Professional Documents
Culture Documents
©1979 The Metals Society. Manuscript received 1 March 1978. The original
version of this paper was presented at the conference on 'Directionality of proper-
ties in wrought products' held by The Metals Society in London on 27-28 November
1974. At the time the work was carried out the authors were with the British Steel
Corporation, Sheffield Laboratories. Dr Banks is now with the United Kingdom
T. M. Banks Atomic Energy Authority, Nuclear Power Development Laboratories, Windscale,
T. Gladman Cumbria.
In the rolling of sheet and strip in modern mills, defor- Although all the lA, I1A, IlIA, and IVA subgroup
mation takes place mainly in the longitudinal direction. As elements constitute potential manganese sulphide modi-
the extension increases, there is a deterioration in the fiers,6 only calcium, titanium, and Mischmetal * have been
transverse and through-thickness toughness parameters, selected for study since the application of the other elements
attributable mainly to the plastically deformable inclusions, (with the exception of zirconium) is limited by practical
such as manganese sulphides. considerations. In addition, the effects of the Type II
The precipitation pattern of manganese sulphides in the MnS-promoting elements, aluminium, and sulphur have
ingot has a particularly deleterious effect on the properties been assessed.
of the wrought product. In the ingot the strong segregation
tendency of sulphur and the frequent distribution of
sulphides as chain-like precipitates at the primary ingot
Experimental procedures
grain boundaries cause a high local planar density of
inclusions. On rolling, inclusion clusters become displaced
and reoriented to form elongated stringers, the effect being A series of O·25C-1·2Mn, 080M40 (En8), and 606M36
exacerbated by deformation of the individual inclusions. (En 16M) steels were air melted in a high-frequency in-
Manganese sulphides have been classified by Sims and duction furnace. The Si, Mn, S, and C levels were adjusted
Dahle,l according to their morphology in the ingot, as fol- by appropriate additions to the initial melt of high-purity
lows: iron. The aluminium and, finally, the titanium, Mischmetal,
Type I: isolated globular sulphides which form as a or Calsibart additions were introduced immediately before
liquid phase in the liquid steel tapping. The chemical analyses of the steels are given in
Type II: dendritic, chain-like intergranular sulphides, Table 1.
described as a cooperative eutectic2,3 or a Each 60kg melt was cast into a cylindrical sand mould of
cooperative monotectic4,5 200mm dia., which minimized the surface area of the ingot.
Type III: isolated idiomorphic sulphides which form as a The sand mould was, in turn, surrounded by a large volume
result of a divorced eutectic reaction. of sand. The cooling rate was measured and estimated to be
The Type II morphology, which has a severe adverse effect equivalent to that of an air-cooled ingot of 540 mm dia.,
on ductility, is not uncommon in commercial steels and, i.e. a small commercial ingot. A 15 mm thick diametral sec-
therefore, in recent years efforts have been made to tion was cut from each ingot and subjected to sulphur prin-
alleviate this problem by the addition of sulphophilic ting. Metallographic specimens were prepared from the
elements. The strong sulphide formers modify the compo-
sition of the sulphide inclusions and hence their morphology *Mischmetal is a mixture of the rare-earth elements having a typical
and distribution in both cast and wrought steels; they composition 50Ce-25La-IONd-5Pr plus the other lanthanides.
also modify the plasticity of the sulphides during hot tCalsibar is the trade name of an alloy containing 15Ca-16Ba-60Si-
deformation. These factors act in concert to reduce the iAI-I Fe. The barium is added to the alloy so that it has a higher
density and a lower vapour pressure. The silicon content is usually
local planar density of inclusions and hence the anisotropy wholly recovered and therefore may limit the addition made to the
of toughness parameters. steel.
