Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute
To excel globally in technical education and research in field of electronics and communication
engineering and thus contribute to the welfare of society.
M1: To establish a unique learning environment to enable the students to face the ever-
emerging challenges in electronics and communication engineering.
M2: To equip the students with a broad intellectual spectrum and prepare them for diverse and
competitive career paths.
M3: To provide practical orientated education and foster tie-up with national/international
educational institutes, research bodies, and industry to support students and faculty
development pursuits.
M4: To provide ethical and value-based education by promoting activities addressing societal
needs.
PEO1:
Be able to successfully practice electronics and communication engineering with acquired skills
and knowledge.
PEO3:
To prepare graduates who will practice their profession with ethics, integrity, and social
responsibility in a global context.
PEO4:
To develop leadership qualities with demonstrable attributes and to contribute to societal needs.
1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated
among Stakeholders
Vision and Mission of the department & PEOs of the program are disseminated across both
internal and external stakeholders as described below:
Governing body members: Displays of the Vision and Mission statements are available in the
director office, board rooms etc.
Faculty & Staff Members: Faculty members participate in the process of revisions in the
Vision, Mission, and PEOs. These are also displayed in the posters at various places in the
department including the course diaries etc.
Students: Vision, Mission, and PEOs are conveyed to the students through audiovisual
communications during orientation and other programs. They are also disseminated via
departmental pages in the institute website, institute prospectus, posters in laboratories,
classrooms, tutorial rooms, and lobby/circulation area etc.
Parents: Vision, Mission, and PEOs are communicated to the parents and students during the
parent’s teacher meetings and through the website and other print media.
Alumni: Updated Vision, Mission, and PEOs are put across the college alumni during the
alumni meet and their feedbacks.
Employers& the Industry: Vision, Mission, and PEOs are expressed to the employers and
industry through placement brochures, institute website, institute prospectus, feedbacks etc.
1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department,
and PEOs of the program
A rigorous process defines the department's vision and mission as shown in the Fig. 1.1 over a
sustained period involving internal and external stakeholders. The departmental Program
Assessment Committee (PAC) frames, gathers feedbacks and opinions, reviews and refines the
PEOs through various inputs as shown the Fig. 1.2
• The departmental faculty group formulates the first draft in consistency with the institute
vision and mission.
• The HOD arranges to obtain the feedback/advice on the draft statements from various
stakeholders and external experts.
• Detailed deliberations/brainstorming takes place in the department faculty group on
inputs, suggestions and advice provided by various stakeholders, the advisory board and
IQAC on the departmental vision and missions.
1.5.1 Mapping of PEOs with Missions of department: The following table shows each
PEO's consistency with the department's missions. The consistency levels are:
PEO1-M1: The department adopts innovative strategies for teaching and learning, which helps
the students substantially to acquire skills and knowledge required to face the ever-emerging
challenges in Electronics and Communication Engineering and practice their profession.
PEO1-M2: The department organizes technical trainings, events, sessions by
PEO1-M3: The department imparts practical skills to students through the laboratory sessions,
internships etc. helping them moderately for a successful career.
PEO1-M4: Ethical and value-based conduct forms a moderate basis for successful professional
practice. The awareness on this matter is created through conduct and fair academic practices
in the department.
PEO2-M1: The learning environment provided in the department greatly offers students to
attain professional competence through curriculum, advanced labs, research work, and other
professional activities that prepare them to face the ever-emerging challenges in Electronics
and Communication Engineering.
PEO2-M2: The department organizes training on advanced technologies, technical events, and
technical sessions by industry/academia experts for various career paths to substantially
broaden their professional competence.
PEO2-M3: The department moderately organizes faculty and student development programs
through external agencies in the emerging and new technologies.
PEO3-M1: The presence of an ethically created and practiced learning environment helps the
students to grow ethically at least at a moderate level.
PEO3-M2: The technical activities related to the development of diverse career paths signify
an un-evident relation with the ethical context.
PEO3-M3: Departmental efforts through the external tie-ups and support activities are
sufficient for slight creation of social responsibility among the students.
PEO4-M1: The overall teaching learning environment moderately develops the leadership
qualities and related attributes among students.
PEO4-M2, M3: The activities related with development of career paths and efforts on
practically oriented education slightly relate with the leadership attributes.
2.1 State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in AnnexureI.
Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any (10)
2.1.1 Following is the process used to identify extent of compliance of University curriculum
for attaining the POs and PSOs.
1) Program assessment committee (PAC) with three senior faculty members is formed.
2) The course outcomes defined in the university curriculum with each course are
sometimes not very functional and need improvements. Course teacher refines the
university course outcomes into measurable course outcomes keeping NBA and other
accreditation guidelines into consideration. Final course outcomes are then mapped
PO- PSO Mapping of the Activities/Programs conducted to fulfill the PO/PSO Gaps
P P P P P P P P P PO PO PO PS PS
O1 O2 O3 O4 O5 O6 O7 O8 O9 10 11 12 O O
1 2
Technical √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
club
Activities
(Circuit
design,
Technical
Seminar,
Poster
Design,
Crosswords)
Trainings on √ √ √ √ √ √
the use of
Modern
tools &
Technologie
s
Annual √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Project
Expo event
2.1.2 State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs
and PSOs (10)
Letter to university regarding gaps in the curriculum has been communicated time to time.
Additionally, as per the university norms, one faculty member from the department is in
University Board of Studies (BOS). Board of Studies reviews the course syllabi and
Date- Resource
% of Relevance to POs,
S.No Action Taken Month- Person with
students PSOs
Year Designation
Demonstration of Lab
INTEL Lab
1 videos for Clean Room 27/07/20 70% -
Videos
Concept
Additional Lecture on
Mr. Sachin
Reflection and
Dhawan
2 refraction of plane 19/08/20 90% P01
Assistant
waves using Huygen
Professor , PIET
principle.
Additional Lecture on Mr. Sachin
Incoherent and Dhawan
3 26/08/20 90% PO1, PSO1
coherent waves Assistant
addition. Professor , PIET
Mr. Vishal Jain
Lab Experiment on
Assistant
4 Time and Amplitude 31/7/2020 70% PO5,PSO1
Professor
operation on signals
ECE
Mr. Vishal Jain
Additional Lecture on
Assistant
5 Introduction to 02/12/2020 70% PO1,PSO1
Professor
Probability Theory
ECE
6 Additional Lecture on 31/7/2020 Mr. Arun Rana 80% PO5,PSO1
Guest Lectures/ Two to Three in each Semester Two to Three in each Semester (as
Workshops (as per availability of experts) per availability of experts)
Industrial Visit One in each semester (as per of One in each semester (as per of
industry norms) industry norms)
Blended Learning:
Flip Learning
M-Tutor: The first year students and teachers use a mobile based ICT
tool called MTutor, which is a digital tutorials package for higher
education developed as per university curriculum.
Education 4.0
Soft Skill Development
In addition to the technical courses, PDP and Communication classes are organized
for students of 3rd and 4th year students to prepare them for placements.
Extra assignments
Assignment given to the students to assess attainment of course outcomes is not
sufficient for the slow learners. Some extra assignments are also given
specifically to slow performers.
Strategic methods
Identification of the reasons of poor performance help faculty formulate strategies
to support slow learners by involving them in discussions of the concepts and
by forming groups of mixed level students.
Department helps bright students to acquire technical exposure, develop competencies and
ethics in following ways-
Technical Fest
In each course many students are made to work on number of additional experiments
for the better attainment of the outcomes.
