Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0321976444 9780321976444
Download full solution manual at:
https://testbankpack.com/p/solution-manual-for-physics-5th-edition-
walker-0321976444-9780321976444/
2. If the tablecloth is pulled rapidly, it can exert a force on the place settings for only a very short time. In this brief time,
the objects on the table accelerate, but only slightly. Therefore, the objects may have barely moved by the time the
tablecloth is completely removed.
4. As the dog shakes its body, it starts water in its fur moving in one direction. When it then begins to shake its body in the
opposite direction, much of the water continues in the same direction because of the law of inertia (Newton’s First Law).
As a result, water leaves the fur with each reversal in direction.
6. (a) The upper string breaks, because the tension in it is equal to the applied force on the lower string plus the weight of
the block. When the tension in the upper string reaches the breaking point, the tension in the lower string is below this
value. (b) The lower string breaks in this case, because of the inertia of the block. As you move your hand downward
rapidly the lower string stretches and breaks before the block can move a significant distance and stretch the upper string.
8. Each time the astronauts throw or catch the ball they exert a force on it, and it exerts an equal and opposite force on them.
This causes the astronauts to move farther apart from one another with increasing speed as the game progresses.
10. The whole brick also experiences twice the force due to gravity. As a result, these two effects (more inertia, more force)
exactly cancel, and the free fall acceleration is independent of mass.
12. No. If only a single force acts on the object, it will not stay at rest; instead, it will accelerate in the direction of the force.
14. (a) When the parrot jumps, it pushes down on its perch. In this case, the scale reads a larger value. (b) When the parrot
is in the air, the scale reads only the weight of the bird cage. (c) When the parrot lands, the perch exerts an upward force
on it to bring it to rest. As a result, the scale again reads a larger value. The average of the scale readings in parts (a), (b),
and (c) is just the weight of the parrot plus the weight of the bird cage.
16. Since the car is at rest, we can conclude that it has zero net force acting on it. This is not the same as having no forces at
all acting on the car. In fact, gravity exerts a downward force, and the road exerts an equal and opposite net upward force
(summed over the four tires).
18. As you hit the rug with the tennis racket, you cause it to accelerate rapidly. The dust on the rug, if it is not attached too
firmly, will be left behind as the rug accelerates away from it. In this way, you are able to remove much of the dust from
the rug.
20. Yes, in fact it happens all the time. Whenever you throw a ball upward it moves in the opposite direction to the net force
acting on it, until it reaches the top of its trajectory.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently exist. No
portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
5–1
Chapter 5: Newton’s Laws of Motion James S. Walker, Physics, 5th Edition
22. This is an example of bad physics. Though the rocket-powered backpack may well produce enough force to give the
truck a large acceleration, that force must be transmitted to the truck through the boy’s arms. A force large enough to
rapidly accelerate a truck would crush a person’s arms.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently exist. No
portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
5–2
Chapter 5: Newton’s Laws of Motion James S. Walker, Physics, 5th Edition
1. Picture the Problem: A force of magnitude F acts on an object of mass m that is initially at rest and accelerates it to
speed v in a time T.
Strategy: Use the concepts of Newton’s second law and the definition of acceleration to construct a ratio that will help
us predict the effect of changing m and F on the time interval T.
Tnew ( v − v0 ) anew
Solution: 1. Construct a
a F m F m F 2m 1
ratio, recalling that = = old = old old = old new = =
a = v t and F = m a : Told ( v − v0 ) aold anew Fnew mnew Fnew mold 4F m 2
Insight: If the mass m were quadrupled instead of doubled, the acceleration would be anew = 4F 4m = aold and hence
the time required to accelerate to speed v would remain unchanged.
