https://simplysociology.com/what-is-social-control.

html
https://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/sociology/social-control-the-meaning-need-types-and-other-
details/8533

https://helpfulprofessor.com/formal-social-control/
https://helpfulprofessor.com/informal-social-control/
Introduction

Every society has devised various mechanisms to exercise control. Social control mechanisms are viewed
by sociologists as all those social arrangements that

1. Prevent such strains as may develop from the individual’s place in the social structure and
2. Prevent the strains from leading to deviance.

Every society has certain means to exercise social control, and there are clear consequences of exercising
social control for promoting stability and conformity in societies.

Types of Mechanisms

1-Preventive mechanisms: These mechanisms are designed to prevent such situations from developing,
that might lead to deviance Socialization, social pressures, establishment of role priorities, force are some
of the mechanisms through which conformity is promoted or the occurrence of deviance is prevented.

2-Mechanisms to manage tensions-: Institutionalized safety valves like humor, games and sports,
leisure, religious rituals are regarded as outlets for the tensions generated by social restraints, and cultural
inconsistencies within a society.

3-Mechanisms to check or change deviant behavior: Sanctions are used by every society to bring about
conformity and check or change deviant behavior. Sanctions have been classified into:

A-Psychological Sanctions-Negative sanctions are reproof, ridicule no acceptance, ostracism

etc. Positive sanctions include acceptance in the group, praise, invitation to inner circle events,
verbal, or physical pat on the back gifts etc.

B-Physical sanctions- These are mostly negative. The most important forms of physical
sanctions are expulsion, physical punishment, and extermination.

c-Economic sanctions- These include positive rewards like promotion of a loyal sincere worker,
grant of tenders to civic minded businessmen etc., or negative sanctions like threat of loss or
reduction in one’s income e.g., threat of discharge by employer may prevent the employee from
continuing his strike), economic boycott etc.

4-Propaganda Mechanisms
Another important mechanism that can bring about change in the desired direction, is propaganda or
moulding public opinion. Propaganda is a deliberate attempt to control the behavior and
interrelationships of members to change the feelings, attitudes, and values. For example, the efforts of the
government to control population growth through family planning propaganda

Anomie ::

The concept of anomie, in sociology, can be defined as a state of normlessness,

disorder, or confusion in a society when the standard norms and values are
weak or unclear. This lack of social or ethical standards can lead to
disconnection, deviance, and social instability among individuals.

French sociologist Emile Durkheim introduced it and later expanded it by

others like Robert K. Merton.
Robert K. Merton expanded the theory to explain why some people engage in
deviant behavior, like crime, suggesting it often arises from a disjunction
between societal goals and the legitimate means to achieve them.

Table of Contents

Anomie According To Émile

Durkheim
The first person to use the term anomie was the French philosopher Jean
Marie Guyau. Guyau argued that in the future, morality would be determined
by no universal laws — what he called anomic morality (Lester & Turpin,
1999).

However, it was not until Emile Durkheim’s book, 1893, The Division of
Labor in Society, that we see anomie in a way similar to how we understand it
today.

Durkheim (1897) believed that there was agreement or consensus over

society’s norms and values in modern societies, which resulted in social order
and stable societies.

Durkheim believed this occurred because society’s institutions (e.g.,

education, religion) successfully implemented social control.

For Durkheim, in periods where the norms and values of society were unclear,
people became confused about how to behave. Social order would be threatened
and people would not feel that their behavior is constrained by norms and values
– a feeling of anomie, or normlessness.
Durkheim considered anomie to be an abnormal form of the division of labor
where there was too little regulation to encourage cooperation between
different social functions.

For example, in the antagonism between capitalists and workers, there is little
contact between the capitalists and workers. Thus, these individuals do not
realize they are working toward a shared goal, and anomie results (Durkheim,
1893; Lester & Turpin, 1999).
Anomic Suicide
A few years later, Emile Durkheim, the 19th-century “father of sociology,”
elaborated his concept of anomie in his 1897 book, Suicide: A Study in
Sociology.

Although suicide is usually viewed as a highly individualistic act, Durkheim

noticed that some countries consistently had higher suicide rates than others.
In particular, he observed that Catholics experienced much lower rates of
suicide than Protestants. He argued that societies with high suicide rates
experienced anomie.

Paying little attention to the high moral foreboding of suicide in Catholicism,

Durkheim defined four types of suicide: egoistic, altruistic, anomic, and
fatalistic.

Notably, Durkheim believed that anomic suicide happened because

Catholicism reflects “strongly integrated social groups” (Durkheim, 1951,
Stark, Doyle & Rushing, 1983), and that Protestants had the power to question
the church, to overthrow the social order created by its beliefs in a way that
Catholics, according to Durkheim, did not.

Because Protestants could question the church, they experienced a higher

degree of normlessness than Catholics. In short, Durkheim argued that
societies with high suicide rates experienced anomie (Stark, Doyle & Rushing,
1983).

Durkheim saw society’s role as regulating its members’ passions and

expectations. As society changes rapidly, norms become unclear, and anomie
results.

With their goals unregulated by society, individuals’ aspirations become

limitless, and deviance results. Individuals stop “aspir[ing] to achieve only
what is realistically possible for them to achieve” (Cloward & Ohlin, 1960, p.
78), and a societal breakdown in norms around achievement leads to deviance
in the form of suicide.

Traditional societies with collective norms have more of a role in influencing

individuals’ behavior than the rapidly evolving western societies of the late
19th century, which placed increasing emphasis on the values of individuals at
the rejection of shared cultural norms (Boudon & Bourricaud, 1989).
Merton’s Strain Theory Of Anomie
And Deviance
Robert K. Merton (1938, 1957) extended the theory of anomie to the United
States and argued that anomie is not simply about unregulated goals, but a
broken relationship between cultural goals and legitimate means of accessing
them.

Mertonian anomie is a strain theory that proposes social structures within a

society may pressure citizens to commit crimes. It arises when there’s a
disjunction between culturally prescribed goals (like wealth and success) and
the socially acceptable means to achieve them.

This disconnect can lead to strain, resulting in different types of deviant

behavior, depending on how individuals adapt to this strain.

For Example

Everyone in the United States, Merton argues, is socialized to believe that

their possibilities, regardless of their circumstances, are limitless and that they
should desire success on a large scale.

However, society restricts or eliminates access to approved modes of acquiring

these symbols for a considerable part of the same population” (Merton, 1938).

