This document provides an overview of analyzing arguments in manifestos and academic writing. It defines key terms like manifesto, argument, claim, evidence, and refutation. It also outlines the typical parts of an argument, including the issue, claim, evidence, and refutation. Additionally, it discusses the differences between inductive and deductive arguments and provides strategies for evaluating arguments, such as assessing the types of evidence used. Finally, the document lists common logical fallacies that can undermine an argument, such as false dilemmas, slippery slopes, appeals to pity, and appeals to consequences.
This document provides an overview of analyzing arguments in manifestos and academic writing. It defines key terms like manifesto, argument, claim, evidence, and refutation. It also outlines the typical parts of an argument, including the issue, claim, evidence, and refutation. Additionally, it discusses the differences between inductive and deductive arguments and provides strategies for evaluating arguments, such as assessing the types of evidence used. Finally, the document lists common logical fallacies that can undermine an argument, such as false dilemmas, slippery slopes, appeals to pity, and appeals to consequences.
This document provides an overview of analyzing arguments in manifestos and academic writing. It defines key terms like manifesto, argument, claim, evidence, and refutation. It also outlines the typical parts of an argument, including the issue, claim, evidence, and refutation. Additionally, it discusses the differences between inductive and deductive arguments and provides strategies for evaluating arguments, such as assessing the types of evidence used. Finally, the document lists common logical fallacies that can undermine an argument, such as false dilemmas, slippery slopes, appeals to pity, and appeals to consequences.
PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES (EAPP) ➔ the stand of position on the given issue premise
c. Evidence "By observing the "Athletes possess physical
ANALYZING ARGUMENTS IN A MANIFESTO ➔ reasons or evidences that the claim is performance of a large stamina. Because Anthony MANIFESTO reasonable and should be accepted number of athletes, you is an athlete, he must ➔ refers to a published declaration of the could conclude that possess physical stamina" intentions, motives, or views of the issuer, be it an d. Refutation athletes possess physical individual, group, political party, or government ➔ opposing viewpoints stamina" ➔ advances a set of ideas, opinions, or views but it TYPES OF SUPPORT
can also lay out a plan of action a. Reason
STRATEGIES FOR READING ARGUMENTS ➔ most often concerns art, literature, or politics ➔ general statement that support your claim ● Read ONCE for initial impression b. Evidence ● Read the argument SEVERAL more times ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING ➔ consists of facts, statistics, experience, ● Annotate as you read ➔ a kind of writing where the students establish a comparison, and example/s that show/s ● Highlight key terms position in a given topic and then use why the claim is valid ● Diagram or map to analyze structure evidence to persuade the audience to see things from their point of view c. Emotional Appeal STEPS IN EVALUATING AN ARGUMENT ➔ ideas that are targeted toward needs or ● Evaluate the types of evidence ARGUMENT values that readers are likely to care about ● Personal experiences ➔ usually a main idea ● Examples ➔ expression of one’s point of view on a particular ● Statistics subject or topic INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT VS DEDUCTIVE ● Comparison and analogies ➔ often called a “Claim” or a “Thesis Statement” ARGUMENT ● Relevance and sufficiency of evidence ➔ presented with shreds of evidence and resources ● Definition of terms supporting the idea which aims for the reader to INDUCTIVE DEDUCTIVE ● Cause and effect relationships either do something or believe something to be specific - general general - specific ● Implied or stated value system true or correct CLAIM PARTS OF AN ARGUMENT reaches a general begins with a major ➔ main argument of the essay which is considered a. Issue conclusion from observed premise and moves the most important part of an academic paper ➔ a problem or controversy about which specifics towards a more specific people disagree ➔ defines your paper’s goals, directions, scope and ➔ advocates the adoption of policies or Example: If you do not admit that evolution is exigence courses of action due to problems that not real, we will isolate you from the group ➔ supported by evidence, quotations, argumentation, have occurred and calls for a solution expert’s opinions, statistics, and telling details Example: Legislation should be passed mandating the TYPES OF CLAIM conduct of Online Voter’s Registration amid the Covid-19 4. Post Hoc a. Claim of Fact pandemic. ➔ an informal fallacy that states "Since ➔ Statement asserting that something has event A followed event B, event A existed, does exist, or will exist LOGICAL FALLACIES must have been caused by event B" ➔ not a fact; it only claims to be a fact; ➔ errors in reasoning that invalidate an argument Example: Dina saw a cat when they went home. Hence, the claim is debatable whether it is Along the way, they crashed into a tree. The black COMMON TYPES OF LOGICAL FALLACIES true or false cat must be the reason why they met an accident. 