Steel AI N
number C Si Mn 5 Sol. Insol. As AIN Sol. Insol. Ti Ca C(: 0
1 0·25 0·42 1·16 0·008 < 0·002 0·004 0·0076 0·010 0·002 0·0117
2 0·24 0·33 1·18 0·008 0·033 0·011 0·0067 0·009 0·002 0·0047
3 0·26 0·38 1·19 0·007 0·101 0·011 0·0079 0·008 0·003 0·0047
4 0·26 0·26 1·14 0·021 0·002 0·001 0·0010 0·011 0·003 0·0102
5 0·24 0·22 1·12 0·021 0·025 0·012 0·0118 0·011 0·003 0·0053
6 0·25 0·25 1·20 0·051 0·004 <0·001 0·0010 0·011 0·003 0·0072
7 0·25 0·24 1·14 0·050 0·031 0·012 0'0096 0·011 0·003 0·0049
8 0·245 0·19 1·11 0·051 0·116 0·012 0·0104 0·010 0·003 .. .. 0·0037
9 0·25 0·18 1·18 0·009 <0·002 <0·001 0·0017 0·006 0·003 0·05 NA 0·0098
10 0·25 0·22 1·18 0·012 <0·002 <0·001 0·0010 0·002 0·005 0·10 NA 0·0115
11 0·255 0·22 1·17 0·007 0·027 0·011 0·0012 0·002 0·007 0·065 NA NA
12 0·26 0·16 1·18 0·010 0·013 0·020 0·0006 0·002 0·008 0·09 NA 0·0069
13 0·25 0·15 1·17 0·010 0·003 <0·001 0·0015 0·008 0·001 <0·02 0·048 0·0070
14 0·25 0·30 1·17 0·011 0·004 <0·001 0·0015 0·007 0·001 <0·02 0·088 0·0110
15 0·26 0·23 1·18 0·009 0·035 <0·001 0·0062 0·008 0·001 <0·02 0·050 0·0096
16 0·26 0·24 1·15 0·009 0·035 <0·001 0·0087 0·008 0·001 <0·02 0·075 0·0070
17 0·12 0·09 0·72 0·026 NA NA 0·0010 0·009 0·003 0·06 NA 0·0232
18 0·21 0·16 1·08 0·025 NA NA 0·0029 0·005 0·006 0·08 NA 0·0133
19 0·25 0·23 1·18 0·026 0·027 0·013 0·0006 0·002 0·009 0·075 NA 0·0056
20 0·25 0·27 1·14 0·026 0·022 0·015 0·004 0·002 0·011 0·12 NA 0·0090
21 0·26 0·23 1·14 0·027 NA NA 0·0046 0·010 0·001 0·003 0·039 0·114
22 0·255 0·185 1·23 0·025 NA NA 0·0040 0·013 0·001 0·004 0·102 0·0175
23 0·26 0·18 1·21 0·025 0·039 0·001 0·0037 0·010 0·001 0·002 0·065 0·0078
24 0·25 0·19 1·15 0·026 0·032 < 0·001 0·0114 0·010 0·001 0·002 .. 0·078 0·0088
25 0·37 0·65 0·84 0·011 0·032 0·005 0·0073 NA NA 0·002 0·0076
26 0·36 0·30 0·78 0·013 0·030 0·013 0·0062 NA NA 0·001 0·0067
27 0·37 0·24 0·82 0·029 0·022 0·010 0·0071 NA NA NA 0·0051
28 0·40 0·68 0·76 0·029 0·021 0·005 0·0093 NA NA 0·003 0·0059
29 0·40 0·38 0·82 0·034 0·023 0·010 0·0096 NA NA 0·002 0·0065
30 0·34 0·30 1·38 0·198 NA NA 0·0010 0·007 0·001 <0·001 0·0092
31 0·34 1·02 1·36 0·176 NA NA 0·0006 0·009 0·002 0·015 0·0090
columnar and equiaxed zones of each section. Charpy- The inclusions in selected steels were examined by
impact specimens were manufactured with their longitudinal electron probe microanalysis, or by X-ray diffraction of
axes normal to the direction of columnar grain growth, and powder residues extracted in a 5% solution of bromine in
tested at 150°C. Two sections were cut from the remainder methanol. Carbon-extraction replicas, prepared in the
of each ingot and rolled either from 1200°C in a falling usual manner, from selected rolled steels, were examined by
temperature regime or at 900°C by reheating after each high-voltage electron microscopy.
pass, to a 4: 1 reduction. The x-z plane was prepared for
metallographic examination.