The relationship between the cultural goals of the United States and the
means of accessing them is dysfunctional because there exist obstacles for
large amounts of the population to achieve success on a large scale
(Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey, 2016).

Those in the lower classes may share the cultural goal of success but are
limited by lack of education and job opportunities. This mismatch between
goals and the reality of opportunity for the lower classes creates anomie and
deviance.

Five Responses to Strain

 Merton’s strain theory proposes five responses to anomie, of which three are
deviant. These responses either accept or reject cultural goals, and accept or
reject institutionalized means (the legitimate means through which one can
achieve a society’s cultural goals).
1. Conformity, Merton argues, is the only non-deviant response to anomie.
When someone conforms, they accept the cultural goals of society and try to
use the institutionalized means of achieving them (Merton, 1957).

For example, a college student in the United States who is getting an

education in order to achieve economic success is conforming to Merton’s
model because he is pursuing the cultural goal of monetary success through
the legitimate means of education (Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey, 2016).

2. Innovation, in contrast, accepts the cultural goal of a society but rejects the
institutional means of obtaining it. A thief may be pursuing the same
cultural goal of economic success as the college student but is using
illegitimate, illegal means to achieve it (Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey, 2016).

Alternatively, someone can reject the cultural goal of their society. This can
take the form of, in Merton’s model, ritualism or retreatism.

3. Ritualism is shared by those who have abandoned the cultural goals of

their society (e.g. materialism) but continue to use legitimate means to make
their way.

A dedicated janitor who has accepted that they will never advance through
the ranks of their workplace is a ritualist (Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey,
2016).

4. Retreatism, meanwhile, is the adaptation of those who have both rejected

the cultural goals of society (materialism) and the legitimate means of
achieving them.

These people are “in the society but not of it” (Merton, 1957). An individual
can also exist completely outside the system of a society’s goals and means
of achieving them.

5. Rebellion, in Merton’s theory, refers to those who attempt to change a

societal system to their own liking. Rebels replace the dominant cultural
goal — such as wealth attainment — with another goal and create their own
means of doing so.
 For example, a terrorist group could use violence to achieve a political goal
(Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey, 2016).

Development of Merton’s Theory

Richard Cloward, a student of Merton, extended Merton’s theory of anomie

further by adding the dimension of illegitimate means. Just as not everyone
has access to legitimate means, not everyone has access to illegitimate means
(Cloward, 1959).

For some people, becoming wealthy through being a successful drug dealer is
just as unrealistic — or more so — than becoming wealthy through a successful
businessman.

Those who wish to obtain success through illegitimate means do not

necessarily have the skills and connections to do so (Inderbitzen, Bates, &
Gainey, 2016).

To understand deviance, Cloward and Ohlin argued, we need to not only

understand the motivations of individuals to commit deviant acts but the
accessibility they have to participate in them (Cloward & Ohlin, 1960).

Anomie Theory Criminology

Sociologists see anomie as a primary driver of crime (Bernburg, 2002), and
this has been so for several decades. Merton’s strain theory of adaptation to
anomie and illegitimate means dominated sociological research in crime
during the 1950s and 60s, but many sociologists criticized this theory (Hirschi,
1969).

In short, it is difficult, if not impossible, to measure how whole societies focus

on goals and means (Kubrin, Stucky, & Krohn 2009).

Messner and Rosenfeld (2007) outline four main critiques of Merton’s anomie
theory:
1. It may be wrong to assume that all Americans, for example, share the same
cultural goals. For many, other goals may be just as or more important than
wealth acquisition (Muftic, 2006).

2. Merton’s theory has difficulty explaining deviance among the privileged

classes. For example, a wealthy entrepreneur who went to an Ivy League
college may embezzle funds despite the fact that he has already met the
cultural value of monetary success.

3. Merton suggests that equal opportunity is a realistic solution to crime,

which Messner and Rosenfeld disagree with.

4. Merton never defines anomie precisely (Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey 2016,
Messner & Rosenfeld 2007).

Institutionalized Anomie Theory

Messner and Rosenfield (2008) responded to these critiques by developing a

theory of institutionalized anomie

This theory argues that the levels and drivers of crime in American society
directly result from the tension between America’s cultural goal of success
through wealth obtainment and the reality that such wealth is unrealistic for
many to obtain.

Unable to obtain this goal through legitimate means, individuals innovate

through crime (2007). This institutional anomie theory focuses on culture and
social structure as manifested by social institutions.

This results in the premise that the normal levels and forms of crime in a
society are a reflection of the fundamental features of social organization
(Messner & Rosenfeld 2008).

In institutionalized anomie theory, institutions guide the actions that

individuals take. The people affected by these institutions chose goals (ends)
and ways of obtaining these goals (means).

Any individual has many ends and many means specific to them, but for social
order to exist, there needs to be a meaningful number of individuals who share
a value system (Parsons 1990).
Societies are also made up of institutions. Social institutions are
interdependent, but these institutions may have competing demands. For
example, performing a role at a company may require working overtime and
contradict with the role of another institution (like taking a daughter to soccer
practice) (Messner & Rosenfeld 2008).

Institutionalized anomie theory claims that societies that have high levels of
crime are ones where the institution of economy has the highest priority.

People feel pressured to sacrifice other roles to fill economic ones — like
stopping shared meal times at a family table to accommodate work schedules
— and the market intrudes into other facets of social life — like paying
students based on their educational accomplishments (Messner & Rosenfeld
2007).

Because economics — and the attainment of wealth — takes precedence over

every other institution, people will resort to any means necessary to meet the
cultural goal of obtaining wealth, even if this causes harm to other institutions
by going against norms.

When the economy dominates, non-economic institutions become weaker and

people feel less constrained by their norms — especially those written as laws.
This results in anomie and high levels of crime (Messner & Rosenfeld 2008).

Anomie Examples
Beauty Standards in the United States
In the past few decades, the majority of fashion models have been tall and
thin, occasionally dangerously so. These models are groomed for hours and
then airbrushed and photoshopped to appear perfect.

Reality television has glorified seeking these standards through plastic

surgery, and young women and men have been exposed to unrealistic
expectations of how they should look.

Because society has failed to regulate the expectations of its members in

physical attractiveness, deviance results in the form of eating disorders and
extensive plastic surgery (Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey, 2016).
As the people in these groups are interdependent, the unethical behavior of an
individual can be the downfall of all.