Students are encouraged to do hands-on practice on system design using physical and
virtual laboratory setups.
Every student has to take own readings/ analysis for the experiment.
After conducting experiment, students write their report and it is verified by the
subject teacher.
The students write the complete experiment concerned in the observation book and
analyze the results to reach to a conclusion.
The subject teacher gives remarks and assigns grade for the experiment and report.
Students are discouraged for any kind of plagiarism in preparing the report.
After the session is over, experiments are repeated for revision and to ensure learning
of the absentees.
The final performance evaluation of students is done on the basis of course outcomes
defined and conveyed to students in the beginning of the session.
The feedback is taken online once in a semester through online students’ feedback software.
Student feedback is collected, analyzed and communicated to all faculty members once in a
semester. The faculty members are counselled by the HOD taking corrective measures if
required. Also, motivation is given to faculty in terms of appreciation letters and awards. The
points used for measuring teaching and learning through Student Feedback are as follows:
Power of Expression
Regularity
Command Over Language
Use of Audio/Video Aids
Syllabus Completion
Problem solving Techniques
Checking of Assignments
Creativity
Subject Knowledge
Clarification of Doubts
Discussion on Examples of the related subject
During COVID Pandemic time, Online feedback was collected from students through MS
Teams.
MS Teams based feedback form points:
Voice clarity
Video Clarity
Network Quality at student’s end
Course content Adequacy as per syllabus
Received corrected quizzes and assignments with teachers comments
Interaction with teacher
Syllabus coverage
Punctuality
During digital online classes, the assignments and quizzes have been conducted
through online platforms including Google forms, Microsoft Teams etc.
The course outcome coverage and equal weight age to the outcomes is ensured by the
course coordinator.
Questions/ Problems for assessing students on Bloom’s Taxonomy levels, with more
weight age to higher levels are ensured by the course coordinator.
Assignment 1
Semester: Vth Faculty Name: Dr. Monika
Gambhir
Course Title: VLSI Course No: ECP-5
Q.1: How do you grow single crystal EGS from Polycrystalline EGS? Illustrate CZ and float
zone technique with diagram and compare the two techniques.
(CO2)
Q.2 Solve the questions with given data: (CO3)
A <100> silicon wafer has a 2000-Å oxide on its surface
(a) How long did it take to grow this oxide at 1100o C in dry oxygen?
(b)The wafer is put back in the furnace in wet oxygen at 1000o C. How long will it
take to
grow an additional 3000 Å of oxide?
Q.3: List out the points of comparison between dry and wet oxidation.
(CO1)
Q.4: Compare <100> and <111> crystal orientations, used in
fabrication. (CO1)
Q.3 & Q.4 have been given in the assignment with an aim to ensure self learning of
students.
Few Innovative assessment methods are used in the department as shown below-
Major and Minor Projects have been incorporated intothe university curriculum to
enhance and utilize the creative potential of the students.
The list of faculty with their domain (like IoT, Embedded System, Image processing,
etc.), is displayed on the notice board so that students can find a brief idea of various
fields for selecting the project ideas.
Students discuss with faculty members about the project domain and decide their
guide; the internal guides allocated toeach project team.
Project teams are formed and displayed on notice boards with their project guide to
developing solutions for complex problems.
The working methods, timeline, roles, and responsibilities are defined. Student teams
have to plan the project and divide the tasks among themselves
The faculties encourage students to participate in project exhibitions. The project
exhibition is aimed to provide a common platform to exhibit their innovations and
their work towards excellence in the latest technologies.
The faculties encourage students to publish their project work in reputed
journals/conferences.
Categories of Projects:
The project allotted to students fall under different categories with their relevance as given
below:
Smart Communication
Healthcare & Biomedical devices
Agriculture & Rural Development
Smart Vehicles
Robotics and Drones
Waste management
Clean air
Renewable Energy
Security & Surveillance
COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
1 3 3 3 3 - - - - - 3 - 3 3 -
2 3 3 - 3 - 3 3 - - - - 3 3 -
3 3 - 3 2 3 - - - - - - 3 3 3
4 - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - -
5 - - - - - - - 2 3 - 3 - - -
AVG 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.67 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00
COs PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 P09 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
1 1 3 - - - 2 - 1 1 2 2 2 2
2 2 1 - - - - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1
3 2 - 2 1 1 - 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1
4 1 1 - - - - 1 - 2 1 1 1 1 1
AVG 1.5 1.66 2 1 1 - 1.25 - 1.25 1 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
Project
Plan, Tota
Problem Technical
Individiu l
Roll Students Identificatio Communicati
Project Name al & Mar
No Name n & Review on
Team ks
work
CO1 (15) CO4(5) CO5(5) 25
Healthcare Model
2. Working Model of Smart Home- Home automation refers to the ability of your
home to make its own decisions depending on environment conditions and give
you the option to control it from a remote location. on the ESP8266 WiFi Module,
we examined how NodeMCU or any of the other ESP8266 based boards can be
used to build a web server through which all the GPIOs of the board can be
controlled over WiFi. web server in use and control home appliances with it.
Smart Dustbin
Head of the ECE and department encouraged the students with their words of
wisdom. Students of ECE departments participated and presented their project in
the event.
The event was successfully organized by faculties of ECE Dept.,PIET :
Mr. Arun Rana Mr. Sachin Dhawan
Student coordinators :
Riya (B.Tech ECE 2nd yr)
Himanshu (B.Tech ECE 2nd yr)
S
Name of Conference/ Title of
. Year of
Journal/Book(Internatio Paper/chapt Name of Author(s)
N Publication
nal/National) er
o
Internet of
Underwater
Internet of Things Sanyam Jain, Nitin Yadav,
Things
Robotic and Drone Mubarak Husain, Mohit
1 Application 2021-2022
Technology Aggarwal, Priyesh Arya,
s and
Shobhit Aggarwal
Challenges
In order to promote innovations and fill the gap between Industry-Academia, the department
conducts:
1. Interactive expert Sessions and Pre-Placement Talks with Industry Executives
2. Industrial Visits
3. Industry Collaboration for Internships, Placements, Skill Development, Start-ups
4. Course Delivery though Industry
Indo-Asian Plant
CSIO Chandigarh
2 Industry Expert Facebook
Sessions Genpact
OYO
Delhivery
NOVO
CSIO Chandigarh
Aptron Pvt. Ltd.
Capegemini
The students are also provided training which helps them to face interviews/tests for the
internship. The internship/placement trainings are scheduled during the semester.
3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and Program
Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20)
The following tables list the Course Outcomes of one course from 3rd to 8th semester.
3rdSemester
COs
4th Semester
6th Semester
DIGITAL DESIGN USING VERILOG (ECE-304 N)
COs
ECE-304 Understand the constructs and conventions of the Verilog HDL
N.1 programming.
ECE-304 Differentiate between the structural, register-transfer level (RTL), and
N.2 algorithmic levels of Abstraction for modeling digital hardware systems.
ECE-304 Design and modeling of combinational and sequential digital systems
N.3 (Finite State Machines)
ECE-304 Apply the concept of test-benches to create testing behavioral environments
N.4 for simulation-based verification.
ECE-304 Implement the concepts of UDPs , tasks, function and compiler directives
N.5 to improve the design.
7th Semester
MICROCONTROLLER AND EMBEDDED SYSTEM DESIGN (ECE-401N)
COs
ECE-401N.1 Recall the basic architecture of microcontrollers & microprocessors and
understand the term embedded systems and its components.
