O.P.

Jindal Global University

Jindal Global Law School
Re-sit Examination

Course Name : Introduction to Academic Reading and Writing/ Writing Workshop

Course Code : L-CA-0014/ L-EA-0067/ L-CA-0013
Programme : B.A., LL.B. 2019/B.B.A., LL.B. 2021/B.Com. (LL.B.) 2021/B.A., LL.B. 2020/B.A., LL.B.
2021
Duration : 12 Hours

How is the exercise of power shaped by language?

Power, in all of its guises, plays a crucial part in the formation of our society as well as the manner in which
we interpret and make sense of the world that surrounds us. One part of power is in the world of language, in
which the words we use and the narratives we make have the capacity to mold and affect our ideas as well
as our beliefs and the ways in which we interact with others. The exercise of power in connection to
language is the topic of this essay, which focuses on two readings that provoke thought: "The Egg and the
Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles" by Emily
Martin and "An Elephant Crackup" by Charles Siebert. Martin digs into the world of reproductive biology in
his book "The Egg and the Sperm," where he investigates the ways in which the language and images of
scien¯ce may perpetuate and reaffirm old gender roles and stereotypes. Martin illustrates, via his analysis of
the representations of fertilization and conception, how the scientific discourse frequently depicts the egg as
being docile and caring, while the sperm is described as being energetic and competitive. Martin's study
raises fundamental concerns concerning the importance of language on our sense of gender and the
preservation of cultural standards, and this construction mimics the gender expectations of society.

On the other side, "An Elephant Crackup" by Siebert investigates the complex link that exists between
elephants, the behavior that they exhibit, and the use of power. This essay explores the emotional and
psychological impacts of trauma suffered by elephants in the wild as a result of human encroachment, loss of
habitat, and aggression. Siebert contends that elephants are susceptible to developing behavioral issues and
possibly "post-traumatic stress disorder" as a result of traumatic situations like those described above.
Siebert invites us to think on our use of power over other species and the language we use to explain such
Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 1
acts by evaluating the implications of human activities on elephants and their social dynamics. This is done
by examining the effects of human actions on elephants. This article makes the argument that the use of
language is intricately connected to the exercise of power, and it does so by drawing on the thought-
provoking readings of Martin and Siebert. Language not only reflects the power relations that already exist
within a society, but it also helps to maintain and bolster those patterns. Our conceptions of gender roles,
social hierarchies, and the manner in which we relate to other animals are shaped by the choices we make in
language, whether we do so through the scientific discourse or the tales we create. In the end, the purpose
of this article is to investigate the ways in which the use of language shapes the exercise of power and the
ways in which a knowledge of this relationship might motivate us to examine and challenge current power
systems. The comparison and contrast of "The Egg and the Sperm" and "An Elephant Crackup" sheds light
on the complex relationship that exists between power and language, as well as the cultural norms that are
created via their interaction. By looking at these readings through a critical lens, we may obtain a greater
knowledge of how language affects and reflects power relations. This will push us to reevaluate our part in
the process of forming a society that is more equal and inclusive.

Language plays a significant part in the formation and maintenance of gender stereotypes and roles, and as
a result, it has an impact on the distribution of power within a society. In her article "The Egg and the Sperm,"
Emily Martin provides a riveting investigation of the ways in which scientific jargon contributes to the
perpetuation of gender prejudices. Martin illustrates the ways in which language contributes to power
inequalities and the marginalization of women by carefully analyzing particular cases and bringing attention
to them through thorough analysis. The language of science frequently makes use of metaphors and images
that conform to the gender norms that are prevalent in society. Martin brings out the interesting observation
that in many accounts of fertilization and conception, the egg is typically portrayed as inactive and caring,
whereas the sperm is given the role of an aggressive and combative participant. These depictions reflect
highly rooted prejudices that position women as submissive and men as dominating, and they mirror those
roles in reverse. The use of this terminology within the context of scientific discourse contributes to the
maintenance of preexisting power dynamics and the idea that women are, by nature, subservient. An
illustration of this may be seen in Martin's article, in which the egg is described as a "passive target" that
waits for the "penetrating" and "piercing" acts of the aggressive sperm. These analogies discreetly support
the perception that men are dominant and that women should be subservient, which is consistent with the
established gender roles in society. Furthermore, the descriptions frequently center on the sperm's "struggle"
and "race," producing a competitive narrative that links strength with male reproductive cells. The
terminology used in scientific discourse contributes to the marginalization of women by reinforcing the idea
that males are superior and by highlighting the active role that sperm play in the fertilization process while
portraying the egg as a passive recipient.

