Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Design of Rectangular Concrete Tanks
Design of Rectangular Concrete Tanks
30 cm
10 cm
812/m
3m
812/m
7.5cm
42
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
43
Example 1 (Design of Roof Slab)
Design of Roof Slab
It is assumed that the tank has a simply supported roof
The slab is designed using plate analysis result of case 10
chapter 2 with a/b =9/6=1.5 page 2-62
For Positive Moment along short span
Coef. Mtx = Coef. Mx + Coef. |Mxy| for +ve B.M. along short span
44
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
For Positive Moment along long span
Coef. Mty = Coef. My + Coef. |Mxy| for +ve B.M. along long span
45
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
For Negative Moment along short span
Coef. Mtx = Coef. Mx - Coef. |Mxy| for -ve B.M. along short span
if Mtx>0 then Mtx=0
46
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
For Negative Moment along long span
Coef. Mty= Coef. My - Coef. |Mxy| for -ve B.M. along long span
if Mtx>0 then Mtx=0
47
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
48
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
M tx coef . qu a 2
M tx , Maximun M tx coef . 51
1000
M 1.6 51 1.7 (6) 2 / 1000 5.0t .m / m
d 30 5 1.2 0.6 23.2
0.85(300) 2.61(10)5 (5.0)
1 1 2 0.0025 min
4200 100(23.2) (300)
A s 0.0033 100 23.2 7.7 cm 2 / m
49
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
M tx coef . qu a 2
M tx , Maximun M tx coef . 49
1000
M 1.6 51 1.7 (6) 2 / 1000 4.8t .m / m
50
Example 1 (Design of Rectangular Tank)
812/m 1.5m
812/m
51
Two-Cell Tank, Long Center Wall
The tank in Figure consists of two adjacent cells, each with
the same inside dimensions as the single cell tank (a clear
height of a =3m. Horizontal inside dimensions are b = 9.0
m and c = 3.0 m). The top is considered free.
Two-Cell Tank, Long Center Wall
The tank consists of four L-shaped and two T-shaped units.
The Bending moments in the walls of multicell tanks are
approximately the same as in single tank, except at locations
of where more than two walls intersect.
The same coefficients of single-cell tank can be directly used
except at the T-shaped wall intersections.
L-(L-F)/3 coefficient are applicable for the three intersecting
walls of the two T-intersections
The coefficient are determined as follow:
Determine the BM Coef. In two-cell as if it were two
independent tanks.
Determine L and F factors to be used in adjustment of BM coef.
at T-shaped
Adjust bending moment coef. At T-shaped wall locations.
Two-Cell Tank, Long Center Wall
Determine the BM Coef. as if it were two independent Tanks
The BM coef. Are determined using table on page 3-30. For
b/a=3 and c/a=1 are given as follow:
6m
8m
Details at Bottom Edge
All tables except one are based on the assumption that the bottom
edge is hinged. It is believed that this assumption in general is
closer to the actual condition than that of a fixed edge.
Consider first the detail in Fig. 9, which shows the wall
Figure 1
Tanks Directly Built on Ground
Tanks on Fill or Soft Weak Soil
In case of medium soils at foundation level, raft foundation
may be used (see Figure 2).
Figure 2
Tanks Directly Built on Ground
Tanks on Fill or Soft Weak Soil
If the incompressible layers are deep or the ground water level
is high one may support the tank on piles. The piles cap may
acts as column capitals (see Figure 3).
Figure 3
Tanks Directly Built on Ground
Tanks on Rigid Foundation.
If the tank supported by a rigid foundation then it the vertical
reaction of the wall will be resisted by area beneath it.
The distance L beyond which no deformation or bending
moment can be calculated approximately as follow:
wL3 ML M
0 L 2
24EI 6EI w
Figure 4
Tanks Directly Built on Ground
Tanks on Compressible Soils
Floors of tanks resisting on medium clayey or sandy soils may
be calculated in the following manner:
The internal forces transmitted from the wall to the floor may
be assumed to be distributed on the soil by the distance L=0.4
to 0.6H.
