Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CEA3180
Pedestal Column
Wall
• Wall is a vertical compression
member whose effective height 𝐻
to thickness 𝑡 (least lateral
dimension) shall not exceed 30
(CL. 32.2.3 of IS 456).
• The larger horizontal dimension
i.e., the length of the wall 𝐿 is
more than 4𝑡.
Why steel is provided in compression
members
• Very few members are truly
axially loaded
• Steel is essential for resisting any
local bending that may occur
• Part of total load is carried by
steel with its much greater
compressive strength
Classification of columns
𝜋2 𝐸𝐼
• 𝑃𝑐𝑟 =
𝐿2𝑒
𝑃𝑐𝑟 𝜋2 𝐸𝐼
• 𝜎𝑐𝑟 = =
𝐴 𝐿2𝑒 𝐴
𝜋2 𝐸
• 𝜎𝑐𝑟 =
𝐿𝑒 𝑟 2
• where
𝐼
•𝑟=
𝐴
Slenderness ratio
a) Short column
b) Long or slender column
• IS 456 stipulates the slenderness ratio as the ratio of its effective
length 𝑙𝑒 to its least lateral dimension.
• The effective length 𝑙𝑒 is different from the unsupported length.
• The rectangular RC column of cross-sectional dimensions b and D
shall have two effective lengths in the two directions of b and D.
• Slenderness ratio about the major axis = 𝑙𝑒𝑥 𝐷
• Slenderness ratio about the minor axis = 𝑙𝑒𝑦 𝑏
Based on slenderness ratio
𝑃𝑢 𝜌
• = 0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 + 0.67𝑓𝑦 − 0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘
𝐴𝑔 100
• 𝜌 = 0.8 − 4% (𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑑)
Example: Design the reinforcement in a column of size 400 mm x 600 mm subjected
to an axial load of 2000 kN under service dead load and live load. The column has an
unsupported length of 4.0 m and effectively held in position and restrained against
rotation in both ends. Use M 25 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
• Step 1: To check if the column is short or slender
• Given 𝐿 = 4000 mm, 𝑏 = 400 mm and 𝐷 = 600 mm.
• Service load (working load) = 2000 kN
• Factored load = 1.5 × 2000 = 3000 𝐾𝑁
• Table 28 of IS 456 =𝑙𝑒𝑥 = 𝑙𝑒𝑦 = 0.65𝐿 = 0.65 × 4000 = 2600 mm. So, we have
• 𝑙𝑒𝑥 𝐷 = 2600 600 = 4.33 < 12
• 𝑙𝑒𝑦 𝑏 = 2600 400 = 6.5 < 12
• Hence, it is a short column.
• Step 2: Minimum eccentricity
• 𝑒x 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐿 500 + 𝐷 30 𝑎𝑛𝑑 20 𝑚𝑚
• 4000 500 + 600 30 = 8 + 20 = 28 𝑚𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 20 𝑚𝑚 = 28 𝑚𝑚
• 𝑒y 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐿 500 + 𝑏 30 𝑎𝑛𝑑 20 𝑚𝑚
• 4000 500 + 400 30 = 8 + 13.33 = 21.33 𝑎𝑛𝑑 20 𝑚𝑚 = 21.33 𝑚𝑚
• 0.05𝐷 = 0.05 × 600 = 30 𝑚𝑚 > 28 𝑚𝑚 = 𝑒𝑥 𝑚𝑖𝑛
• 0.05𝑏 = 0.05 × 400 = 20 𝑚𝑚 = 20 𝑚𝑚 = 𝑒𝑦 𝑚𝑖𝑛
• Hence, the equation given in CL.39.3 of IS 456 is applicable for the design here.
• Step 3: Area of steel
• We know that
• 𝑃𝑢 = 0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑐 + 0.67𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑐 or
• 𝑃𝑢 = 0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑔 + 0.67𝑓𝑦 − 0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑠𝑐 or 𝑃𝑢 = 0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 {𝐴𝑔 −𝐴𝑠𝑐 } + 0.67𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑐
• 3000 103 = 0.4 25 400 600 − 𝐴𝑠𝑐 + 0.67 415 𝐴𝑠𝑐
• 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠,
• 𝐴𝑠𝑐 = 2238.39 𝑚𝑚2
• Provide 6-20 mm diameter and 2-16 mm diameter bars giving 2287 mm2 (>2238.39 mm2)
and 𝜌 = 0.953%, which is more than minimum percentage of 0.8 and less than maximum
percentage of 4.0. Hence, o.k.