Anomie and the American Dream

Messner and Rosenfeld (2007) argue that “the distinctive patterns and levels
of crime in the United States are produced by the cultural and social
organization of American society.”

That is to say, the United States has strong pressures — cultural goals — to
obtain success through wealth (the American Dream) and weak restraints on
how one can obtain this wealth.

Because the United States has blurry norms as to how one can obtain the
cultural goal of wealth, this creates anomie and an “anything goes” ” mentality
in pursuing goals (Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey 2016).

Thus, Messner and Rosenfeld argue, the American Dream contributes to crime
by encouraging people to seek out all means — illegal or not — to achieve
America’s cultural goal of monetary success (Messner & Rosenfeld, 2007).

The anomic fabric of American society encourages deviance (Inderbitzen,

Bates, & Gainey, 2016).

Inderbitzin (2007) confirmed this theory by focusing on boys in a juvenile

prison who believed deeply in the American Dream but had few legitimate
means of achieving it due to the barriers of class, lack of education, and racism
(Inderbitzen, Bates, & Gainey, 2016).

Because these young men had been virtually shut out from legitimate means of
success by an array of societal barriers, illegitimate means — committing
crimes — provided a viable way for young, poorly educated minorities to meet
their financial needs.

These young men called “getting paid” (M.L. Sullivan, 1989) the main
motivator in committing crimes.

The juvenile prison itself took the place of Durheim’s social regulator, as the
staff encouraged the young men to shift their values and conform to less
glamorous goals (Inderbitzin, 2007).
Anomie and Academia
Anomie measures real societies alongside how individuals within a society
would ideally behave. Anomie can result when institutions try to achieve
objectives that are incompatible.

For example, since the 1960s, universities have undergone a rapid change
toward an emphasis on professional education. The capabilities of the
university’s faculty — to produce knowledge — is different from those required
to achieve the new cultural goal of cultural education.

Because what a university can realistically teach its students departs from the
expectations or ideals of what a university can teach, and there are no or
blurry norms around what a university is expected to achieve, universities can
have anomie.

As a result, individuals in the “society,” of a university can conform, innovate,

ritualize, retreat, or rebel (Boudon & Bourricaud, 1989).

Anomie can be expressed through two primary forms of social

breakdown:
1. Loss Of One’s Sense Of Social Belonging

People who experience periods of anomie tend to feel disconnected

from society. For them, society no longer represents the values and
norms they hold dear.

This leads people to lose their sense of purpose or ideals. They feel
they no longer belong to a community whose rules they should
respect. They feel like outsiders or hopeless.

2. Breakdown Of Social Norms That Keep People United

Anomie also points to a condition of social derangement. It is linked

with the disintegration of the social ties that unite people into
functional groups and communities.

Periods of anomie tend to be unstable and chaotic. Social

disintegration encourages conflict.
This is because the shared norms and ideals that would ordinarily
offer stability are weaker or absent.

As a result, people might be more inclined to commit crimes or other

forms of social disruption. But violence and crime are not necessarily
characteristics of anomie.

Anomie Examples
Some Simple Examples
 People living in high-rise residencies feel disconnected from one
another and struggle with loneliness.
 People engage in organized theft because they do not have
other ways of accumulating wealth.
 Individuals resorting to criminal activities (e.g., looting) during
times of war or military occupation.
 Self-righteousness. Self-righteous think they have the right to
impose their moral standards on others because they are
superior to them.
 People from disadvantaged backgrounds have fewer chances to
fulfil society’s expectations (e.g., the ‘American Dream’). Thus,
they might feel disconnected from other members of the
community and engage in violent activities.
 People living in big cities are more likely to engage in deviant
behavior than people living in small villages. That’s because
they’re more alienated from other people and they don’t
necessarily share the same values.
 Unrestrained materialism makes people—even those who have
everything they could possibly want—feel empty, unhappy, and
purposeless.
 Societies have increased suicide rates during a financial crisis
and their members feel bewildered or hopeless.
Criticisms Of Anomie
Anomie Theory, especially Merton’s theory, has come under critical
scrutiny for a range of reasons:

1. It does not broach and justify the crimes committed by the

wealthy and powerful (Thio, 1975). For example, a wealthy
entrepreneur who attended an Ivy League university may
embezzle funds despite having already achieved financial
success. Other types of crimes carried out by the rich—not
mentioned by Merton—are financial corruption, tax evasion,
intellectual theft, trafficking etc.
2. It doesn’t take into consideration the “social reality of crime”
(Quinney, [1970]2017). This means that our understanding of
crime comprises behaviors that “conflict with the interests of the
dominant class, which has the power to translate its interests into
public policy”.
3. It assumes a homogenous society in the United States. People
from different demographic groups (women vs. men, white vs. of
color) might engaging in criminal activities for very different
reasons.
4. Because someone is unable to obtain wealth through hard work
and education, it does not follow that they will easily find a
criminal path to wealth and success. Merton did not consider that
some people live in areas where there is already a criminal
subculture, while others do not. Furthermore, the available
subcultures differ vastly. This helps to explain why not everyone
who finds legitimate opportunity structures blocked resorts to
crime, as Merton assumed (Cloward and Ohlin, [1960]1970).
Conclusion
In short, anomie marks a condition of social deregulation, breakdown
of standards, and regular interaction in society. People who
experience anomie feel lost, isolated, purposeless, and even
worthless.

This occurs because they no longer see their personal ideals and
moral standards mirrored in their society. As a result, they are more
likely to question and reject shared values and behavioral norms.

Anomie is a crucial theory that attempts to explain deviant or criminal

behavior as a result of the lack of social norms and regulations.
However, it has been severely criticized for its formalism and
disregard for crimes committed by the wealthy and other types of
institutional violence.
Anomie’s key sociological implication is that individuals and groups
can thrive in times of social upheaval only when they are bound by
strong social bonds which maintain social stability.

Alienation :
The theory of Alienation was proposed by the German economist Karl Marx. Karl Marx was one of
the greatest thinkers of all time. He is a famous advocate of communism. His main motto was to fight
for the capitalists VS the working class. He founded the base of communism through his famous
work “The Communist Manifesto” in 1848. The concept of Alienation spread through this man only.

To know more about Alienation, keep scrolling your screen and discovering new and astonishing
facts regarding this topic. Sit with a pen and paper to note down all the essential details of this topic,
and don’t miss out on anything.