2. Picture the Problem: The free body diagram for this problem is shown at right.
Strategy: Use the free body diagram to determine the net force on the rock, and then
apply Newton’s second law to find the acceleration of the rock. Let upward be the
positive direction.
r
Solution: 1. Find the net force: F = ( − 40.0 N ) yˆ + ( 46.2 N ) yˆ = ( 6.2 N ) yˆ
r
2. Now apply Newton’s second
r r
a=
F = ( 6.2 N ) yˆ = (1.2 m/s ) yˆ 2
law (Equation 5-1) to find a : m 5.00 kg
Insight: If the astronaut were to exert less than 40.0 N of upward force on the rock, it would accelerate downward.
3. Picture the Problem: A shopping cart accelerates in the forward direction due to a pushing force.
Strategy: Use Newton’s second law to find the acceleration of the cart, then use the acceleration to find the distance
traveled in 2.50 s.
r
r F (13.4 N ) xˆ
= ( 0.870 m/s 2 ) xˆ
r
Solution: 1. Find a using Equation 5-1: a= =
m 15.4 kg
Insight: Doubling the applied force would double the acceleration and double the distance traveled.
4. Picture the Problem: You exert a horizontal force that accelerates both your little sister and her sled.
Strategy: Apply Newton’s second law to the sled + sister combination, and solve for the mass of your sister.
Solution: 1. Use Newton’s second law to find F 120 N
mtotal = = = 48 kg
the total mass of the sled + sister combination: a 2.5 m/s 2
2. Find the mass of your sister by subtracting: msister = mtotal – msled = 48 kg – 7.4 kg = 41 kg
Insight: A more massive sister would decrease the acceleration of the sled if the pulling force remained the same.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently exist. No
portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
5–3
Chapter 5: Newton’s Laws of Motion James S. Walker, Physics, 5th Edition
Solution: Determine the acceleration from the initial F = m a = m v = 0.53 kg (12 m/s − 0 ) = 1600 N = 1.6 kN
( )
and final speeds, and apply Newton’s second law: t 4.0 10−3 s – 0
Insight: This substantial force (about 360 lb) acts over a very short time, hence the final speed isn’t all that spectacular.
v 2 − v0 2 (12 m/s )2 − 0
2. Find the net force on the skier using Equation 5-1: F = ma = m = ( 92 kg ) = 260 N
2x 2 ( 25 m − 0 )
Insight: This moderate force (about 60 lb) accelerates the skier at a rate of 2.9 m/s 2 or 0.29g.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently exist. No
portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
5–4
Chapter 5: Newton’s Laws of Motion James S. Walker, Physics, 5th Edition
8. Picture the Problem: Metal ball 1 and wood ball 2 have the same diameter and are dropped from the same height.
Strategy: Both balls experience the same upward force of air resistance but different magnitudes of gravitational force.
Consider the net force on each ball and use Newton’s second law to answer the conceptual question.
Solution: 1. (a) In the absence of air friction both balls would accelerate at the same rate. In each case the presence of
air friction reduces the acceleration of the ball, but the air friction force represents a larger fraction of the gravitational
force on ball 2 than that on ball 1, hence ball 2 will experience the smaller acceleration. Therefore the drop time of ball
1 will be less than the drop time of ball 2.
2. (b) The best explanation is III. Air resistance has less effect on the more massive ball. Statement I is true only in
vacuum and statement II is true but there is also a larger gravitational force on the more massive ball.
Insight: There is a larger net force on ball 1 but it is also more massive, so one must examine the fraction of the
gravitational force represented by the air friction in order to determine its effect upon the acceleration of each ball.
9. Picture the Problem: A parachutist is moving straight downward, slowing down and coming to rest over a distance of
0.750 m.
Strategy: Use Equation 2-12 to determine the acceleration of the parachutist, and then use Newton’s second law
r
(Equation 5-1) to find the force N exerted on her by the ground.
a= yˆ = yˆ = 9.88 m/s 2 yˆ
2y 2 ( 0 − 0.750 m )
r r r
2. Use Equation 5-1 to find the ground force: Fr = N − m g yˆ = m a
N = m ( a yˆ + g yˆ ) = ( 42.0 kg ) ( 9.88 + 9.81 m/s 2 ) yˆ = (827 N ) yˆ
3. (b) If the parachutist comes to rest in a shorter distance, her acceleration will be greater and the force exerted on her
by the ground will therefore be greater than that in part (a).