• Step 4: Lateral ties
• The diameter of transverse reinforcement (lateral ties) is
determined from CL.26.5.3.2 C-2 of IS 456 as not less than
• ∅ 4 and
• (ii) 6 mm.
• Here,∅ = largest bar diameter used as longitudinal
reinforcement = 20 mm. So, the diameter of bars used as
lateral ties = 6 mm.
• The pitch of lateral ties, as per CL.26.5.3.2 C-1 of IS 456,
should be not more than the least of
• (i) The least lateral dimension of the column = 400 mm
• (ii) Sixteen times the smallest diameter of longitudinal
reinforcement bar to be tied = 16 (16) = 256 mm
• (iii) 300 mm
• Adopt pitch of lateral ties = 250 mm
Example 2: Design the column of Problem 1 employing the chart of SP-16.
• Solution 2: Steps 1 and 2 are the same as those of
Problem 1.
• Step 3: Area of steel
• 𝑃𝑢 𝐴𝑔 = 3000 103 600 × 400 = 12.5 𝑀𝑃𝑎
• From the lower section of Chart 25 of SP-16, we
get 𝑝 = 0.95% when 𝑃𝑢 𝐴𝑔 =12.5 N/mm2and
concrete grade is M 25. This gives 𝐴𝑠𝑐 = 0.95(400)
(600)/100 =2288 mm2. The results of both the
problems are in good agreement. Marginally
higher value of Asc while using the chart is due to
parallax error while reading the value from the
chart. Here also, 6-20 mm diameter bars + 2-16
mm diameter bars (Asc provided = 2287 mm2) is
o.k., though it is 1 mm2 less.
• Step 4 is the same as that of Problem 1. Figure
showing the reinforcing bars (longitudinal and
transverse reinforcement) of this problem (same
column as that of Problem 1).
Spiral columns
• Columns with helical reinforcement take more load than that of tied
columns due to additional strength of spirals.
• CL. 39.4 recommends a multiplying factor of 1.05 regarding the
strength of such columns.
• The code further recommends that the ratio of volume of helical
reinforcement to the volume of core shall not be less than
• 0.36 (𝐴𝑔 𝐴𝑐 − 1) 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑦 as per CL. 39.4.1.
• The governing equation of the spiral columns may be written as
• 𝑃𝑢 = 1.05(0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑐 + 0.67𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑐 )
Pitch of helical reinforcement
• Volume of helical reinforcement in one loop = 𝜋 𝐷𝑐 − 𝜑𝑠𝑝 𝑎𝑠𝑝
• Volume of core= 𝜋 4 𝐷𝑐2 . 𝑝
• where 𝐷𝑐 =diameter of the core
• 𝜑𝑠𝑝 =Diameter of the spiral reinforcement
• 𝑎𝑠𝑝 =Area of cross section of spiral reinforcement
• 𝑝 =Pitch of the spiral reinforcement
• To satisfy the condition of CL 39.4.1 of IS 456, i.e ratio of volume of helical
reinforcement to the volume of core shall not be less than 0.36 𝐴𝑔 𝐴𝑐 − 1 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑦
• 𝜋 𝐷𝑐 − 𝜑𝑠𝑝 𝑎𝑠𝑝 𝜋 4 𝐷𝑐2 𝑝 ≥ 0.36 𝐴𝑔 𝐴𝑐 − 1 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑦
• which finally gives
• 𝑝 ≤ 11.1 𝐷𝑐 − 𝜑𝑠𝑝 𝑎𝑠𝑝 𝑓𝑦 / 𝐷2 − 𝐷𝑐2 𝑓𝑐𝑘
Example: Design a circular column of 400 mm diameter with helical reinforcement
subjected to an axial load of 1500 kN under service dead and live load. The column
has an unsupported length of 3 m effectively held in position at both ends but not
restrained against rotation. Use M 25 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
• Step 1: To check if the column is short or slender
• Given 𝐿 = 3000 mm, 𝐷 = 400 mm. Table 28 of Annexure E of IS 456 gives effective length
• =𝑙𝑒 = 𝐿= 3000 mm. So, we have
• 𝑙𝑒 𝐷 = 3000 400 = 7.5 < 12
• Hence, it is a short column.
