ISO/TS 15530-2 GPS CMMs:

Techniques for evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement.

Part 2: Use of multiple measurement strategies in measurements of artefacts

V. Zelený
I. Linkeová
J. Sýkora
P. Skalník
 CMI activities

Review of draft Examples recalculation in MS Excel

• ISO/TC 213/WG 10 N 727-1
ISO/TS 15530-2 GPS CMMs:
Techniques for evaluation of the uncertainty of
measurement. Part 2: Use of multiple measurement
strategies in measurements of artefacts
• ISO/TC 213/WG 10 N 727-2
Annex A: Examples of the formulas with which the
result, the uncertainty contributions and systematic
errors may be calculated
• ISO/TC 213/WG 10 N 727-3
Annex B: Examples
Annex C: Calculation of the coverage factor k using
the effective degrees of freedom
Annex D: Recommendations for standards of
distance probed in a uni-directional or a center-to
center mode
Annex E: Justifications of randomization
FORMULAS
CMI SUGGESTIONS
• Example 1: Measurement results and
uncertainty assessment of a feature of
distance (p.1)
• Example 3: Measurement results and
uncertainty assessment of the
deviations from a LSM fitted substitute
element (p. 11)
• Example 4: Measurmeent results and
uncertainty assessment of an angle
measurement (p. 13)
Measurement on SIP CMM 5 and
uncertainty assessment in MS Excel
• Example 2: Measurement results and
uncertainty assessment of the
deviations from a CAD element (p.7)
Hyperbolic paraboloid

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 2

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

Hyperbolic paraboloid – measurement results and uncertainty assessment of the deviations from a CAD element
1. Measuremet strategy
Definition of workpiece coordinate system by datum points

Measured points on fiducial sphere Definition of workpiece coordinate sytem

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 3

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

1. Measuremet strategy
Sampling of measured points

52 sampled points in (x,y) grid

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 4

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

2. Measurement of surface normal distance of each point in 5 cycles in 4 orientations with respect to 2 CAD models
Orientation 1 – basic orientation. Workpiece coordinate system is identical with world coordinate system.
Orientation 2 – rotation of workpiece by 90° around x-axis with respect to the basic orientation.
Orientation 3 – rotation of workpiece by 90° around y-axis with respect to the basic orientation.
Orientation 4 – rotation of workpiece by 90° around z-axis with respect to the basic orientation.

Orientation 1 Orientation 2 Orientation 3 Orientation 4

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 5

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

2. Measurement of surface normal distance of each point in 5 cycles in 4 orientations with respect to 2 CAD models

Orientation 1 Orientation 2 Orientation 3 Orientation 4

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 6

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

Reference Measurement with respect

precise CAD model to the original CAD

Simulation of
UNPRECISE WORKPIECE
measurement

Reference Measurement with respect

calibrated CAD model to the calibrated CAD

Simulation of
PRECISE WORKPIECE
measurement

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 7

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

Two references One physical standard

Theoretical CAD model Calibrated CAD model

Simulation of Simulation of
UNPRECISE WORKPIECE PRECISE WORKPIECE
measurement measurement

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 8

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

3. Uncerainty assesment according to ISO/TS 15530-2 (ISO/TC 213/WG 10 N 727-1, 2, 3)

Uavr 0.000753916 Uavr 0.000826748

Umin 0.000165998 Umin 0.000265501
Umax 0.001515485 Umax 0.001465534

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 9

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

3. Uncerainty assesment according to ISO/TS 15530-2 (ISO/TC 213/WG 10 N 727-1, 2, 3)

Uncertainty CAD CCAD

U_avr 0.00075 mm 0.00083 mm

U_min 0.00017 mm 0.00027 mm

U_max 0.00152 mm 0.00147 mm

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 10

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

4. CMI suggestions

Uncertainty ISO/TS 15520—2 CMI

contribution Formula Description Formula Description

Quadratic average of the

Quadratic average of the standard deviations for the
Uncertainty individual tests
standard deviations
1 1 1 in different orientations
originating from = for the individual tests in =
repeatibility different orientations
See: Stadek, J.A.: Coordinate
divided by
Metrology, Springer, 2015, p.
76, eq. (3.15)

Standard deviation of the

Quadratic average of the
Uncertainty ofiginating averages of the
1 1 1 standard deviaitons for the
from geometry errors = − measured values =
of CMM −1 individual tests
form each orientation
in different cycles
divided by

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 11

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

Uncerainty assesment according to CMI

Uavr 0.001587989 Uavr 0.00173050

Umin 0.000532016 Umin 0.00059941
Umax 0.003083534 Umax 0.00299832

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 12

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

Uncerainty assesment according to CMI

Uncertainty CAD CCAD

U_avr 0.00159 mm 0.00173 mm

U_min 0.00053 mm 0.00060 mm

U_max 0.00308 mm 0.00300 mm

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 13

 Measurement of HP on SIP CMM 5 and uncertainty assessment in MS Excel

Uncerainty assesment according to ISO/TS 15530-2 and CMI comparison

CMI CAD CCAD

U_avr 0.00159 mm 0.00173 mm

U_min 0.00053 mm 0.00060 mm

U_max 0.00308 mm 0.00300 mm

ISO/TS 15530-2 CAD CCAD

U_avr 0.00075 mm 0.00083 mm

U_min 0.00017 mm 0.00027 mm

U_max 0.00152 mm 0.00147 mm

November 5 -6, 2019 PTB, Braunschweig 14

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Okružní 31, 638 00 Brno, Czech Republic, + 420 545 555 337, www.cmi.cz