Professional Documents
Culture Documents
View Journal
NJC
New Journal of Chemistry A journal for new directions in chemistry
Accepted Manuscript
This article can be cited before page numbers have been issued, to do this please use: R. Pino Rios, New
J. Chem., 2023, DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J.
Volume 42
Number 6
21 March 2018
This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the
Pages 3963-4776
Royal Society of Chemistry peer review process and has been
accepted for publication.
NJC
New Journal of Chemistry A journal for new directions in chemistry Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance,
rsc.li/njc
before technical editing, formatting and proof reading. Using this free
service, authors can make their results available to the community, in
citable form, before we publish the edited article. We will replace this
Accepted Manuscript with the edited and formatted Advance Article as
soon as it is available.
Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the
text and/or graphics, which may alter content. The journal’s standard
ISSN 1144-2546 Terms & Conditions and the Ethical guidelines still apply. In no event
PAPER
Chechia Hu, Tzu-Jen Lin et al.
Yellowish and blue luminescent graphene oxide quantum dots
shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors
prepared via a microwave-assisted hydrothermal route using
H2O2 and KMnO4 as oxidizing agents
or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising
from the use of any information it contains.
rsc.li/njc
Page 1 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 Revealing Charge Shift bonds in H3+ and their metallic analogs M3+ (M = Li, Na, K) through
4
5 electron density topology
6
7 Ricardo Pino-Riosa, b
8
1
2
3 INTRODUCTION
4
5
6 The H3+ cluster is the lightest of all atomic clusters. It was detected first by Sir J. J. Thomson
7
8
1911 in his report on experiments regarding positive rays of electricity1. This small cluster is
17
18 Another fascinating feature of this compound is its chemical bonding7, according to previous
19
20 studies, this compound is the simplest example of a molecule with a delocalized bond and
21
22 also possesses aromaticity. The two electrons owned by H3+ indicate the existence of a three-
23
24
25 center-two-electron bond (3c-2e) enabling compliance with Hückel’s 4n+2 rule8, although
26
27 this rule was strictly given for the π electron count. Haven’t et al. have shown the existence
28
29 of a diatropic ring current9, a pattern present in aromatic rings. Negative values of NICS also
30
31
32
support the ring current results.
33
34
35
From the electron density topology view, the picture is very different. Some authors indicate
36
37 that this compound is not even a ring10, 11. Reports of the topology of the electron density of
38
39 H3+ show a maximum in the center of the triangle formed by the hydrogen atoms. This
40
41 maximum is known as a non-nuclear attractor (NNA) in the context of Bader's quantum
42
43
44 theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM).12 Additionally, the absence of bond paths linking
45
46 the hydrogen atoms and those connecting the NNA and hydrogen atoms supports the idea
47
48 that there is no cyclic ring. Although it has been shown on several occasions that a bond path
49
50
51 does not unequivocally express the existence of a chemical bond as traditionally known, it
52
53 does indicate that there are specific attractive interactions or electronic exchanges between
54
55 two electron density maxima.13
56
57
58
59
60
Page 3 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 Some factors may contradict both explanations. First, the charges on H3+ are equally
4
5
6
distributed on the hydrogen atoms since it is an equilateral triangle, so each one should have
7
8 a charge of 0.33. It is plausible that the electrostatic repulsion is greater than the covalent
1
2
3 method allows a decomposition of the interaction energies between the atoms with the
4
5
6
advantage that no arbitrary fragment selection is required. IQA has been recently reviewed
7
8 by Pendás and coworkers showing the ability of this method to explain various chemical
17
18 CCSD(T)15/def2-TZVP16 level using Gaussian 16 software17. Vibrational frequencies
19
20
21 indicate a minimum in the potential energy surface (NImag=0). Topological analysis of the
22
23 electron density and interacting quantum atoms calculations have been performed using
24
25 AIMAll program.18
26
27
28 The gradient, in conjunction with the Laplacian of the electron density, allows us to identify
29
30
31
and characterize critical points (CP) that permit an analysis of the chemical bond pattern
32
33 through its topology. First of all, it is possible to identify density maxima of the (3,-3) which
34
35 are typically located at the atom positions. These points are known as nuclear attractors
36
37
(NACP). However, the maxima can also be found in areas that do not coincide with the
38
39
40 positions of the atoms; these critical points are known as non-nuclear attractors (NNACP).