1. False Dilemma Example: The Philippine Economy will bounce back ➔ occurs when an arguer presents his/her 5. Appeal To Pity higher before the end of this year. argument as one of only two options ➔ occurs when the element of pity is despite the presence of multiple The statement is a claim of fact (future) which is to be used instead of logical reasoning possibilities proven to be true or false come the end of this year Example: Please do not fire me for being Example: Either you fully devote yourself to the b. Claim of Value absent all month; I have a sick mother and a company or you quit. ➔ Statement asserting something to be good special child to support or bad or that something is better 2. Slippery Slope 6. Appeal To Consequences than the other one or that something ➔ occurs when a series of increasingly ➔ occurs when unpleasant consequences is more or less desirable superficial and unacceptable of believing something are pointed consequences is drawn Example: The Game of Thrones is the best book series out to show that the belief is false of all time Example: If we ban computer shops, then Example: You can't believe that colonialism is students will not be able to do research. And if c. Claim of Policy bad, because if it were, then we would not be they do not have tools for research, these ➔ Statement urging that some conditions civilized students will fail their subjects should exist, or that something should 7. Straw Man be or should not be done 3. Appeal To Force ➔ occurs when the position of the ➔ occurs when a threat, instead of opposition is twisted so that it is reasoning is used to argue easier to refute 11. Irrelevant Conclusion ➔ occurs when something is instantly Example: Person A: "The school lunch budget ➔ occurs when an argument which is concluded to be true just because it must be examined to cut waste" supposed to prove something is not proven to be false, and vice Person B: "This guy wants to STARVE our concludes something else instead versa children!!" Example: We must support the fight for gender Example: The writer does not talk about the equality between men and women. Women have connection between the victim’s killer and his 8. Inconsistency suffered enough violence at home. Violence sister, so there must be none ➔ occurs when arguments contradict against women must be stopped. one another 12. False Analogy Example: Frank is older than Jake, Jake is older ➔ occurs when a writer assumes that two b. Complex Question than Noli, and Noli is older than Frank concepts that are similar in some ➔ occurs when two or more points are "I've got nothing against poor people, ways are also similar in other ways rolled into one and the reader is but I don't want them moving into my neighborhood" expected to accept or reject both at Example: Drugs are like massages; they make the same time, when one point may 9. Attacking The Person you feel good. be satisfactory while the other is not ➔ occurs when someone tries to refute an Apples, strawberries, and raspberries are Example: “Have you stopped cheating on argument by attacking the character of all read. They are also all fruits. Therefore, all exams?” a person instead of attacking the fruits are red. ideas of the argument c. Appeal To Authority 13. Bandwagon ➔ occurs when the argument quotes an Example: I cannot accept your argument ➔ occurs when an argument is valid expert who’s not qualified in the because, unlike me, you were not educated at because it is what the majority think particular subject matter Harvard University Example: Most Filipinas want to have fair skin Example: Bill Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft, 10. Hasty Generalization because they think they look beautiful. Therefore, recommends the effective fabric softening ➔ occurs when a sample is not significant having fair skin must be the real standard of properties of Downy fabric softener. enough to support a generalization beauty about a population d. Anonymous Authority OTHER TYPES OF LOGICAL FALLACIES ➔ the authority in question is not Example: Martha, the foreigner from France is a. Appeal To Ignorance mentioned or named very impolite. French people are mean and rude. Example: Experts claim that eating peanuts Example: If you are drinking wine, you have Questions: causes pimples. a problem. Therefore, if you have a problem, ● Is the author’s name identified? you are drinking wine. ● Is the author’s background, education or e. Accident training related to the topic? ➔ occurs when a general rule is i. Denying The Antecedent applied to a situation, even when it ➔ any argument of the form: If A is true c. Currency / Date of Publication should be an exception then B is true; If A is not true then B ➔ In most fields, the data from the older is not true publications may no longer be valid. Example: Jaywalking is not allowed, so you ➔ the date of publication should be at most should not have done that even when you Example: If you are drinking wine, you have five years earlier. were being chased by terrorists. a problem. Therefore, if you are not drinking wine, you do not have a problem. Questions: f. Wrong Direction ● What is the date of the publication?