Insight: During her descent there are two forces acting on the parachutist, the upward force of her parachute and the
downward force of gravity. Those two forces must cancel if she is to move downward at constant speed (a = 0).
10. Picture the Problem: A baseball is accelerated horizontally from rest to 98 mi/h over a distance of 1.7 m.
Strategy: Use Equation 2-12 to determine the acceleration of the ball, and then use Newton’s second law
(Equation 5-1) to find the average net force acting on it.
3. (b) If the mass of the ball is increased, the force must be increased to produce the same acceleration.
Insight: While the force is not large (85 N is about 19 lb), the acceleration is impressive, about 57 times the
acceleration of gravity! We kept an extra significant digit in step 1 in order to avoid rounding error.
Copyright © 2017 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is protected under all copyright laws as they currently exist. No
portion of this material may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without permission in writing from the publisher.
5–5
Another document from Scribd.com that is
random and unrelated content:
It is a remarkable fact that in some parts of Asia the natives construct a
pipe on the same principle. This pipe will be described in its proper
place.
When the Kaffirs can assemble for a quiet smoke, they have another
curious custom. The strong, rank tobacco excites a copious flow of
saliva, and this is disposed of in a rather strange manner. The smokers
are furnished with a tube about a yard in length, and generally a reed, or
straight branch, from which the pith has been extracted. A peculiarly
handsome specimen is usually covered with the skin of a bullock’s tail.
Through this tube the smokers in turn discharge the superabundant
moisture, and it is thought to be a delicate compliment to select the same
spot that has been previously used by another. Sometimes, instead of a
hole, a circular trench is employed, but the mode of using it is exactly the
same.
The illustration No. 4, same page, represents a couple of well-bred
gentlemen—a married man and a “boy”—indulging in a pipe in the cool
of the evening. The man has taken his turn at the pipe, and handed it to
his comrade, who inhales the smoke while he himself is engaged with
the tube above-mentioned. Wishing to give some little variety to the
occupation, he has drawn an outlined figure of a kraal, and is just going
to form one of the huts. Presently, the boy will hand the pipe back again,
exchange it for the tube, and take his turn at the manufacture of the kraal,
which will be completed by the time that the pipe is finished.
Major Ross King describes this curious proceeding in a very amusing
manner. “Retaining the last draught of smoke in his mouth, which he fills
with a decoction of bark and water from a calabash, he squirts it on the
ground by his side, through a long ornamented tube, performing thereon,
by the aid of a reserved portion of the liquid, a sort of boatswain’s
whistle, complacently regarding the soap-like bubbles, the joint
production of himself and neighbor.
“On this occasion, finding a blanketed group sitting apart in a circle,
smoking the dagha before described, at their invitation I squatted down
cross-legged in the ring, and receiving the rude cow-horn pipe in my
turn, took a pull at its capacious mouth, coughing violently at the
suffocating fumes, as indeed they all did more or less, and after tasting
the nasty decoction of bark which followed round in a calabash, took the
politely offered spitting-tube of my next neighbor, signally failing,
however, in the orthodox whistle, to the unbounded delight of the
Fingoes, whose hearty, ringing laughter was most contagious.”
Tobacco is cultivated by several of the tribes inhabiting Southern
Africa, and is prepared in nearly the same method as is employed in
other parts of the world, the leaves being gathered, “sweated,” and
finally dried. Still, they appreciate the tobacco which they obtain from
Europeans, and prefer it to that which is manufactured by themselves.
