Professional Documents
Culture Documents
30
Calcium Homeostasis
R O B I N M. Z AVO D
Abbreviations
AF-2, activation factor-2 HMG-CoA, hydroxymethylglutaryl– PTH, parathyroid hormone
ATP, adenosine triphosphate coenzyme A RANKL, receptor activator of nuclear
BMD, bone mineral density IM, intramuscular factor-kB ligand
CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor IV, intravenous RRE, raloxifene responding element
DIOP, drug-induced osteoporosis NaF, sodium fluoride SAR, structure–activity relationship
DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid NHANES III, National Health and SC, subcutaneous
ER, estrogen receptor Nutrition Examination Survey III SERM, selective estrogen receptor
ERE, estrogen responding element 1,25(OH)2D3, modulator
ERT, estrogen replacement therapy 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol UGT, uridine diphosphate
FDA, U.S. Food and Drug 25(OH)D3, 25-hydroxycholecalciferol glucuronosyltransferase
Administration PPARg2, peroxisome proliferator-
activated receptor g2
*
Drugs listed include those available inside and outside of the United States; drugs available outside of the United States are shown in italics.
964
SCENARIO
Kathryn Neill, PharmD
PJ is a 70-year-old woman with hypertension, gastroesophageal PJ takes alendronate each morning with only a glass of water.
reflux, and osteoporosis. She was prescribed alendronate and After 30 minutes she takes ramipril, omeprazole, and calcium with
calcium 6 months ago, but the resulting improvement in bone coffee. Additional calcium doses are taken with lunch and supper.
density is less than expected. The pharmacist interviews PJ. Her PJ has lost weight the last few months due to an unsettled stomach.
current medications are alendronate 10 mg daily, calcium car-
bonate 500 mg three times daily with meals, omeprazole 20 mg (The reader is directed to the clinical solution and chemical analy-
daily, and ramipril 5 mg daily. sis of this case at the end of the chapter).
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
As our knowledge about the devel- agents and improved the quality of life for countless individu-
opment and risk factors associ- als affected by calcium homeostasis disorders. Understanding
ated with disruptions in calcium the development of individual disease processes involved in
homeostasis has increased, so too have disorders of calcium homeostasis (e.g., osteoporosis, osteo-
the modalities available to prevent and/or petrosis, hyperparathyroidism, and Paget’s disease) and the
treat these disease processes. In general, disorders of calcium pharmacodynamic effects of individual compounds used to
homeostasis involve the development of bone disease and/or treat these disorders is paramount for the practitioner making
alterations in serum calcium concentration. In the most basic therapeutic decisions. Incorporation of these factors into the
sense, the development of bone disease is simply an inequity therapeutic plan is necessary to target the valued pharmaco-
between bone breakdown and bone formation, which also may dynamic effects of these agents while minimizing unwanted
result in an altered serum calcium concentration. In addition or harmful effects. For example, the selection of raloxifene to
to bone disease, disruptions in normal serum calcium concen- treat osteoporosis in a patient with severe gastroesophageal
trations may be related to an imbalance in calcium intake and reflux disease, as opposed to an oral bisphosphonate, which
renal calcium elimination. These disturbances can result from could increase the likelihood of developing erosive esophagi-
various factors, including increased activity of cells that cause tis. Finally, it is also important for the clinician to recognize
bone breakdown, decreased activity of cells that form new bone, the capacity of certain entities used to treat calcium disorders
decreased absorption of calcium, or irregularities in levels of to be allergenic or more prone to produce adverse effects so
hormones that affect calcium absorption and influence cells that selection of the best agent for an individual patient is
involved in bone maintenance. An increased understanding of facilitated.
these physiologic pathways has led to the development of mul-
tiple classes of agents targeting the different mechanisms for Kathryn Neill, PharmD
evolution of these disease processes, including selective estro- Hospital Experiential Director
gen receptor modulators, bisphosphonates, and various calcium Assistant Professor
salts. Critical Care Specialist
Application of the principles of medicinal chemistry has Department of Pharmacy Practice
resulted in the formulation of agents with additional routes of College of Pharmacy
administration, increased potency, and decreased frequency University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
of dosing. These advances have increased the utility of these Little Rock, Arkansas
FIGURE 30.1 The Arnaud’s butterfly model for regulating calcium homeostasis consists of three overlapping loops that interlock and
relate to one another through the serum concentrations of ionic calcium (SCa), parathyroid hormone (PTH), and calcitonin (CT). The right
side (B loops, where B refers to the effects of CT) of the model describes the physiologic processes that increase the serum calcium con-
centration in response to hypocalcemia; the left side (A loops, where A refers to the effects of PTH) of the model depicts the events that
decrease the serum calcium concentration in response to hypercalcemia. Loop 1 bone resorption; loop 2 intestinal absorption; loop 3 renal
excretion; SPi, serum inorganic phosphate; UPi, urinary inorganic phosphate. (Adapted from Arnaud CD. Calcium homeostasis: regulatory
elements and their integration. Fed Proc 1978;37:2557–2560, with permission).
(CaSR). These cell surface receptors help cells to react calcium (Fig. 30.1, loop 2A), and in combination with
to micromolar changes in the concentration of ionized active vitamin D, promotes bone resorption (Fig. 30.1,
calcium in the serum (8). Binding of calcium to these loop 1A). PTH stimulates bone resorption by several
receptors facilitates activation of phospholipase C and, mechanisms: 1) transformation of osteoprogenitor cells
ultimately, inhibition of PTH secretion. The relatively into osteoclasts is stimulated in the presence of PTH, 2)
short-acting PTH is secreted from the parathyroid gland PTH promotes the deep osteocytes to mobilize calcium
chief cells in response to a hypocalcemic state and serves from perilacunar bone, and 3) surface osteocytes are
to oppose the hormonal effects of calcitonin (1). Unlike stimulated by PTH to increase the flow of calcium out of
calcitonin, the biologic activity of PTH resides solely in the bone. In addition, the secretion of PTH stimulates the
residues 1 to 34 in the amino terminus. biosynthesis, activation, and release of the third hormone
PTH decreases renal excretion of calcium (Fig. 30.1, associated with calcium homeostasis, vitamin D. When
loop 3A), indirectly stimulates intestinal absorption of serum calcium concentrations are high, the release of
PTH is inhibited.
H2N Met Met Ser Ala Lys Asp Met Val Lys Val Vitamin D
Met
Ser Arg Ala Leu Phe Cys Ile Ala Leu Met Val Ile Derived from cholesterol, vitamin D is biosynthesized
Asp from its prohormone cholecalciferol (D3), the product
Gly Lys Ser Val Lys Lys Arg Ser Val Ser Glu Ile Gln of solar ultraviolet irradiation of 7-dehydrocholesterol in
1 2 Leu the skin (2). In 1966, it was first recognized that vitamin
Arg Glu Met Ser Asn Leu His Lys Gly Leu Asn His Met
D must undergo activation via two oxidative metabolic
Val steps (Fig. 30.3). The first oxidation to 25-hydroxycho-
Glu Trp Leu Arg Lys Lys Leu Gln Asp Val His lecalciferol [25(OH)D3: calcifediol; Calderol] occurs in
Asn the endoplasmic reticulum of the liver and is catalyzed by
HO2C Gln Ser Lys Ala Lys [79...35] Phe
vitamin D 25-hydroxylase. This activation step is not regu-
FIGURE 30.2 Preproparathyroid hormone is the 115–amino acid lated by plasma calcium concentrations. The major circu-
protein indicated above. Cleavage at site 1 gives rise to propara- lating form (10 to 80 mg/mL) is 25(OH)D3, which also is
thyroid hormone (89 amino acids), whereas cleavage at site 2 gives the primary storage form of vitamin D (2). In response to
rise to parathyroid hormone (PTH, 84 amino acids). The protein a hypocalcemic state and the secretion of PTH, a second
shown in red is teriparatide (34 amino acids). oxidation step is activated in the mitochondria of the
NORMAL PHYSIOLOGY
Kidney
During growth periods in childhood and early adult-
CH2 CH2 hood, bone formation characteristically exceeds bone
HO HO
loss. In young adulthood, bone formation and bone
OH
resorption are nearly equal. After the age of 40 years,
1,25-Dihydroxycholescalciferol 25-Hydroxycholecalciferol however, bone resorption is slightly greater than bone
formation, and this results in a gradual decline in skel-
FIGURE 30.3 Bioactivation of vitamin D. etal mass. Osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes are the
three types of cells that make up the bone remodeling
kidney, catalyzed by vitamin D 1a-hydroxylase (2,9). The unit or bone metabolizing unit and, therefore, are largely
product of this reaction, 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol responsible for the bone remodeling process (3,4).