𝜋 2
• Gross area of column = 400 = 125663.7 𝑚𝑚2
4
• Step 2: Minimum eccentricity
• 𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝐿 500 + 𝑏 30 (> 20 𝑚𝑚)
• 𝑒 𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 3000 500 + 400 30 = 19.33 𝑚𝑚 (≈ 20 𝑚𝑚)
• 0.05𝐷 = 0.05 × 400 = 20 𝑚𝑚
• As per CL. 39.3 of IS 456, 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑛 should not exceed 0.05𝐷. Here, both the eccentricities are
the same. So, we can use the equation in that clause of IS 456.
• Step 3: Area of steel
• 𝑃𝑢 = 1.05(0.4𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝐴𝑐 + 0.67𝑓𝑦 𝐴𝑠𝑐 )
• 𝐴𝑐 = 𝐴𝑔 − 𝐴𝑠𝑐 = 125663.7 − 𝐴𝑠𝑐
• 1.5 × 1500 103 = 1.05{0.4 25 125663.7 − 𝐴𝑠𝑐 + 0.67 415 𝐴𝑠𝑐
• 𝑤ℎ𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑔𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠,
• 𝐴𝑠𝑐 = 3304.29 𝑚𝑚2 (2.64% of gross area)
• Provide 11-20 mm diameter bars = 3455𝑚𝑚2 as longitudinal reinforcement
giving 𝜌 = 2.75%, this 𝜌 is between 0.8 (min.) and of 4 (max.) per cent. Hence, o.k.
• Diameter of helical reinforcement (CL.26.5.3.2 d-2) shall be not less than greater of
• (i) one-fourth of the diameter of largest longitudinal bar, and (ii) 6 mm.
• Therefore, with 20 mm diameter bars as longitudinal reinforcement, the diameter
of helical reinforcement = 6 mm.
• 𝑝 ≤ 11.1 𝐷𝑐 − 𝜑𝑠𝑝 𝑎𝑠𝑝 𝑓𝑦 / 𝐷2 − 𝐷𝑐2 𝑓𝑐𝑘
• 𝐷𝑐 = 400 − 40 − 40 = 320 𝑚𝑚
• 𝜑𝑠𝑝 = 6 𝑚𝑚
• 𝑎𝑠𝑝 = 28 𝑚𝑚2
• 𝐷 = 400 𝑚𝑚
• 𝑝 ≤ 11.1 320 − 6 28 415 4002 − 3202 25 ≤ 28.125𝑚𝑚
• As per CL.26.5.3.2 d-1, the maximum pitch is the lesser of 75 mm and 320/6 =
53.34 mm and the minimum pitch is greater of 25 mm and 3(6) = 18 mm. We
adopt pitch = 25 mm So, provide 6 mm bars @ 25 mm pitch forming the helix.
• Checking of CL. 39.4.1 of IS 456
• To satisfy the condition of CL 39.4.1 of IS 456, we have
• 𝜋 𝐷𝑐 − 𝜑𝑠𝑝 𝑎𝑠𝑝 𝜋 4 𝐷𝑐2 𝑝 ≥ 0.36 𝐴𝑔 𝐴𝑐 − 1 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑦
• Volume of helical reinforcement in one loop
= 𝜋 𝐷𝑐 − 𝜑𝑠𝑝 𝑎𝑠𝑝
• = 𝜋 320 − 6 28 = 27621𝑚𝑚3
• Volume of core in one loop = 𝜋 4 𝐷𝑐2 . 𝑝
• = 𝜋 4 𝐷𝑐2 . 𝑝 = 𝜋 4 320 2 . 25 =
2011619.2 mm3
• Their ratio = 27621/2010619.2 = 0.0137307
• 0.36 (𝐴𝑔 𝐴𝑐 − 1) 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑦 =
0.012198795
• Thus, it is seen that the above ratio is not
less than 0.36 (𝐴𝑔 𝐴𝑐 − 1) 𝑓𝑐𝑘 𝑓𝑦 ok