The terminology that is employed in scientific discourse forms our knowledge of gender and determines how
societal attitudes are formed. When scientific language continues to promote gender prejudices, it does two
Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 2
things: it supports society expectations and it minimizes women's autonomy and contributions. The
terminology used in scientific discourse restricts our understanding of women's responsibilities and the
potential contributions they may make to both the field of research and to society as a whole since it portrays
women as participating in reproduction only as passive vessels and men as active participants. This
reinforces existing power dynamics by relegating women to the margins of society and stymieing their
advancement and recognition in scientific disciplines. When we take into consideration the effect that these
gendered narratives have, the relationship between language and power dynamics becomes very clear. The
maintenance of power systems, in which males continue to play the leading roles and women are consigned
to supporting roles as a result of the perpetuation of stereotypes through the use of scientific jargon. This
lends support to the thesis assertion that language has a significant role in determining how power is
exercised. The vocabulary that is employed in scientific discourse not only reflects the power disparities that
already exist, but it also actively contributes to their continuation. This language serves to reinforce societal
norms and slows down the movement toward a society that is more equitable.

Language plays an important part in the process of establishing as well as maintaining the gender power
dynamic. The article "The Egg and the Sperm" written by Emily Martin explains how the language of science
may promote prejudices and biases, particularly those that are associated with gender roles. Martin
demonstrates, with numerous illustrations and illustrations, how the language used in scientific discourse
maintains power inequalities and marginalizes women. This language has an impact that reaches well
beyond the sphere of science; it molds the perceptions of society and acts as a barrier to the advancement of
women in a variety of disciplines. It is possible for us to work towards questioning and reforming current
institutions in order to cultivate a society that is more inclusive and fair if we acknowledge the influence that
language has on power relations.

Language is a potent instrument that has a major impact on both our comprehension of and our behavior
toward animals. In the thought-provoking article "An Elephant Crackup," written by Charles Siebert, the
author investigates how language molds our image of non-human species and justifies our oppression and
exploitation of them. We can have a better understanding of the ways in which language contributes to power
relations and the dehumanization of animals if we look closely at certain examples from the text. The way we
communicate with one another, especially via language, has a significant impact on the way we think about
and behave toward animals. It frequently acts as an excuse for the oppression and exploitation of non-
human people, therefore establishing a framework that upholds human preeminence. The power dynamic
that is maintained through the use of language is brought to light in Siebert's article. The infliction of violence
and cruelty upon animals is sometimes masked by humans using terms such as "animal control," "culling," or
"pest control" in an effort to make it simpler for humans to exercise control over them. The use of such
terminology undermines the intrinsic agency and emotional lives of animals, which in turn reinforces their
objectification and makes it possible for them to be mistreated.

Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 3

The essay written by Siebert explores the emotional lives of elephants, which challenges traditional notions
of animals as being nothing more than things. The article sheds light on the intricate social behaviors and
emotional experiences of elephants, drawing attention to the fact that these animals are capable of empathy,
sadness, and trauma. The language employed challenges the prevalent concept of animals as products or
commodities by presenting elephants as sentient beings that have deep emotional lives. This upending of
conventional ideas by use of language possesses the potential to transform our knowledge of animals and
drive us to think about their rights and well-being. Language has a key part in either supporting or rejecting
the power dynamics that are closely entangled with the treatment of animals, and this can be either positive
or negative. The vocabulary of dehumanization that is employed to excuse the exploitation of animals only
serves to maintain the power disparities that already exist. Animals are frequently referred to as "resources,"
"products," or "property," which diminishes their status and agency and establishes humans as the more
advanced species. This language contributes to the perpetuation of power dynamics that place an emphasis
on the domination and control of humans over other species. However, language also has the potential to be
a driving force behind change and opposition. We have the ability to question and transform power dynamics
by adopting language that respects the emotional lives, intellect, and inherent value of animals. The use of
alternative language that recognizes animals as sentient beings opposes the language of exploitation and
objectification, as well as the dominant narrative that humans are superior to other living things. We can
cultivate a connection with animals that is more caring and respectful to them by changing the narrative via
language, which will give them more agency and help us fight for their legal rights.

Language is one of the primary contributors to the dehumanization of animals as well as the maintenance of
power disparities. The book "An Elephant Crackup" by Charles Siebert sheds light on the ways in which
language shapes our perception of non-human species as well as how we treat them. The oppression and
exploitation of animals is legitimized via the use of language, which reinforces power relations that place an
emphasis on human control. However, we have the capacity to change these patterns if we acknowledge the
emotional lives of animals and challenge language that dehumanizes them. Our perspective of animals can
evolve from that of objects to that of sentient beings thanks to the power of language, which can lead to a
more humane and equal treatment of non-human species. We have the ability to reject and modify the power
systems that control our connection with animals by making conscious decisions about the language we use.
Language is used in political situations to form public opinion, consolidate power, and sustain authority.
Because of this, language plays a key role in political settings. Language is carefully used by political
leaders, media outlets, and propaganda apparatus in order to shape narratives and maintain control over the
discourse. The use of language in political situations may strengthen preexisting power structures while
simultaneously silencing voices that disagree with the status quo. In addition, there is a symbiotic link
between power and language, which means that language is not only influenced by power but also plays a
significant role in the formation of power structures. Language is a powerful instrument that may be utilized in
the sphere of politics to affect public opinion and to solidify power. The language that political leaders and
other prominent persons use to build narratives that promote their objectives and retain their authority is
Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 4
carefully prepared. Language transforms into a tool for influencing public opinion and garnering support when
persuasive strategies such as rhetoric, framing, and emotional appeal are utilized. Politicians are able to
exert power over the narrative and shape the collective consciousness of society by employing language in
an intentional and planned manner.
The vocabulary that is used in political discourse is another area in which media outlets play an important
part. The reporting in the media, as well as editorials and comments on the news, frequently contain biased
language, which selectively emphasizes some viewpoints while marginalizing others. The interests and
beliefs of those in power are reflected in the choices of language that are utilized in the construction of
narratives in the media. Media sources have the ability to manipulate public perception, maintain power
imbalances, and stifle dissident voices simply by phrasing topics in a specific manner. Propaganda
machinery is another example of the manipulative power of language in political discourse. Propaganda is
used by authoritarian regimes and oppressive governments to spread controlled information and to silence
dissenters. Emotions may be manipulated by language, which also serves to induce fear and demean certain
persons or groups. In order to affect public opinion and keep a tight grasp on power, propaganda apparatus
will carefully build narratives that match with the objectives of the government. These narratives will
frequently use loaded terminology, euphemisms, and exaggerations in order to achieve their goals. The use
of language in political discourse may be an effective tool for silencing dissident voices and reinforcing
established power systems. Political opponents or members of marginalized groups are frequently the target
of pejorative names or terminology that questions the validity or credibility of the individuals or groups in
question. Those in power will often resort to rhetoric like this in an effort to not only retain their own authority
but also to discredit competing ideas. Language may also be used to perpetuate prejudice, strengthen social
hierarchies, and exclude some groups from political participation and decision-making processes.