ECE-401N.2 Understand the detailed architecture of microcontrollers
(8051,PIC16,AVR,ARM).
ECE-401N.3 Classify and explain the instruction set and programming concepts in C
and assembly language.
ECE-401N.4 Apply the programming tools to solve different problems in C and
assembly language.
ECE-401N.5 Interface peripherals with microcontrollers.
ECE-401N.6 Design the systems /models based on microcontrollers.
3rd Semester
5th Semester
7th Semester
3.1.3 Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year courses (10)
Sr CO Subject PO PO2 PO P P P P P P PO PO PO PS P
. UR Name 1 3 O O O O O O 10 11 12 O1 S
4 5 6 7 8 9 O
N SE 2
o
1 AS- Applied 2.1 1.83 1.5 1. 1. - - - - - - - - -
101 Physics I 7 0 33 83
N
2 AS- Applied 2.1 1.83 1.5 1. 1. - - - - - - - - -
102 Physics II 7 0 33 83
N
3 AS- Applied 1.4 1.67 1.0 - 1. - 1. 1. - 1.0 - 1.0 - -
103 Chemistry 0 0 00 00 00 0 0
N
4 AS- Mathematics 3.0 2.67 1.0 2. 2. - - - - - - 1.3 - -
104 II 0 0 33 67 3
N
5 AS- Mathematics 3.0 2.67 1.0 2. 2. - - - - - - 1.3 - -
105 I 0 0 33 67 3
N
6 AS- Applied 3.0 2.17 1.8 1. 1. 2. - - - - - - - -
106 Physics Lab I 0 0 33 75 17
N
7 AS- Applied 3.0 2.17 1.8 1. 1. 2. - - - - - - - -
107 Physics Lab 0 0 25 75 17
N II
1. Theory Subjects
The internal assessment marks in theory papers are based on three sessional tests conducted per
semester as per the academic calendar stipulated by the affiliated university. Question papers
for the corresponding course are prepared by the respective faculty and submitted to the
departmental sessional coordinator well in advance.
Consider the sample of marks obtained by a class of six students in a sessional test as shown
below in Table 3.2.1.2. In the table only six students are considered to keep the data set
minimum and still present the procedure; however in reality the class strength is up to 60 only.In
this sample test the entire COs are evaluated uniformly out of 10 marks. The table presents
students scores out of these 10 marks for the question asked for each CO.
2 55% students scoring 50% marks or more, out of the maximum marks
3 60% students scoring 50% marks or more, out of the maximum marks
B. Assignments
▪ The assignments are also issued CO wise and evaluation for questions of each CO is recorded
separately as shown in the Table shown below.
▪ Three to four assignments per course are given to the students in a semester.
The below table 3.2.1.c presents students scores out of these 10 marks for the question asked for each
CO.
Laboratory experiment provides students with first-hand experience with course concepts and
the opportunity to explore experimental methods used in their discipline. Two tools used for
laboratory assessment are:
Performance assessment is based on the ability of the student to actively participate in the
successful conduct of prescribed practical work and draw appropriate conclusions. The student
submits a record of practical work performed in each class.
A major lab exam is conducted to assess the ability of a student to perform a given task by
integrating the knowledge gained from related theory course and regular lab sessions. The exam
includes viva voce and lab performance.
3. Project work
Students are expected to finalize the project themes/titles with the assistance of an identified
faculty member as project guide at the beginning of the semester. During this the students are
required to submit a project plan, relevance of the project proposed, time schedule and cost
estimate. Assessment tools used to evaluate project work are:
a. Project Synopsis
• Student groups are required to submit the synopsis as per the guide lines and format given
by the project coordinators and synopsis is scrutinized by a team of faculty members.
• The students give the preliminary presentation to the above team for approval of the project
work. The committee approves or rejects the project based on the understanding of the
project by students and complexity/ current technology/ social relevance.
3.2.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set
Attainment levels (40)
The theory course evaluation process consists of internal and university examination.
Internal evaluation process includes sessional tests and assignments.
Setting Course Outcome attainment targets for internal and university examinations
In every educational program, the concerned department is expected to decide on the target
attainment levels. It is like setting one’s own program’s standards. If a low target is set, it
becomes easy to attain but in long run it degrades educational quality or the program strengths.
Therefore the attainment targets are gradually improved over the years so that enough
challenges continue exist in place to improve the quality. Table 3.2.2.a presents the target
attainment statements to be used for internal sessional tests and the university examinations.
Table 3.2.2.b. An example of Course Outcome attainment targets applicable to take home
assignments
Attainment Level Achieved If the following target is accomplished
1 50% students scoring 60% marks or more, out of the maximum marks
2 55% students scoring 60% marks or more, out of the maximum marks
3 60% students scoring 60% marks or more, out of the maximum marks
The CO attainments through the internal assessment and the university examinations are
combined to calculate the final CO attainments as shown in the sample table 3.2.2.c below for
Average
Attainment
attainment Final attainment
through
through level of the course
Sr. No. Subject Code Semester university
internal ((W1 * A1)+(W2 *
examination
assesment tools A2))/ 100
(A1)
(A2)
1 ECE-207N 3 2 - 0.5
2 ECE-205N 3 2.16 - 0.54
3 ECE-209N 3 2.2 - 0.55
4 ECE-203N 3 2.2 - 0.55
5 ECE-201N 3 2.5 - 0.63
6 AS-201N 3 2.1 - 0.53
7 ECE-210N 4 2 - 0.5
8 ECE-208N 4 1.5 - 0.375
9 ECE-206N 4 2.5 2 2.13
10 AS-206N 4 2.2 - 0.55
11 ECE-202N 4 2.4 3 2.85
12 ECE-204N 4 2.4 - 0.6
13 ECE-301N 5 2.8 3 2.95
14 ECE-305 N 5 0.76 3 2.44
15 ECE-303N 5 2.8 3 2.95
16 ECE-307N 5 2.4 - 0.6
17 HS-303N 5 2.4 3 2.85
18 CSE-304N 5 2.1 1 1.25
19 ECE-308N 6 2.1 3 2.7
20 ECE-306N 6 2.2 3 2.8
21 ECE-302N 6 2.6 3 2.9
22 ECE-304 N 6 2.6 3 2.9
23 HS-302N 6 2.2 3 2.8
24 ECE-419N 7 3 3 3
25 ECE-423N 7 3 3 3
26 ECE-401N 7 2.33 3 2.83
27 ECE 405N 7 2.6 3 2.9
28 ECE-403N 7 2.4 3 2.85
29 ECE-404N 8 3 3 3
30 ECE-402N 8 3 3 3
31 ECE-420N 8 3 3 3
32 ECE-422N 8 3 3 3
Where
A1: Attainment through Final/University Examination
A2: Attainment through Internal Assessment (avg. of all the internal assessment tools)
W1: Weightage given to Final/University Examination, W1 =75
W2: Weightage given to Internal Assessment, W2 = 25
3.3.1. Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of the
Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes
(10)
Evaluation of attainment of PO’s and PSO’s is based on direct and indirect assessment tools.
Direct assessment of PO’s and PSO’s through COs is based on students’ performance in internal
assessments and university exams. Indirect assessment is based on exit survey, alumni feedback
and recruiter’s survey as listed in the table 3.3.1.a below.