➔ occurs when the direction between FACTORS ON AUTHENTICITY AND VALIDITY
cause and effect is reversed OF EVIDENCES / INFORMATION d. Contents / Accuracy of Information a. Relevance of the source ➔ You do not want to use a source that is Example: Liver damage leads to alcoholism. ➔ You can check the title, table of disputable, so make sure to verify your g. Complex Cause contents, summary, introduction or findings with multiple sources. ➔ occurs when the explanation for an headings of the text to have a sense of its Questions: event is reduced to one thing content ● Does the author have a lot of citations in when there are other factors which Questions: his or her text and/or bibliography or also contributed to the event ● How well does the source support your works cited section? stand? Example: We were not able to solve the e. Location of sources problem because of limited time, even if all the b. Authority / Author’s Qualifications ➔ Avoid using blogs or personal other groups were able to do so ➔ If the source does not have an author, homepage and wiki sites (Wikipedia, think twice before using it. Wiktionary, Wikiquotes) h. Affirming The Consequent ➔ Legitimate academic texts must include ➔ If the URL includes the top-level domain ➔ any argument of the form: If A is true citations. Citations demonstrate that .edu, then that means that it has been then B is true; If B is true therefore the writer has thoroughly researched the published by an academic institution such A is true topic and is not plagiarizing the material. as university ➔ In academic writing, reputable sites are 1. Introduction (1 paragraph) PIECES OF EVIDENCE TO STRENGTHEN THE those with .edu, .gov, .net and .org in ➔ identify the perspective AUTHOR’S CLAIMS URL. ➔ explain your understanding 1. Evidence from surveys, library research and ➔ Common URLs include: ➔ state your position experiments ◆ .gov (government) ➔ starts with a topic sentence that attracts 2. Evidence from informant interviews (those ◆ .org (organizations) attention and summarizes the issue who have direct experience related to the ◆ .com (commercial sites) ➔ inform the reader of your point of view problem / issue) ◆ .net (network infrastructures) ➔ states your thesis 3. Evidence from expert interviews Questions: 2. Body (Counter Argument and Argument - ● Where was the source published? Was it POSITION PAPER 3 paragraph) published digitally or in print? ➔ a type of academic writing that presents one's ➔ summarize the counterclaims ● Is it a book, an academic journal or a stand or viewpoint on a particular issue ➔ provide supporting information on the reputable news source such as ➔ a stand supported by arguments and evidences counterclaims www.nytimes.com or ➔ present an opinion and make a claim or stand ➔ refute the counterclaims www.economist.com? about an issue ➔ give evidences for the arguments ● Does it provide complete publication ➔ use inductive reasoning which addresses both ➔ assert your point of claim (up to three) by information such as author/s, editor/s, strengths and weaknesses. giving your opinion and providing title, date of publication and publisher? ➔ expresses a position, conclusion, or support/evidence ● What is the URL of the website? recommendation concerning a contested issue or ➔ explain your reason/s to support your PRESENTATION OF REASONABLE undecided questions position ARGUMENTS AND FACTUAL EVIDENCES TO ➔ factual, relevant, and accurate evidence to PURPOSE / GOAL DEFEND A STAND prove your argument ● to convince the audience that your position is valid C - contains a clear proposition or statement that must be and worth listening to 3. Conclusion (1-2 paragraph) defended ● to generate support on an issue ➔ summarize and restate in a forceful A - assesses conflicting opinions or opposing views on the manner your position WHO DO WE WRITE POSITION PAPERS? issue ➔ summarize and conclude your arguments ● to convince the audience that your position is valid T - takes a firm stand on the issue ➔ provide solution ● an essential tool for social change L - lists arguments in an organized manner to defend the ● ranges from simple to complex formats PREP METHOD stand C- consider your audience/reader PARTS OF POSITION PAPER ➔ you cannot test everyone or rating scales (such as Likert P Position Introduction ➔ there have to be certain restrictions scale) R