Various methods of assessing the inclusion plasticity Results
have been cited in the literature.7-9 In accordance with
other recently published work,10 the definition due to
Malkiewicz and Rudnik 9 has been utilized in the present EFFECTS OF COMPOSITION ON INCLUSION
investigation. The plasticity ratio v is defined by CONSTITUTION AND MORPHOLOGY
210gA Selected inclusions were examined in the as-cast or as-rolled
v=-- conditions by electron probe microanalysis, and typical
310gh analyses are given in Table 2. The morphological classi-
where A=a/b and h=Fo/F1; a and b are the major and fication of Sims and Dahle1 applies, strictly, to manganese
minor axes, respectively, of the ellipsoidally deformed sulphides, but it is also commonly used to describe other
inclusion, and Fo and F1 are the initial and final cross- sulphide species. In this paper, classification will be based
sectional areas of the steel. The advantages of this expres- solely on form.
sion are: the value of the plasticity ratio for zero-inclusion In unmodified steels the sulphide is always (Mn, Fe)S,
deformation is always zero, the terms 10gAand logh are provided the Mn/S ratio is greater than 5. The iron content
both measures of true strain, the distribution of 10gA could not be determined accurately owing to the thickness
values is normal enabling statistical analyses to be per- of the inclusion relative to the depth of penetration of the
formed, and also bimodality may be more easily identified.
The mean projected length and mean projected width,
measured on the x-z face, may be computed using the Quan-
timet or, alternatively, the aspect ratio of each inclusion Table 2 Electron probe microanalysis of selected in-
measured manually. However, the QTM is not able to differ- clusions
entiate between cerium oxides, sulphides, and oxysulphides
Analysis, %
so that the possibility of a bimodal distribution could not Steel Inclusion type Fe MnS AI Ti Ca Si02 AI203 Ti203 MnO
be tested. Also, the value of mean 10gAis not equal to the
value of log (mean A),particularly in the situation where the 4 Type I MnS 60 28 15 ..
range of A-values is large. The length and width of about 4 Silicate 33 1 1 .. .. .. 21 17 27
6 Type II MnS 57 32 16 .. 3
250 inclusions, therefore, were measured manually. Oxides 8 Type II MnS 47 36 19 .. ..
were included in the aspect-ratio measurements since it is 8 Alumina 78 .. .. 22 ..
18 Oxide 29 2 .. .. .. 2 60
believed that oxides and sulphides will both form voids by 19 Type II MnS 55 30 17 .. ..
interface decohesion at very low strains, and hence con- 19 Oxide 33 1 .. .. .. .. 70 15
tribute to the fracture process in a like manner.
28 Type II MnS 6 59 31 6 ..
a b
c d
a steel 1, 0·008%5; b steel 6, 0·051 %5 ; c steel 4, 0·003%AI ; d steel 5, 0·037%AI
1 Optical micrographs of sulphide in cast steel, showing effects of sulphur and aluminium xSOO
electron beam. However, although it is known that up to observation has been made by the authors; (cf steels 4, 6,
60% of the manganese may be replaced by iron, a value of and 8, Table 2). Globular, relatively isolated duplex silicate-
5 % would be more typical. 11 sulphide inclusions are frequently observed in silicon-killed
Increasing the sulphur l~~velcan lead to a replacement of steels, whereas in aluminium-treated steels alumina
Type I with Type II manganese sulphide (Fig.1a and b). galaxies are observed, often in association with Type II
The sulphur level at which this occurs depends on the sulphides. The concomitant reduction in oxygen levels is
carbon, oxygen, silicon, and manganese contents.12 The the cause of the replacement of Type I by Type II sulphides, 2
Type II sulphides formed as a result of increasing the which form by a cooperative mechanism at columnar
sulphur level (rather than by adding aluminium) have very grain boundaries (cf Fig.Ie and d). In the absence of
pronounced rod-like structures. A possible explanation for aluminium, isolated globular Type I sulphides are ob-
the effect of sulphur or, more precisely, S/O ratio is that the served to form loose networks in the interdendritic regions
first formed liquid-oxide phase takes the sulphide into owing to sulphur segregation. In modified steels, prior
solution and, subsequently, on cooling, precipitates it at deoxidation with aluminium is essential to avoid the
the globular oxide/metal interface. Increasing the sulphur occurance of gross oxide stringers.