41
42 Additionally, it is possible to identify first-order saddle points in the electron density. These
43
44 (3,-1) critical points are known as bond critical points (BCP) and provide information about
45
46
47 the interaction between two maxima (either a nuclear or non-nuclear attractor). It is possible
48
49 to determine the binding between two maxima through bond paths, which link BCPs and
50
51 NACPs (or NNACPs) through the maximum electron density. Finally, the second-order
52
53
54
saddle points and minima of the electron density are known as ring (RCP) and cage critical
55
56 points (CCP), which appear in the center when electron density maxima are linked through
57
58
59
60
Page 5 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 the ring- or three-dimensional cage-shaped bond paths. In addition, delocalization and
4
5
6
localization indexes are computed. The first provides information of electrons shared
7
8 between two atoms (or NNAs), and the second indicates the electrons located in a given atom
17
18 obtain coulombic (related to classical electrostatic interactions) and exchange contributions
19
20 (related to quantum and covalent effects). More technical details about QTAIM and IQA can
21
22 be found in the famous Bader book12 and the recent review by Pendás and coworkers14,
23
24
25 respectively.
26
27
28 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
29
30
31
Scheme 1 shows the molecular graph obtained at the CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP level. As
32
33 previously reported. Four maxima (3,-3) of the electron density (red dots) are found, three
34
35 located at the positions of the hydrogen atoms and one at the geometrical center. There are
36
37
also saddle points between the NNA and the hydrogen atoms. These points, known as BCPs
38
39
40 (blue dots) according to QTAIM, indicate interaction between two maxima. Finally, the black
41
42 lines indicate the bond paths detected for H3+.
43
44
45
46
H
47
48
49
50
51 H H
52
53
54 Scheme 1. QTAIM molecular graph of H3+ obtained at the CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP level.
55
56
57
58
59
60
New Journal of Chemistry Page 6 of 14
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 The results shown are similar to others reported previously.11 Additionally, the
4
5
6
delocalization/localization (DI/LI) indexes and charges for H3+ have been computed. Table 1
7
8 shows that the charges on the hydrogen atoms are positive. However, they are higher than
17 Complementarily, the DI values indicate how the electrons are distributed between two atoms
18
19 (or NNA, in this case). It is possible to observe a delocalization of 0.3615 a.u. for H – H
20
21
22 interactions. while for H – NNA, it is 0.1182 a.u.
23
24
25 Table 1. Charges, localization (LI) and delocalization indexes (DI) in a.u. for H3+ computed
26
27 at the CCSD(T)/def2-TZVP level.
28
29
30 Basin Charge LI DI
31 H1 0.3988 0.1810 H1 – H2 0.3615
32
H2 0.3988 0.1810 H1 – H3 0.3615
33
34 H3 0.3988 0.1810 H2 – H3 0.3615
35 NNA -0.1965 0.0193 H1 – NNA 0.1182
36 ------ H2 – NNA 0.1182
37 ------ H3 –NNA 0.1182
38
39
40
41
42
According to the calculated charges, the appropriate bonding pattern is the one observed in
43
44 scheme 2a, while the notoriously higher DI values and lower localization values indicate that
45
46 the best pattern is described by scheme 2b. So, what is the most appropriate description for
47
48
this compound?.
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Page 7 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3
4 a) b)
5
6
7 H H
8
17
18 results of table 1.
19
20
21 To have more detail regarding the contributions in the interactions of two atoms, energy
22
23 decomposition calculations were carried out under the IQA approach. Table 2 shows that the
24
25 interaction energy between hydrogens atoms is completely repulsive (11.93 kcal.mol-1). The
26
27
28 absolute value of the exchange contribution (covalent) is lower than the repulsive (positive)
29
30 coulombic (ionic) contribution. On the other hand, the H – NNA interactions are negative;
31
32 even the ionic and covalent contributions contribute to the total interaction by 60% and 40%,
33
34
35 respectively, showing that the coulombic contributions are notoriously more important.
36
37
38
Table 2. Interacting quantum atoms results (in kcal.mol-1) for H3+ at the CCSD(T)/def2-
39
40 TZVP level. VIQA,Inter, VC,IQA,Inter, VX,IQA,Inter refers to Total, Coulombic (ionic) and Exchange
41
42 (covalent) contributions to the interaction energies respectively.
