Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PEC2601
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
CIVIL ENGINEERING
In terms of the Copyright Act 98 of 1978 no part of this material may be
reproduced, be stored in a retrieval system, be transmitted or used in any
form or be published, redistributed or screened by any means (electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the prior
written permission of Unisa. However, permission to use in these ways
any material in this work that is derived from other sources must be
obtained from the original sources.
Compiled by:
Mr CPC Bruwer
Dr T Groenewald
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................. ii
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1
1. PEC2601 IN CONTEXT ...................................................................................... 1
2. THE SPECIFIED OUTCOMES OF PEC2601 ............................................................ 2
2.1 The planning stage of a project .............................................................. 3
2.2 The construction stage of a project ......................................................... 3
2.3 Critical cross-field outcome: communication ............................................ 4
3. THE WORKPLACE MENTOR ................................................................................ 5
3.1 Unisa's plea to workplace mentors .......................................................... 5
3.2 Confirmation of the workplace mentor/supervisor ..................................... 6
4. PROGRESSIVE AND SYSTEMATIC RECORDING OF WORK-INTEGRATED
LEARNING AND THE CONTINUOUS MONITORING THEREOF .................................. 6
4.1 The planning stage of a project .............................................................. 7
4.1.1 Initial information gathering................................................................... 7
4.1.2 The people and environmental factors ..................................................... 7
4.1.3 The preliminary design of a civil engineering project ................................. 8
4.1.4 The preliminary costing ......................................................................... 8
4.2 The construction stage of a project ......................................................... 8
4.2.1 Site establishment ................................................................................ 8
4.2.2 Demonstrated ability to read drawings .................................................... 8
4.2.3 Demonstrated comprehension of contract documentation .......................... 9
4.2.4 On-site quality control ........................................................................... 9
4.2.5 Variation orders ................................................................................... 9
4.2.6 Materials testing ................................................................................... 9
4.2.7 Contract management ........................................................................... 9
4.3 Specifications on writing the eleven (11) 'small' work-integrated learning
reports .............................................................................................. 10
4.3.1 Format .............................................................................................. 10
4.3.2 Checking and editing........................................................................... 10
4.3.3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................. 11
4.3.4 Table of contents and headings ............................................................ 11
4.3.5 Introduction ....................................................................................... 12
4.3.6 The body of the report ........................................................................ 12
4.3.7 Discussion of personal involvement and what has been learned ................ 12
4.3.8 Conclusion ......................................................................................... 12
4.3.9 Annexures ......................................................................................... 12
4.4 Building blocks for the final report ........................................................ 13
5. FINAL WORK-INTEGRATED LEARNING REPORT .................................................. 13
5.1 Presentation ...................................................................................... 13
5.2 Title page .......................................................................................... 13
5.2.1 Report title ........................................................................................ 13
5.2.2 Student's name and number ................................................................ 13
5.2.3 Date of report .................................................................................... 13
5.3 Overall table of contents...................................................................... 14
5.4 Synopsis ........................................................................................... 14
5.5 Body of the report .............................................................................. 14
BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................... 15
2.1 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on initial information
gathering ........................................................................................................ 1
2.2 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on the people and
environmental factors ...................................................................................... 2
2.3 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on the preliminary
design of a civil engineering project ................................................................... 3
ii
2.4 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on the preliminary
costing ........................................................................................................... 4
3.1 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on site establishment ......... 5
3.2 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report to demonstrate ability to
read drawings ................................................................................................. 6
3.3 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report to demonstrate
comprehension of contract documentation .......................................................... 7
3.4 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on quality control on site .... 8
3.5 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on variation orders ............ 9
3.6 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on materials testing ......... 10
3.7 The workplace mentor's assessment of student's report on contract management . 11
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE for the final work-integrated learning report for
Engineering Practice: Civil II (PEC2601) ........................................................... 27
ON-SITE MONITORING/ASSESSMENT OF WORK-INTEGRATED LEARNING: PEC2601 .... 32
iii
INTRODUCTION
Welcome! You've 'arrived' at a very important part of the curriculum of
the National Diploma: Civil Engineering, namely your work-integrated
learning. Please study this manual carefully, because it contains important
information regarding the study unit Engineering Practice: Civil II.
