TANAW AGHAM 2024

MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOL

Instruction

This CID initiated M & E tool will be used in monitoring and evaluating school science
curriculum delivery in relation to Division Memorandum No. 154, s. 2021 or Tanaw Agham
2022-2024. The components of the Tanaw Agham 2024 Pedagogical Model reflects to the
paradigm of K-12 Basic Education Curriculum Framework, K-12 Science Curriculum
Framework, Philippine Science Education Framework and lastly, Philippine Professional
Standards for Teachers. It is designed with criteria and indicators aligned to the division
pedagogical model. This tool will be used by CID personnel for quarterly monitoring of
schools. In addition, school head, master teachers, and science teachers themselves may
use this tool to score day-to-day teaching and to generate meaningful reflections that serve
as bases in crafting relevant curriculum decisions.
The data that will be successfully collected using this tool serve as source of
information in identifying “priority schools” or schools needing technical assistance and
curriculum support. In other words, the purpose of this tool is to identify the gaps of science
curriculum implementation and create interventions and relevant solutions to the identified
gaps. Basic research will also be crafted to formally document schools’ performance in terms
of science curriculum delivery. The indicators enumerated in this tool may emerge
highlighting relevance and appropriateness.
To begin with the monitoring and evaluation activities, the user should fill in with
necessary information the table below as voluntarily shared by the client subjected to data
privacy act. In scoring, each evident indicator is equivalent to one point. Interpretation of
the results will be based on the scale below:

Descriptor Grading Scale Remarks

Outstanding 90 - 100 Passed
Very Satisfactory 85 - 90 Passed
Satisfactory 80 - 84 Passed
Fairly Satisfactory 75 - 79 Passed
Did not meet the Below 75 Failed
expectations
M&E Term of Reference
City Schools Division Tanauan supports the provision of RA 10533 commonly known
as Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 and the guidelines stipulated in DepEd Order
No. 21 s. 2019 or Policy Guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program. This tool will
be the primary source of data that will serve as bases in creating relevant programs,
projects, and activities. Thus, the following terms of reference:
Division Personnel
Chief education Supervisors, Education Program Supervisors, Public Schools
District Supervisor, and Senior Education Program Specialists/ Junior Education
Program Specialists and other non-teaching division personnel shall use the tool in
monitoring and evaluating schools in terms of science curriculum delivery.
Specifically, they are expected to:
1. accomplish the tool to gather data on science curriculum implementation
in the division.
2. utilize the tool in monitoring public elementary and secondary schools (and
private schools upon agreement).
3. suggest relevant constructs for the continuous improvement of the tool.
4. submit the data gathered to education program supervisor in charge with
the curriculum for consolidation purposes.
School Head
School Principals, Head Teachers, and Teachers-in-Charge in public
elementary and secondary schools (private schools upon agreement) shall adopt the
tool in monitoring and evaluation of the school in the implementation of science
curriculum. Particularly, they are expected to:
1. accomplish the tool to gather data on science curriculum implementation
in the school level.
2. utilize the tool in monitoring science teachers’ accomplishment on
curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
3. suggest relevant constructs for the continuous improvement of the tool.
4. relay the data gathered to division personnel monitoring/evaluating the
school or submit the gathered data to the education program supervisor in
charge with the curriculum, or Public Schools District Supervisor assigned
to supervise the said school for consolidation and TA purposes.
Science Teachers
Science teachers of both public elementary and secondary schools shall adopt
the tool for self-assessment purposes.

Effectivity
The Tanaw Agham M&E tool (localized tool) will be adopted in monitoring and
evaluating the schools’ accomplishment/endeavors in the division for the School Year
2021-2022, 2022 – 2023, and 2023 – 2024.
 TANAW AGHAM 2022 - 2024
MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOL
Client Profile:

School Date:
School Head
Contact No. Total No. of
Science Teachers
Science Major
Coordinator
Contact No. Non major
Science School MPS
Teacher:
Contact No. Grade level MPS
Specialization Class MPS
IPCRF Rating No. of Students

I. PEDAGOGICAL PRISM 1: CURRICULUM

Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks

Evident
Contextualization 1. The curriculum Lesson
& Localization design is compatible Plan/DLL
to learners’ Instructional
environment Materials

2. The curriculum Curriculum

content is culture matrix with
sensitive/ supports identified
local and national cultural
culture. entities, Lesson
Plan/DLL

3. The curriculum Lesson

standards are Plan/DLL
translated in real Instructional
life scenario. Materials

TOTAL:

Curriculum 1. The curriculum Curriculum

Integration has integration of Integration
financial literacy Matrix,
Lesson
Plan/DLL,
instructional
materials
Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks
Evident
Curriculum 2. The curriculum Curriculum
Integration has integration of Integration
(Continuation) environmental Matrix,
literacy/ COVID-19 Lesson
Literacy Plan/DLL,
instructional
materials
3. The curriculum Curriculum
has integration of Integration
drug education Matrix,
Lesson
Plan/DLL,
instructional
materials
4. The curriculum Curriculum
has ICT Integration
integration Matrix,
Lesson
Plan/DLL,
instructional
materials
5. The curriculum Curriculum
has citizenship Integration
integration Matrix,
Lesson
Plan/DLL,
instructional
materials
Total:

Curriculum 1. The curriculum Matrix on

Innovation is relevant to the Curriculum
needs of learners Mapping with
through “bridging “bridging
competencies”
competencies”.
Lesson
Plan/DLL
Intervention
Materials
2. The curriculum Lesson
acknowledges Plan/DLL
modern Instructional
approaches. Materials
3. The curriculum Research
is research- Proposal,
based/evident- Completed
based/ data- Research,
Action Plan
driven.
Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks
Evident
4. The curriculum MOA with
is participatory identified
with identified partners
linkages.
Total

Summary:

Pedagogical Prism 1: Curriculum

Criteria Total % Verbal Interpretation Remarks

Score
Contextualization &
Localization
Curriculum Integration
Curriculum Innovation
Grand Total

Comments & Suggestions Agreement

Prepared by: Conforme:

DENNIS B. MASANGCAY, PhD ________________________________________

Education Program Supervisor - Science School Head
Date: Date:
 TANAW AGHAM 2022 - 2024
MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOL

Client Profile:
School Date:
School Head
Contact No. Total No. of
Science Teachers
Science Major
Coordinator
Contact No. Non major
Science School MPS
Teacher:
Contact No. Grade level MPS
Specialization Class MPS
IPCRF Rating No. of Students

I. PEDAGOGICAL PRISM 2: INSTRUCTION

Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks

Evident
1. Inquisitive 1. The lesson/s Lesson
Facilitation manifest/s Plan/DLL
curiosity-awakening Instructional
introduction. Materials, COT
2. The lesson/s Lesson
exhibit/s art of Plan/DLL
questioning with Instructional
essential and probe Materials, COT
questions.
3. The lesson/s Lesson
employ/s Plan/DLL
HOTS/critical Instructional
questions. Materials, COT
Total

2. Motivational 1. The lesson/s Lesson

Stimulation has/have Plan/DLL
integration of real- Instructional
life situations/ Materials, COT,
phenomena and Documentation
use/s realia.
2. The lessons Lesson
provide/s Plan/DLL
laboratory Instructional
activity/ies. Materials, COT,
Documentation
Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks
Evident
Motivational 3. The lessons Lesson
Stimulation engage/s the Plan/DLL
(Continuation) learners to play and Instructional
scientific Materials, COT,
investigation. Documentation

4. The lesson/s Lesson

give/s trivia or Plan/DLL
science discovery Instructional
updates. Materials, COT
Total

3. Meaningful 1. The lesson/s Lesson

Engagement has/have both Plan/DLL
classroom-based Instructional
and home-based Materials,
science activities. Sample
learners’
output
2. The lesson/s Lesson
has/have Plan/DLL
community-based Instructional
or service-learning Materials,
tasks. Sample
learners’
output
3. The lesson/s Lesson
has/have balanced Plan/DLL
individualized and Instructional
collaborative Materials,
learning tasks. Sample
learners’
output
4. The lesson/s Lesson
provide/s activities Plan/DLL
on research/real- Instructional
world problem- Materials,
solving tasks. Sample
learners’
output
Total

4. Diverging 1. The lesson/ Lesson

Differentiation activity nurture/s Plan/DLL
21st century skills Instructional
(4Cs) Materials,
Sample
learners’
output, Activity
Proposal
Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks
Evident
Diverging 2. The lesson/ Lesson
Differentiation activity nurture/s Plan/DLL
(Continuation) talents and skills Instructional
Materials,
Sample
learners’
output, Activity
Proposal
Documentation
3. The Lesson
lesson/activity Plan/DLL
nurture/s values Instructional
Materials,

Total

Summary:

Pedagogical Prism 2: Instruction

Criteria Total % Verbal Interpretation Remarks

Score
1. Inquisitive
Facilitation
2. Motivational
Stimulation
3. Meaningful
Engagement
4. Diverging
Differentiation

Grand Total

Comments & Suggestions Agreement

Prepared by: Conforme:

DENNIS B. MASANGCAY, PhD ________________________________________

Education Program Supervisor - Science School Head
Date: Date:
 TANAW AGHAM 2022 - 2024
MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOL

Client Profile:
School Date:
School Head
Contact No. Total No. of
Science Teachers
Science Major
Coordinator
Contact No. Non major
Science School MPS
Teacher:
Contact No. Grade level MPS
Specialization Class MPS
IPCRF Rating No. of Students

I. PEDAGOGICAL PRISM 3: LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks

Evident
1. Organized and 1. The classroom Documentation
Safe Learning has physical (Pictures/
Facility organization Videos)
conducive for
learning.
2. Classroom is well Documentation
painted, ventilated (Pictures/
with bulletin board Videos)
and garbage bin
with decent cover.
3. The classroom is Risk assessment
safe with posted tool.
hotline numbers Evacuation plan,
and evacuation plan List of Hotline
Numbers
Total

2. Positive and 1. The class has Guidance

Appreciative zero bullying cases, Records,
Psychosocial abuse, and Anecdotal Record
Environment discrimination. Classroom
Postings
2. The class Guidance
exhibits freedom of Records,
expression, respect Anecdotal
ideas, and peaceful Record,
Classroom
dialogues. Postings
 Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks
Evident
Positive and 3. The class Classroom
Appreciative recognize learners’ Bulletin Board,
Psychosocial work and output. Documentation
Environment Sample
(Continuation) Learners
Output
4. The class uses Classroom
appreciative and Bulletin Board,
kind words. Documentation
Total

3. Improvisation 1. There is Documentation,

and innovation utilization of Sample
improvised teaching teaching device
devices /materials.
2, There is Documentation,
utilization of Sample
innovative teaching teaching device
devices/materials.
3. There is Documentation,
utilization of Sample
technology teaching device
(hardware/software)
Total
Summary:

Pedagogical Prism 3: Learning Environment

Criteria Total % Verbal Interpretation Remarks

Score
1. Organized and Safe
Learning Facility
2. Positive and
Appreciative
Psychosocial
Environment
3. Improvisation and
innovation
ion
Grand Total

Comments & Suggestions Agreement

Prepared by: Conforme:

DENNIS B. MASANGCAY, PhD ________________________________________

Education Program Supervisor - Science School Head
Date: Date:
 TANAW AGHAM 2022 - 2024
MONITORING AND EVALUATION TOOL

Client Profile:
School Date:
School Head
Contact No. Total No. of
Science Teachers
Science Major
Coordinator
Contact No. Non major
Science School MPS
Teacher:
Contact No. Grade level MPS
Specialization Class MPS
IPCRF Rating No. of Students

FEEDBACK AND ASSESSMENT

Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks

Evident
1. Quantitative 1. The teacher/s DLL/ Lesson
and Qualitative has/ have Plan,
observation assessment tools
aligned to
LC/MELCs
2. The teacher/s Class Record
has/have organized
class record with
tracking of learners’
progress
3. The classroom is Risk assessment
safe with posted tool.
hotline numbers Evacuation plan,
and evacuation plan List of Hotline
Numbers
4. Quarterly Approved
Assessment with Quarterly
TOS Assessment/

Total

2. Individual 1. Class Mean, SD

and Quarterly Report of
Collaborative Assessment Quarterly
Interpretation Results and Assessment
Findings
 Criteria Indicators Evident Not MOVs Remarks
Evident
Individual and 2. Grade level Mean, SD
Collaborative Quarterly Report of
Interpretation/ Assessment Quarterly
Reflections Results and Assessment
(continuation) Findings
3. The teachers DLL/Lesson
lesson plan has Plan
daily reflection Mean, SD
Report of
Quarterly
Assessment
Total

3. Strategic 1. The teacher Sample

Communication has intervention Intervention
& Relevant materials. Materials
Action (teacher devised
or adopted)
2. The teacher Intervention
has Intervention Report/
Results and Documentation
Findings
3. The teacher Remediation
has remediation Report/
plan and Documentation
activities Learning
materials
4. The teacher Intervention
has remediation Report/
results and Documentation
findings.
Total
Summary:

FEEDBACK AND ASSESSMENT

Criteria Total % Verbal Interpretation Remarks

Score
1. Quantitative and
Qualitative observation

2. Individual and
Collaborative
Interpretation

3. Strategic
Communication &
Relevant Action
Grand Total

Comments & Suggestions Agreement

Prepared by: Conforme:

DENNIS B. MASANGCAY, PhD ________________________________________

Education Program Supervisor - Science School Head
Date: Date:

Prepared by:

DENNIS B. MASANGCAY, PhD

Education Program Supervisor- Science