Reason/s Body concerning the target audience of your 5. Design question sequence and overall layout questionnaire E Example/s Body ➔ Are there transitions from one question 3. Develop questions to the next? P Position Conclusion ➔ smart questions are the cornerstone of ➔ Are follow-up questions placed correctly? every questionnaire ➔ Are skip-rules implemented (if needed) so QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY ➔ they have to be phrased in a way that that respondents can skip questions that ➔ a technique for gathering statistical information prevents any misunderstandings or do not apply to them? about the attributes, attitudes, or actions of a ambiguities population by a structured set of questions TESTING AND REVISING SURVEY ➔ it is important to consider the cognitive, (International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, QUESTIONNAIRES attentional, and sensory competencies of 2009) VALIDATING A SURVEY your target group ➔ aims to obtain information suitable for statistical ➔ refers to the process of assessing the survey ➔ refrain from using jargon or technical analysis questions for their dependability language as the text needs to be fully ➔ an essential process that helps to ensure the FORMS OF SURVEY understood by anyone completing the survey is truly a dependable one ● postal survey questionnaire ● telephone interviews 1. Establish face validity 4. Choose your question type ● face-to-face interviews ➔ involves having your survey reviewed by a. EXPLORATIVE QUESTIONNAIRE ● internet surveys two different parties - you will find mainly open ● First group DESIGNING SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES questions where respondents - familiar with your topic 5 STEPS TO A GOOD QUESTIONNAIRE can fill any answer and can evaluate if your DESIGN (Fansworth, 2019) b. QUANTITATIVE questions successfully 1. Identify your research aims and the goal of QUESTIONNAIRE capture your topic your questionnaire - primarily include closed ➔ What kind of information do you want to ● Second group questions, which have been gather with your questionnaire? - should come from predefined by the researcher in ➔ What is your main objective? someone who is an expert form of multiple choice answers on question construction 2. Define your target respondents - ensures that your survey ➔ checking the correlation between Best used for: does not contain common questions that load on the same factors ➔ Collecting rank ordered data errors such as misleading, measure questions reliability by ensuring ➔ When all response choices are known confusing, or double- the survey answers are consistent ➔ When quantitative statistical tool results barreled questions are desired 6. Revise your survey 2. Run a pilot test ➔ revise your survey based on the Example: In which of the following do you live? ➔ select a subset of your intended survey information you gathered from your o A house participants and run a pilot test of the principal component analysis and o An apartment survey Cronbach's Alpha o A condo unit ➔ the suggested sample size vary, although ◆ If you run across a question that OTHER FORMS OF CLOSE-ENDED QUESTIONS 10 percent of the total population is a does not neatly load onto a factor, a. Likert Scale solid number of participants you can choose to delete it. Best used for: ◆ If only minor changes were made 3. Clean collected data ➔ Assessing a person's opinion and feelings to your survey, it's likely to be ➔ enter your collected data into a about something ready after its final revision. spreadsheet to clean the data Example: Please circle the way you feel about the ➔ double-check minimum and maximum following: values for your overall dataset TYPES OF QUESTIONS AND ITS USAGE 1 = Disagree ; 5 = Agree 4. Use Principal Components Analysis (PCA) a. Open-Ended b. Multiple Choice ➔ identify underlying components that are Best used for: Best used for: being measured by your survey questions ➔ Breaking the ice in an interview ➔ When there are finite number of options ➔ validates what your survey is measuring ➔ When respondent's own words are Example: Which of the following best describes your ➔ your overall goal at this stage is to important current civil status? determine what factors represent by ➔ When the researcher does not know all o Single o Widowed seeking out common themes in questions