What is Alienation?
This term is used to describe the separation of people from a particular community or people. The
Alienation could be due to different norms, values, and social relations. The people who are
alienated from society do not follow the mainstream. There are types of people who are isolated
from society, known as Alienation. The name in itself is sufficient to define this term.

Karl Marx’s theory of Alienation

Karl Marx’s theory of Alienation stated that.

1. The workers are socially isolated from the products which they manufacture. Only the capitalists
receive the hard-earned money of the workers. The workers did not receive their money from hard
work. All these agreements are made through the wage labour agreement.
2. The workers don’t do the labour work by their wish. They are forced to do so because they are left
with no other option. The wages are essential for the sake of the labourer’s lives.
3. The labourers are alienated from their souls. They are not given the fundamental freedom of doing
what they want to. Instead, they are forced to do the work directed by their masters.
4. There is an environment of competition among other workers in which they are forced to sell their
work at the lower costs available.

Types of Alienation
Learn about all the four types of Alienation and expand your knowledge.

1. Alienation of the worker from their product: According to this type of Alienation, the worker is not
responsible for the product they create. The product entirely belongs to the capitalists and belongs to
the workers in no way. The capitalists are the only authority over the products created by the
workers.
2. Alienation of workers from the act of production: Workers are forced to manufacture goods and
services. The forceful production of these goods and services does not satisfy the workers.
Labourers are forced to take this task as their means of survival because they have no other work to
survive upon.
3. Alienation of the worker from their species essence: According to the capitalist mode of production, a
particular person always loses his right to self-development because they are forced to sell their
labour-power in the market for the sake of living.
4. Alienation of the worker from other workers: A market is created due to the competition among other
workers for their labour-power.

Theories of Alienation
A paper by the famous sociologist Melvin Seeman defined Alienation. The paper was published in
1959, with the title “On the Meaning of Alienation.” The features of Alienation are given below in
detail. Have a look at the points given below.

1. Powerlessness: Whenever any people are isolated from their surroundings, they feel as if they are
powerless and do not have any control over their life.
2. Meaninglessness: This happens when any person is completely isolated from their surrounding,
they feel as if their life is meaningless and does not hold any authority over their life. In a word, they
feel miserable.
3. Social Isolation: People are socially isolated from their surroundings due to caste, creed, colour, or
social beliefs. This type of condition of isolation is termed social isolation.
4. Self Estrangement: Due to social Alienation, people feel like their likes and dislikes are being
ignored. They force the likes and dislikes of some other people.

Conclusion
Once you complete this blog, you will understand the topic of Alienation in full detail. You will also
know about Karl Marx, who was the actual founder of this term and supported the communist
thoughts. This will also give you a glimpse of the four types of Alienation and their meanings. This
term is used to define the people who are isolated from others and the mainstream of society. Get a
glimpse of these topics and apply them well in your sociology subject. Get ready to be the best
among the best.

Marx's Theory of Alienation

Karl Marx's theory of alienation was central to his critique of industrial
capitalism and the class-stratified social system that both resulted from it and
supported it. He wrote directly about it in Economic and Philosophic
Manuscripts and The German Ideology, though it is a concept that is central to
most of his writing. The way Marx used the term and wrote about the concept
shifted as he grew and developed as an intellectual, but the version of the term
that is most frequently associated with Marx and taught within sociology is of the
alienation of workers within a capitalist system of production.

According to Marx, the organization of the capitalist system of production, which

features a wealthy class of owners and managers who purchase labor from
workers for wages, creates the alienation of the entire working class. This
arrangement leads to four distinct ways in which workers are alienated.

1. They are alienated from the product they make because it is designed and
directed by others, and because it earns a profit for the capitalist, and not
the worker, through the wage-labor agreement.
2. They are alienated from the production work itself, which is entirely
directed by someone else, highly specific in nature, repetitive, and
creatively unrewarding. Further, it is work that they do only because they
need the wage for survival.
 3. They are alienated from their true inner self, desires, and the pursuit of
happiness by the demands placed on them by the socio-economic
structure, and by their conversion into an object by the capitalist mode of
production, which views and treats them not as human subjects but as
replaceable elements of a system of production.
4. They are alienated from other workers by a system of production which
pits them against each other in a competition to sell their labor for the
lowest possible value. This form of alienation serves to prevent workers
from seeing and understanding their shared experiences and problems—
it fosters a false consciousness and prevents the development of a class
consciousness.

While Marx's observations and theories were based on the early industrial
capitalism of the 19th century, his theory of the alienation of workers holds true
today. Sociologists who study the conditions of labor under global capitalism find
that the conditions that cause alienation and the experience of it have actually
intensified and worsened.

The Broader Theory of Social Alienation

Sociologist Melvin Seeman provided a robust definition of social alienation in a
paper published in 1959, titled "On the Meaning of Alienation." The five features
he attributed to social alienation hold true today in how sociologists study this
phenomenon. They are:

1. Powerlessness: When individuals are socially alienated they believe that

what happens in their lives is outside of their control and that what they do
ultimately does not matter. They believe they are powerless to shape their
life course.
2. Meaninglessness: When an individual does not derive meaning from the
things in which he or she is engaged, or at least not the same common or
normative meaning that others derive from it.
3. Social Isolation: When a person feels that they are not meaningfully
connected to their community through shared values, beliefs, and
practices, and/or when they do not have meaningful social relationships
with other people.
4. Self-Estrangement: When a person experiences social alienation they
may deny their own personal interests and desires in order to satisfy
demands placed by others and/or by social norms.

Causes of Social Alienation

In addition to the cause of working and living within the capitalist system as
described by Marx, sociologists recognize other causes of alienation. Economic
instability and the social upheaval that tends to go with it has been documented
to lead to what Durkheim called anomie—a sense of normlessness that fosters
social alienation. Moving from one country to another or from one region within
a country to a very different region within it can also destabilize a person's norms,
practices, and social relations in such a way as to cause social alienation.
Sociologists have also documented that demographic changes within a
population can cause social isolation for some who find themselves no longer in
the majority in terms of race, religion, values, and worldviews, for example.
Social alienation also results from the experience of living at the lower rungs of
social hierarchies of race and class. Many people of color experience social
alienation as a consequence of systemic racism. Poor people in general, but
especially those who live in poverty, experience social isolation because they are
economically unable to participate in society in a way that is considered normal.