level (or reducing the oxide content) to a level which In the present work titanium additions of up to 0'12%
exceeds the solubility causes the sulphide to be nucleated result in the formation of (Mn,Ti)S inclusions containing
directly. up to 3~!c> titanium. The oxide phase in non-aluminium-
Published work 13 has shown that although aluminium is treated titanium-modified steels is Tb03 containing small
effective in modifying the sulphide morphology it has a amounts of alumina. In aluminium-treated steels, the
negligible effect on sulphide composition. A similar oxide phase is alumina containing up to 22% Th03, in
a b
c d
e
a steel 4, Type I MnS, x550; b steel 22, RE-metal-modified sulphides, x500; c steel 8, Type II MnS, x550; d steel 18, Type II MnS in titanium-bearing
steels, x 510; e steel 30, Type II MnS, x 500; f steel 31 , calcium-modified sulphides, x 520
3 Scanning electron micrographs of fracture surface of cast steel
110
J S7 %
(a)
(j) 0·01 0·025 0'18
~100 rollQd at 900°C 0 • •
w rollQd at 1200°C 0 • A
~
(j) 1-5
••
90
u
~
°
lD
(\J 80
I
• o
1-0
6 -;
'-' 0 ------ I •0
-0---0__ 0
0::: 70
>- 0
~
U
° 60
• \l\l
t:05
u
i=
U ----_
0 0 ---
0 (j)
lD <!
~ 50
• 'Y
ttJ
~ 0
>-
• •
<.9
0::: 40 TYPQ II
W
Z sulphidQS
W \l
I-
U
<!
30
0 basQ
• •
Q..
2 20 • basQ + Al
0 basQ + CQ
>-
Q..
0::: 10
• basQ + CQ + Al
'V basQ + Ti 0·5
<!
I
• basQ + Ti + Al --g--------------e
u
o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 o
AREA FRACTION (SULPHIDE + OXIDE) IN
COLUMNAR ZONE, x 104
4 Charpy ductile shelf energy as function of inclusion 6 Effects of titanium and calcium on inclusion
area fraction plasticity ratio
the sulphur content which largely determines the volume The relationship between shelf energy and the area
fraction of inclusions present in the steel, and the alu- fraction of (sulphide+oxide) inclusions in the columnar
minium, sulphur, titanium, cerium, and calcium contents zone of the O·25%C steels is shown in Fig.4. Although
which determine the morphology and distribution and increasing the volume fraction reduces the impact energy,
hence planar density of the sulphide inclusions. the data points fall into two regimes, the upper containing
the base (low-sulphur) steels (Fig.3a) and the cerium-
treated steels (Fig.3b), which exhibit well dispersed in-
0-4 clusions, and the lower containing the base (high-sulphur)
stQQI 1 stQQI 8
0·3 (with AL)
0·2
S7 %
~ 0·1 0·6
w
0::: 0
0-4
0·3
>
~ 0·4
..J
•
w 0·025°10 S as
0·2 0::: 0.2 RE202S
0·1
o 0
-0-4 0 0-40'8 1-2 1·6 2·0 -04 0 040·8 l2 1·6 2·02-4
LOG A
a b
a and b steel 1, initially containing Type I sulphides x 500; c steel 6, initially containing Type II sulphides, x 500; d steel 30, showing inclusion
stringer x 100
8 Optical micrographs of sulphide inclusions in rolled steel
steels (Fig.3c) and the titanium-treated steels (Fig.3d), deformability) lies in the fact that it gives a direct indication
which exhibit extensive networks of Type II morphology of the hot-deformation behaviour of the inclusion in its
sulphides. One of the cerium-treated steels (21) contained a steel environment. It is possible, therefore, to connect
proportion of Type II rnanganese sulphides which were metallographic studies of the deformation of individual
instrumental in reducing the impact-energy value. The inclusions with the subsequent mechanical behaviour of the
salient feature of Fig.4, therefore, is that the upper regime aggregate of steel and inclusion population. In addition, it
contains only isolated sulphides, whereas the lower regime provides a measure of the tendency of both individual
contains Type II morphology sulphides. Similarly, a 1% inclusions and clusters of inclusions to form elongated
addition of Calsibar to 080M40 and 606M36 steels (27, 28, stringers.