[1,25(OH)2D3: 1,25-calcitriol; Rocaltrol, Calcijex] is the The bone remodeling process is comprised of two
active form of vitamin D. Its concentration in the blood opposing activities, bone resorption and bone forma-
is 1/500 that of its monohydroxylated precursor. The bio- tion. Bone resorption is launched when osteocytes and
synthesis of vitamin D is tightly regulated based on the those cells that line the bone surface release cytokines
serum concentrations of calcium, phosphate, PTH, and and growth factors (Fig. 30.4). These endogenous sub-
active vitamin D (2). stances signal osteoblasts to release receptor activator of
Sterol-specific cytoplasmic receptor proteins (vitamin nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANK-ligand or RANKL), a
D receptor) mediate the biologic action of vitamin D (9). cytokine (10). This ligand interacts with and activates its
The active hormone is transported from the cytoplasm to receptor (RANK) found on 1) the surface of osteoclast
the nucleus via the vitamin D receptor, and as a result of the precursor cells, which stimulates osteoclast differentia-
interaction of the hormone with target genes, a variety of tion, and 2) the surface of mature osteoclasts, which pro-
proteins are produced that stimulate the transport of cal- motes activation (10). RANKL also decreases osteoclast
cium in each of the target tissues. Active vitamin D works in apoptosis.
Cytokines*
RANKL
RANKL Active
Osteoclast
Osteoblast Osteoclasts
precursor cells
Growth factors*
*Involved in
osteoblast Integrin Cathepsin K
maturation Osteoprotegrin
Acidic media
FIGURE 30.4 Bone resorption involving receptor activator of nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL).
Osteoclasts are the large multinucleated cells of Other methods under development that measure BMD
hemopoietic origin that are responsible for carrying out include ultrasound, traditional x-rays, and blood/urine
the bone resorption or destroying process (6). Cytokines tests (6). Traditional x-rays can identify the site of frac-
(including RANKL), PTH, and the active form of vita- ture, but they cannot measure BMD (3). Blood/urine
min D are responsible for activation of these cells. Bone- tests can identify if the patient is suffering from a medi-
lining flat cells, derived from “retired” osteoclasts and cal condition that is contributing to the loss of BMD and
osteoblasts, are located on the bone surface (3). The can identify important biochemical markers that can
function of these flat cells is thought to serve to iden- assess the rate of bone resorption and bone turnover.
tify areas of the bone that have become weakened or The measurement of serum calcium, phosphorous, and
misshapen and to send a signal to the bone remodel- vitamin D levels also may provide insight regarding the
ing unit to prepare the bone. Lining cells then digest cause of decreased BMD (3). Often, patients suffer from
the outer layer of the bone matrix in preparation for multiple vertebral compression fractures without seek-
bone remodeling. As part of the bone resorption pro- ing treatment other than an over-the-counter analgesic,
cess, the osteoclast membrane comes into contact with and the diagnosis of osteoporosis occurs only after the
the bone surface and, in the presence of integrin, forms patient has already lost significant (as much as 30%)
an impermeable “sealing zone” of approximately 500 to bone mass.
1,000 mm in size (2,6). The ruffled border of the osteo-
clast membrane secretes hydrogen ions, H+ ATPase, and
the cysteine protease cathepsin K (11). As a result, this DISEASE STATES ASSOCIATED WITH
microenvironment becomes acidified, and ultimately, ABNORMAL CALCIUM HOMEOSTASIS
bone demineralization occurs (6). Several types of lyso-
somal enzymes have been proposed to digest the colla- Osteoporosis
gen matrix, thereby pitting the bone surface to a depth Osteoporosis is a skeletal disease that is characterized
of 50 mm (3–6). by loss of bone mass as well as microarchitectural dete-
Osteoblasts, which are of mesenchymal origin and rioration of the bone tissue. This disease is associated
are formed in the bone marrow, stimulate bone forma- with increased bone fragility and susceptibility to frac-
tion (6). In the maturation process, osteoblasts undergo ture. It is a condition that is characterized not by inad-
multiple cell divisions and, in so doing, express the gene equate bone formation but, rather, by a deficiency in the
products that are needed to form the bone matrix or production of well-mineralized bone mass. Whereas no
osteoid, as well as those products responsible for miner- medical cause typically is evident in primary osteopo-
alization of that tissue (3,6). It is in the rough endoplas- rosis (3), secondary osteoporosis classically stems from
mic reticulum that the biosynthesis of the bone matrix medical illness or medication use. There are two types of
protein occurs (4). Multiple endogenous substances are primary adult osteoporosis, type I, or postmenopausal,
involved in osteoblast maturation, including many cyto- and type II, or senile (Table 30.1) (15,16). In type I
kines (interleukins and granulocyte-macrophage colony- osteoporosis, there is an accelerated rate of bone loss
stimulating factor), as well as hormones and growth via enhanced resorption at the onset of menopause. In
factors. this form of the disease, the loss of trabecular bone is
Not only are osteoblasts involved in bone forma- threefold greater than the loss of cortical bone. This
tion, but they also have a role in limiting bone resorp- disproportionate loss of bone mass is the primary cause
tion. Produced by osteoblasts, osteoprotegerin binds to of the vertebral crush fractures and the wrist and ankle
RANKL and therefore prevents its interaction with its fractures experienced by postmenopausal women. In
RANK receptors on the osteoclast (11). As a result, osteo- type II osteoporosis, which is associated with aging, the
clast differentiation and bone resorption are inhibited. degree of bone loss is similar in both trabecular and cor-
Quantification of bone mineral density (BMD) can tical bone and is caused by decreased bone formation by
be measured by noninvasive radiographic tests, such as the osteoblasts (5).
single-photon or dual-photon absorptiometry (spine, Drug- or disease-induced, or type III, osteoporosis
hip, and total body), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (Table 30.2) accounts for up to 30% of the cases of
(spine, hip, and total body), peripheral dual-energy vertebral fractures reported annually. It can be caused
x-ray absorptiometry (wrist, heel, and finger), single by a variety of factors, including long-term suppres-
energy x-ray absorptiometry (wrist or heel), quantitative sion of osteoblast function, an inhibition of calcium
computed tomography (spine), peripheral quantitative absorption from the gut, altered vitamin D metabolism,
computed tomography (wrist), and quantitative ultra- or excessive loss of calcium in the urine (17). Disease
sound (heel, shin bone, and knee cap) (3,12–14). Dual- states or pharmacologic therapies that result in estro-
energy x-ray absorptiometry is considered to be the gold gen deficiency, hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism,
standard for measuring bone density and has an accu- or hypogonadism have been correlated with the devel-
racy that exceeds 95% (4). These techniques measure opment of osteoporosis (6,13,17,18). Drug-induced
the attenuation of x-rays or gamma rays as they cross the osteoporosis (DIOP) is associated with the use of glu-
spine, hip, or radius before they reach the detector (6). cocorticoids, thyroid hormone replacement, lithium,
Typical fracture site Vertebrae, distal radius Femur, neck, hip Vertebrae, hip,
extremities
Bone morphology Decreased trabecular bone Decreased trabecular and normal cortical bone Decreases cortical bone
antiepileptic agents, selective serotonin reuptake According to the National Health and Nutrition Exami-
inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors, thiazolidinedio- nation Survey III (NHANES III) the National Osteoporosis
nes, methotrexate, cyclosporine, aromatase inhibitors, Foundation estimates that more than 10 million Americans
gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, and immu- have osteoporosis and an additional 33.6 million have
nosuppressive therapy (6,17–21). See Table 30.3 for low BMD of the hip (23). It is projected that by 2020,
a list of the drug-specific mechanisms associated with these numbers will increase to 14 and 47 million, respec-
DIOP (17). tively (24). With these increases, it is anticipated that the
After estrogen deficiency related to menopause, number of hip fractures will double or triple by 2040.