43
44
45 VIQA,Inter(A,B) VC,IQA,Inter(A,B) VX,IQA,Inter(A,B)
46
47 H1 – H2 11.93 72.90 -60.97
48 H1 – H3 11.93 72.90 -60.97
49 H2 – H3 11.93 72.90 -60.97
50 -71.42 -43.82 -27.59
51
H1 – NNA
52 H2 – NNA -71.41 -43.82 -27.59
53 H3 –NNA -71.41 -43.82 -27.59
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
New Journal of Chemistry Page 8 of 14
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 Results indicate that in order to define the bonding pattern in H3+, electrostatic and covalent
4
5
6
interactions must be considered. This can be described using classical chemical criteria under
7
8 the valence bond approach through resonance structures based on the
17 Covalent
18
19 H H H H H H
20 (+) (+)
21
22
23
24 (+) (+)
25 H H H
26
27 (-) (-)
28
29 H H H (-) H H H
Ionic
30 (+) (+) (+) (+)
31
32
33
34
35
36 Scheme 3. Proposed resonance structures for H3+ according to the presented QTAIM and
37
38 IQA results.
39
40
41 The covalent resonance structures describe the chemical bond between the H – H atoms (DI
42
43 = 0.3612 a. u.) which are delocalized around the triangle formed by the hydrogens according
44
45
46 to the DI values. However, the importance of the covalent H – NNA (DI = 0.1182 a. u.)
47
48 interactions must also be considered, which, although they contribute to a lesser degree, are
49
50 not negligible. The proposed structures also allow us to explain the charges in the atomic
51
52
53
positions (including the NNA).
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
Page 9 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 The delocalization and localization values must be considered for a complete bond analysis
4
5
6
since DI + LI = # of total electrons. Scheme 4 shows fully ionic resonance structures (LIH =
7
8 0.1810; LINNA = 0.0193, in a.u.) with no covalent bonding but multiple ionic interactions.
17 the triangle, which would be due to the localization of at least one electron. It is possible to
18
19 verify this by observing the diatropic current of the hydrogen atom shown in the Figure S1
20
21
22 in the supporting information (SI).
23
24
25 (+) (+)
26
27 H H
28
29
30
31
(-) H H H H (-)
32 (+) (+)
33
34 Fully
35 Ionic
36 (+)
37 (-) H H
38
39 (2-)
40
41 H H H H
42 (+) (+) (+) (+)
43
44
45
46 Scheme 4. Proposed fully ionic resonance structures for H3+ according to the results obtained
47
48
49 by QTAIM and IQA.
50
51
52 When ionic resonance structures have important contributions for the description of chemical
53
54 bonding, we have charge shift bonds20, 21. This type of bond has been widely documented
55
56 and allows us to explain the bonds in different molecules, for example, F2 and XeF222, among
57
58
59
60
New Journal of Chemistry Page 10 of 14
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 others.23 For this case, the contributions of all the resonance structures mentioned can be
4
5
6
quantified using the DI and LI values. The DI and LI values can be divided by two electrons
7
8 and multiplied by 100 to have a percentage value: covalent structures contribute 54% (18%
17 of the electrostatic contributions is 46% which would confirm the charge-shift nature of the
18
19 chemical bond.
20
21
22 The same analysis has been carried out for the metal analogs, obtaining remarkable results.
23
24
25 First, the topology of the M3+ is identical to that of H3+ (See Figures S2 – S5) with an NNA
26
27 in the center of the triangle formed by the atoms bonded through bond paths. Additionally,
28
29 the coulombic and exchange contributions show the same tendency as H3+, indicating that
30
31
32
we are dealing with compounds that could possess charge shift bonds. For this reason, we
33
34 have calculated the contributions using the DI and LI values. However, in the case of heavier
35
36 molecules, only the two valence electrons of each cluster have been used.
37
38
39 In the case of Li3+, the resonance structures that contribute the most are the ionic ones (See
40
41 Table 3). It is very striking that the structure with three Li+ cations surrounding the electron
42
43
44 pair located at the center of the triangle (Fully ionic) is the structure that contributes the most
45
46 (52%). Additionally, the ionic structure, where there are "covalent" bonds between the metal
47
48 and the NNA, is in second place with 42%. As can be seen, the covalent contributions are
49
50
51 meager. These results agree with those presented by Foroutan-Nejad et al., who indicated
52
53 that covalent bonding in Li3+ does not exist. The best way to describe the chemical bonding
54
55 pattern in this structure is through ionic resonance forms. Based on the calculation of ionic
56
57
58
59
60
Page 11 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 contributions, it is feasible to say that Li3+ consists of an electron pair surrounded by Li+
4
5
6
cations and not a ring structure.