30, and 31) modifies the sulphide morphology from Type II Histograms illustrating the distribution of inclusion
to Type III (Fig.3e and f) and in both cases results in an aspect ratios for a number of steels, selected to show the
approximately 50% increase in shelf energy. The Charpy effects of aluminium, titanium, cerium, and calcium, are
ductile shelf energy, therefore, provides a technique for presented in Fig.5. Steel 1 contains a proportion of silicate
ranking the degree of indusion clustering in the cast steel, inclusions which are generally assumed to be more plastic
and emphasizes the extent to which clustering may be than sulphides at elevated temperatures.16 The high mean
present before rolling. logarithm of aspect ratio (indicated by the dashed line) of
steel 1 relative to steel 8 after rolling from 1200°C is in
INCLUSION PLASTICITY agreement with this assumption. The addition of up to
The importance of inclusion plasticity ratio (or index of 0·12% titanium (steel 20) has no significant effect on the
a steel 20, 0'12%Ti; b steel 24, 0'078%Ce; c steel 28, 0'003%Ca; d steel 30, O%Ca; e steel 31 , 0'015%Ca
9 Optical micrographs of sulphide inclusions in rolled steel, showing effects of titanium, cerium, and calcium
x500
V
o
o
elongation of the individual sulphide branches and the JOB
reorientation of the complete colonies, with their con- Q..
o
stituent branches, into the rolling plane. The deformed and z
o o TYPQ IMnS + Ca
reoriented Type II sulphides appear in optical micrographs ~0·6 o
as stringers contained within a ferrite envelope (Fig.8c and L
d). Rolled titanium-modified steels contained extensively
deformed sulphide inclusions, but the globular brown Ti203 0-4
particles and angular yellow Ti(C,N) particles remained
undeformed (Fig.9a). The cerium (or rare earth) oxides
and oxysulphides remain essentially spherical after rolling 0·2
(Fig.9b). The sulphides in the Calsibar-treated 080M40
steels were only slightly elongated, and frequently con-
tained dark-grey globular calcium aluminate particles
o
3·0 4·0 5·0
(Fig.9c). The addition of calcium to 606M36 steels favour- MEAN MAXIMUM CHORD WIDTH, I-lm
ably modified the sulphide distribution, but the plasticity
10 Effect of initial inclusion size on plasticity ratio
was not significantly changed (Figs.9d and e).
Large variations in plasticity ratios between the material
rolled from 1200°C and that rolled at 900°C were not ob- with increasing temperature. 10There are no published data
served, although the mean value increased from 0·72 to on the variation of relative plasticity of Type II MnS with
0·79. One explanation of this is that the finish-rolling tem- temperature.
peratures were not too dissimilar; or it may be a conse- Although there are few quantitative data on the effect of
quence of the Type II sulphide morphology in 18 of the 31 inclusion size on plasticity ratio, it is accepted that small
steels examined. Work cited in the literature has shown particles deform less readily than large ones, and generally
Type I MnS inclusions to have maximum relative plas- only start to deform at low temperatures and large re-
ticityat 1100°,17 750°,18 or 900°C,10and the relative plas- ductions. This effect has been ascribed by Kiessling16
ticity of Type III MnS inclusions to decrease continuously to the forces at the metal/inclusion interface. In Fig.l0 the
a b
a at 900°C, x 80 000; b from 1 200°C, x 75 000
11 Electron micrographs of manganese sulphides after rolling
INCLUSION SEGREGATION
The spatial distribution of sulphide and oxide inclusions
within the ingot naturally is also of importance in relation
to the local planar density of inclusions. A decrease of
about 25% in the average volume fraction of non-refractory
sulphide inclusions in the equiaxed zone relative to the
columnar zone was observed, together with a correspond-
ing decrease in sulphide size. This is in accordance with the
normal segregation pattern in the lower region of kiIled-
steel ingots. However, the size of the ingot was such that
the equiaxed zone was not sufficiently large to cause segre-
gation of oxides and refractory sulphides, although this is a
cause for concern in commercial ingots.19
a x 50 000; b x 12 000
13 Transmission electron micrographs of alumina inclusions after rolling from 1200°C
suggests that small coherent FeS precipitates have been dislocation reaction (arrow A) and some particles exhibit-
formed within the MnS inclusion, since the solubility of ing Moire fringe contrast (arrow B). It is germane to
FeS in MnS may be as much as 60% at I180°C but emphasize that the micrographs in Figs.II-14 represent
decreases rapidly with falling temperature,20 and Widman- the structure within extracted inclusions. Figure I4c may be
sHitten precipitation of FeS in artificial FeS-MnS alloys analysed as a (00·1) zone of Y-phase (Ti(C,N)S). The
has been observed.21 In addition, Kiessling22 has noted second-phase particles have little effect on matrix (Le.