long-term therapy with glucocorticoids represents the Approximately 40% of United States white women and
most prevalent cause of DIOP. As much as 3% to 27% of 13% of United States white men will experience at least
total bone loss can occur within the first 6 to 12 months one fracture related to low BMD in their lifetime. The
of glucocorticoid therapy (17). From a mechanistic chance of a 50-year-old woman experiencing a hip, verte-
perspective, glucocorticoids cause an initial increase in bral, or forearm fracture is 17%, 15%, and 16%, respec-
bone resorption as a result of their ability to increase tively. It is predicted that by age 80, 27% of women will be
RANKL and macrophage colony-stimulating factor. osteopenic and 70% will be osteoporotic. It has been esti-
This results in an increase in osteoclastogenesis and mated that approximately 20% of hip fracture patients
a decrease in osteoclast apoptosis. With the ability of will require long-term nursing home care. A surprising
the glucocorticoids to cause an increase in peroxisome 60% of hip fracture patients do not regain full function,
proliferator-activated receptor g2 (PPARg2) signaling and within 3 to 4 months of hip fracture, as many as 25%
and a decrease in Wnt signaling protein, a decrease in die as a result of secondary complications (e.g., pneumo-
osteoblast formation and function and an increase in nia or infection). Mortality also is increased 17% after
osteoblast apoptosis result, and there is a decrease in both femoral and vertebral fractures. Whereas postmeno-
bone formation (22). pausal African Americans have the lowest rate of osteo-
Vitamin D deficiency, as the cause of pseudohyper- porosis (4%), Native Americans have the highest (12%)
parathyroidism, is a common cause of osteoporosis in with Hispanic and Asian postmenopausal women falling
elder persons who are institutionalized and lack ade- in between (10% for both) (25). Additional risk factors
quate sunlight exposure (2). Many of the older antiepi- associated with osteoporosis are presented in Table 30.4.
leptic agents induce cytochrome P450 24A1 (CYP24A1) Given these statistics, osteoporosis should be considered
enzymes, which catalyze the conversion of vitamin D to a significant health problem that only stands to worsen
inactive metabolites (17). unless appropriate interventions are pursued.
Nutritional excesses or deficiencies Alcoholism, calcium, vitamin D, protein deficiency, excess vitamin A, total parenteral nutrition.
Endocrine-based diseases Acromegaly, diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2), disease-related elevated hormone levels
(hypercortisolism, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism), disease-related suppressed hormone levels
Other disease states Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemophilia, myeloma, and some other cancers
Antipsychotic agents Stimulation of prolactin secretion lowers estrogen and testosterone levels 99, 100
(results in hypogonadism)
Thiazolidinediones Decreases osteoblast differentiation and function via PPARg activation 117–119
CAII Carbonic acid and proton production Less severe: may improve with age, short <5
stature, no hematologic failure
Hyperparathyroidism
H H
Increased levels of PTH lead to moderately to severely
elevated serum calcium concentrations and, as a result,
a significant loss of calcium from the bone (2). Deposits HO H HO H
of calcium salts in soft tissue, as well as formation of renal H
OH
H
OH
calculi, also can result from this hormonal imbalance.
Treatment of this condition with salmon calcitonin, loop Paricalcitol (Zemplar) Doxercalciferol (Hectorol)
diuretics, or other classical treatments for hypercalcemia
has been favorable. The IV vitamin D analog paricalci- This analog also is indicated for the treatment of
tol, which is used for both prevention and treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Doxercalciferol cap-
hyperparathyroidism secondary to chronic renal failure, sules should be administered three times weekly at the
has been shown to reduce PTH levels by an average of time of dialysis along with close monitoring of calcium
30% after 6 weeks of treatment. Whereas paricalcitol is and phosphate levels. Treatment of secondary hyper-
a fully active form of vitamin D, doxercalciferol requires parathyroidism with vitamin D therapy is problem-
activation by the liver. atic, however, because it often leads to hypercalcemia,
Hypomagnesemia Renal Inhibitors of bone resorption Rapid infusion of citrate buffered plasma
Failure or blood or large amounts of albumin
Tubule disorders
Nephrotic syndrome
Hepatobiliary disease
(decreases synthesis)
Pancreatic disease
(malabsorption)
Anticonvulsant therapy
(malabsorption, abnormal
metabolism)
Disorders leading to hypercalcemia Fluids, low-calcium diet, sulfate, loop diuretics, Hyperparathyroidism
glucocorticoids, calcitonin, EDTA Hypervitaminosis D
Sarcoidosis
Neoplasia
Hyperthyroidism
Immobilization
Paget disease of the bone
hyperphosphatemia, or both because of increased intes- and are present at elevated levels. Patients afflicted with
tinal absorption of both calcium and phosphorous (29). this painful condition often suffer from multiple com-
In patients with chronic renal failure, CaSR agonists are pression fractures. Administration of calcitonin and
able to limit progression of hyperparathyroidism and oral calcium and phosphate supplements had been the
growth of the parathyroid gland. treatment of choice until the bisphosphonate risedro-
nate sodium was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug
Rickets and Osteomalacia Administration (FDA). Daily administration of rise-
During the Industrial Revolution, there was widespread dronate sodium (see later discussion of bisphospho-
incidence of rickets in both children and adults, because nates) results in a decreased rate of bone turnover and
inadequate exposure to sunlight prevented the biosynthe- a decrease in the levels of serum alkaline phosphatase
sis of the precursor to active vitamin D in the skin. Both and urinary hydroxyproline, two biochemical markers
rickets and osteomalacia are metabolic bone diseases that of bone turnover (4,30). A significant advantage to treat-
are characterized by poor bone mineralization. Without ment with the bisphosphonates is long-term suppression
adequate plasma levels of vitamin D and calcium, deposi- of the disease. Calcium supplementation, which often
tion of the calcium salts in the bone markedly decreases. is necessary in these patients, must be dosed separately
Vitamin D supplementation (to improve intestinal absorp- from risedronate sodium, because calcium- and alumi-
tion of calcium and mineralization of the bone) as well as num- or magnesium-containing antacids interfere with
oral calcium supplementation are required to treat these absorption of the bisphosphonates.
diseases once established. The incidence of rickets in
the United States dropped dramatically through vitamin DRUG THERAPIES USED TO TREAT
D–supplemented food programs. The increased use of OSTEOPOROSIS
milk substitutes (e.g., soy) and reduced exposure to sun-
light has recently led to a rise in rickets. Rickets is still Agents used in the treatment and prevention of osteo-
considered to be a worldwide health problem. porosis are categorized as antiresorptive agents or bone-
In addition to the classical environmental or nutri- forming agents depending on the primary mechanism
tional cause of these diseases, both osteomalacia and rick- of action (31). For most of the effective therapies, bone
ets can have a pharmacologic origin as a result of chronic mass is observed to increase for the first few years of treat-
treatment with anticonvulsants (phenobarbital and phe- ment. Eventually, however, all the pits or lacunae will be
nytoin) or glucocorticoids. These agents interfere with filled in with new bone, and no additional increase in
intestinal absorption of calcium and, thereby, cause pseu- bone mass will occur. Antiresorptive agents have been
dohyperparathyroidism. As a result, an increase in bone shown to increase bone mass by as much as 8% to 9%
turnover and a decrease in the formation of appropri- at the lumbar spine and 3% to 6% in the femoral neck.
ately mineralized bone are observed. In these patients, Once a diagnosis of osteoporosis and the likely cause has
treatment with vitamin D improves calcium absorption, been established, it is important to consider both patient
ultimately enhancing mineralization of the bone. fracture history and general medical history when
selecting the appropriate treatment for a given patient
Paget Disease of the Bone (Table 30.8)(32).
