Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • NFC - Paper 2 - Diversity and Change

    Uploaded by

    Joseph
    1 views2 pages
    The document provides guidance for answering questions on a paper about diversity and change. It outlines three levels of complexity for AO1 answers regarding linguistic features: 1) non-standard grammar and lexis, 2) technical features like t-glottaling and address terms, and 3) maximally technical stratification of post-vocalic /r/ and affrication. For AO2, it advises using theories, studies, and evaluative language to agree or disagree with the question. Phrases like "possibly" and "it could be argued" are suggested. Levels of understanding and complexity from L1 to L5 are also defined.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    NFC -- Paper 2 - diversity and change

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document provides guidance for answering questions on a paper about diversity and change. It outlines three levels of complexity for AO1 answers regarding linguistic features: 1) non-standard grammar and lexis, 2) technical features like t-glottaling and address terms, and 3) maximally technical stratification of post-vocalic /r/ and affrication. For AO2, it advises using theories, studies, and evaluative language to agree or disagree with the question. Phrases like "possibly" and "it could be argued" are suggested. Levels of understanding and complexity from L1 to L5 are also defined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    NFC - Paper 2 - Diversity and Change

    Uploaded by

    Joseph
    The document provides guidance for answering questions on a paper about diversity and change. It outlines three levels of complexity for AO1 answers regarding linguistic features: 1) non-standard grammar and lexis, 2) technical features like t-glottaling and address terms, and 3) maximally technical stratification of post-vocalic /r/ and affrication. For AO2, it advises using theories, studies, and evaluative language to agree or disagree with the question. Phrases like "possibly" and "it could be argued" are suggested. Levels of understanding and complexity from L1 to L5 are also defined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    29/03/2023

    Paper 2 diversity and change

    For AO1, there's 1 tickers, 2 tickers and 3 tickers:

    · 1 - Accurate: Non-standard grammer, slang, lexis, tag questions

    · 2 - Complex; technical: t-glottaling, vernacular features, l-vocalisation, delayed minimal


    responses, non-binary address terms, such as 'mx'

    · 3 - Maximally technical: social stratification of post-vocalic /r/, affrication of plosive sounds, velar
    fricative /x/

    For AO2, detail theories/studies, use big concepts and evaluation (for example, evaluation of how for you
    agree with the question)

    Phrases to use:

    · possibly...

    · may...

    · it's debated that...

    · it could be argued that...

    · there's some evidence for...

    · it's likely that...

    L1 - limited

    L2 - familiarity

    L3 - clear, explained, detailed

    L4 and L5 - evaluative, challenging, tentative, conceptualise

    You might also like