1. PEC2601 IN CONTEXT
Engineering Practice: Civil II (PEC2601) is a study unit of part 3 of the
curriculum of the National Diploma in Civil Engineering at Unisa.
Engineering Practice: Civil II is preceded by several theoretical and
practical study units of the curriculum, which gives the student an
academic foundation.
1
See http://www.civils.org.za for the South African Institution of Civil Engineering
differentiation between a professional engineer, a professional technologist (engineering)
and an engineering technician.
Your submissions with regard to the four practical experience areas must
prove that you have acquired the ability and cognitive skills to start
rendering productive work in the civil engineering field.
Please note that Engineering Practice: Civil II & III must both be
completed prior to registration for the B Tech in Civil Engineering.
The next section outlines the outcomes of Engineering Practice: Civil II.
Dear mentor
We do thank you in advance for the time you invest in the education of
the student entrusted to your mentoring.
Each of your reports (see 4.3 for the specifications) should consist of:
a table of contents
an introduction
the body of the report, presented under appropriate headings and
sub-headings
a description of your personal involvement and what you've learned
annexures as required
After your mentor has assessed each report (see assessment forms
enclosed) and has given you feedback, you must do the necessary
corrections and/or improvements. If your report is found to be
inadequate, you must redo it and again present it to your mentor for
assessment.
In addition to the above, the lecturer at Unisa who is responsible for the
study unit will conduct at least one (1) monitoring visit. It is your
responsibility to make the necessary arrangements for your on-site
visit(s). See annexure C of the tutorial letter.
In consultation with your mentor, pick a civil engineering project for which
you can ideally complete all 11 'assignments'. If this is not feasible, derive
your learning from related projects in order to be in a position to
complete your final work-integrated learning report. The reports should
be completed at a rate of at least one report every two weeks, allowing
for four to six weeks at the end to complete your final work-integrated
learning report.
Explain the process and the various activities undertaken (or that you
would undertake) to gather sufficient data (geological, cadastral and on
existing services) for the planning of a civil engineering project. Present
the actual data that you have gathered in a logical way and draw relevant
conclusions and recommendations. Make use of graphs and sketches to
enhance understanding, and add an executive overview.
Obtain a set of project drawings and explain the drawings fully in a well-
composed report. Submit the drawings with the report.
Explain how site supervision and quality control are done and report on
the findings regarding workmanship and quality control measures, layout
of the project and materials used.
Explain how and why testing of materials is done and report on the
findings.
Explain the various means (why and how) of managing a civil engineering
contract. This includes but is not limited to scheduling, monthly site
meetings, progress monitoring, community liaison and environmental
sensitivity.
Number all tables and figures, so that reference can be made to any
specific one. Table headings can be numbered for clarity if appropriate.
Use the spellcheckers available with all word processor software, first
setting the correct language to "South African English". The default US
(American) settings should be avoided. If a grammar and language style
check is available, use it once the first draft of the report has been written
and is being edited.
Example:
1. FIRST-LEVEL HEADING
1.1. Second-level heading
1.1.1 Third-level heading
Fourth-level heading
Fifth-level heading. This leads straight into the text, on the same line.
You must further concisely reflect on what you've learned from your
involvement. You must clearly describe the knowledge you have gained.
4.3.8 Conclusion
The conclusions of the work-integrated learning report should be given in
this section, restating the essence of the project involved but avoiding
further discussion. This section must be a summary of conclusions and
recommendations, presented in order of importance.