Paget disease of the bone (Table 30.7) is characterized
by excessive bone resorption, followed by replacement Antiresorptive Agents
of the normally mineralized bone with soft, poorly min- Estrogen Analogs—Estrogen Replacement Therapy
eralized tissue (30). It has been determined that the MECHANISM OF ACTION The precise mechanism by which
osteoclasts have an abnormal structure, are hyperactive, estrogen prevents bone resorption has not been elucidated;
Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis X X
however, it has been proposed to be associated with inhi- and that which is considered to be standard therapy is
bition of osteoclast activity. Limited evidence supports 0.625 mg/d of conjugated estrogens (Premarin); how-
the presence of estrogen-specific receptors (present on ever, a 0.3 mg/d dose of esterified estrogen (e.g., Menest)
osteoclasts) having a biochemical role in the regula- has been shown to be adequate for the prevention of
tion of bone remodeling (15). Estrogen improves cal- osteoporosis (5). Estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) is
cium absorption, promotes calcitonin biosynthesis, and available in several types of formulations, including trans-
increases the vitamin D receptors on osteoclasts. Although dermal patches (e.g., 17b-estradiol: Climera, Estraderm,
the primary mechanism of action remains unclear and its Menostar, or Vivelle).
use is controversial at best, estrogen replacement therapy Initiated at the onset of menopause, this therapy also
(i.e., 17b-estradiol, estrone sodium sulfate, or 17-ethinyl has favorable effects on serum cholesterol levels (reduces
estradiol) has value in the treatment and prevention of low-density lipoprotein and elevates high-density lipopro-
osteoporosis (31,33–35). tein levels). Women taking ERT have found relief from
hot flashes, vaginal dryness, and urinary stress inconti-
OH O nence (31). It is recommended that the estrogen be
combined with a progestin for those women with an
intact uterus so as to decrease the risk of endometrial
HO HO
cancer (15).
17β-estradiol Estrone
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators
OH RALOXIFENE (EVISTA) Tamoxifen citrate, classified chemi-
C CH
cally as a triarylethylene, was developed as an anties-
trogenic agent and as a selective estrogen receptor
HO
modulator (SERM). It is indicated as adjuvant therapy
in the treatment of axillary node–negative or –posi-
17-Ethinyl estradiol tive breast cancer following partial or full mastectomy.
Raloxifene hydrochloride, a benzothiophene derivative,
In light of the findings of the Women’s Health Initiative also may be considered a semirigid analog of tamoxifen
study, the FDA recommends the use of short-term hor- (Fig. 30.5) (36).
mone replacement therapy (estrogen and progestin) in The two drugs are similar in that they both possess
the prevention of osteoporosis only in select cases. The agonist activity in certain tissues (e.g., bone and cardio-
pharmacokinetics of the estrogens are covered in detail vascular) and antagonist activity in others (e.g., breast
in Chapter 41 (33,34). and uterus) (see Chapter 41) (6,31). Raloxifene hydro-
chloride, the first SERM approved for the prevention of
osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, acts as an estro-
THERAPEUTIC EFFECTS Fractures of the spine, wrist, and hips gen agonist on receptors in osteoblasts and osteoclasts
decrease by 50% to 70%, and spinal bone density increases but as an antagonist at breast and uterine estrogen recep-
by 5%, in those women treated with estrogen within 3 tors. This selective action means that this agent does not
years of the onset of menopause and for 5 to 10 years increase the risk of endometrial or breast cancer, as is
thereafter (5,13,36,37). The minimum dose required the case with long-term tamoxifen therapy. Because this
A. Investigational bisphosphonates:
CH3
H PO3H
Cl PO3H N PO3H N PO3H
2 Na 2 Na H2N Na H3C Na
PO3H2
Cl PO3H PO3H HO HO PO3H2
HO PO3H
Na HO PO3H2 HO PO3H Na PO3H Na
N
CH3
H2N PO3H Na PO3H2 H3C (CH2)4 N PO3H2
N N
HO PO3H Na HO PO3H2 HO PO3H Na
well as improves the antiresorptive character of the agent the rapid rate of clearance, the bisphosphonates enjoy
(31,46). The character of the R2 substituent varies widely a short circulating half-life and very limited drug expo-
and clearly has a significant influence on the potency of sure to nontarget tissues (37). Because the bisphospho-
this class of compounds (Fig. 30.9). The R2 amino–sub- nates are only released from the bone when the bone is
stituted bisphosphonates (pamidronate disodium, alen- resorbed, they have a tissue half-life of 1 to 10 years; how-
dronate sodium, and neridronate) are more potent than ever, these agents remain pharmacologically active only
etidronate disodium and clodronate disodium (not avail- while they are exposed on bone resorption surfaces (45).
able in the United States). The R2 3-carbon amino linear
chain for alendronate sodium is more potent than the SPECIFIC DRUGS
R2 2-carbon derivative pamidronate disodium and the Etidronate Disodium (Didronel) and Tiludronate Disodium
R2 6-carbon analog neridronate (31). Alkylation of the (Skelid) Agents in the first generation of bisphos-
amine functional group improves potency as is demon- phonates that were dosed continuously produced
strated by compounds with N substituted amino alkyls poorly mineralized bone, because there was no inter-
at R2 (e.g., olpadronate and ibandronate sodium) and val for appropriate bone mineralization to occur (3).
those that contain rings at R2 (e.g., risedronate sodium, Subsequent studies that used a cyclic dosing schedule
incadronate, tiludronate disodium, and zoledronic acid). (400 mg/d for 2 weeks, followed by 2.5 months of cal-
The third-generation analogs contain a basic heterocyclic cium supplementation only) showed improvement in
side chain at R2 tethered to the central carbon by a variety bone mineralization (13,43). Both of these bisphospho-
of linkages (potency: NH > CH2 > S > O) (31,46). Because nates have been approved for treatment of Paget disease
structural variation of R2 has a significant effect on of the bone but not for the treatment of osteoporosis
potency, it can be surmised that R2 interacts at an “active (5). Tiludronate disodium is approximately 10-fold more
site” and participates in a specific molecular interaction. potent than etidronate disodium and, when given orally
The bisphosphonate itself as well as the hydroxyl group at for 6 months (200, 400, or 800 mg/d), increases BMD by
R1 also should be included as critical SAR features (31). 2% (Fig. 30.9) (6). No further bone loss was detected in
patients 6 months after cessation of therapy.
PHARMACOKINETICS To date, four generations of bisphos-
phonates have been developed for the treatment of Alendronate Sodium (Fosamax) The second-generation
osteoporosis (Fig. 30.9). Absorption of these agents agent alendronate sodium was the first bisphosphonate
from the gut is quite poor (1% to 5%) because of their agent approved by the FDA for the prevention and treat-
polar nature, and as a therapeutic class, they have lim- ment of osteoporosis and Paget disease of the bone and
ited cellular penetration (13). Up to 50% of the actual is 1,000-fold more potent than etidronate disodium
absorbed dose is taken up specifically by the bone within (Fig. 30.9) (45,47). Alendronate sodium is also indicated
4 to 6 hours, and the rest is exclusively excreted by the for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.
kidney (6,36). Uptake of these agents in the bone is con- This derivative, when dosed continuously (5 to 10 mg/d for
centrated in areas of the bone that are actively undergo- osteoporosis and 40 mg/d for Paget disease of the bone)
ing remodeling (45). Between the selective uptake and and given with oral calcium supplements (500 mg/d),
myeloma, breast, prostate, or lung cancers), taking corti- treatment of osteoporosis is 100 IU/d (46). Initially only
costeroids, and had undergone a dental procedure (e.g., available by IM or SC injection, the peptide hormone
tooth extraction). The FDA recommends that patients calcitonin-salmon is available as a nasal spray (Miacalcin)
receive a thorough dental examination before initiation and as a rectal suppository (6). A recombinant DNA
of IV bisphosphonate therapy and that they avoid inva- form of calcitonin-salmon (Fortical) is available as a nasal
sive dental work during treatment. spray. The bioavailability of calcitonin-salmon nasal spray
In October 2010, the FDA approved safety labeling shows great variability (range, 0.3% to 30.6% of an IM
changes for the bisphosphonates in response to reports dose). It is absorbed rapidly from the nasal mucosa, with
of an increase in risk of atypical femur fracture in patients peak plasma concentrations appearing 30 to 40 minutes
undergoing long-term bisphosphonate therapy (50,51). after nasal administration, compared with 16 to 25 min-
In addition, an increase in the risk of developing esopha- utes following parental dosing. Calcitonin-salmon is read-
geal cancer has surfaced in patients with approximately ily metabolized in the kidney, with an elimination half-life
5 years of oral bisphosphonate use. Because of these calculated at 43 minutes. As a result, the intranasal dose
adverse effects, it is recommended that clinicians weigh required is 200 IU/d (3). Once the Miacalcin nasal pump
the benefits against the potential risks. has been activated, the bottle may be kept at room tem-
The remaining bisphosphonates, pamidronate diso- perature until the medication is finished (2 weeks).