Social integration :

Social integration is the process by which newcomers are

incorporated into a society. Social integration examples include
developing friendships, learning the local dialect, and joining
local clubs.
It is the extent to which individuals from different groups interact with
one another in an equal manner and feel a sense of belongingness to
society. Usually, it refers to how immigrants and minority groups get
integrated into a host country.
Social integration includes initiatives that promote cultural exchange &
understanding, along with policies aimed at reducing discrimination
and social inequalities. It is a dynamic and ongoing process, which is
important for the well-being of society.

Some of the key examples include multicultural education,

intermarriage etc. Let us begin with the definition and examples of
social integration, and then we will look at the efforts and challenges
associated with it.
Social Integration Definition
Some definitions from scholarly sources include:

…we define social integration as an individual’s enacted and

perceived engagement with social ties

(Fuller-Iglesias & Rajbhandari, 2016)

…we define social integration as cooperative behaviour of
individuals and as solidarity between them

(Marton & Hajdu, 2015)

The term “social integration” was coined by Émile Durkheim. While
trying to study why suicide rates were different in different social
classes, he concluded that society exerted a great force on
individuals. He added that people’s values & norms made up
a collective consciousness.
Integration Vs Assimilation

Park and Burgess later built social integration upon the concept
of assimilation. They defined it as a process by which one group
acquires the “memories, sentiments, and attitude” of another
group, joining them into “a common cultural life” (1921).
Some scholars still see integration as a kind of assimilation. They
argue that over successive generations, the immigrants eventually get
socially, economically, and culturally assimilated into the host society.
Others, however, see integration as a multicultural process. It’s not
just the immigrants who adapt according to the host society; instead,
the immigrants also reshape the host society by bringing their
experiences and values. This leads to a diverse cultural world.
(Nathan, 1964)

Social Integration Examples

1. Learning the Language: Learning the language or local dialect
is important for social integration because it enables people to
participate in daily activities such as shopping and interacting
with the bureaucracy.
2. Multicultural Education: Multicultural education aims to
promote understanding and respect for different cultures while
also providing the skills needed to succeed in a multicultural
society. It involves the inclusion of diverse cultural experiences in
the curriculum and teaching methods. Multicultural education
provides a more holistic understanding of the world and leads to
more positive attitudes toward diversity.
3. Intermarriage: It is a form of social integration that occurs when
individuals from different racial or ethnic backgrounds marry
each other. Researchers see it as a key measure of social
integration; they often ask newcomers if they will consider
marrying a local or if they would like their children to do the same
(Wang, 2012). In recent times, the decline in racial segregation
and greater acceptance has increased intermarriages.
4. Friendships: Friendships, the personal connections between
individuals, are usually seen as an important measure of social
integration as they promote understanding and acceptance of
diversity. Many researchers see the total number of immigrant
friends as a measure while others focus on the frequency of
interactions. For an immigrant, having local friends is quite
important in getting integrated.
5. Local Clubs: Local clubs refer to individuals coming together to
participate in a shared interest or activity. Many scholars use
these social activities, such as the ability to join a local football
club, to measure social integration (Nesseler, 2019). It promotes
understanding by bringing together people with the same
interest, plus it can also increase mobility by providing people
access to new opportunities & individuals.
6. Multilinguality: The ability and willingness to communicate in
multiple languages are crucial to promoting cultural
understanding. For immigrants, learning the host language leads
to better communication with the local people, greater cultural
understanding, and access to new opportunities. The host
 nations can also try to promote inclusivity, say by providing
government services in multiple languages, etc.
7. Community outreach: Community outreach aims to provide
resources to any group that may otherwise not have access to
such services. Through community events, educational
workshops, and social services, outreach improves the well-
being of marginalized groups such as immigrants, minorities,
low-income families, etc. Besides providing equal access, it also
promotes understanding between different groups.
8. Affirmative Action in Workplaces: Affirmative action includes
the policies and practices that increase the representation of
marginalized groups in the workplace. Examples
include recruitment initiatives and training opportunities to help
marginalized groups gain equal access and grow in their
careers. It not only helps these groups but also makes the
workplace more diverse & culturally component.
9. Religious tolerance: It is the acceptance and respect for
diverse religious beliefs and practices in society. Religious
tolerance includes laws and policies that allow the practice of
different religions, accommodate such practices in
schools/workplaces, and promote interfaith understanding. It
allows individuals to have equal access to opportunities while
also leading to greater social cohesion in society.
10. Cultural festivals & events: These are gatherings or
activities that celebrate the cultural heritage and traditions of
different groups. They include festivals, performances, and
exhibitions that bring out the art, food, music, and other aspects
of different cultures. Often organized by government agencies or
community groups, these allow people to learn about diverse
cultures and also create a sense of belongingness.
11. Diverse media representation: It refers to the presence of
perspectives in television, films, and literature. This involves the
inclusion of characters and stories from marginalized groups,
such as people of color, LGBTQ+ individuals, etc., which can
create role models and inspire individuals. Moreover, it also
promotes greater acceptance between different groups, leading
to a more equitable society.
Efforts For Social Integration

Throughout history, there have been several movements and

policies to promote social integration.
Perhaps the most well-known of these is the Civil Rights Movement in
the US. Led by activists like Martin Luther King Jr. & Rosa Parks, it
took place in the 1950s and 60s with the aim of ending discrimination
and securing equal rights for marginalized groups like African
Americans.

It included a range of issues, such as voting rights, desegregation in

public places, and fair treatment in the justice system. The movement
led to the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibited discrimination on
the basis of race, color, religion, etc. It also ensured voting for African
Americans with the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Besides leading to specific legislation, the Civil Rights Movement also

raised awareness about the inequalities faced by marginalized groups
and promoted a greater acceptance of diversity within the country.

Another example is the European Union’s policies, many of which

have been designed to help immigrants and refugees integrate into
society. The Blue Card Directive, for example, aims to attract highly
skilled workers from outside the EU and allows them to live in any EU
country for up to four years.

The EU has an integration framework, which provides language

classes, job training programs, etc., all of which aim to fight
discrimination & promote acceptance. They also support marginalized
groups that need special attention, such as the Roma population in
Europe.

Challenges To Social Integration

 There are several challenges to social integration, such as
structural inequalities, prejudice, etc.
Structural inequalities, such as poverty and lack of access to
resources, hinder social integration. They make it difficult for
marginalized groups to participate fully in society and can also lead
to social exclusion.
Prejudice, in the form of negative attitudes or stereotypes towards
certain groups, leads to discrimination and resistance to change. This
is also associated with a lack of trust between different groups.
Without trust, there can be no understanding or acceptance between
them.
There are limited resources to support social integration. For example,
outreach programs are often underfunded, and their benefits do not
reach everyone. Finally, the lack of effective laws and regulations also
makes social integration difficult.