1) Direct Assessment
• Based on Course outcomes attainment
Performance of the students in internal assessments and university exams will lead to the
attainment of Course Outcomes’. COs of a particular subject are mapped to the relevant PO’s
in the scale of 3, 2,and 1. Attainment for particular Program Outcome is calculated by taking
weighted average of all course outcome attainment addressing that particular PO. Similar
calculation is used for all the POs and for every subject. The PO attainment for a batch of
students is calculated by taking the sum of all attainments for a particular PO and dividing by
the number of courses mapped to the same PO.
2) Indirect Assessment
Exit Survey
The survey questions are asked to get the opinion and observations about the program outcomes
from the final year students. The questions are rated by the outgoing batch students in the range
of 3, 2, 1 and 0 and the exit survey attainment is calculated accordingly. The department uses
an exit survey form used in the institute for indirect assessment of POs as shown below.
Alumni Feedback
A survey is conducted after one year of graduation from the pass out students and proper
statistics are taken and gathered which helps the department and the institute to overcome any
of its shortcomings and also to enhance the skills that are required the most by industries.
N Issue
Strongly Agree
Disagree (0)
o.
11 Do you agree that the internal evaluation during your studies was
transparent and fair?
12 Do you agree that the level of your final year project work was up to
your expectations?
Recruiter’s Surve
A survey is also conducted from the recruiters coming for the placements in the institute, with the
various parameters as shown below.
Sr. CO Subject P P P P P P P P P PO PO PO PS PS
No URS Name O O O O O O O O 09 10 11 12 O1 O2
E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 AS- Applied 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. … … … … … … … - -
101 Physics I 9 0 69 70 90
N 3 0
2 AS- Applied 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. … … … … … … … - -
102 Physics II 4 5 31 36 53
N 9 0
3 AS- Applied 1. 1. 1. … 2. … 2. 0. … 1.3 … 1.6 - -
103 Chemistry 5 8 81 08 08 73 4 9
N 8 3
4 AS- Mathematic 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. … … … … … … 0.1 - -
104 s II 1 1 15 34 13 2
N 5 8
5 AS- Mathematic 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. … … … … … … 0.6 - -
105 sI 9 9 94 62 84 1
N 4 4
6 AS- Applied 3. 2. 1. 1. 1. 2. … … … … … … - -
106 Physics Lab 0 2 80 30 80 20
N I 0 0
7 AS- Applied 3. 2. 1. 1. 1. 2. … … … … … … - -
107 Physics Lab 0 2 80 30 80 20
N II 0 0
8 AS- Applied 2. 2. 1. 2. 2. 1. … 1. … … … … - -
109 Chemistry 7 5 50 50 20 00 70
N Lab 0 0
9 BT- Introduction 0. 0. 0. … 0. 1. 0. 0. 0. 0.8 1.4 0.9 - -
101 to 8 7 82 95 00 77 50 55 8 4 2
N Biotechnolo 4 8
gy
10 CSE Introduction 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. … … 0. 0. 0.1 0.4 0.1 - -
- to Computer 3 2 27 16 31 18 13 6 3 9
101 Programmin 1 9
N g
11 CSE Introduction 2. 2. 2. 1. 2. … … 1. 1. 1.5 1.2 1.8 - -
- to Computer 8 7 50 50 80 70 20 0 0 0
103 Programmin 0 0
N g Lab
12 ECE Basics of 0. 0. 0. 0. … … … … … … 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3
- Electronics 8 8 85 61 7 7 7 7
101 Engineering 5 5
N
13 ECE Basics of 2. 2. 2. 1. 2. … … … 1. … … 1.3 2.5 1.2
- Electronics 7 0 25 50 00 00 3 5
103 Engineering 5 0
N Lab
14 EE- Electrical 0. 0. 0. 0. … 0. 0. … 0. 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.3
101 Technology 6 5 47 55 48 49 40 1 9 9 5 9
N Fundamenta 5 7
l
15 EE- Electrical 3. 2. 1. 1. … 1. 1. 1. 2. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.8 -
103 Technology 0 0 33 66 00 00 00 00 0 0 0
N Fundamenta 0 0
l Lab
Item (Information to be
provided cumulatively for 2020-
2019-20 2018-19 2017-18 2016-17 2015-16 2014-18
all the shifts with explicit 21
headings, wherever CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3 CAYm4 CAYm5 CAYm6
(CAY)
applicable)
Table 4.2
Year of Entry Total No of
Number of students who have
admitted in successfully graduated without
the program backlogs in any semester/year of study
(Without Backlog means no compartment or
(N1+N2+N3)
failures in any semester/year of study)
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
2020-21 (CAY) 35
2019-20 (CAYm1) 23 10
2018-19 (CAYm2) 35 9 8
2017-18 (CAYm3) 31 6 8 8
2016-17 (LYG) 24 5 8 6 6
2015-16 (LYGm1) 36 6 6 6 6
2014-15 (LYGm2) 35 8 6 6 6
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program without backlog)/(Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and actually admitted in 2nd year via lateral
entry and separate division, if applicable)
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course
duration)/(Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and actually admitted in
2nd year via lateral entry and separate division, if applicable)
Note: If 100% students clear without any backlog then also total marks scored will be 40 as
both 4.2.1 & 4.2.2 will be applicable simultaneously.
Information of Faculty
Faculty List (Session 2020-2021)
(Regular/Contract/ Adjunct)
Date on which Designated as
Nature of Association
Currently Associated
Date of Leaving
Date of Joining
Qualification
Designation
PAN No.
“ No” )
S. No.
Name
(Y/N)
1 Dr. Manoj AECPA6149L Ph.D. Informati Professor 10-02-2020 Y Regular
Arora on
Security
2 Monika ARDPM5552D Ph.D. Optical Associate 02-08-2018 09-08- Y Regular
Gambhir Commun Professor 2019
ication
3 Swati Gupta AIDPG4373M M.E. Wireless Assist. 16-02-2012 Y Regular
Sensor Prof.
Networks
4 Rajesh ASDPK1059J M.Tech Assist. 11-02-2010 Y Regular
Kumar WSN Prof.
5 Vishal Jain AJQPJ8385C M.Tech Optical Assist. 01-03-2013 Y Regular
Commun Prof.
ication
6 Arun Rana BBQPK0868N M.Tech Assist. 18-01-2016 Y Regular
WSN Prof.
7 Sachin AQZPD1458J M.Tech. Image Assist. 16-07-2012 Y Regular
Dhawan Processin Prof.
g
8 Vikas Goyal AKAPV3659G M.Tech Assist. 04-08-2012 Y Regular
WSN Prof.
9 Rajeev DBHPK1705D M.Tech Soft Assist. 31-01-2017 Y Regular
Kumar Computi Prof.
ng
10 Sapna Arora AMAPA6288J M.Tech Antenna Assist. 25-07-2016 Y Regular
design Prof.
11 Rajeev AQVPR7929Q M.Tech Optical Assist. 06-08-2014 Y Regular
Commun Prof.
ication
12 Pankaj Batra BQNPP1306E M.Tech Signal Assist. 29-07-2013 Y Regular
Processin Prof.
g
13 Yeeshu ASMPR3174P M.Tech Image Assist. 01-07-2013 Y Regular
Processin Prof.
g
14 Sudhir AKKPM1890N M.Tech Nano Assist. 14-01-2016 Y Regular
Mahajan Technolo Prof.
gy
15 Sandeep BSEPK9570N M.Tech Image Assist. 24-01-2017 Y Regular
Kumar Processin Prof.
g
16 Pankaj CNZPP3168G M.Tech Image Assist. 04-10-2017 Y Regular
Processin Prof.
g
17 Kanhaiya AOPPT6781C M.Tech Image Assist. 13-01-2017 N Regular 31-03-
Tripathi Processin Prof. 2022
g
Nature of Association
Currently Associated
Date of Leaving
Date of Joining
Qualification
Designation
is “ No” )
PAN No.