Some of the Kaffirs are very successful in their cultivation of tobacco,
and find that a good crop is a very valuable property. A Kaffir without
tobacco is a miserable being, and, if it were only for his own sake, the
possession of a supply which will last him throughout the year is a
subject of congratulation. But any tobacco that is not needed for the use
of himself or his household is as good as money to the owner, as there
are few things which a Kaffir loves that tobacco cannot buy. If he sees a
set of beads that particularly pleases him, and the owner should happen
to be poorer than himself, he can purchase the finery by the sacrifice of a
little of his fragrant store. Also, he can gain the respect of the “boys,”
who seldom possess property of any kind except their shield and spears,
and, by judicious gifts of tobacco, can often make them his followers,
this being the first step toward chieftainship. Generally, a Kaffir makes
up the crop of each garden into a single bundle, sometimes weighing
fifty or sixty pounds, and carefully incases it with reeds, much after the
fashion that naval tobacco is sewed up in canvas. He is sure to place
these rolls in a conspicuous part of the house, in order to extort the envy
and admiration of his companions.
It is not very easy to say whether a Kaffir possesses any religion at all,
in our sense of the word. With superstition he is deeply imbued, and
passes his lifetime in considerable dread of witchcraft and of evil spirits.
But religion which conveys any sense of moral responsibility, seems to
be incomprehensible to the ordinary Kaffir, and even his naturally logical
mind inclines him to practical atheism. As far as is known, the Kaffir
tribes have a sort of tradition concerning a Creator, whom they call by a
compound word that may be translated as the Great-Great, and to whom
they attribute the first origin of all things. But it is certain they offer him
no worship, and make no prayers to him, and have no idea that they are
personally responsible to him for their acts. Moreover many of the tribes
do not even possess this imperfect knowledge; and even in those cases
where it does exist, its origin is very uncertain, and it is impossible to
ascertain whether the tradition may not be a corrupted recollection of
instruction received from some European. Such, indeed, has been known
to be the case among the Kaffirs, and it is probable that the knowledge of
a Creator is really derived from European sources. At all events, such
knowledge is by no means universal, and exercises such small influence
on the people that it is scarcely worthy of mention.
There are, indeed, one or two legendary stories concerning the Great-
Great, relating to the creation of man, and to the duration of human life.
The man is supposed to have been created by splitting a reed, from
which the first parents of the human race proceeded. This legend is
probably due to a double meaning of the word signifying “origin” and
“create,” which also signify “reed” and “splitting.” Another form of the
tradition deprives the Great-Great of all creatorship, and makes him to be
one of the two who issued from the split reed, so that he is rather the
great ancestor of the human race than its creator.
The tradition concerning the affliction of death upon the human race is
a very curious one, and was related to the missionaries by a native who
had been converted to Christianity.
When mankind had increased upon the earth, the Great-Great took
counsel with himself, and sent two messengers to them, one the giver of
life, the other the herald of death. The first messenger was the
chameleon, who was ordered to go and utter the proclamation, “Let not
the people die!” The chameleon set off on its mission, but lingered on the
road, stopping occasionally to eat by the way, and walking leisurely
instead of running. The second messenger was the salamander, who was
commanded to proclaim, “Let the people die!” But the latter was the
more obedient, and ran the whole of the journey, until he reached the
habitation of men, when he proclaimed his message of death. Shortly
afterward, the chameleon arrived and delivered his message, when the
salamander beat him and drove him away, as having failed in his duty to
his Master. Then the people lamented because they had received the
message of death before that of life, and from that time men have been
subject to the power of death. The consequence is, that both animals are
detested by the Kaffirs, who kill the chameleon when they find it,
because it lingered on the way, and lost them the gift of immortality. And
they are equally sure to kill the salamander, because, when it was
charged with such a dread message, it hastened on its journey, and
anticipated the chameleon in its message of life. There are many
variations of this story, but in its main points it is current throughout
many parts of Southern Africa.