dium and zoledronic acid, are approved for treatment
of hypercalcemia of malignancy as well as other cancer THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION Calcitonin therapy requires the
conditions and will be discussed later in the chapter. concomitant oral administration of elemental calcium
(500 mg/d, see Table 30.9). Clinical studies have shown
Calcitonin (Calcimar [IV, subcutaneous]; Miacalcin and that the combination of intranasal calcitonin-salmon
Fortical [nasal spray]) (200 IU/d), oral calcium supplementation (>1,000 mg/d
Calcitonin (see earlier discussion in this chapter) has of elemental calcium), and vitamin D (400 IU/d) has
been approved for the treatment of postmenopausal decreased the rate of new fractures by more than 75%
osteoporosis, hypercalcemia of malignancy, and Paget and has improved vertebral BMD by as much as 3% annu-
disease of the bone. Several sources are available (e.g., ally (3). Calcitonin prevents the abnormal bone turn-
eel, human, salmon, and porcine). The calcitonin iso- over characteristic of Paget disease of the bone and has
lated from salmon is the preferred source, because it has antiresorptive activity. In the presence of calcitonin, the
greater receptor affinity and a longer half-life than the osteoclast brush borders disappear, and the osteoclasts
human hormone (3,7). Calcitonin is commercially avail- move away from the bone surface undergoing remodel-
able as synthetic calcitonin-salmon, which contains the ing (52). Side effects are significantly more pronounced
same linear sequence of 32 amino acids, as occurs in nat- when calcitonin-salmon is administered by injection and
ural calcitonin-salmon. Calcitonin-salmon differs struc- can include nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and flushing.
turally from human calcitonin at 16 of 32 amino acids Because calcitonin-salmon is protein in nature, the possi-
(see Fig. 30.10 for primary structure differences between bility of a systemic allergic reaction should be considered,
human and salmon calcitonin). The pharmacologic and appropriate measures for treatment of hypersensitiv-
activity of these calcitonins is the same, but calcitonin- ity reaction should be readily available. Although calcito-
salmon is approximately 50-fold more potent on a weight nin-salmon does not cross the placenta, it may pass into
basis than human calcitonin with a longer duration of breast milk. Calcitonin-salmon is a possible alternative to
action. The duration of action for calcitonin salmon is ERT; however, only limited evidence suggests that it has
8 to 24 hours following intramuscular (IM) or subcutane- efficacy in women who already have fractures. Resistance
ous (SC) administration and 0.5 to 12.0 hours following to calcitonin-salmon can result from the development of
IV administration. The parenteral dose required for the neutralizing antibodies (53).
S S
Cys Ser Asn Leu Ser Thr Cys Val Leu Gly Lys Leu Ser Gln Glu Leu His Lys Leu Gln
1 5 10 15 20
Thr Tyr Pro Arg Thr Asn Thr Gly Ser Gly Thr Pro-NH2 Salmon CT
25 30
S S
Cys Gly Asn Leu Ser Thr Cys Met Leu Gly Thr Tyr Thr Gln Asp Phe Asn Lys Phe His
1 5 10 15 20
Thr Phe Pro Gln Thr Ala Ile Gly Val Gly Ala Pro-NH2 Human CT
25 30
FIGURE 30.10 Primary structures of salmon and human calcitonin (CT). Similarities are highlighted in red.
In addition to its antiresorptive action via suppres- demonstrates 95% bioavailability, and is quickly elimi-
sion of osteoclast activity, calcitonin-salmon exhibits a nated via both hepatic and extrahepatic routes. The half-
potent analgesic effect and has provided considerable life is 1 hour when administered SC. Metabolic studies
relief to those patients suffering from the pain associ- have not been performed on teriparatide; however, the
ated with Paget disease of the bone and osteoporosis. entire PTH preprohormone has been shown to undergo
This analgesic effect is a result of calcitonin-stimulated enzyme-mediated transformations in the liver. Dizziness
endogenous opioid release. The potency of this anal- and leg cramps are the most commonly reported adverse
gesic effect has been demonstrated to be 30- to 50-fold side effects.
that of morphine in selected patients. Calcitonin is pre- Temporary increases in serum calcium levels occur
ferred over estrogen and the bisphosphonates when following administration of teriparatide. As a result, this
treatment of both osteoporosis and related bone pain agent is contraindicated in patients who are predisposed
is warranted. to hypercalcemia. Some evidence suggests that these
elevations in serum calcium levels may cause a patient
who is taking digitalis to experience digitalis toxicity
Bone-Forming Agents
(55). Teriparatide should not be prescribed to patients
Teriparatide (Forteo) with Paget disease of the bone, children, young adults,
In 2002, the FDA approved teriparatide for the treat- women who are pregnant or nursing, and patients who
ment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in patients who have received skeletal radiation therapy (52). Because of
have a high risk of fracture, for the treatment of glu- an increased incidence of osteosarcoma (malignant bone
cocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, and to increase bone tumors) observed in rats, teriparatide also carries a black
mass in men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis box warning.
who have a high risk of fracture (54). Teriparatide is
recombinant human PTH 1-34 (Fig. 30.2), the biologi- Inorganic Salts
cally active portion of the endogenously produced pre- CALCIUM SALTS Appropriate intake of calcium during
prohormone. Unlike the bisphosphonates, which are childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood increases
classified as bone restorative agents, teriparatide is the peak BMD and may reduce the overall risk of developing
first approved bone-forming agent. Bone formation is osteoporosis. For those who are at low risk of develop-
possible because of the ability of this agent to increase ing osteoporosis and have adequate BMD, consumption
the number of osteoblasts. Although teriparatide of the recommended amounts of calcium (1,300 mg/d
enhances the function of both osteoclasts and osteo- of elemental calcium for teenagers, 1,000 mg/d for pre-
blasts, the exposure incidence dictates its effect on the menopausal women and men, and 1,200 mg/d for post-
skeleton. If administered once daily or intermittently, menopausal women) typically is sufficient to prevent
teriparatide preferentially enhances osteoblastic func- bone loss (56,57). This often can be accomplished by
tion, and bone formation occurs. Continuous expo- eating a well-balanced diet. For patients with established
sure to endogenous PTH may result in poor skeletal osteoporosis or areas of poorly mineralized bone, cal-
composition because of enhanced osteoclast-mediated cium supplementation alone is not sufficient to reverse
bone resorption (52). After 18 months of treatment, the bone loss or to significantly improve mineralization
lumbar BMD increased up to 12% in postmenopausal of the bone (13).
women. After 10 months of treatment, 53% of men had It should be noted that a study conducted by Bolland
an increase of 5% or greater in spine BMD. The risk for et al. (58) reported that calcium supplementation in
developing new vertebral fractures was reduced by 65% postmenopausal women may be correlated with signifi-
after 21 months of treatment, and the number of non- cant increases in the rates of vascular events.
vertebral fragility fractures was reduced by 53% (35). The actual amount of elemental calcium that is pres-
There is limited evidence that teriparatide can regrow ent in the available calcium salts varies considerably;
jaw bone that has been damaged by osteonecrosis and however, no one particular salt has been identified as an
periodontitis. exceptional source of elemental calcium (Table 30.9).