Conclusion
Social integration refers to the process of incorporating
newcomers into society; it explains how well different social
groups interact with and accept each other.
Through social integration, individuals from different groups gain equal
access to resources and opportunities. It makes societies more
cohesive and culturally diverse by promoting understanding and
acceptance.

Social integration involves various aspects such as multicultural

education, intermarriages, etc. It is often actualized through social
movements (such as the Civil Rights Movement) and government
policies (EU’s immigration policies).
There are also certain challenges to social integration, such as
structural inequalities, prejudice, etc. In our increasingly globalized,
multicultural world, it is absolutely essential to address these
challenges and work towards a more equitable world.

Meaning of Integration:
Society is a constellation of groups, organisations, institutional agencies,
collectivities and ecological entities so interrelated that it operates as an
interconnected system. In society persons are bound together and dependent
upon each other in systems of interrelationships that combine to constitute a
total functional structure.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

But despite the fact that the structural units of society are inter-connected and
inter-dependent so that they constitute a continuing entity, we find in every
society, what Merton called, “a strain towards anomie.” This refers to a
condition where the continuity of the society has broken down to some degree.
The degree of anomie may range from slight contradiction and confusion to
serious deterioration and disintegration.

But along with the “strain towards anomie”, we also find in every society,
“strain towards consistency”. The “strain towards consistency” is called the
integrating process. Integration is, therefore, the harmonizing or unifying
process whereby the various structural components of society are properly
organised.

Integration does not involve similarity of various structural parts. Thus, the
family system may not be similar in the different communities or all the people
may not believe in the same religion or carry on the same occupation. What is
essential for integration is that certain values must be accepted as common and
the different institutional agencies should preserve and promote these values.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

When basic changes occur in a society as when a new technology is introduced

into the economy, and the old values become inadequate and the structures
serving these values; cease to function effectively, then new altered values may
be developed and new social forms created or old ones readjusted to serve the
altered values. This process serves to maintain integration.

The aim of integration is to maintain a harmonious and active relationship

between the various structural components of society. It not only keeps the
society going but also imparts a meaning and purpose to the lives of the
individuals so that they feel themselves to be a part of a comprehensible and
harmonious social life.

As we know the structural forms come into existence to perform functions in

relation to social values. Thus family provides sanctioned sex relations, care of
the offspring, protection, education and recreation etc.

Religion or church develops a sense of relationship with the Divine and

promotes character building. But change is the law of nature and consequently
there comes a change in the functions of the structural forms.

Thus, family has lost most of its traditional functions which have been taken
over by other agencies. The functions of education once performed by church
agencies have passed on to the public supported or privately owned schools and
colleges. With the change in the functions of different structural parts
integration becomes necessary to keep the society going. Integration is thus the
consequence of differentiation and. specialization.

Had there been no differentiation and specialization of functions in the society,

there would have been no need of integration. The more the differentiation and
specialization of functions, the more becomes the need for integration.

The modern society with its elaborate division of labour and complex
institutional pattern is much faced with the difficulty of integration. Integration
organises and harmonizes the institutions, organisations and other structural
forms so that they operate together to serve the purposes of society and to
develop orderly social entity.

Problems in Integration:
Integration is a difficult process. It is faced with various difficulties. Firstly, the
complexity of society makes it difficult to co-ordinate all the structural parts and
to socialise all the humans. As we know society is a complex of different
structural forms and elaborates division of labour.

To bring about a harmony and unity among the complex institutional patterns is
a formidable task. The problem of integration in a simple and small society is
not so complicated as in a complex and large society as ours. So the first
difficulty is presented by the complex and large size of modern society.

ADVERTISEMENTS:

The second difficulty is presented by the cultural heterogeneity. The people in a

society belong to many ethnic and racial origins and are marked by class,
religious and occupational differentiation. The presence of numerous sub-
cultures within a society adds to the problem of integration.

This is particularly true of Indian society. Ours is a multi caste and multilingual
society. The sentiments of Casteism and Linguism have made deep inroads into
our social structure. Even the development of Hindi as a link language is being
opposed by the South.

The third difficulty is presented by the rapidity of social change. New elements
are being introduced at an unprecedented rate. Numerous cultural lags have
produced stresses and strains in the inter-related parts of the web. The individual
today finds himself in a state of bewildered vacuity.

He has slipped out of the warm embrace of a culture into the cold air of
fragmentary existence. He is marginal man. The rapidity and magnitude of the
present day change tax the human imagination. We do not know whether or not
we can make the necessary readjustments and make them rapidly enough.

The last difficulty is presented by the tendency of persistence found in a

structural form. Sometimes, the structures of a social system become so rigid
that they will not adapt to change. Vested interests develop around these
structures which block change. Thus the capitalists oppose change in the
economic structure, the priestly class opposes change in the caste system and
the authors oppose change in the educational system.

Modes of Integration:
Societies are integrated in different ways. In totalitarian societies the
government controls social life so completely that each structural form is
completely co-ordinated with the aims these societies support. Thus, in
communistic societies the schools, the churches, economic agencies,
organizations and all manifestations of collective behaviour are subsumed under
the policies and controls of the government.

There is only one political party, and it controls all other organizations including
families. It controls all communication channels. The activities of each agency
are directed through its official hierarchy.

No challenge to its power or the system of values that defines its aims is
tolerated. It achieves its integration by threat or use of force, such a mode of
integration has been called “closely woven” type of integration.

On the other hand, there are “loosely woven” societies. In such societies, there
is a variation not only in individual behaviour but also in national behaviour. It
does not, however, mean that the society is not integrated or poorly integrated.

It only implies that there are no rigid social norms and that people have a wide
range of alternative modes of behaviour open to them. The group relationships
are not well-defined and the moral norms are laxly carried out. Ours is a loosely
woven society.

In order to remove the strain towards anomie and to keep the society on-going
integration is persistently sought. Generally speaking, people carry their
activities in a normative fashion. There is general support for the folkways,
mores and institutional patterns. However, beyond the daily reinforcement of
integration by normative behaviour, deliberate efforts are also made for bringing
about social integration.