Although the Kaffir’s ideas of the Creator are so vague and undefined,
he has at all events a very firm belief in the existence of the soul and its
immortality after death. Tchaka once made use of this belief in a very
ingenious manner. The people had become rather tired of war, and
required some inducement to make them welcome the order for battle as
heretofore. Whereupon, Tchaka had a vision of Umbia, a well-known
chief, who had served under his father, and who appeared to Tchaka to
tell him that his father was becoming angry with the Zulu tribe because
they had become lazy, and had not gone to war against the remaining
unconquered tribes. This laziness on the part of the Zulus who still
inhabited the earth was displeasing to the spirits of the dead, who would
be very comfortable below ground with a plenty of wives and cattle, as
soon as they saw their tribe in supreme authority over the whole land,
from the Draakensberg to the sea.
In honor of this messenger from the shades, Tchaka ordered numbers
of cattle to be slaughtered in all his military kraals, gave sumptuous
feasts, and raised the descendants of Umbia to the rank of Indunas. Of
course, the name of Umbia was in all mouths, and, while the excitement
was at its height, an old man suddenly disappeared from his hut, having
been dragged away, according to his wife’s account, by a lion. The affair
was reported to Tchaka in council, but he affected to take no notice of it.
After the lapse of three months, when the immediate excitement had died
away, the old man reappeared before Tchaka with his head-ring torn off,
and clothed in a wild and fantastic manner.
He said that the lion had dragged him away to its den, when the earth
suddenly opened and swallowed them both up. The lion accompanied
him without doing him any harm, and brought him to a place where there
was some red earth. This also gave way, and he fell into another abyss,
where he lay stunned by the fall. On recovering, he found himself in a
pleasant country, and discovered that it was inhabited by the spirits of
Zulus who had died, and whom he had known in life. There was
Senzangakona, the father of Tchaka, with his councillors, his chiefs, his
soldiers, his wives, and his cattle. Umbia was also there, and enjoyed
himself very much. Since his departure into the shades, he had become a
great doctor, and was accustomed to stroll about at night, instead of
staying at home quietly with his family. No one seemed to know where
he had gone, but he told the narrator that he used to revisit earth in order
to see his friends and relatives. For three months the narrator was kept in
the shades below, and was then told to go back to his tribe and narrate
what he had seen.
Tchaka pretended to disbelieve the narrative, and publicly treated with
contempt the man, denouncing him as a liar, and sending for prophets
who should “smell” him, and discover whether he had told the truth. The
seers arrived, performed their conjurations, “smelt” the man, and stated
that he had told the truth, that he had really visited the spirits of the dead,
and that he had been fetched by the lion because the people did not
believe the vision that had appeared to Tchaka. It is needless to observe
that the whole business had been previously arranged by that wily chief,
in order to carry out his ambitious purposes.
Unbounded as is in one respect their reverence for the spirits of their
ancestors, they attribute to those same spirits a very limited range of
power. A Kaffir has the very highest respect for the spirits of his own
ancestors, or those of his chief, but pays not the least regard to those
which belong to other families. The spirit of a departed Kaffir is
supposed to have no sympathy except with relations and immediate
descendants.
It has been already mentioned that, after the death of a Kaffir, his spirit
is supposed to dwell in the shade below, and to have the power of
influencing the survivors of his own family, whether for good or evil. He
likes cattle to be sacrificed to his name, because, in that case, he adds the
spirits of the dead cattle to his herd below, while his friends above eat the
flesh, so that both parties are well pleased. Sometimes, if he thinks that
he has been neglected by them, he visits his displeasure by afflicting
them with various diseases, from which they seldom expect to recover
without the sacrifice of cattle. If the ailment is comparatively trifling, the
sacrifice of a goat is deemed sufficient; but if the malady be serious,
nothing but an ox, or in some cases several oxen, are required before the
offended spirits will relent. Sheep seem never to be used for this purpose.
If the reader will refer to page 78, he will see that the sacrifice of cattle
in case of sickness forms part of a guardian’s duty toward a young girl,
and that, if her temporary guardian should have complied with this
custom, her relatives, should they he discovered, are bound to refund
such cattle.