the possible answers o Married o Divorced that load onto the same factors Example: What changes do you recommend for c. Rating Scales 5. Check Internal Consistency the school to do in order to help students Best used for: ➔ review the internal consistency of perform better? ➔ Rate things in relation to other things questions that load onto the same factors b. Close-Ended Example: How likely would you recommend the current ➔ aims to present and explain the actual experiences ➔ can also serve as a technique for verifying or strand you are enrolled in to your friend? of a certain population nullifying information provided in face to face 6 NOT AT ALL LIKELY EXTREMELY ➔ Conducting survey is done in three (3) encounters LIKELY steps: LIMITATIONS OF OBSERVATIONS ◆ by email ● Change in people's behavior when they know they 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ◆ Telephone are being observed ◆ personal interview d. Ranking Questions ● A 'snap shot' view of a whole situation ➔ the method of data collection can be from Best used for: ● Think Big Brother... observation to content analysis and this can be ➔ Ordering answer choices by way of ● The researcher may miss something while they are used in the survey preference watching and taking notes ➔ allows you to not only understand how CHALLENGES LIMITATIONS OF A SURVEY ● The researcher may make judgments, make value respondents feel about each answer (Criteria) statements or misunderstand what has been option, but it also helps you understand ● appropriateness of the method observed each one's relative popularity ● accuracy of what to observe STRENGTHS OF OBSERVATION ● generalizability of findings Example: Rank the following subjects in order of ● Can offer a flavor for what is happening ● administrative constraints preference - 1 being your favorite and 5 being your least ● Can give an insight into the bigger picture ● ethical and political difficulties favorite. ● Can demonstrate sub-groups OBSERVATION ● Can be used to assist in the design of the rest of ➔ may take place in natural settings and involve the the research English Social Science researcher taking lengthy and descriptive notes of ● Sometimes, the researcher becomes or needs to Math Music, Arts, PE and Health what is happening become a participant observer, where he/she is ➔ there are limits to the situations that can be taking part in the situation in order to be accepted Filipino TLE observed in their 'natural' settings and that the and further understand the workings of the social Science Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao presence of the researcher may lead to problems phenomenon with validity TECHNIQUES FOR COLLECTING DATA SURVEY ➔ can sometimes obtain more reliable information THROUGH OBSERVATION ➔ the researcher must understand the right mode of about certain things for example, how people inquiry for establishing an inference whether in a actually behave a. Written Description large group of people or from a small number of people in a group ➔ The researcher makes written ➔ you will randomly select people and you need to descriptions of the people, situations or split them into groups and they will now be your environment control group LIMITATIONS INCLUDE: a. Positive Side ● Researcher might miss out on an - the control group reduces bias observation as they are taking whereas in the survey and ● The researcher may be focused on observational study, you didn't a particular event or situation have a control group There is room for subjective interpretation of what is b. Negative Side happening - it is time consuming because you're going to have two different b. Video Recording groups ➔ Allows the researcher to also record - It is a little bit harder to keep notes track of who's in which group, LIMITATIONS INCLUDE: how you are treating each group ● People acting unnaturally towards - always has to be concerned with the camera or others avoiding the ethics meaning you are not going camera to persuade them to behave in a ● The camera may not always see certain way or treating them in a everything way that is not okay c. Photographs and Artifacts ➔ Useful when there is a need to collect observable information or phenomena such as buildings, neighborhoods, dress, and appearance ➔ Artifacts include objects of significance - memorabilia, instruments, tools and others