The link between language and power is a two-way street that is always evolving. Power exerts an influence
on language because individuals who hold positions of authority are in a position to dictate the terms of
discourse and control the narrative. This ability shapes language. At the same time, language is an essential
factor in the formation of power dynamics, as it is responsible for the construction and maintenance of social
norms, ideologies, and hierarchies. Language is not only a tool for exercising and maintaining power, but it
also reflects and strengthens the power systems that already exist in a society. When it comes to political
discourse, language is a potent tool because of its ability to mold public opinion, sustain control and
authority, and consolidate power. Language is carefully used by political leaders, media outlets, and
propaganda apparatus in order to shape narratives and maintain control over the discourse. It is possible, via
the use of language, to silence voices of opposition, prolong power inequalities, and bolster preexisting
institutions of authority. Language, on the other hand, is not a static thing but rather a dynamic force that not
only is moulded by power but also shapes the dynamics of power. In order to cultivate critical thinking,
combat manipulation, and advance the cause of creating a society that is more inclusive and equal, it is vital
to acknowledge the power that language may have in political situations.

Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 5

The investigation of language and its connection to the exercise of power demonstrates the language's deep
effect on many facets of society. We have examined the ways in which language shapes power dynamics
through an analysis of the readings "The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance
Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles" by Emily Martin and "An Elephant Crackup" by Charles Siebert,
as well as through an examination of language in political discourse. We began our discussion on the
construction of gender roles and stereotypes through language in the first paragraph of the body of the
article, using Emily Martin's research as an example. Language is a significant factor that contributes to the
maintenance of gender stereotypes and the imbalance of power that exists between men and women. The
representation of women in scientific language, in particular, can contribute to the marginalization of women
by casting them in positions that are considered to be stereotypical. We were able to get insight into the
formation and maintenance of power relations by analyzing the language that is employed in scientific
discourse.

Utilizing Charles Siebert's article as a jumping off point, the second paragraph of the body looked at how
language may be used to dehumanize non-human creatures. Language is used to form both our perception
of animals and how we treat them, and this shaping frequently serves to legitimize the oppression and
exploitation of animals. The power dynamics that favor human domination are reinforced when animals are
objectified through the use of language. However, acknowledging the emotional lives of animals and
challenging language that dehumanizes them opens the door to the possibility of treating non-human species
with more compassion and respect.

In the third paragraph of the body, we discussed how language may be used as a powerful instrument in
political dialogue. Language is used by political leaders, media outlets, and propaganda apparatus in order to
mould public opinion, consolidate power, and silence voices who disagree with the status quo. The way in
which we see political issues is influenced by the strategic use of language, which also serves to support
existing power structures. Language's ability to influence power dynamics while also being influenced by
those dynamics is illustrated by the reciprocal link that exists between language and power.

Our thesis statement proposes, for the purpose of gaining an understanding of the role that language plays in
determining power dynamics, that the exercise of power is deeply influenced by language. Language
contributes to power disparities in society through, among other things, constructing gender roles, providing
justification for the cruelty of animals, and framing political narratives. When we acknowledge the power that
language possesses, we obtain an understanding of the processes that are utilized in the exercise and
maintenance of power. The consequences that language has for power relations are not limited to the
circumstances that have been discussed in this article. It has an effect on our ways of perceiving the world, it
molds the ideas that we have, and eventually, it has an effect on the power structures that exist in our
society. When we contemplate the power that language possesses, we should be prompted to conduct a

Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 6

critical analysis of the language that we use and encounter, calling into question the effect that it has on
power dynamics and contemplating how we may utilize language to bring about good change.

In conclusion, language and the use of power are inextricably bound together by their very nature. Language
has a significant impact in the construction of gender roles and stereotypes, the dehumanization of animals,
and the framing of political narratives. The manipulation of language maintains current power disparities and
strengthens existing authority systems. It is possible for us to participate in conscious language choices that
challenge oppressive institutions and strive towards creating a society that is more equal and inclusive if we
are aware of the influence that language has on the dynamics of power. grasping the consequences of
language is essential for supporting positive change and creating a more just world. Language is not only a
tool for communication; it is a vehicle for power, and grasping its ramifications is critical for promoting positive
change.

Re-sit Examination – Spring’2023 Page 7