That the spirits of the dead are allowed to quit their shadowy home
below and to revisit their friends has already been mentioned. In some
instances, as in the case of Umbia, they are supposed to present
themselves in their own form. But the usual plan is, for them to adopt the
shape of some animal which is not in the habit of entering human
dwellings, and so to appear under a borrowed form. The serpent or the
lizard shape is supposed to be the favorite mark under which the spirit
conceals its identity, and the man whose house it enters is left to exercise
his ingenuity in guessing the particular spirit that may be enshrined in the
strange animal. In order to ascertain precisely the character of the visitor,
he lays a stick gently on its back; and if it shows no sign of anger, he is
quite sure that he is favored with the presence of one of his dead
ancestors. There are few Kaffirs that will make such a discovery, and
will not offer a sacrifice at once, for the prevalent idea in their mind is,
that an ancestor would not have taken the trouble to come on earth,
except to give a warning that, unless he were treated with more respect,
some evil consequence would follow. In consequence of this belief, most
of the Kaffirs have a great dislike to killing serpents and lizards, not
knowing whether they may not be acting rudely toward some dead
ancestor who will avenge himself upon them for their want of respect.
Should a cow or a calf enter a hut, the Kaffir would take no notice of
it, as these animals are in the habit of entering human dwellings; but if a
sheep were to do so, he would immediately fancy that it was inspired
with the shade of one of his ancestors. The same would be the case with
a wild animal of any kind, unless it were a beast of prey, in which case it
might possibly have made its way into the hut in search of food. A
similar exception would be made with regard to antelopes and other
animals which had been hunted, and had rushed into the kraal or crept
into the hut as a refuge from their foes.
Sacrifices are often made, not only to remove existing evils, but to
avert impending danger. In battle, for example, a soldier who finds that
the enemy are getting the upper hand, will make a vow to his ancestors
that if he comes safely out of the fight, he will make a sacrifice to them,
and this vow is always kept. Even if the soldier should be a “boy,” who
has no cattle, his father or nearest relation would think himself bound to
fulfil the vow. Now and then, if he should find that the danger was not so
great as was anticipated, he will compromise the matter by offering a
goat. Unless a sacrifice of some kind were made, the vengeance of the
offended spirits would be terrible, and no Kaffir would willingly run
such a risk.
Sacrifices are also offered for the purpose of obtaining certain favors.
For example, as has been already mentioned, when an army starts on an
expedition, sacrifices are made to the spirits, and a similar rite is
performed when a new kraal is built, or a new field laid out. Relatives at
home will offer sacrifices in behalf of their absent friends; and when a
chief is away from home in command of a war expedition, the sacrifices
for his welfare occur almost daily. Sacrifices or thank-offerings ought
also to be made when the spirits have been propitious; and if the army is
victorious, or the chief returned in health, it is thought right to add
another sacrifice to the former, in token of acknowledgment that the
previous offering has not been in vain.
The Kaffir generally reserves the largest and finest ox in his herd for
sacrifice under very important circumstances, and this animal, which is
distinguished by the name of “Ox of the Spirits,” is never sold except on
pressing emergency. Mr. Shooter, who has given great attention to the
moral culture of the Kaffir tribes, remarks with much truth, that the
Kaffir’s idea of a sacrifice is simply a present of food to the spirit. For
the same reason, when an ox is solemnly sacrificed, the prophet in
attendance calls upon the spirits to come and eat, and adds to the
inducement by placing baskets of beer and vessels of snuff by the side of
the slaughtered animal. Indeed, when a man is very poor, and has no
cattle to sacrifice, he contents himself with these latter offerings.
The account of one of these sacrifices has been translated by Mr.
Grout, from the words of a native. After mentioning a great variety of
preliminary rites, he proceeds to say, “Now some one person goes out,
and when he has come abroad, without the kraal, all who are within their
houses keep silence, while he goes round the kraal, the outer enclosure of
the kraal, and says, ‘Honor to thee, lord!’ (inkosi.) Offering prayers to
the shades, he continues, ‘A blessing, let a blessing come then, since you
have really demanded your cow; let sickness depart utterly. Thus we
offer your animal.’
