plus /3-glucan. Official Methods of Analysis (12th ed.). Methods 7.057 and 7.058.
The starchy endosperm cells in the distal tips of the barley kernel The Association: Washington, DC (1975).
are not exposed to hydrolytic enzyme action until late in 3. BARKER, S. A., and FLEETWOOD, J. G. J. Chem. Soc., London, p.
germination (4) and are likely to be poorly modified. Furthermore, 4857 (1957).
these distal tips are left largely intact by the relatively coarse milling 4. BRIGGS, D. E. Planta. 108: 351 (1972).
5. BROBST, K. M., SCOBELL, H. D., and STEELE, E. M. Amer. Soc.
of malt for mashing. The fine milling of the CSG probably Brew. Chem., Proc. 1973, p. 43.
permitted a more efficient substrate-enzyme interaction for 6. BURKHART, B. A., DICKSON, A. D., and HUNT, W. N. Amer. Soc.
carbohydrate hydrolysis than was permitted by the unmilled PSG. Brew. Chem., Proc. 1953, p. 34.
Protease hydrolyzed the protein of the PSG, despite the large 7. FOLKES, B. F., and YEMM, E. W. Biochem. J. 62: 4 (1955).
particle size, as readily as the protein of CSG. 8. GRIFFIN, H. L. Anal. Biochem. 56: 621 (1973).
200 HYDROLYSIS OF SPENT GRAIN Vol. 36
9. HAUGAWA, S., and SMOLENSKY, D. C. J. Agric. Food Chem. 18: (1977).
902(1970). 18. SAEMAN, J. F., MOORE, W. E., and MILLETT, M. A. Methods in
10. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BIOCHEMISTRY. Enzyme carbohydrate chemistry. Vol. Ill, ch. 12. Academic Press: New York
nomenclature. Elsevier Publishing Co.: New York (1965). (1963).
11. JOHNSON, M. J. J. Biol. Chem. 137: 575 (1941). 19. SEGEL, E. Brew. Dig. 51(3): 26 (1976).
12. LUCHSINGER, W. W., and CORESKY, R. A. Anal. Biochem. 4: 346 20. TOWNSLEY, P. M. Tech. Quart. Master Brew. Assn. Amer. 11: 262
(1962). (1974).
13. MIKOLA, J., PIETILA, K., and ENARI, T-M. J. Inst. Brew. 78: 388 21. TROWELL, H., and BURKETT, D. Refined carbohydrate foods and
(1972). disease. Some implications of dietary fiber. Ch. 21. Academic Press:
14. MOORE, W. E., EFFLAND, M. J., and MILLETT, M. A. /. Agric. New York (1975).
food Chem. 20: 1173(1972). 22. WHELAN, W. J. Biochem. J. 122: 609 (1971).
15. OKE, O. L. Tropical Sci. 15: 139 (1973).
16. POMERANZ, Y., and ROBBINS, G. S. Cereal Chem. 49: 560 (1972).
17. PRENTICE, N., and D'APPOLONIA, B. L. Cereal Chem. 54: 1084 [Received March 15, 1978]

You might also like