S. No.
Name
(Y/N)
1 Monika ARDPM5552D Ph.D. Optical Associ 02-08-2018 09-08-2019 Y Regular
Gambhir Comm ate
unicati Profess
on or
2 Swati AIDPG4373M M.E. Wirele Assist. 16-02-2012 Y Regular
Gupta ss Prof.
Sensor
Networ
ks
3 Dr. AIAPA6915E Ph.D. Associ 31-01-2017 09-08-2019 N Regular
Ruchira Image ate
Aneja Proces Profess 13-10-2020
sing or
4 Rajesh ASDPK1059J M.Tech Assist. 11-02-2010 Y Regular
Kumar WSN Prof.
5 Vishal Jain AJQPJ8385C M.Tech Optical Assist. 01-03-2013 Y Regular
Comm Prof.
unicati
on
6 Arun Rana BBQPK0868N M.Tech Assist. 18-01-2016 Y Regular
WSN Prof.
7 Sachin AQZPD1458J M.Tech. Image Assist. 16-07-2012 Y Regular
Dhawan Proces Prof.
sing
8 Vikas AKAPV3659G M.Tech Assist. 04-08-2012 Y Regular
Goyal WSN Prof.
9 Rajeev DBHPK1705D M.Tech Soft Assist. 31-01-2017 Y Regular
Kumar Compu Prof.
ting
10 Sapna AMAPA6288J M.Tech Antenn Assist. 25-07-2016 Y Regular
Arora a Prof.
design
11 Rajeev AQVPR7929Q M.Tech Optical Assist. 06-08-2014 Y Regular
Comm Prof.
unicati
on
12 Pankaj BQNPP1306E M.Tech Signal Assist. 29-07-2013 Y Regular
Batra Proces Prof.
sing
13 Yeeshu ASMPR3174P M.Tech Image Assist. 01-07-2013 Y Regular
Proces Prof.
sing
14 Sudhir AKKPM1890N M.Tech Nano Assist. 14.1.2016 Y Regular
Mahajan Techno Prof.
logy
15 Sandeep BSEPK9570N M.Tech Image Assist. 24-01-2017 Y Regular
Kumar Proces Prof.
sing
16 Pankaj CNZPP3168G M.Tech Image Assist. 04-10-2017 Y Regular
Proces Prof.
sing
17 Kanhaiya AOPPT6781C M.Tech Image Assist. 13-01-2017 N Regular 31-03-2022
Tripathi Proces Prof.
sing
18 Shikha DYZPS8209D M.Tech ML Assist. 04-03-2013 N Regular 20-01-2021
Prof.
(Regular/Contract/ Adjunct)
Date on which Designated as
Areea of Specialisation
Nature of Association
Currently Associated
Date of Leaving
Date of Joining
Qualification
Designation
Part time
PAN No.
“ No” )
S. No.
Name
(Y/N)
1 Monika ARDPM5552 Ph.D. Assist. Optical 02-08-2018 Y Regular
Gambhir D Professor Communic
ation
2 AIDPG4373 M.E. Wireless 16-02-2012 Y Regular
M Assist. Sensor
Swati Gupta Prof. Networks
3 Dr. Ruchira AIAPA6915E Ph.D. Assist. Image 31-01-2017 N Regular 13-10-2020
Aneja Professor Processing
4 Rajesh ASDPK1059J M.Tech Assist. 11-02-2010 Y Regular
Kumar Prof. WSN
5 Vishal Jain AJQPJ8385C M.Tech Assist. Optical 01-03-2013 Y Regular
Prof. Communic
ation
6 Arun Rana BBQPK0868 M.Tech Assist. 18-01-2016 Y Regular
N Prof. WSN
7 Sachin AQZPD1458J M.Tech. Assist. Image 16-07-2012 Y Regular
Dhawan Prof. Processing
8 Vinay ATAPD0388 M.Tech Assist. 01-07-2013 N Regular 11-01-2020
Dawar D Prof. Image
Processing
9 AKAPV3659 M.Tech Assist. 04-08-2012 Y Regular
Vikas Goyal G Prof. WSN
10 Rajeev DBHPK1705 M.Tech Assist. Soft 31-01-2017 Y Regular
Kumar D Prof. Computing
11 AMAPA6288 M.Tech Assist. Antenna 25-07-2016 Y Regular
Sapna Arora J Prof. design
12 Rajeev AQVPR7929 M.Tech Assist. Optical 06-08-2014 Y Regular
Q Prof. Communic
ation
13 Pankaj Batra BQNPP1306 M.Tech Assist. Signal 29-07-2013 Y Regular
E Prof. Processing
14 Yeeshu ASMPR3174 M.Tech Assist. Image 01-07-2013 Y Regular
P Prof. Processing
15 Sudhir AKKPM1890 M.Tech Assist. Nano 14.1.2016 Y Regular
Mahajan N Prof. Technology
16 Sandeep BSEPK9570 M.Tech Assist. Image 24-01-2017 Y Regular
Kumar N Prof. Processing
17 Pankaj CNZPP3168 M.Tech Assist. Image 04-10-2017 Y Regular
G Prof. Processing
18 Kanhaiya AOPPT6781 M.Tech Assist. Image 13-01-2017 N Regular 31-03-2022
Tripathi C Prof. Processing
19 Shikha DYZPS8209 M.Tech Assist. ML 04-03-2013 N Regular 20-01-2021
D Prof.
Faculty Detail
Academic Session Total Faculty in ECE Total Faculty
excluding 1st Year
2020-21 17 14
2019-20 18 15
2018-19 19 16
Total Marks=20
Institute Marks=20
Note*
Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR
between 15:1 to 25:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 25:1. Marks distribution is given as
below:
< = 15 - 20 Marks
< = 17 - 18 Marks
< = 19 - 16 Marks
< = 21 - 14 Marks
< = 23 - 12 Marks
< = 25 - 10 Marks
> 25 - 0 Marks
Total Marks=25
Institute Marks=20.14
Note*
X is no. of faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of faculty with M.Tech, F is no. of faculty required to comply 1:20
Faculty Student ratio
Average= 89.47
Assessment Marks= 20
Note*
A. ≥ 90% of required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2
as base year (25)
B. ≥ 75% of required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2
as base year (20)
C. ≥ 60% of required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2
as base year (15)
D. ≥ 50% of required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2
as base year (10)
E. Otherwise (0)
The instructional material of Innovation by the Faculty in teaching and learning is available in the
following URL:https://www.piet.co.in/admissions/why-piet/
Objective:
In order to help students develop understanding about the different orientations of the silicon wafer that
helps engineers to choose a surface for IC fabrication, a 3D model of the single crystal structure of
Silicon wafer has been prepared.
This has been achieved using Houdini software available free of cost on
https://www.creators3d.com/online-viewer . The software is a 3D procedural software for modeling,
rigging & animation.
Snapshots:
Objective:
In order to help students develop understanding about 8086 assembly language programming the
programmes were simulated.
This has been achieved using on emulator 8086 software trial version available free of cost Download
EMU8086 - MICROPROCESSOR EMULATOR - latest version (softonic.com). The software is an
emulator that can debug and run 8086 assembly language programming.