A black box warning from the FDA advises that treat- Absorption of calcium from the gastrointestinal tract
ment with teriparatide should be avoided in patients (25% to 40%) improves under acidic conditions; there-
with an increased baseline risk for osteosarcoma and that fore, those medications that change the acidic environ-
treatment should not exceed 2 years in duration. ment of the stomach (e.g., H2 antagonists and proton
Administered as a once-daily, 20-mg SC injection in the pump inhibitors) have an adverse effect on calcium
thigh or abdominal wall, teriparatide is a clear, colorless absorption (3). Total daily doses of elemental calcium
liquid that is available as a 750 mg/3 mL, prefilled, dispos- that exceed 500 mg should be spaced out over the day
able pen that requires refrigeration. Concurrent calcium to improve absorption (5,56). The more water soluble
(1,000 mg) and vitamin D (400 IU) supplementation and, therefore, more easily absorbed salts (e.g., citrate,
is recommended. Treatment for longer than 2 years is lactate, and gluconate) are less dependent on the acidic
not recommended. Teriparatide is rapidly absorbed, environment for appropriate absorption and would be
Calcium carbonate 40
Tums (500 mg chewable) 200 mg
Titilac (1 g/5 mL suspension) 400 mg/5 mL
Alka-Mints (850 mg chewable) 340 mg
Os-Cal 500 (1,250 mg tablet) 500 mg
Viactive (1,250 mg chewable) 500 mg
Tricalcium phosphate 39
Calcium chloride 27
Tribasic calcium phosphate 23
Posture (1,565.2 mg tablets) 600 mg
Calcium citrate 21
Citrical (950 mg tablets) 200 mg
Citrical Liquitab (2,376 mg effervescent tablets) 500 mg
Calcium lactate 13
Generics (325 mg tablets) 42 mg
Generics (650 mg tablets) 84 mg
Calcium gluconate 9
Neo-Calglucon (1.8 g/5 mL syrup) 115 mg/5 mL
appropriate alternatives for patients who produce low improve bone mass (vertebra, 5% per year; femoral neck,
levels of acid. Calcium carbonate is a poorly soluble form 2% per year) and to decrease the number of vertebral
of calcium, but it is inexpensive and only requires the fractures (59,60).
patient to take a few tablets per day with acidic food or
beverages like citrus juice (56). Monoclonal Antibody-Based Therapies
RANKL Inhibitor
SODIUM FLUORIDE Sodium fluoride (NaF) promotes the DENOSUMAB (PROLIA) Denosumab (Prolia) has been
proliferation and activity of osteoblasts and is classified as approved by the FDA for the treatment of postmeno-
a nonhormonal bone-forming agent. Because treatment pausal women with osteoporosis at high risk for frac-
with NaF induces bone formation, it is essential that this ture. Denosumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody
therapy be coupled with oral calcium supplementation to RANKL, where it functions as a RANKL inhibitor
(1,000 mg/d). Additionally, NaF exhibits moderate anti- (Fig. 30.4). The RANKL receptor is expressed on the
resorptive activity, because it inhibits osteoclastic activity surface of osteoclasts and osteoclast precursors. When
when it is absorbed into the bone matrix. In the treat- bound to its receptor, RANKL promotes the formation
ment of osteoporosis, the therapeutic window for this and activation of osteoclasts. To balance the effects of
agent is fairly narrow: Doses less than 45 mg/d are sub- RANKL, osteoblasts produce osteoprotegerin, which
therapeutic, and doses in excess of 75 mg/d impair bone binds to RANKL and prevents it from binding to and
mineralization. In addition, the bone that is formed in activating its receptor, modulating the production
the presence of NaF is neither as well mineralized nor as and activation of osteoclasts (61). When an individual
strong as normal bone tissue. In fact, some studies have develops osteoporosis, this balance is “disrupted,” and
demonstrated that patients taking sodium fluoride have RANKL overwhelms osteoprotegerin activity, causing
increased bone fragility despite the increase in bone mass significant bone loss. Denosumab was designed to mimic
and, as a result, have an increased nonvertebral fracture the biochemical effects of osteoprotegerin. Studies show
rate as compared to the placebo group (5,31,46). As a that denosumab is more effective in improving BMD
result, its use in the treatment of osteoporosis has not (4% to 7%) than weekly administration of alendronate
been approved and is considered to be somewhat con- (5%) (61). Denosumab is reported to reduce the risk
troversial. Several studies have examined the benefits of of vertebral fraction (68%), hip fracture (40%), and
continuous versus cyclic dosing of NaF in the treatment nonvertebral facture (20%). This agent is administered
of osteoporosis. Intermittent dosing (25 mg twice a day subcutaneously once every 6 months and has been asso-
for 12 months, followed by 2 months of calcium supple- ciated with adverse events including back pain (35%),
mentation alone) of a slow-release formulation of NaF serious infections, hypocalcemia, and osteonecrosis of
with 400 mg of calcium citrate was shown to effectively the jaw.
TABLE 30.10 Classes of Experimental Agents for Treatment of Abnormal Calcium Homeostasis
Class Action
Antiresorptive Agents
Cathepsin K inhibitors Prevent degradation of collagen matrix
C-src kinase inhibitors Prevent formation of osteoclast sealing zone
Bone-Forming Agents
Calcilytic agents Inhibit calcium-sensing receptors to promote PTH release
Dkk1 monoclonal antibody Inhibitor of negative regulators of Wnt signaling
Cinacalcet is the first type II calcimimetic agent approved function occurs when single doses of this agent exceed
that improves CaSR sensitivity to calcium (29,71). 4 mg and the infusion duration is less than 15 minutes
When calcium is bound to the CaSR, phospholipase C (74). It is recommended that patients be well hydrated
is activated, and the secretion of PTH is inhibited. In before infusion. If serum calcium levels do not fall to
the presence of cinacalcet, not only is a decrease in normal levels, retreatment is appropriate, but retreat-
PTH levels observed, but a decrease in serum calcium ment is not recommended until 7 days have elapsed
and phosphorous levels is also observed. This repre- from the initial treatment. For the treatment of mul-
sents a significant therapeutic advantage over vitamin tiple myeloma and metastatic bone lesions, a 4-mg ini-
D–based treatments for secondary hyperparathyroidism tial dose is recommended, followed by additional doses
(29). Cinacalcet hydrochloride is a second-generation every 3 to 4 weeks for 9 to 15 months (prostate can-
calcimimetic approved for the treatment of secondary cer, 15 months; breast cancer, 12 months; other solid
hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney tumors, 9 months).
disease on dialysis and for the treatment of hypercalce- Zoledronic acid is a white, crystalline powder that is
mia in patients with parathyroid cancer. It can be used available in vials for reconstitution for IV infusion over at
alone, with vitamin D, and/or with a phosphate binder least 15 minutes. It does not undergo metabolic transfor-
(72). mation and does not inhibit CYP450 enzymes. Clearance
of this agent is dependent on the patient’s creatinine
clearance, not on dose. Serum creatinine levels should
DRUG THERAPIES USED TO TREAT be evaluated prior to every treatment. Zoledronic
HYPERCALCEMIA OF MALIGNANCY acid is contraindicated in patients with severe renal
impairment.
Zoledronic Acid (Zometa) Zoledronic acid should not be mixed with infusion
Zoledronic acid, a bisphosphonate, was approved by solutions that contain calcium (e.g., lactated Ringer’s)
the FDA in 2001 for the treatment of hypercalcemia and should be administered via IV infusion in its own
of malignancy, a metabolic complication that can be line. Because of the possibility of a serious deteriora-
life-threatening (Fig. 30.9). Hypercalcemia of malig- tion in renal function, the manufacturer requires strict
nancy can occur in up to 50% of patients diagnosed adherence to the infusion duration being no less than
with advanced breast cancer, multiple myeloma, and 15 minutes.
non–small-cell lung cancer. This condition arises when
chemical moieties produced by the tumor cause over- Pamidronate Disodium (Aredia)
stimulation of osteoclasts. When there is an increase
Pamidronate disodium, a second-generation bisphos-
in bone degradation, there is a concomitant release of
phonate, is 100-fold more potent than etidronate
calcium into the plasma. When serum concentrations
disodium for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malig-
of calcium rapidly elevate, the kidneys are unable to
nancy (Fig. 30.9) (6). It has also been approved for
handle the overload, and hypercalcemia results. This
the treatment of Paget disease of the bone and for
can lead to dehydration, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and
osteolytic bone metastases of breast cancer and osteo-
confusion. Zoledronic acid effectively decreases plasma
lytic lesions of multiple myeloma. When used to treat
calcium concentrations via inhibition of bone resorp-
bone metastases, pamidronate disodium decreases
tion (inhibition of osteoclastic activity and induction
osteoclast recruitment, decreases osteoclast activity,
of osteoclast apoptosis). It also prevents the increase in
and increases osteoclast apoptosis (75). Administered
osteoclastic activity caused by tumor-based stimulatory
by IV infusion, a single dose is typically sufficient for
factors. In addition, zoledronic acid has been approved
the treatment of hypercalcemia and Paget disease of
by the FDA for the treatment of multiple myeloma and
the bone. In the treatment of osteolytic lesions of mul-
bone metastases associated with solid tumor–based can-
tiple myeloma, monthly administration is indicated.
cers (e.g., prostrate and lung) (73).