7
8
Table 3. Contributions of the different resonance structures computed using delocalization
1
2
3 in H3+ possesses a charge shift nature. Additionally, the description of a charge shift bond
4
5
6
considers all the features presented in the description of the delocalized ring at 3c-2e and the
7
8 one where the NNA holds the hydrogen nuclei together through electrostatic interactions
17
18 to describe the Li3+ bonding pattern is through an electron pair surrounded by Li+ cations.
19
20 While for Na3+ and K3+, the results are very similar to each other. Covalent structures have
21
22 become more relevant, but ionic structures are still the most important, including the fully
23
24
25 ionic structures, which contribute up to 30% in both cases.
26
27
28 Although in the four isovalent systems studied, different descriptions of the bonding pattern
29
30 have been obtained, in all cases, it is concluded that the ionic and fully ionic contributions
31
32 are important (the latter being around 30% for Na3+ and K3+ and 52% for Li3+) leading to the
33
34
35
conclusion that in these compounds possess charge shift bonds. Finally, to the best of the
36
37 author’s knowledge, it is the first time that NNAs have been used for the proposition of
38
39 resonance structures.
40
41
42 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
43
44
45 The author thank the financial support of the National Agency for Research and Development
46
47 (ANID) through FONDECYT projects 1230571.
48
49
50 REFERENCES
51
52
53 1. J. J. Thomson, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of
54
55 Science, 1911, 21, 225-249.
56
57
58
59
60
Page 13 of 14 New Journal of Chemistry
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 2. J.-P. Maillard, P. Drossart, J. K. G. Watson, S. J. Kim and J. Caldwell, The Astrophysical
4
5 Journal, 1990, 363, L37.
6
7 3. T. R. Geballe, M. F. Jagod and T. Oka, The Astrophysical Journal, 1993, 408, L109.
8
17
18 7. L. Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals:
19
20 An Introduction to Modern Structural Chemistry, Cornell University Press, 1960.
21
22 8. E. Hückel, Zeitschrift für Physik, 1931, 70, 204-286.
23
24 9. R. W. A. Havenith, F. De Proft, P. W. Fowler and P. Geerlings, Chemical Physics Letters,
25
26 2005, 407, 391-396.
27
28
10. A. Sadjadi and M. Abdzadeh, Journal of Chemical Research, 2004, 2004, 797-801.
29
30
31 11. C. Foroutan-Nejad and P. Rashidi-Ranjbar, Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM,
32
33 2009, 901, 243-248.
34
35 12. R. F. W. Bader and R. F. Bader, Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory, Clarendon Press,
36
37 1990.
38
39 13. R. F. W. Bader, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2009, 113, 10391-10396.
40
41 14. J. M. Guevara-Vela, E. Francisco, T. Rocha-Rinza and Á. Martín Pendás, Journal, 2020, 25.
42
43 15. R. J. Bartlett and M. Musiał, Reviews of Modern Physics, 2007, 79, 291-352.
44
45 16. F. Weigend and R. Ahlrichs, Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2005, 7, 3297-3305.
46
47
17. G. W. Frisch, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V.
48
49
50
Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. V. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G.
51
52 Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, D. J. M. J. Hratch and Trucks, Gaussian, Inc.,
53
54 Wallingford, CT, 2016.
55
56
57
58
59
60
New Journal of Chemistry Page 14 of 14
View Article Online
DOI: 10.1039/D3NJ03674J
1
2
3 18. T. A. Keith, AIMAll (Version 19.02.13), Overland Park KS, USA, 2019
4
5 (aim.tkgristmill.com).
6
7 19. R. Pino-Rios, D. Inostroza and W. Tiznado, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2021,
8
17
18 22. B. Braïda and P. C. Hiberty, Nature Chemistry, 2013, 5, 417-422.
19
20 23. S. Shaik, D. Danovich, W. Wu and P. C. Hiberty, in The Chemical Bond, 2014, DOI:
21
22 https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527664696.ch5, pp. 159-198.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60