Group Evaluation Form CMPT470

(Submit to canvas after final project submission)

Please note that this will not be a strict numerical basis for marking. It is just a way for me to identify
extreme cases and adjust group marks accordingly.

Please also note that there are different levels of technical knowledge among team members and this
evaluation is submitted on the assumption that, for the most part, each member did an acceptable
amount of work. If this is NOT THE CASE, please contact Bobby directly at bobbyc@sfu.ca.

Group Name:

Name: Hector Onato

Private Feedback on Group Members

For each of the following, please evaluate on the following scale:
5 – expectational: clearly did the most in the group and should be given extra recognition.
4 – good,
3 – average,
2 – poor

Please note: You do not need to give any 5’s in your group (if any, there should be at most two). If you
feel everyone was pulling equal weight, then you should assign all members a 4. Use the 2 and 3 ranking
for members who you feel could have done a better job.

Vy Nguyen: 5

Joel Tai: 4

Jieung Park: 4

Private Feedback on Individual

Self Evaluation: 4

If you gave yourself less than 4. Please explain why.