Pamidronate disodium is cleared renally and therefore
Cancer treatment–induced bone loss is a major
is contraindicated in patients with deteriorated renal
adverse effect associated with endocrine-based can-
function.
cer therapies. These therapies may depress ovarian
function (e.g., goserelin acetate), decrease ER acti-
vation (e.g., ER antagonist), and/or inhibit estrogen Gallium Nitrate (Ganite)
biosynthesis (e.g., aromatase inhibition) all of which
will lead to significant bone loss. Zoledronic acid has O
Ga3+
demonstrated efficacy in reducing or delaying these O N O
complications. 3
respond to hydration (46). Its effectiveness stems from DRUG THERAPY USED IN THE TREATMENT
its ability to inhibit bone resorption despite the pres- OF HYPOPARATHYROIDISM
ence of tumor-derived factors that promote calcium
loss from the bone. Administered by infusion over 24 Parathyroid Hormone [rDNA 1-84] (Preos)
hours, the typical dose is 200 mg/m2/day for 5 consecu- In 2007, the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development
tive days. A lower dose is recommended if the symptoms granted orphan drug designation for Preos for the treat-
of hypercalcemia are mild (100 mg/m2/d for 5 days). ment of hypoparathyroidism (Fig. 30.2). Structurally iden-
Steady-state is achieved in 24 to 48 hours. Maintenance tical to endogenous PTH, the recombinant human PTH
of patient hydration is essential during treatment. is administered once daily as an SC injection. Although
Gallium nitrate is not significantly metabolized and is Preos shares a common mechanism of action with teripa-
largely excreted through the kidneys. It is contraindi- ratide, it has been suggested that the C-terminal region
cated in patients with severe renal impairment. Renal may possess valuable biologic activity mediated by a novel
function should be closely monitored in all patients receptor that specifically interacts with this portion of the
receiving this agent. peptide hormone.
CASE STUDY
Victoria Roche and S. William Zito
JA is a 73-year-old woman who had polio 58 years ago. Although hearing, Paget’s disease predisposes patients to the development
she had maintained a very active lifestyle throughout her youth of osteosarcoma, a rare and therapeutically challenging bone
and most of her adulthood, postpolio syndrome (PPS) has signifi- cancer. It is important that JA be treated for this disease because,
cantly restricted her mobility and she now uses a wheelchair at in addition to these serious complications and the compounding
home and a power chair to get around outside. JA’s relative lack of of her pain, she would be at high risk for compression fractures
activity during the past 5 years has caused a troublesome weight from the stress she must put on her arms when she transfers to
gain, and she now carries close to 185 pounds on a 5′5″ frame. and from her wheelchair and power chair.
The extreme fatigue that is a hallmark of PPS is complicated by JA’s current medications include the proton pump inhibi-
osteoarthritis in the joints of her upper extremities that came from tor pantoprazole sodium (Protonix) for gastric hyperacidity and
years of walking in full leg braces with the aid of canes. Some days pregabalin (Lyrica) for neuropathic pain in her feet. She takes
the fatigue and the joint pain are so disabling that she just stays 1,000 mg of elemental calcium daily (2 Viactiv calcium chews)
in bed and sleeps, saying it is the only place she is comfortable. and 2,000 IU of vitamin D. She is depending on you, her ambu-
JA was recently diagnosed with Paget’s disease of the bone, latory care pharmacist, to select the right therapy to keep her
a disorder characterized by the deterioration and demineraliza- going in the face of this newest health challenge. You contem-
tion of bone. In addition to exacerbating osteoarthritis and lead- plate the structures of three potential drug candidates shown
ing to loss of below.
CH3O NH
OCH3 OH OH N
O H O H O H O
H
N N N N O
H2N N N N N
N H O H O H O H HN NH2
O
S O H2N O
O OH S
N NH2 O OH O NH2 HN O
N HO O
Na HN NH O H O H O H O
O N N N NH
N N N N
F2 CH NH H O H O H O H
O HN
S NH2 NH2 N
HN O
Pantoprazole sodium H NH2
O O N O
O O O O
H3C H H
HN N HN N N
CH CH2 CH CH2 COOH N N
HO H H
H3C O H
CH2-NH2 NH O
HN O
O NH
H 2N N O
Pregabalin H
NH2 NH
O OH
PO3H2
O HN O
CH3-(CH2)4 N (CH2)2 C PO3H2 H
2 HO N
N
CH3 OH H
O O
O N
1 NH2 HN
NH2
HO
O O O
H H H H
N NH N N N
HN N N
O O H H O
O OH O O
O NH2 O N
O H H
N S S NH
N OH
NH2
H O O
HO NH2 NH O
O NH2 HO O NH2
NH2 NH HO
NH NH O
O O O
H H H
O N N N
O N N N N O
N H H H H
O O O O
OH NH OH
N
NH NH2 NH
H2N O
O
O O O
H H H
N N N
O N N N N
H
O
H
O
H
O 3
HO OH HO
1. Conduct a thorough and mechanistic SAR analysis of the 2. Apply the chemical understanding gained from the SAR
three therapeutic options in the case. analysis to this patient’s specific needs to make a thera-
peutic recommendation.
References 38. Grese TA, Sluka JP, Bryant HU, et al. Benzopyran selective estrogen receptor
modulators (SERMs): pharmacological effects and structural correlation with
1. Copp DH. Calcitonin: discovery, development, and clinical application. Clin raloxifene. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 1996;6:903–908
Invest Med 1994;17:268–277. 39. Bryant HU, Glasebrook AL, Yang NN, et al. A pharmacologic review of raloxi-
2. Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Boonen S. Aging and calcium metabolism. Bailliere’s fene. J Bone Miner Metab 1996;14:1–9.
Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;11:341–365. 40. Kemp DC, Fan PW, Stevens JC. Characterization of raloxifene glucuronida-
3. Haines ST, Caceres B, Yancey L. Alternatives to estrogen replacement therapy tion in vitro: contribution of intestinal metabolism to presystemic clearance.
for preventing osteoporosis. J Am Pharm Assoc 1996;36:707–715. Drug Metab Dispos 2002;30:694–700.
4. Christenson RH. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism: an overview. Clin 41. Jeong EJ, Lin H, Hu M. Disposition mechanisms of raloxifene in the human
Biochem 1997;30:573–593. intestinal Caco-2 model. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004;310:376–386.
5. Miller DR, Hanel HJ. Prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. US 42. Jeong EJ, Liu Y, Lin H, et al. Species- and disposition model-dependent
Pharmacist 1999;24:81–90. metabolism of raloxifene in gut and liver: role of UGT1A10. Drug Metab
6. Rodan GA. Emerging therapies in osteoporosis. Ann Rpts Med Chem Dispos 2005;33:785–794.
1994;29:275–285. 43. Gennari L. Ospemifene. Curr Opin Invest Drugs 2004;5:448–455.
7. Arnaud CD. Calcium homeostasis: regulatory elements and their integration. 44. Gruber C, Gruber D. Bazedoxifene. Curr Opin Invest Drugs 2004;5:1086–1093.
Fed Proc 1978;37:2557–2560. 45. Diener KM. Bisphosphonates for controlling pain from metastatic bone dis-
8. Iqbal J, Zaidi M, Schneider AE. Cinacalcet hydrochloride. IDrugs ease. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1996;53:1917–1927.