“And on our part we say, ‘Let the sick man come out, come forth, be
no longer sick, and slaughter your animal then, since we have now
consented that he may have it for his own use. Glory to thee, lord; good
news; come then, let us see him going about like other people. Now then,
we have given you what you want; let us therefore see whether or not it
was enjoined in order that he might recover, and that the sickness might
pass by.’
“And then, coming out, spear in hand, he enters the cattle fold, comes
up and stabs it. The cow cries, says yeh! to which he replies, ‘An animal
for the gods ought to show signs of distress’; it is all right then, just what
you required. Then they skin it, eat it, finish it.” Sometimes the gall is
eaten by the sacrificer, and sometimes it is rubbed over the body.
Another kind of sacrifice is that which is made by the principal man of
a kraal, or even by the king himself, about the first of January, the time
when the pods of the maize are green, and are in a fit state for food. No
Kaffir will venture to eat the produce of the new year until after the
festival, which may be called the Feast of First-fruits. The feast lasts for
several days, and in order to celebrate it, the whole army assembles,
together with the young recruits who have not yet been entrusted with
shields. The prophets also assemble in great force, their business being to
invent certain modes of preparing food, which will render the body of
the consumer strong throughout the year. At this festival, also, the
veteran soldiers who have earned their discharge are formally released
from service, while the recruits are drafted into the ranks.
The first business is, the sacrifice of the bull. For this purpose a bull is
given to the warriors, who are obliged to catch it and strangle it with
their naked hands. They are not even allowed a rope with which to bind
the animal, and the natural consequence is, that no small amount of
torture is inflicted upon the poor animal, while the warriors are placed in
considerable jeopardy of their lives. When the bull is dead, the chief
prophet opens it, and removes the gall, which he mixes with other
medicines and gives to the king and his councillors. The dose thus
prepared is always as unsavory a mixture as can well be conceived, but
the Kaffir palate is not very delicate, and suffers little under the
infliction. The body of the bull is next handed over to the “boys,” who
eat as much as they can, and are obliged to burn the remainder. As a
general rule, there is very little to be burned. The men do not eat the
flesh of this animal, but they feast to their heart’s content on other cattle,
which are slaughtered in the usual manner. Dancing, drinking, and taking
snuff now set in, and continue in full force for several days, until not
even Kaffir energy can endure more exertion.
Then comes the part of the king. The subjects form themselves into a
vast ring, into which the king, dressed in all the bravery of his dancing
apparel, enters with a bound, amid shouts of welcome from the people.
He proceeds to indulge in one of the furious dances which the Kaffirs
love, springing high into the air, flourishing his stick of office, and
singing songs in his own praises, until he can dance and sing no longer.
Generally, this dance is not of very long duration, as the king is almost
invariably a fat and unwieldy man, and cannot endure a prolonged
exertion. The crowning incident of the feast now takes place. The king
stands in the midst of his people—Dingan always stood on a small
mound of earth—takes a young and green calabash in his hands, and
dashes it upon the ground, so as to break it in pieces; by this act
declaring the harvest begun, and the people at liberty to eat of the fruits
of the new year. A very similar ceremony takes place among the tribes of
American Indians, the consequence of which is frequently that the
people abuse the newly granted permission, and in a few days consume
all the maize that ought to have served them for the cold months of
winter.
