Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARGUMENTATION FIELDS
Argumentation Fields are subdivisions of rhetorical argument according to
its subject matter or context. The assumption is that different norms
characterize argument practice and evaluation in different fields.
• Academic Argumentation
• Legal Argumentation
• Political Argumentation
• Scientific Argumentation
• Business Argumentation
Argumentation Fields are specialized areas where arguments and debates
occur. They are characterized by their own unique norms, values, and
standards of evidence. Argumentation fields can be found in all aspects of
society, from academia to the workplace to everyday life.
• Better understand the different ways that arguments are used in different contexts.
• Identify the different norms and standards that are used to evaluate arguments in
different fields.
• Develop more effective arguments, tailored to the specific audience and context.
• Become more critical consumers of arguments, by being able to identify and evaluate
the different types of evidence and reasoning that are used in different fields.
Law is an Argumentation Field because it relies on lawyers, judges, and legal
scholars to construct persuasive arguments to support their positions in legal
cases. These arguments are based on the law, evidence, and precedent.
Legal Arguments are essential to the legal system, and they play a vital role in ensuring that
justice is served.
Exploration on how arguments shape political discourse:
Arguments play a vital role in shaping political discourse. Politician use
arguments to persuade voters to support where candidates and policies. Voters
use arguments to evaluate candidates and policies and to make informed
decisions at ballot box. Arguments can be also used to hold politicians
accountable for their actions.
• Using evidence
• Appealing to emotions
• Using storytelling
Argumentation is essential to scientific research and the peer review process. Scientists use
argumentation to support their claims, to challenge the claims of others, and to advance
scientific knowledge. In peer review process, scientists review the work of their colleagues
and provide feedback on the strength of their arguments and the quality of their evidence.
This process helps to ensure that only high quality research is published.
• Observation
• Question
• Hypothesis
• Experiment
• Analyze results
• Communicate results
Argumentation is an essential part of science. Scientists used argumentation to support their claims,
to challenge the claims of others and to advance scientific knowledge. The scientific method provides a
framework for constructing strong arguments based on evidence. Scientific controversies and debates
are also important because they help to advance scientific knowledge.
Introduction to the filed of philosophy and its focus on rational argumentation:
Philosophy is the study of fundamental questions about existence, knowledge, values,
reasons, mind, and language. Philosophers use rational argumentation to explore these
questions and develop and defend their views. Rational argumentation is a process of reasoning
that uses logic and evidence to support a conclusion. Philosophers use rational argumentation
to challenge and refine their own views, as well as to engage with the views other philosophers.
By following the tips above, you can enhance your argumentations skills and become a more persuasive
communicator.