2003;6:587–592. 46. Caggiano TJ, Zask A, Bex F. Recent advances in bone metabolism and osteo-
9. DeLuca HF, Zierold C. Mechanisms and functions of vitamin D. Nutr Rev porosis research. Ann Rpts Med Chem 1991;26.
1998;56:S4–S10. 47. Ashworth L. Focus on alendronate. Formulary 1996;31:23–30.
10. Raisz LG. Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts and prospects. 48. Riley TN, DeRuitter J. New drug review. US Pharmacist 2003:95–104.
J Clin Invest 2005;115:3318–3325. 49. King AE, Umland EM. Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients receiving intrave-
11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Chapter 2: the basics of nous or oral bisphosphonates. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:667–677.
bone in health and disease. In: Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of 50. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bisphosphonates (osteoporosis drugs): label
the Surgeon General (2004). Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/ change—atypical fractures update. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Safety/
library/bonehealth/. Accessed January 19, 2011. MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/
12. Schaefer B, Cone S. Increasing awareness of osteoporosis: a community phar- ucm229244.htm. Accessed January 14, 2011.
macy’s experience. US Pharmacist 1998;23:72–85. 51. Schmidt GA, Horner KE, McDanel DL, et al. Risks and benefits of long-term
13. Francis RM. Management of established osteoporosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol bisphosphonate therapy. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2010;67:e12–e19.
1998;45:95–99. 52. Reginster J. Calcitonin for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J
14. Saljoughian M. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. US Pharmacy 2003;28:18–35. Med 1993;95(Suppl 5A):44S–47S.
15. Hansen LB, Follin Vondracek S. Prevention and treatment of nonpostmeno- 53. Gennari C, Agnusdei D, Camporeale A. Long-term treatment with calcitonin
pausal osteoporosis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2004;61:2637–2656. in osteoporosis. Horm Metab Res 1993;25:484–485.
16. Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Camacho PM, et al. American Association of Clinical 54. Freeman TR. Teriparatide: a novel agent that builds new bone. J Am Pharm
Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and Assoc 2003;43:535–537.
treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Pract 2010;16(Suppl 3):1–37. 55. LoBuono C. New osteoporosis drug is first to form bone. Drug Topics 2003:24.
17. O’Connell MB, Borgelt LM, Bowles SK, et al. Drug-induced osteoporosis in 56. American Pharmaceutical Association. Special Report. Therapeutic Options for
the older adult. Aging Health 2010;6:501–518. Osteoporosis. Washington, DC: American Pharmaceutical Association, 1993.
18. Reid DM, Harvie J. Secondary osteoporosis. Bailliere’s Clin Endocrinol Metab 57. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Dietary reference intakes
1997;11:83–99. for calcium and vitamin D. Available at: http://iom.edu/Reports/2010/
19. Diem SJ, Blackwell TL, Stone KL, et al. Use of antidepressants and rates of hip Dietar y-Reference-Intakes-for-Calcium-and-Vitamin-D/DRI-Values.aspx.
bone loss in older women. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1240–1245. Updated November 20, 2010.
20. Gray SL, LaCroix AZ, Larson J, et al. Proton pump inhibitor use, hip fracture 58. Bolland MJ, Barber PA, Doughty RN, et al. Vascular events in healthy older
and change in bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Arch Intern women receiving calcium supplementation: randomized controlled trial. BMJ
Med 2010;179:765–771. 2008;336:262–266.
21. Riche DM, King ST. Bone loss and fracture risk associated with thiazolidinedi- 59. American Pharmaceutical Association. New product bulletin. Miacalcin nasal
one therapy. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:716–727. spray. Washington, DC: American Pharmaceutical Association, 1996.
22. van Brussel MS, Bultink IE, Lems WF. Prevention of glucocorticoid-induced 60. Pak CYC, Sakhaee K, Rubin C, et al. Update of fluoride in the treatment of
osteoporosis. Exp Opin Pharmacother 2009;10:997–1005. osteoporosis. Endocrinologist 1998;8:15–20.
23. National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinicians guide to prevention and treatment 61. Bekker PJ, Holloway DL, Rasmussen AS, et al. A single-dose placebo-con-
of osteoporosis, revised January 2010. Available at: http://www.nof.org/sites/ trolled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL in
default/files/pdfs/NOF_ClinicianGuide2009_v7.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2011. postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 2004;19:1059–1066.
24. International Osteoporosis Foundation. Facts and statistics about osteopo- 62. Bone HG, McClung MR, Roux C, et al. Odanacatib, a cathepsin-K inhibitor
rosis and its impact. Available at: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-and- for osteoporosis: a two year study in postmenopausal women with low bone
statistics.html. Accessed January 10, 2011. density. J Bone Miner Res 2010;25:934–936.
25. Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE, et al. Osteoporosis and fracture risk in 63. Meunier PJ, Roux C, Seeman E, et al. The effects of strontium ranelate on the
women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 2005;20:185–194. risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl
26. Tolar J, Teitelbaum SL, Orchard PJ. Osteopetrosis. N Engl J Med J Med 2004;350:459–468.
2004;351:2839–2849. 64. Reginster J-Y, Lecart M-P, Deroisy R, et al. Strontium ranelate—a new paradigm
27. Whyte MP, Wenkert D, Clements KL, et al. Bisphosphonate-induced osteopo- in the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2004;13:857–864.
rosis. N Engl J Med 2003;349:457–463. 65. Marie PJ. Strontium ranelate: a novel mode of action optimizing bone forma-
28. Suneja M. Hypocalcemia. Available at: http://www.emedicine.com/med/ tion and resorption. Osteoporosis Int 2005;16(Suppl 1):S7–S10.
topic1118.htm. Updated September 3, 2010. Accessed January 21, 2011. 66. Gogakos AI, Cheung MS, Bassett JHD, et al. Bone signaling pathways and
29. Block GA, Martin, KJ, De Franciso AL. Cinacalcet for secondary hyperparathy- treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab 2009;4:639–650.
roidism in patients receiving hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1516–1525. 67. Gonyeau M. Statins and osteoporosis: a clinical review. Pharmacotherapy
30. Reginster J-YL, LeCart M-P. Efficacy and safety of drugs for Paget’s disease of 2005;25:229–243.
bone. Bone 1995;17:485S–488S. 68. Richard AA, Harrison TM. Efficacy of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in treat-
31. De Silva Jardine P, Thompson D. Antiosteoporosis agents. Ann Rpts Med ing osteoporosis. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002;59:372–377.
Chem 1996;31:211–220. 69. Burkiewicz J, O’Connell MB. New approaches to the management of osteopo-
32. Hisel TM, Phillips BB. Update on the treatment of osteoporosis. Formulary rosis. American Pharmacists Association Highlights Newsletter 2010;13:S1–S12
2003;38:223–243. 70. Joy MS, Kshirsagar A, Franceschini N. Calcimimetics and the treatment of pri-
33. Rossouw JE, et al. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy mary and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Pharmacother 2004;38:171–180.
postmenopausal women. Principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative 71. Franceschini N, Joy MS, Kshirsagar A. Cinacalcet HCl: a calcimimetic agent
randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2002;288:321–333. for the treatment of primary and secondary hypoparathyroidism. Expert
34. Women’s Health Initiative Steering Committee. Effects of conjugated equine Opin Investig Drugs 2003;12:1413–1421.
estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy. JAMA 2004;291: 72. Hussar DA. New drugs of 2004. J Am Pharm Assoc 2005;45:185–218.
1701–1712. 73. Michaelson MD, Smith MR. Bisphosphonates for treatment and prevention of
35. Greenblatt D. Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Pharmacotherapy bone metastases. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:8219–8224.
2005;25:574–584. 74. Zometa prescribing information. Available at: http://www.pharma.
36. Francis RM. Bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis in 1997: a us.novartis.com/product/pi/pdf/Zometa.pdf. Updated October 2009.
review. Curr Ther Res 1997;58:656–678. Accessed January 20, 2011.
37. Yates AJ, Rodan GA. Alendronate and osteoporosis. Drug Discov Today 75. Van Poznak CH. The use of bisphosphonates in patients with breast cancer.
1998;3:69–78. Cancer Control 2002;9:480–489.