Professional Documents
Culture Documents
swamp
Towards an NSM lexical-semantic analysis of two English
landscape terms
Thomas Schwaiger
NSM-Con2023, June 23, 2023, online
Institute of Linguistics, University of Graz
Point-of-departure mini-corpus: “Skulls in the Stars” (1929)
“THERE are two roads to Torkertown. One, the shorter and more direct route,
leads across a barren upland moor, and the other, which is much longer, winds
its tortuous way in and out among the hummocks and quagmires of the
swamps, skirting the low hills to the east. It was a dangerous and tedious trail;
so Solomon Kane halted in amazement when a breathless youth from the vil-
lage he had just left, overtook him and implored him for God’s sake to take the
swamp road.” (Howard 1929: 49; emphases TS)
(occurrences of respective strings in the story: ‘moor’ 25x, ‘swamp’ 20x) 1/15
Theoretical point of departure: NSM and landscape terms
especially Bromhead (2017) and Bromhead (2018), i.e. “the first extended
study of the lexical semantics of landscape in cultural context anchored
in a human-centred perspective, using fine-grained reductive paraphrases
written in the Natural Semantic Metalanguage” (Bromhead 2018: 3)
“it is necessary for landscape concepts to be explained, in part, through
intermediate concepts which themselves need to be explained via seman-
tic primes” (Bromhead 2018: 14), i.e. universal, approximate and culture-
specific semantic molecules like
‘ground’, ‘water’, ‘grow’ (Goddard 2010: 137, 141, 2020: 25)
‘tree’ (Wierzbicka 1985: 182–183)
‘country’ (Goddard 2020: §2)
..
.
especially collocations, phraseology and productivity of the word or words
in question as important linguistic evidence in the formulation of explica-
tions
2/15
Preliminary word of warning: NSM-layman’s work in progress
the present study likely cannot claim any of the above points for itself.
But “[a]lthough these criteria allow one to evaluate proposed analyses, there are
no fixed discovery procedures that lead directly from usage data to an optimal
analysis” (Goddard 2021: 96),
an open area of hills covered with rough grass, especially in Britain (Cambridge)
1 chiefly British: an expanse of open rolling infertile land
2 a boggy area; especially: one that is peaty and dominated by grasses and
sedges (Merriam-Webster)
an area of open and usually high land with poor soil that is covered mainly with
grass and heather [mainly British] (Collins)
1 [especially British English; usually plural] a high open area of land that is not
used for farming, especially an area covered with rough grass and heather
2 [uncountable] land that consists of moors (Oxford Learner’s)
[usually plural; British] a large area of high land covered with grass, bushes,
and heather, with soil that is not good for growing crops
(Macmillan)
[usually plural; especially British English] a wild open area of high land, covered
with rough grass or low bushes and heather, that is not farmed because the soil
is not good enough (Longman) 4/15
Towards the lexical semantics of moor: Howard (1929) etc.
7/15
A very tentative explication of moor
8/15
Towards the lexical semantics of swamp: Online dictionaries
(Cambridge)
1 a wetland often partially or intermittently covered with water;
especially: one dominated by woody vegetation
2 a tract of swamp
3 a difficult or troublesome situation or subject (Merriam-Webster)
an area of very wet land with wild plants growing in it (Collins)
an area of ground that is very wet or covered with water and in which
plants, trees, etc. are growing (Oxford Learner’s)
an area of land covered by water where trees and plants grow (Macmillan)
land that is always very wet or covered with a layer of water (Longman) 9/15
Towards the lexical semantics of swamp: Howard (1929) etc.
filled places would have represented very salient and dangerous areas” (Perono Cacciafoco & Cavallaro 2023: 165)
h. the water [m] in these places does not move (cf. Bromhead
2017: 190, 2018: 162)
i. because of this, this water [m] is not like the water
[m] in places of other kinds (cf. Bromhead 2018: 94)
j. because it is like this, when someone is in a place
like this, this someone can feel something bad in their
body (cf. Bromhead 2018: 63)
difficult/troublesome situation/subject: affective components (g), (j)
– fetid as exclusive modifier of swamp (WS)
“[P]laces were also named after the bad or swampy water attested there, in order to avoid them.” (Perono
12/15
A very tentative explication of swamp
a. a place of one kind
b. places of this kind can be big places, places of this kind can be
small places
c. there is always (= at all times) water [m] in many parts of places of
this kind
d. because of this, the ground [m] in these places is not like the
ground [m] in places of other kinds
e. many things can grow [m] in many parts of these places, these things
can be big
f. because it is like this, people can not always move in these places,
like they can move in other places
g. when people move in places of this kind, something bad can happen to
them because of this
h. the water [m] in these places does not move
i. because of this, this water [m] is not like the water [m] in places
of other kinds
j. because it is like this, when someone is in a place like this, this
someone can feel something bad in their body
(still many problems, e.g. coherence, ‘tree’, no ‘think’ component, etc.)
– drain (clearly more) frequent with swamp as object (WS)
⇒ further component(s) for human intent in the landscape (see Bromhead 2018: §6)? 13/15
The end
14/15
References
Bromhead, Helen. 2017. The semantics of standing-water places in English, French, and Pitjantjatjara/
Yankunytjatjara. In Ye, Zhengdao (ed.), The semantics of nouns, 180–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bromhead, Helen. 2018. Landscape and culture: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Goddard, Cliff. 2010. Semantic molecules and semantic complexity (with special reference to “environmen-
tal” molecules). Review of Cognitive Linguistics 8. 123–155.
Goddard, Cliff. 2015. The natural semantic metalanguage approach. In Heine, Bernd & Narrog, Heiko
(eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. 2nd edn., 817–841. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, Cliff. 2020. ‘Country’, ‘land’, ‘nation’: Key Anglo English words for talking and thinking about
people in places. Journal of Postcolonial Linguistics 2. 8–27.
Goddard, Cliff. 2021. Natural semantic metalanguage. In Wen, Xu & Taylor, John R. (ed.), The Routled-
ge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 93–110. New York: Routledge.
Goddard, Cliff & Wierzbicka, Anna & Wong, Jock. 2016. “Walking” and “running” in English and German:
The conceptual semantics of verbs of human locomotion. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14. 303–336.
Howard, Robert E. 1929. Skulls in the stars. Weird Tales 13. 49–55.
Perono Cacciafoco, Francesco & Cavallaro, Francesco. 2023. Place names: Approaches and perspectives in
toponymy and toponomastics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1985. Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition: Universal human concepts in culture-specific
configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15/15