Thus ameliorative programmes are carried out to decrease delinquency, to

educate voters, to provide help to the underprivileged and the overburdened and
to improve education, housing, medical care, recreation and local
administration. These programmes seek to make improvements in the existing
structural forms without fundamentally affecting the basic pattern of social
structure.

To some integration means not only social reform but social reconstruction.
They form radical groups who want to abolish the existing social system and
organise it in a completely new way. They do not believe in half-way measures
 but go to the root of the matter and want a fundamentally changed organisation
of society.

Thus instead of cleansing capitalism of its evils, they will abolish the system
itself. According to them, piecemeal changes do not provide a solid foundation
for integration. To them reintegration means a “new order”.

In between the mildly ameliorative and radical programmes come the social
movements such as the abolition of bonded labour, prohibition, ‘Lib’
movement, the labour movement and the non- formal education movement.

All the programmes to bring about integration or re-integration involve social

planning. Social planning employs research and involves decision and action. In
our country social planning is still in its infancy. Planning in this country is
more visible in the economic field than in the social field.

At the hand of Planning Commission, social planning gets step-motherly

treatment. Planning in a democracy is a much more difficult matter than in a
totalitarian society. However, it must be admitted that social planning is the
most effective method of achieving reintegration in a complex and rapidly
changing society.

Social integration refers to the process by which individuals and groups within a society come
together, interact, and form connections that help build a cohesive and functioning social structure.
There are several modes or dimensions of social integration that help facilitate this process. Some of
the key modes of social integration include:

1. Structural Integration: This mode involves the physical and institutional aspects of integration. It
includes the presence of common infrastructure, institutions, and organizations that facilitate
interaction and cooperation among individuals and groups. Examples include schools, workplaces,
community centers, and government agencies.
2. Cultural Integration: Cultural integration refers to the sharing of common values, beliefs, customs,
and practices among individuals and groups within a society. This shared cultural understanding
helps in reducing misunderstandings and conflicts and fosters a sense of unity. Cultural integration
can be seen in shared holidays, traditions, language, and other cultural practices.
3. Normative Integration: Norms are the unwritten rules and expectations that guide behavior in a
society. Normative integration involves a common understanding and adherence to these norms,
which promotes cooperation and reduces deviant behavior. Social norms can relate to various
aspects of life, such as etiquette, morality, and social roles.
4. Interactive Integration: This mode of integration pertains to the frequency and quality of social
interactions among individuals from different groups. Interaction helps build relationships, enhance
 understanding, and reduce stereotypes and prejudices. Interaction can occur through various means,
such as face-to-face communication, social media, and community events.
5. Emotional Integration: Emotional integration refers to the development of a sense of belonging,
empathy, and solidarity among members of a society. This involves the ability to share emotional
experiences and feelings, leading to a stronger sense of unity and support during challenging times.
6. Economic Integration: Economic integration involves the participation of individuals and groups in
the economic activities of society. It includes access to employment, education, and resources
necessary for a decent standard of living. Economic integration plays a crucial role in reducing
economic disparities and promoting social cohesion.
7. Spatial Integration: Spatial integration refers to the physical proximity and distribution of different
social groups within a geographic area. A well-integrated society would have diverse groups living in
close proximity, which can encourage interaction and mutual understanding.
8. Institutional Integration: This mode refers to the inclusion of diverse groups within various formal
institutions, such as government bodies, educational institutions, and businesses. Ensuring
representation and participation of different groups in decision-making processes promotes social
cohesion and reduces marginalization.
9. Identity Integration: Identity integration involves how individuals from different backgrounds
perceive themselves and others within the larger societal context. A strong sense of shared national
or cultural identity can help in reducing divisions and promoting social harmony.

These modes of social integration are interconnected and contribute to the overall stability and
cohesion of a society. A well-integrated society tends to have lower levels of conflict, better social
mobility, and a higher overall quality of life for its members.

"Social Integration"

Social integration is a dynamic and principled process in which societies engage to advance

social development. The aim of social integration is to create a society for all based on non-

discrimination, tolerance, respect for diversity, equality of opportunity, solidarity, security and

participation of all people irrespective of race, class, age, ethnicity, cultural background,

political and religious beliefs and other differences.

Social Integration can be seen as a dynamic and principled process where all members

participate in dialogue to achieve and maintain peaceful social relations. Social integration does

not mean coerced assimilation or forced integration.

Social Integration and system integration These terms were first coined by the British

sociologist David Lockwood.

Social integration refers to the principles by which individuals or actors are related to one
another in a society; system integration refers to the relationships between parts of a society or

social system.

Durkheim believed that society exerted a powerful force on individuals. According to

Durkheim, people's norms, beliefs, and values make up a collective consciousness, or a shared

way of understanding and behaving in the world.

The collective consciousness binds individuals together and creates social integration.

Durkheim saw increasing population density as a key factor in the advent of modernity. As the

number of people in a given area increase, so does the number of interactions, and the society

becomes more complex.

As people engage in more economic activity with neighbors or distant traders, they begin to

loosen the traditional bonds of family, religion, and moral solidarity that had previously

ensured social integration. Durkheim worried that modernity might herald the disintegration of

society.

Simpler societies are based on mechanical solidarity, in which self-sufficient people are

connected to others by close personal ties and traditions. Modern societies are based on organic

solidarity, in which people are connected by their reliance on others in the division of labor.

Although modern society may undermine the traditional bonds of mechanical solidarity, it

replaces them with the bonds of organic solidarity.

In the Elementary Forms of Religious Life, Durkheim presented a theory of the function of

religion in aboriginal and modern societies and described the phenomenon of collective

effervescence and collective consciousness.

Durkheim has been called a structural functionalist because his theories focus on the function

certain institutions (e.g., religion) play in maintaining social solidarity or social structure.

Organic versus Mechanical Solidarity

Further, Durkheim argued, the organic solidarity of modern societies might have advantages

over traditional mechanical solidarity. In traditional societies, people are self-sufficient, and

therefore society has little need for cooperation and interdependence. Institutions that require

cooperation and agreement must often resort to force and repression to keep society together.
 Traditional mechanical solidarity may tend, therefore, to be authoritarian and coercive. In

modern societies, under organic solidarity, people are necessarily much more interdependent.

Specialization and the division of labor require cooperation. Thus, solidarity and social

integration are necessary for survival and do not require the same sort of coercion as under

mechanical solidarity.