that the corrosion behaviour of inclusions is related to strain-field) contrast, structure-factor contrast, or orient-
their conductivity, which, in turn, is related to their FeS ation contrast, which suggests that precipitate and matrix
content, such that there is a conductivity minimum for are almost identical in structure and lattice parameter.
small FeS contents. The decomposition of a supersaturated Y-phase,24 TiS2, and ThS425 are hexagonal phases having
alloy with the formation of coherent particles, such as similar lattice parameters. Their crystal data are given in
those observed, may be expected to give rise to a classical Table 4.
resistivity maximum 23such as that reported by Kiessling. ThS4 may be regarded as TiS2 with sulphur atoms re-
It has also been suggested that oxide particles may be moved from alternate basal planes, and Y-phase as TiS2
present in MnS inclusions, and, although no selected-area with carbon or nitrogen replacing sulphur atoms. Although
diffraction evidence has been obtained, the appearance of a more accurate electron-diffraction examination is neces-
the microstructure shown in Fig.12c (small second-phase sary to identify the inclusions and internal precipitates
particles inhibiting subgrain growth) is consistent with this conclusively, it is suggested that the precipitation of
suggestion. The inclusions shown in Fig.12 were from the vacancies, or the incorporation of carbon or nitrogen on
same steel as those shown in Fig.II. Some diffraction cooling TiS2 inclusions could give rise to the observed
patterns could be analysed only by including forbidden two-phase structure, with little structure-factor and strain-
reflections which could not be caused by double diffraction. field contrast (Fig. 14). The Moire pattern (arrow B) in
It is postulated, therefore, that the MnS contains transition Fig.14b has a spacing of ~2·4nm. The operating re-
metals in ordered solid solution, or that vacancies induced flection is the (11·0) reflection which has d spacings of
to compensate for the consequent change in valency of the 0·171 nm for ThS4 and 0·1603nm for Y-phase. The Moire
metal ions are themselves ordered. spacing D for parallel superimposed lattices of spacings
The electron microstructure of alumina inclusions dl and d2, given by D=d1d2/(dl-d2), is calculated to be
(Fig.13) is entirely consistent with their known refractory 2·55 nm, in excellent agreement with the measured value,
properties. The alumina inclusion, from steel 7, exhibits an which tends to confirm that the inclusions in this steel are
occasional low-angle boundary but little evidence of Y-phase containing ThS4.
significant dislocation mobility. At low magnification it can
be seen that the particle fractured in a brittle manner into
hard angular fragments (Fig. I3b).
The electron microstructure of inclusions in an experi- Discussion
mental HSLA steel is shown in Fig.14. This steel, from a
different source, is not included in Table 1, but contained a
higher level of titanium (0·23%) than the other steels The role of non-metallic inclusions as nucleating sites for
studied by the authors. Figure I4a shows arrays of void formation in the ductile fracture of steels has become
featureless precipitates within the inclusions and smaller well established.26 Elongation of the inclusions leads to
particles which have apparently precipitated on dislocation poor ductility in the situation where the inclusions are
arrays revealed by slip traces. Figure I4b shows an unusual stressed normal to their longitudinal direction,27 and
precipitation within manganese sulphides and of TisS4 pre- 13. P. P. MOHLA and J. BEECH: Br. Foundryman, 1968,453.