The length L is chosen such that the maximum stress 1 is
smaller than the allowed soil bearing pressure, 2 > 1/2 on
clayey soils and 2 > 0 on sandy soils.
This limitations are recommended in order to prevent
relatively big rotations of the floor at b.
Tanks Directly Built on Ground
Tanks on Compressible Soils
Figure 5
Approximate Analysis
H
(3/4H)
B H
L
Deep Tanks: Square sections
It is assumed that the maximum internal pressure take
place at ¾ H from the top or 1m from the bottom
whichever greater
PL2
MC at support Mm
12 Mc
2
PL
Mm at center
24
PL
Direct Tension : T
2
Deep Tanks: Rectangular sections
It is assumed that the maximum internal pressure take
place at ¾ H from the top
M C L LB B 2
P 2
at support
12
2
PL M1m
M 1m Mc
8
Mc
L 2LB 2B 2
P 2
24 M2m B
L
Deep Tanks: Rectangular sections
PB 2
M c B 2 2LB 2L2
P
M 2m
8 24
PB
Direct Tension in long Wall T
2
PL
Direct Tension in short Wall T
2
B) Shallow Tanks
Where H/L and H/B <1/2
The water pressure is resisted by vertical action as follows:
a) Cantilever walls
Wall fixed to the floor and free at top may act as simple
cantilever walls (suitable for H<3 m)
Tension in the floor = Reaction at the base
H
R=H/2
M=H3/6
B) Shallow Tanks
b) Wall simply supported at top and fixed at Bottom
Wall act as one way slab and resist water pressure in vertical
direction (suitable for H<4.5 m)
R=0.1H
H3/33.5
+
H
H3/15
R=0.4H
M=H3/15
B) Shallow Tanks
c) Wall fixed at top and fixed at Bottom
M=H3/20
M=H3/20
R=0.15H
+
H3/46.6
- H
M=H3/20
R=0.35H
M=H3/20
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
In moderate or medium tanks where
H H
0.5 & 2
L B
The water pressure is resisted by vertical and horizontal action
Different approximate methods is used to determine the
internal distribution Some of them:
a) Approach 1: According to L/B ratio (Deep tank action)
b) Approach 2: Strip method (coefficient method)
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
Approach 1: According to L/B ratio
For rectangular tank in which L/B<2 the tanks are designed
as continuous frame subjected to max. pressure at H/4
from the bottom
The bottom H/4 is designed as a cantilever
M1m
Mc
(3/4H) B
M2m
L
H
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
Approach 1: According to L/B ratio
For rectangular tank in which L/B>2
The long wall are designed as a cantilever
The short walls as a slab fixed supported on the long walls
The bottom H/4 portion of the short wall is designed as a
cantilever
H
R=H/2
M=H3/6
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
Approach 1: According to L/B ratio > 2
R=H/2
M=H3/6
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
Approach 1: According to L/B ratio >2
3H
B 2
M center
4 24 H
a) Vertical Moment
H -
wH2/12
H 1 H
+
3
1
M H wH2/24
2 4 3 4 96
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
Approach 1: According to L/B ratio > 2
Direct Tension
It is assumed that the end one meter width of the long wall
contribute to direct tension on the short wall
H/4
Where: Pv Ph
P: hydrostatic pressure at specific depth
Pv: Pressure resisted in the vertical direction
Ph: Pressure resisted in the horizontal direction
C) Medium Moderate Tanks
Approach 2: The Strip Method
The fixed Moment at bottom due to pressure resisted
Ra
vertically H 2
H
2 a
M f PV Ph
15 117
3H/4
The shear at a
H H
Ra Pv Ph
10 540 H/4
Pv Ph b
The shear at b is evaluated from equilibrium
The moments due to horizontal pressure are evaluated as
discussed before at (3H/4)
Design of section subjected to eccentric tension or
compression
bt 2 bt
Mu Mu’
Pu Pu