4.3.9 Annexures
Annexures are used for information pertinent to the report but too bulky
to be placed in the body of the report. However, the body of the report
should contain brief explanations/descriptions of the annexures. They are
particularly useful for information that would otherwise interrupt the flow
of the report.
If your first attempt at any one of the reports has been deemed
inadequate, you need to redo it until found adequate by your mentor.
Your final report may not contain inadequate reports.
5.1 Presentation
It is in your own best interest that you bind your final work-integrated
learning report together, for example in a lever-arch file. Make use of
dividers to separate the various components of the final report, for
example the alphabetical dividers normally included in a lever-arch file.
5.4 Synopsis
The synopsis serves as an executive summary. It summarises the content
of the 11 reports, the main findings, conclusions and recommendations in
a concise form. The executive summary should be approximately 300
words long.
Planning stage:
Initial information gathering
The people and environmental factors
The preliminary design of a civil engineering project
The preliminary costing
Construction stage:
Site establishment
Demonstrated ability to read drawings
Demonstrated comprehension of contract documentation
On-site quality control
Variation orders
Materials testing
Contract management
Ensure that the corrections your mentor indicated have been made and
her/his commentary has been attended to.
Rate the student's report on the initial information gathering for the
project that s/he has been involved in:
Inadequate Adequate
Little data gathered Insufficient data Sufficient data Substantial data
for the report gathered gathered gathered
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Data poorly Presentation lacking Data well presented Data very well
presented presented
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Few/no conclusions Conclusions/recom. Conclusions/recom. Comprehensive and
or recommendations do not flow from the flow from critical specific conclusions
data evaluation of data or recom. flowing
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
The report has no Poor summary Report well Excellent summary
summary summarised – clear and concise
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
No/little description Sketchy description Personal Clear description of
of personal of personal involvement and involvement and
involvement involvement learning evident learning
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Total:
Also rate the student on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 = acceptable,
5 = average and 10 = excellent with regard to:
Rating Comments
Communication skills
Attitude towards staff and public
Personal appearance
Initiative
Punctuality
Rate the student's report on the people and environmental factors of the
project that s/he has been involved in:
Inadequate Adequate
Little data gathered Insufficient data Sufficient data Substantial data
for the report gathered gathered gathered
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Data poorly Presentation lacking Data well presented Data very well
presented presented
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Few/no conclusions Conclusions/recom. Conclusions/recom. Comprehensive and
or recommendations do not flow from the flow from critical specific conclusions
data evaluation of data or recom. flowing
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
The report has no Poor summary Report well Excellent summary
summary summarised – clear and concise
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
No/little description Sketchy description Personal Clear description of
of personal of personal involvement and involvement and
involvement involvement learning evident learning
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Total:
Also rate the student on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 = acceptable,
5 = average and 10 = excellent with regard to:
Rating Comments
Communication skills
Attitude towards staff and public
Personal appearance
Initiative
Punctuality
Rate the student's report on the preliminary costing of the project that
s/he has been involved in:
Inadequate Adequate
Little data gathered Insufficient data Sufficient data Substantial data
for the report gathered gathered gathered
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Data poorly Presentation lacking Data well presented Data very well
presented presented
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Few/no conclusions Conclusions/recom. Conclusions/recom. Comprehensive and
or recommendations do not flow from the flow from critical specific conclusions
data evaluation of data or recom. flowing
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
The report has no Poor summary Report well Excellent summary
summary summarised – clear and concise
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
No/little description Sketchy description Personal Clear description of
of personal of personal involvement and involvement and
involvement involvement learning evident learning
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Total:
Also rate the student on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 = acceptable,
5 = average and 10 = excellent with regard to:
Rating Comments
Communication skills
Attitude towards staff and public
Personal appearance
Initiative
Punctuality
Rate the student's report on site establishment of the project that s/he
has been involved in:
Inadequate Adequate
Little data gathered Insufficient data Sufficient data Substantial data
for the report gathered gathered gathered
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Data poorly Presentation lacking Data well presented Data very well
presented presented
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Few/no conclusions Conclusions/recom. Conclusions/recom. Comprehensive and
or recommendations do not flow from the flow from critical specific conclusions
data evaluation of data or recom. flowing
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
The report has no Poor summary Report well Excellent summary
summary summarised – clear and concise
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
No/little description Sketchy description Personal Clear description of
of personal of personal involvement and involvement and
involvement involvement learning evident learning
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Total:
Also rate the student on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 = acceptable,
5 = average and 10 = excellent with regard to:
Rating Comments
Communication skills
Attitude towards staff and public
Personal appearance
Initiative
Punctuality
Rate the student's report on the quality control on site of the project that
s/he has been involved in:
Inadequate Adequate
Little data gathered Insufficient data Sufficient data Substantial data
for the report gathered gathered gathered
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Data poorly Presentation lacking Data well presented Data very well
presented presented
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Few/no conclusions Conclusions/recom. Conclusions/recom. Comprehensive and
or recommendations do not flow from the flow from critical specific conclusions
data evaluation of data or recom. flowing
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
The report has no Poor summary Report well Excellent summary
summary summarised – clear and concise
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
No/little description Sketchy description Personal Clear description of
of personal of personal involvement and involvement and
involvement involvement learning evident learning
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Total:
Also rate the student on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 = acceptable,
5 = average and 10 = excellent with regard to:
Rating Comments
Communication skills
Attitude towards staff and public
Personal appearance
Initiative
Punctuality
Rate the student's report on materials testing of the project that s/he has
been involved in:
Inadequate Adequate
Little data gathered Insufficient data Sufficient data Substantial data
for the report gathered gathered gathered
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Data poorly Presentation lacking Data well presented Data very well
presented presented
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Few/no conclusions Conclusions/recom. Conclusions/recom. Comprehensive and
or recommendations do not flow from the flow from critical specific conclusions
data evaluation of data or recom. flowing
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
The report has no Poor summary Report well Excellent summary
summary summarised – clear and concise
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
No/little description Sketchy description Personal Clear description of
of personal of personal involvement and involvement and
involvement involvement learning evident learning
0 ..................... 2.5 3 ........................ 5 5.5 .................. 7.5 8 .................... 10
Total:
Also rate the student on a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 = acceptable,
5 = average and 10 = excellent with regard to:
Rating Comments
Communication skills
Attitude towards staff and public
Personal appearance
Initiative
Punctuality
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE for the final work-integrated learning report for Engineering Practice: Civil II (PEC2601)
1.1 Synopsis Inadequate or Poorly written and Comprehensive, but Clear and concise.
unclear significant gaps in some minor gaps in Full coverage of the
the project the project project
1-2 3-4 5-7 8-10
Total:
Total:
Total:
4.1 Completeness Incomplete. Major Partially complete. Mostly complete. Comprehensive. In-
gaps in discussion Some significant Some minor gaps in depth coverage
gaps in discussion discussion
1 2 3 4-5
4.2 Technical quality Unacceptable Acceptable, but with Acceptable with Outstanding quality.
major corrections minor corrections No corrections
1 2 3 4-5
Total:
5. COMMENTARY ON REPORT AND FEEDBACK TO STUDENT
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
INTERPRETATION OF TOTAL SCORE
40 40 TO 60 60
Failed Revision and resubmission (poor Pass. No further
New submission reporting) submission required
required OR
At least one more project (wrong or too
limited in scope; inappropriate approach;
information too limited)
This form must be completed during the student’s workplace/site visit.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Postal code:
Postal address:
Postal code:
Telephone number: ( )
Internet address / URL:
Monitor to record what the work-integrated learning of the student has entailed
to date and any recommendations made in this regard:
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
Monitor to record the nature of the mentoring that the student has been
receiving and any observations and/or recommendations made:
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________