In organic solidarity, the individual is considered vitally important, even sacred. In organic

solidarity, the individual, rather than the collective, becomes the focus of rights and

responsibilities, the center of public and private rituals holding the society together—a function

once performed by the religion. To stress the importance of this concept, Durkheim talked of

the "cult of the individual. " However, he made clear that the cult of the individual is itself a

social fact, socially produced; reverence for the individual is not an inherent human trait, but a

social fact that arises in certain societies at certain times

social INTEGRATion in Pakistani society

Certainly, I can provide further explanations on the geographical and demographic

aspects of Pakistan's society and how they relate to social integration.

Geography and Demographics: Pakistan's geographical location plays a significant

role in shaping its society. It's situated in a region where South Asia meets Central Asia,
West Asia, and the Middle East, leading to a blend of cultures, languages, and traditions.
The diverse geography, including the Himalayan and Karakoram mountain ranges, the
fertile plains of Punjab and Sindh, and the arid landscapes of Balochistan and Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, has influenced the ways in which communities interact and engage with
each other.

Ethnic and Cultural Diversity: Pakistan's ethnic diversity is a result of its historical
evolution and its location at the crossroads of different civilizations. The major ethnic
groups have their roots in various regions of the country, and they bring distinct
languages, traditions, and cultural practices. For example:

 Punjabis are the largest ethnic group and reside mainly in Punjab province. They speak
Punjabi and have a rich cultural heritage.
 Sindhis inhabit Sindh province and have their own language, Sindhi, and cultural
traditions.
 Pashtuns are prominent in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and parts of Balochistan. They speak
Pashto and have a unique cultural identity.
 Baloch people primarily live in Balochistan and have their own Balochi language and
traditions.
 Muhajirs are descendants of those who migrated from India during the partition in
1947. They are mainly settled in urban centers like Karachi and bring a mix of cultural
influences.

Social Integration Challenges: The diversity of Pakistan's society is both a strength and
a challenge. While diversity enriches the cultural fabric of the country, it can also lead to
challenges related to social integration:

 Language Barriers: The presence of multiple languages can sometimes hinder effective
communication and understanding among different ethnic groups.
 Identity Politics: Ethnic and regional identities can sometimes take precedence over a
national identity, which can lead to political and social divisions.
 Economic Disparities: Unequal access to resources and opportunities can create
feelings of marginalization and hinder social integration.
 Urban-Rural Dynamics: The urban-rural divide can lead to differing perspectives and
values, making it important to bridge this gap for greater cohesion.

Government Initiatives and Regional Autonomy: The Pakistani government has taken
steps to address these challenges and promote social integration. For example, efforts
have been made to provide greater representation for different ethnic groups in political
and administrative structures. Additionally, the devolution of power to provincial
governments has allowed for greater local autonomy and responsiveness to regional
needs.

Cultural Fusion and Integration: Despite challenges, Pakistanis often find ways to
connect across ethnic and cultural lines. Urban centers like Karachi and Lahore are
melting pots where people from various backgrounds live and work together, leading to
a fusion of cultures and traditions. Festivals, celebrations, and events often bring people
together to celebrate their diversity.

Overall, Pakistan's journey toward social integration involves acknowledging its diversity,
addressing disparities, promoting equal opportunities, and fostering a sense of shared
national identity alongside regional identities. Efforts at various levels of society,
including government, education, and community engagement, are essential to creating
a more integrated and harmonious Pakistani society.
1.
Emphasis on Shared Identity: Fostering a strong sense of national identity that
transcends ethnic and linguistic differences is crucial. This means promoting the idea
that all Pakistanis are part of a larger collective, united by shared values and goals. It
involves:
 Education: Including lessons on national history, culture, and values that
emphasize unity and shared identity.
 Media: Portraying stories and narratives that highlight the diversity within unity
and promote a sense of belonging.
 Cultural Celebrations: Organizing events that celebrate Pakistan's diversity while
emphasizing the commonalities that unite its people.
2. Limiting Ethnic Politics: Restricting the influence of ethnicity-based politics is essential
to prevent divisions. This can be achieved by:
 Inclusive Policies: Formulating policies that prioritize the overall welfare of
citizens and ensure equitable distribution of resources.
 Focus on National Issues: Encouraging political parties to focus on broader
national concerns rather than exploiting ethnic differences.
 Cross-Ethnic Representation: Promoting political parties to include candidates
from diverse ethnic backgrounds to ensure fair representation.
3. Functional Judicial Process: A well-functioning and impartial judicial system enhances
social integration by ensuring equal treatment and access to justice for all citizens. Key
aspects include:
 Rule of Law: Consistently upholding the rule of law regardless of ethnic or social
background.
 Impartiality: Maintaining an impartial and independent judiciary free from
political influences.
 Access to Justice: Ensuring that legal services are accessible to all, especially
marginalized groups.
4. Limiting Linguistic Politics: Reducing tensions related to languages and linguistic
diversity is important for unity. Strategies include:
 Multilingual Education: Encouraging bilingual education to help bridge
linguistic gaps and promote mutual understanding.
 Cultural Exchange: Organizing events that facilitate interaction among speakers
of different languages, fostering cultural exchange.
5. Striving for Interfaith Harmony: Promoting understanding and cooperation among
different faiths helps create an inclusive society:
 Interfaith Dialogue: Organizing discussions and activities that encourage
dialogue and mutual respect among followers of various religions.
  Religious Tolerance Education: Incorporating lessons on religious tolerance and
diversity in educational curricula.
6. Ending Sectarianism: Overcoming sectarian divides requires concerted efforts:
 Community Engagement: Encouraging communities to organize events that
promote interaction and understanding among different sectarian groups.
 Religious Leaders: Engaging religious leaders to spread messages of unity and
tolerance within their congregations.
7. Eradicating Poverty and Providing Economic Opportunity: Addressing economic
disparities is a critical step in creating a socially integrated society:
 Socioeconomic Programs: Implementing programs that lift people out of
poverty and ensure equal opportunities for upward mobility.
 Job Creation: Focusing on job creation in underserved areas to reduce
unemployment and enhance economic participation.

Each of these factors contributes to the larger goal of building a more united and
cohesive society in Pakistan. They require a multi-faceted approach involving education,
media, policy-making, community engagement, and individual efforts. By working on
these fronts, Pakistan can enhance social integration and create an environment where
all citizens feel a sense of belonging and actively participate in the nation's progress.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxuqLqg7qO8