14. w. G. WILSON and R. G. WELLS: Met. Progr., 1973,103,75.
cipitation within the Y-phase has been presented. 15. w. G. WILSON, D. A. R. KAY., and A. VAHED: J. Met., 1974,26,15.
16. R. KIESSLING: 'Non-metallic inclusions in steel', Part III, 54;
1968, London, The Iron and Steel Institute.
17. C. MOORE: M.Met. thesis, University of Sheffield, 1968.
Acknowledgments 18. P. J. H. MAUNDER and J. A. CHARLES: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1968,206,
705.
19. I. G. DAVIES, M. RANDLE and R. WIDDOWSON: Met. Technol., 1974,
1,241.
The authors would like to thank Dr K. J. Irvine, Manager 20. R. KIESSLING and N. LANGE: 'Non-metallic inclusions in steel',
of the Sheffield Laboratories, British Steel Corporation, for Part II, 128; 1966, London, The Iron and Steel Institute.
permission to publish this paper. 21. Ibid., 109.
22. R. KIESSLING: 'Sulfide inclusions in steel', 442; 1974, New York,
American Society for Metals.
23. A. KELLY and R. B. NICHOLSON: Prog. Mater. Sci., 1963. 10, (3),
176.
References 24. K. W. ANDREWS, D. J. DYSON, and s. R. KEOWN: 'The interpretation
of electron diffraction patterns'; 1971, London, Hilger.
25. A. TAYLOR and B. J. KAGLE: 'Crystallographic data on metal and
1. c. E. SIMS and F. B. DAHLE: Trans. AFS., 1938,46,65. alloy structures'; 1962, New York, Dover Publications.
2. L. K. BIGELOW and M. C. FLEMINGS: Report CR-7Q-13, Army 26. T. GLADMAN, B. HOLMES, and I. D. MCIVOR: 'The effect of second-
Materials and Mechanics Research Center, 1970. phase particles on the mechanical properties of steel', 68; 1971,
3. W. DAHL, H. HENGSTENBERG, and c. DUREN: Stahl Eisen, 1966,86, London, The Iron and Steel Institute.
782. 27. M. WAHLSTER, H. HEIMBACH, and K. FORCH: Stahl Eisen, 1969,89,
4. H. FREDERIKSSON and M. HlLLERT: J. Iron Steel Inst., 1971, 209, 1037.
109. 28. T. J. BAKER and J. A. CHARLES: 'The effect of second-phase
5. H. FREDERIKSSON and M. HlLLERT: Scand. J. Metall., 1972, 2, particles on the mechanical properties of steel', 79; 1971,
125-145. London, The Iron and Steel Institute.
6. K. A. GSCHNEIDER and N. KIPPENHAM: IS-RIC-5, Molybdenum 29. T. GLADMAN: 'Sulfide inclusions in steel', 273; 1974, New York,
Corporation of America, 1971. American Society for Metals.
7. E. SCHElL and R. SCHNELL: Stahl Eisen, 1952,72,683. 30. F. HEISTERKAMP and L. MEYER: Thyssen Forsch., 1971, 3,44.
8. F. B. PICKERING: J. Iron SteeIInst., 1958,189,148. 31. H. GONDA, Y. TANI, T. YAMAGUCHI, I. KOZASU, J. NOSE, and Y.
9. T. MALKIEWICZ and s. RUDNIK: ibid., 1963,201,33. IKEGAMI: Nippon Kokan Tech. Rep. (Overseas), 1973,9.
10. T. J. BAKER and J. A. CHARLES: ibid., 1972,210,680. 32. J. H. LITTLE and W. J. M. HENDERSON: 'The effect of second-phase
11. R. KIESSLING and N. LANGE: 'Non-metallic inclusions in steel', particles on the mechanical properties of steel', 182; 1971,
Part II, 130; 1966, London, The Iron and Steel Institute. London, The Iron and Steel Institute.
12. J. BRADSHAW and w. J. JACKSON: J. Research (SCRATA), 1970,9, 33. J. L. MIHELICH, J. R. BELL, and M. KORCHYNSKY: J. Iron SteeIInst.,
11. 1971,209,469.