Snapshots:
During lockdown Experiments were conducted on virtual lab and students were asked to perform various
project based on Arduino and raspberry pi. Students shared their screen and demonstrated the project after
performing on their individual pcs or mobiles.
Circuito.io
Demonstration of Project
During lockdown Experiments were conducted on virtual lab and students were asked to perform various
cases of a particular experiment. Students shared their screen and demonstrated the experiment after
performing on their individual pcs or mobiles.
2. Ramandeep Kaur
Registration No.41800487
Registration Year: 2018
Research Topic: Nature inspired Computing Based new ANN and Fuzzy Model Identification
Approaches
Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab
3. Ashina Kalra
Enrollment no. 1405003
Research Topic: Soft computing base system (ANN) model identification
Punjab technical university, Kapurthla, Punjab
Dustbins (or Garbage bins, Trash Cans, whatever you call them) are small plastic (or metal) containers
that are used to store trash (or waste) on a temporary basis. They are often used in homes, offices, streets,
(ix) A LIGHT FIDELITY (LI-FI) BASED SINGLE LASER STEREO AUDIO TRANSMISSION
SYSTEM USING FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (FDM)
Application No: 202111017943; Inventor- Dr. Shakti Kumar, Rajeev Dhanda
(x) A LIGHT FIDELITY (LI-FI) BASED SINGLE LASER STEREO AUDIO AND VIDEO
TRANSMISSION SYSTEM USING FREQUENCY DIVISION MULTIPLEXING (FDM)
Application No: 202111018503; Inventors- Dr. Shakti Kumar, Rajeev Dhanda
The present invention discloses a light fidelity (Li-Fi) based a single laser, stereo audio and video
transmission system by using the Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM). The system includes, but is
not limited to, a first housing with a Li-Fi transmission unit communicatively coupled with at least one
stereo sound and video input system, transmitting stereo audio and video signals by a single light source
through the Li-Fi transmission unit. The stereo / multiple audio and video signals transmission is
performed after modulating, band pass filtering and combining all audio and video signals from audio and
video receiving channels on a single channel by using a Frequency Division Multiplexing (FDM) circuit.
Further, a second housing communicatively coupled with one or more Li-Fi based stereo / multiple sound
channel output (headset) systems and at least one Li-Fi based video output system by using band pass
filters, demodulating system and having an in-built Light fidelity (Li-Fi) receiver unit.
Department has developed the instructional material for IoT lab, Li-Fi lab, Robotics lab & Idea lab. All of
these labs help the student to create new solutions and innovations in multidisciplinary domains. Various
other lab manuals are also developed by the faculty of ECE department. These include the lab subjects
Electronic Devices, Analog Circuit, Communication, Microprocessor & Microcontroller, Electromagnetic
The learning and instructional material provided by the faculty members of ECE department for even
semesters is available in the following URL:
ftp://103.206.51.21/ELECTRONICS%20AND%20COMMUNICATION/
Healthcare Model
(iii) Working Model of Smart Home- Home automation refers to the ability of your home to make its
own decisions depending on environment conditions and give you the option to control it from a
remote location. on the ESP8266 WiFi Module, we examined how NodeMCU or any of the other
ESP8266 based boards can be used to build a web server through which all the GPIOs of the board
can be controlled over WiFi. web server in use and control home appliances with it.
(iv) Working Model of Smart Dustbin- In this model, we designed a smart dustbin that operates
automatically to help solve this issue using IOT and sensor based circuitry. Usual dustbins require
to be opened by pressing foot against its lever and then throwing garbage. Also a person needs to
keep track when it is full so that it can be emptied and does not overflow. Here we propose a smart
dustbin that does all this by itself. Our system consists of a sensor in order to detect human clap
signal and on a clap of foot tap it opens automatically without anyone needing to press its lever.
The dustbin opens automatically when it receives the signal and closes its hatch. Also the dustbin
consists of a level sensing ultrasonic sensor that constantly measures the level of garbage in the
bin and automatically detects if it is about to fill up.
Smart Dustbin
(v) Working Model of Li-Fi- In this model, we discloses a system for projector connectivity through
Light Fidelity Li-Fi. The system comprises a signal conditioning and separation unit is resided at a
transmitter unit Tx; a light source for transmitting modulated data to a receiver unit Rx; a photo
sensor unit to receive the transmitted modulated data from the transmitter unit Tx; a projector
interface to present final data output on a projector screen via a transconductance amplifier.
Further, the projector interface is configured to connect with the photo sensor unit to receive the
transmitted modulated data and further processing through the transconductance amplifier and
other power amplifiers.
As per AICTE it is advised for the institutions to adopt 360-degree feedback for the faculty.
The PIET has included the same in the annual appraisal policy for faculty. |This 360 degrees
will contribute 60 % in the annual appraisal. To promote the research in the institute, the API
score of every faculty will be calculated and maximum 20 % will be awarded to the faculty.
Rest 20 % will be awarded by the Director and HoD of concerned department by taking into
account the initiative specially benefitting the Institute.
Please refer Annexure I for 360-Degree form and Annexure II for API calculations
Director
0
CALCULATION OF 360 FEEDBACK SCORE
The 360 degree feedback score is proposed to be based on the following criteria:
Maximum point
a. Teaching Process 25
b. Students’ Feedback 25
c. Departmental Activities 20
d. Institute Activity 10
e. Annual Confidential Report(ACR) (Format in Annexure –I) 10
f. Contribution to Society 10
Total 100
General Information
Name: Department:
Designation: Academic Year:
Appointment (Regular/Contractual):
Enclosure No
Classes Classes Points (Attendance
S.No Semester Course Code/Name Scheduled(S) held(H) (H/ S)*25 records
TOTAL
Total
(Maximum 20)
S. Credit Enclosure
No Semester Activity Point Criteria No.
TOTAL
Enclosure
S. No. Semester Activity Credit Point Details No.
Name: Department:
Designation: Academic Year:
Assistant Professor
0-20 As per the formula
20-30 17
30-40 18
40-50 19
>50 20
16/20*API (Applicable only for less than 20. Rest as per grading given above)
Associate Professor
0-40 As per the formula
40-50 17
50-60 18
60-70 19
>70 20
16/40*API (Applicable only for less than 40. Rest as per grading given above)
Professor
0-60 As per the formula
60-70 17
70-80 18
80-90 19
>90 20
16/60*API (Applicable only for less than 60. Rest as per grading given above)
Sr. Name of the No of Name of the important Weekly utilization Technical manpower support
No. Laboratory Students equipment status
Name of
per setup Designatio
Technical Qualification
(Batch n
staff
size)
P-N Junction Diode CV
Characteristics kit, Half & Full
Wave Rectifier kit, Clipper &
Clamper Kit, Zener Diode as
Electronic Devices Lab Odd sem.: 10 hours, Mr. Anil Lab
1 2 Voltage Regulator Kit, BJT ITI (ECE)
Even sem.: 6 hours Technician
Characteristic kit, Cathode ray
oscilloscope, Digital storage
oscilloscope, Function generator,
Power supply
PAM-PPM-PWM modulation &
demodulation kits, DSB/SSB
transmitter & receiver trainer kits,
FM Trainer kits, Modulation
Communication transmitter trainer kits, TDM plus Even sem.: 6 hours, ITI (ECE)/
Mr. Anil/
Lab/MWE Lab code modulation receiver, Digital Odd sem.: 6 hours Lab Diploma
2 2 Mr. Sanjeev
storage oscilloscope, Spectrum Technician (ECE)
analyzer, Cathode ray
oscilloscope, Function generator,
Klystron source test bench, Gunn
power supply & oscillator,
Microwave components
Sr.No. Facility Details Reason for creating Utilization Area in which students Relevance to
Name facility are expected to have POs/PSOs
enhanced learning
The laboratory provides facilities
To provide required
such as Computers (CPU i7 PO1, PO2,
research resources in Throughout Internet communication,
processor, 8GB RAM, 512SSD), PO3, PO5,
the domain of IoT and the semester sensor networks,
1 IoT Lab Raspberry Pi, Node MCU, Wi-Fi PO9, PO11,
to support related (By students Networking and image
module, bluetooth module, Arduino PO12, PSO1,
innovations & & Faculty) processing
based kits, IR sensor, ultrasonic PSO2
Academic Projects
sensor, relay module etc.
