You are on page 1of 3

M2 Activity 3

Analyze each case and discuss the following:

1. The general ethical standards and procedures violated by the


psychometrician/psychologist. Explain your answer.
2. The ethical standards and procedures in assessment that were violated by the
psychometrician/psychologist. Explain your answer.
3. Introduce measures to resolve ethical issues.

CASE 1

Jackson is a newly hired psychologist in the XYZ clinic. He recognizes the fact that he is not yet
adept in providing psychological assessment to clients since he just started with her advanced
course in Psychological Testing. He needs experience, hence he conducts testing and
assessment with his nieces and nephews using the tests and assessment tools that he will use
to her future clients. He believes that there is no harm if he will practice the use of these tests or
tools to non-clients.

CASE 2

Mark feels uncomfortable with the fact that he needs to undergo testing as a requirement for the
renewal of his license as security agent. He has been taking the same tests over and over and
has gone bored with the procedure. He plans to just get the photocopies of the protocols and
answer them at home since he was able to get copies of the answer keys. It is a waste of his
time to spend the whole day in the testing room, since everyone knows that this procedure is
just for formality sake.
Case General Ethical Standards Ethical Standards Introduce measures to
and Procedures Violated and Procedures in Resolve Ethical Issues.
Assessment that
were Violated

Case 1 PRINCIPLE IV: Professional I. Assessment by 1. As a Psychology


and Scientific Unqualified Persons student, I personally
Responsibilities to Society think that
1. We do not promote professionals like
B. The discipline’s the use of Jackson (even
responsibility to use assessment tools though he is not yet
psychological knowledge for and methods by qualified for doing
beneficial purposes unqualified persons psychological
and to protect such except for training assessments) shall
knowledge from being purposes with continue his
misused, used incompetently, adequate education and
or made useless. supervision. course before
conducting the test
and that specifically,
Why: Because as a Why: "He recognizes not with his niece
Psychologist, Jackson should the fact that he is not and nephews nor
have considered that he is yet adept in providing any of the family
not yet proficient and still psychological members. Aside
have an ongoing course in assessment to clients from this, if he wants
psychological assessment since he just started and needs to
which he still persistently with her advanced conduct some
conducted the tests with his course in testing, supervision
nieces and nephews. As Psychological Testing. and mentoring is a
stated above in item b, use He needs experience" must– until Jackson
psychological knowledge for From this case, gains sufficient
beneficial purposes and to Jackson is technically proficiency, he
protect such knowledge from considered as an should seek
being used incompetently. unqualified person supervision and
using the test to guidance from a
conduct with his nieces qualified
and nephews knowing psychologist who
that he is not yet ready can oversee his
to use the test, he still assessment activities
conducted it without and provide
supervision. constructive
feedback. Third, he
must always
consider his
knowledge before
doing any actions ad
must comply with the
ethical standards
and principles
governing
psychological
assessments, such
as those outlined by
the American
Psychological
Association (APA) or
relevant professional
organizations in his
region.

Case 2 PRINCIPLE IV: Professional I. Assessment by In Mark’s case, with the


and Scientific Unqualified Persons view of the test-users,
Responsibilities to Society stricter or Enhanced
2. We ensure that test Security Protocols shall
B. The discipline’s protocols, their be alarming to the
responsibility to use interpretations and test-users. Qualified
psychological knowledge for all other records are professionals, including
beneficial purposes kept secured from psychologists,
and to protect such unqualified persons. psychometricians, and
knowledge from being psychiatrists, should
misused, used incompetently, Why: As stated in I. establish and enforce
or made useless. Assessment by stringent security
Unqualified persons, protocols for all
Why: Firstly, Mark is not a we shall ensure that psychological tests,
psychologist nor the test protocols, protocols, answer keys,
psychometrician in this case interpretations and and related materials.
and it is clearly stated that he other records are Access to sensitive
is a security agent which secure. Hence, with materials should be
concludes that the test-users this case, test-users restricted to authorized
(psychologists, are unable to keep the personnel only, and
psychometrician, test protocols (copy of secure storage
psychiatrists) or the qualified answer keys) secured mechanisms. Aside from
persons are the one who from unqualified the measures stated, the
violated the ethics as they persons which is Mark. society at large must
were unable to protect such engage in public
knowledge from being awareness campaigns to
misused and used highlight the importance
incompetently. of protecting
psychological knowledge
and the consequences of
its misuse or
incompetence as to avoid
and learn to be
competent, honest, and
have integrity as a person
as in Mark’s point of view.

You might also like