Typical facilities for demonstration
of Li-Fi based data communication
are made available in this To familiarize the Throughout
Wireless data PO1, PO2,
laboratory. They include power students with concepts the semester
2 Li-Fi Lab communication via light PO7, PO12,
supplies, color LASER pointers, of Li-Fi, Facility for (By students
rays PSO1, PSO2
LEDs, two TV monitors, Fos-LED Research work & Faculty)
search light, photodiodes, Arduino
Due etc.
To expose the students
The facility provides drone Throughout
with the general
Robotics accessories, drives, motor the semester Robotics, Sensor PO1, PO5,
3 functioning and
Lab controllers, Arduino, chassis, (By technologies and control PO9, PSO1
development of various
sensors, hex robot, humanoid etc. students)
field robot
The laboratory houses PCB Milling PCB Designing &
& Prototype machine, CNC router, Fabrication, Computer
To provide a platform Throughout PO1, PO3,
3D scanner, 3D printer, Laser cutter, aided design, 3D
for the students to the semester PO5, PO9,
4 IDEA Lab Laser printer, ANT PC PHEIDOLE Printing, Image
convert their ideas in to (By students PO10, PSO1,
XE4216 (32GB Ram, 2TB SSD, Processing, Machine
real solutions. & Faculty) PSO2
NVIDIA 48 GB GPU), Raspberry Learning, Deep
Pi, Arduino Uno etc. Learning
TUL To exploit the benefits Throughout PO1, PO3,
PYNQ-Z2 board featuring the
PYNQTM- of programmable logic the semester VLSI Design, PO4, PO5,
5 ZYNQ Systems on Chips (SoCs),
Z2 FPGA and microprocessors in (By students Embedded System PO11, PSO1,
Xilinx Vivado Design Suite
Boards Zynq & Faculty) PSO2
PIET SAR NBA,2022 189
6.3 Laboratories Maintenance& Overall Ambiance
Maintenance:
The department maintains its various laboratories housing the state of art instruments to assure their
availability and satisfy the curriculum requirements. A group of two students are allotted for an
experimental setup in hardware labs and one system is allotted for each student in computer related labs.
Computer lab is supported by uninterrupted power supply that ensures effective utilization and backup
generator supply is also available for other labs. Salient features regarding maintenance and availability
of laboratory facilities are as follows:
• The stock keeping of the laboratory assets are maintained by the lab technicians/assistants.
• The head of department arranges lab stock audits on annual basis.
• The lab technicians observe the usage of all their lab equipments and identify a faulty device.
• The minor repairs are performed by the group of lab technicians/assistants and major flaws are
brought to the notice of laboratory faculty incharge. Major repairs are outsourced.
• The lab technicians/assistants prepare the lab arrangements prior to the conduct of a lab class and
assure that functional equipments are provided for conduct of the lab class.
Overall Ambiance
• Department has sufficient number of clean, spacious, ventilated, illuminated & well maintained
laboratories with proper infrastructure.
• All laboratories are well equipped.
• Necessary storage and furniture for students is provided in each laboratory based on the
requirements.
• List of experiments with related course outcomes, time table and safety guidelines are displayed
in every lab.
• Vision, missions, POs, PEOs & PSOs are also displayed in each lab.
Department has a dedicated Project lab which is equipped with all the relevant equipments. Project lab
remains open during the regular institute hours. On request from students it is made available beyond the
regular institute timings including holidays. Students are encouraged to do project work in domain wise
with the support of the facilities available in the laboratories.
Dark Room (PCB art work film maker, Dye tank, Utilized by students for making
2 PCB curing machine, UV exposure unit, minor & major projects
Development tank, Photo resist dip coating machine)
Software Lab (CPU-i3 Processor, 4GB RAM, Utilized by students for making
500GB HARD DISK, MATLAB SOFTWARE, minor & major projects
3
ARDUINO SOFTWARE, ANACONDA
NAVIGATOR, KEIL SOFTWARE)
IoT Lab (CPU i7 processor, 8GB RAM, 512SSD, Utilized by students for making
Raspberry Pi, Node MCU, Wi-Fi module, bluetooth minor & major projects
5
module, Arduino based kits, IR sensor, ultrasonic
sensor, relay module etc.)
7.1 Action taken based on the results of the evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20)
PO6: The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
assess societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities
relevant to the professional engineering practice.
PO6 0.93 0.91 Target not met.
Action 1: Student participation in the Swachh Bharat drives, blood donation camps, NSS &
Rotract social activities.
Action 2: Students are encouraged to take up the project problem statement that serves the
societal issues.
PO7: Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional
engineering solutions in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the
knowledge of, and need for sustainable development.
PO7 0.90 0.95 Target met.
Action : Not required
PO8: Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities
and norms of the engineering practice.
PO8 1.07 1.05 Target not met.
Action 1: Industrial visit to integrated circuits fabrication lab to demonstrate the norms
and practice in clean room.
Action 2: Students participate in co-curricular activities, games promoting commitment to
ethical principles.
PO9: Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or
leader in diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
PO9 1.11 1.08 Target not met.
Action 1: Student coordination of technical and cultural activities to groom the effective
leadership and team member skills.
Action 2: Conducting technical discussion in class room by forming teams on technical
competency.
Action 3: Students team participation in national level innovation challenges under the
mentoring of faculties.
PO10: Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with
the engineering community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and
write effective reports and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and
receive clear instructions.
The academic audit committee is constituted by the director of the institute. The members of
the academic audit committee are the deans, the heads of other departments or the senior
professors. Audit process set by IQAC is designed to observe the focal area in the academic
process and the improvements over a period of time. It has the advantage of placing
transparency in activates and self-reflection to improve.
The focal areas of academic audit contain a few criteria and each criterion is rated as anyone
from - Not applicable/ Not Evident/ Emerging/ Established/ Highly Developed.
The list of focal area on which audit is conducted are summarized as follows:
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Curriculum and Co-curriculum
3. Teaching and Learning
4. Student Learning Assessment
5. Student Support
The process of the academic audit includes evaluation on the focal area through the
documents. Committee also visits to department library, laboratories and other facility for the
students.
1. Course File
2. Time Table
3. Lab equipment details
4. Students Projects
5. Result Analysis
6. Details of departmental activities.
The performance of the department on above parameter is evaluated by the members of the
audit committee and recommendations are given to the department for overall improvement
and to facilitate all stakeholders.
A sample of departmental academic audit for the year 2018-19 is available as under:
1 2017-18 12 0 0 12 35 34%
2 2018-19 14 0 0 14 36 39%
3 2019-20 17 1 0 18 24 75%
4 2020-21 18 1 0 19 29 66%
Table 7.3.1 Improvement in placements, higher studies and entrepreneur in last four years.
In the Table 7.3.1 total students appearing/ students placed in the final year are included. Since all
the students appear in the placement process.
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
%Age
30%
20%
10%
0%
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21
6
4 3
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
1 0 1
75% 0 6(CGPA
75% 0 6(CGPA)
8.4.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which
the evaluation of Course Outcomes of first year is done (5)
Evaluation Process: The delivery of course outcomes is done with the help of lectures,
quizzes, tutorials, lab lectures, oral exams, assignments, and presentations. The measurements
of the desired outcomes are based on the overall performance of the students in the University
exam that are conducted semester wise twice a year and internal evaluation which includes
sessionals that are conducted to evaluate their internal assessment thrice a semester.
Criterion of assessment:
1. THEORY
1.1 Internal Theory: As per University norms, the internal evaluation is based on:
a) Sessionals b) Assignments
1.2 External Theory (University Exam) : The evaluation is based on the examination conducted
by Kurukshetra University at the end of every semester. It carries the weightage of 75 marks in
every subject.
2. PRACTICAL
2.1 Internal Practical : It is conducted by the respective internal subject teacher. The weightage
given to internal practical is of 20 marks in each practical subject. The breakup of 20 marks is as
follows:
Lab record and experiment: 4 marks and 8 marks respectively (where lab experiment includes
written practical, performance and file).
8.4.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses
(5): Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university
examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to
be measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of
a subject plus the performance in the University examination)
Course Titles: Following are the course titles along with course code of year 2018-2021 used
in POs
COURSE
COURSE NAME ATTAINMENT
CODE
BS-101A CHEMISTRY 2.58
HM-101A ENGLISH 3.00
BS-141A BIOLOGY 2.93
BS-115 A SEMICONDUCTOR PHYSICS 3.00
BS-134A PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS 3.00
BS-133A CALCULUS AND LINEAR ALGEBRA 2.50
HM-103LA LANGUAGE LAB 3.00
BS-117LA SEMICONDUCTOR PHYSICS LAB 3.00
BS-103L A CHEMISTRY LAB 3.00
ES-109A ENGINEERING GRAPHICS & DESIGN 2.93
ES-113LA ENGINEERING GRAPHICS & DESIGN LAB 3.00
ES-111LA MANUFACTURING PROCESS & WORKSHOP 3.00
ES-105 PROGRAMMING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING 2.41
ES-107L PROGRAMMING FOR PROBLEM SOLVING LAB 3.00
ES-101A BASIC ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 2.68
ES-103LA BASIC ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING LAB 3.00
Attainment Level 1: 60% students scoring 50% & more marks out of the relevant maximum marks.
Attainment Level 2: 70% students scoring 50% & more marks out of the relevant maximum marks.
Attainment Level 3: 80% students scoring 50% & more marks out of the relevant maximum marks.
1. Arrange the following molecules in the order of increasing bond order/ stability
N2+, N2, N2-. N22- [CO1]
2. Write electronic configuration for O2 to Ne2 and Li2 to N2 respectively. [CO 1]
3. Why bond order of O2+ is more than O2 molecule whereas bond order of N2+
is less than N2 molecule. Explain on the basis of MOT [CO 1]
4. How do splitting of d orbitals in an octahedral field and tetrahedral field differs? [CO 1]
5. How does a magnetic property depend upon crystal field splitting? [CO 1]
6. What is Huckel Rule ? [CO 1]
7. How will you justify the extra stability of 1,3 butadiene [CO 1]
Q.
Questions Marks CO BL PO
No.
Explain the following with example.i) Enantiomerism,
1(a) 6 5 2 3,6,10
ii) diastereoisomerism
Write the postulates of crystal field theory and aslo explain the
2(b) 6 1 2,4 3,10
strong field and weak field ligands in case of octahedral
complexes with example
3(a) Discuss the molecular geometry of PCl5, SF6 and CCl4 9 4 2,4 6,9
Dicuss the concept of Hard Acids and Bases citing appropriate
3(b) 5 4 2,3.4 6,9
examples
SESSIONAL
Sr.No Roll Name CO1 CO1 CO4
MARKS
1 2820411 CHAKSHU 18 - 9 9
2 2820412 AMAN YADAV 11 - 3 8
3 2820413 PRIYANKA DASH 16 - 8 8
4 2820414 YASH 10 4 6 -
5 2820415 MOHIT GANDHI 16 - 10 6
6 2820416 SHUBHAM GOYAL 14 5 9 -
7 2820417 MANOGYA SHARMA 18 - 12 6
8 2820419 NEHA GARG 21 11 - 13
Final attainment level of the course = ((W1 * A1) +(W2 * A2))/ 100
= (75 *3 + 25*1.33)/100 = (258.25)/100 = 2.58
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
2018-19
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
BS101A 0.92 0.50 … 0.77 … … … … … … … …
BS103LA 2.50 … … 2.00 … … … … … … … …
BS115A 1.75 1.24 0.95 0.85 … … … … … … … …
BS117LA 3.00 2.50 … 2.00 … … … … … … … …
BS119A 1.78 0.70 1.15 1.00 … … … … … … … …
BS121LA 3.00 2.50 … 2.00 … … … … … … … …
BS133A 1.40 0.50 0.54 0.42 … … … … … … … …
BS134A 1.75 0.83 0.65 0.75 … … … … … … … …
BS135A 1.28 1.00 0.50 … … … … … … … … …
BS136A 1.10 1.16 0.45 0.35 … … … … … … … …
BS141A 0.78 1.11 0.65 1.00 … 0.60 0.55 … … … … …
ES101A 1.75 1.40 … … … … … … … … … …
ES103LA 3.00 3.00 … … … … … … 1.00 … … …
ES105A 1.17 1.14 1.42 1.20 … … … … … … … …
ES107LA 2.00 2.50 3.00 .. … … … .. .. .. … …
ES109A 1.85 1.24 1.30 … … … … … … … … …
ES111LA 3.00 2.50 2.00 3.00 2.00 … … - … … … …
ES113LA 3.00 2.50 3.00 2.00 3.00 … … … … … … …
HM101A … … … … … … … 2.20 2.30 2.30 … 2.50
HM-
… … … … … … … 1.83 2.50 2.67 … 2.50
103LA
Average: 1.95 1.55 1.30 1.33 2.50 0.60 0.55 2.02 1.93 2.49 … 2.50
* Direct attainment level of a PO is determined by taking average across all courses addressing that
PO.
Target Attainment
POs Observations
Level Level
PO-1 Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals, and an
engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
No action required
PO-2 Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems
reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences,
and engineering sciences.
No action required
PO-3 Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design system components or
processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the public health
and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
No action required
PO-4 Use research based knowledge and research methods including design of experiments,
analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the information to provide valid
conclusions.
No action required
PO-5 Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern engineering and IT
tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
No action required
No action required
PO-7 Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions in societal and
environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development.
No action required
PO-8 Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of
the engineering practice.
No action required
PO-9 Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in
multidisciplinary settings.
No action required
PO-10 Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering community
and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and write effective reports and
design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
No action required
PO-11 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering and management principles
and apply these to one’s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects
and in multidisciplinary environments.
PO11
No action required
PO-12 Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in independent and
No action required