The Kaffir has a strong belief in omens; though perhaps not stronger
than similar credulity in some parts of our own land. He is always on the
look-out for omens, and has as keen an eye for them and their meaning
as an ancient augur. Anything that happens out of the ordinary course of
events is an omen, either for good or evil, and the natural constitution of
a Kaffir’s mind always inclines him to the latter feeling. As in the ancient
days, the modern Kaffir finds most of his omens in the actions of
animals. One of the worst of omens is the bleating of a sheep as it is
being slaughtered. Some years ago this omen occurred in the kraal
belonging to one of Panda’s “indunas,” or councillors. A prophet was
immediately summoned, and a number of sacrifices offered to avert the
evil omen. Panda himself was so uneasy that he added an ox to the
sacrifices, and afterward came to the conclusion that a man whose kraal
could be visited by such an infliction could not be fit to live. He
accordingly sent a party of soldiers to kill the induna, but the man,
knowing the character of his chief, took the alarm in time, and escaped
into British territory in Natal.
If a goat were to leap on a hut, nothing would be thought of it; but if a
dog or a sheep were to do so, it would be an omen. It is rather
remarkable that among the North American tribes the roofs of houses
form the usual resting-place of the dogs which swarm in every village. If
a cow were to eat grain that had been spilled on the ground, it would be
no omen; but if she were to push off the cover of a vessel containing
grain, and eat the contents, the act would be considered ominous.
Mention has been made once or twice of the prophets, sometimes, but
erroneously, called witch doctors. These personages play a most
important part in the religious system of the Kaffir tribes; and although
their office varies slightly in detail, according to the locality to which
they belong, their general characteristics are the same throughout the
country. Their chief offices are, communicating with the spirits of the
departed, and ascertaining their wishes; discovering the perpetrators of
crimes; reversing spells thrown by witchcraft; and lastly, and most
important, rain-making.
(1.) THE PROPHET’S SCHOOL.
(See pages 175, 176.)
(2.) THE PROPHET’S RETURN.
(See Page 175.)
The object for which the Kaffir prophet is generally consulted is the
discovery of witchcraft. Now, the reader must understand that the belief
in witchcraft is universal throughout Africa, and in no part of that
continent is it so strong as in Kaffirland. There is scarcely an ill that can
befall mankind which is not believed to be caused by witchcraft, and,
consequently, the prophet has to find out the author of the evil. The most
harmless discovery that he can make is, that the charm has not been
wrought by any individual, but has been the work of offended spirits. All
illness, for example, is thought to be caused by the spirits of the
departed, either because they are offended with the sufferer, or because
they have been worked upon by some necromancer.
Mr. Shooter has so well described the course of proceeding in such a
case that his own words must be given:—
“When people consult a prophet, they do not tell him on what subject
they wish to be enlightened. He is supposed to be acquainted with their
thoughts, and they merely intimate that they wish to have the benefit of
his knowledge. Probably he will ‘take time to consider,’ and not give his
responses at once. Two young men visiting him, in consequence of their
brother’s illness, found the prophet squatting by his hut, and saluted him.
He then invited them to sit down, and, retiring outside the kraal, squatted
near the gate, to take snuff and meditate. This done to his satisfaction, he
sends a boy to call the visitors into his presence; when they immediately
join him, and squat.
“The prophet asks for his ‘assagai’—a figurative expression for his fee
—when the applicants reply that they have nothing to give at present;
after a while, they will seek something to pay him with. ‘No,’ answers
the prophet, not disposed to give credit; ‘you want to cheat me—
everybody tries to do so now. Why don’t you give me two shillings?’
They offer him a small assagai; but he is not satisfied with the weapon,
and, pointing to a larger one, says, ‘That is mine.’ The man who had
brought this excuses himself by saying that it does not belong to him; but
the prophet persists, and it is given. Having no hope of extorting a larger
fee, the prophet says, ‘Beat and hear, my people.’ Each of the applicants
snaps his fingers, and replies, ‘I hear.’ The beating is sometimes, and
perhaps more regularly, performed by beating the ground with sticks.
The prophet now pretends to have a vision, indistinct at first, but
becoming eventually clearer, until he sees the actual thing which has
occurred. This vision he professes to describe as it appears to him. We
may imagine him saying, for instance, ‘A cow is sick—no, I see a man; a
man has been hurt.’ While he runs on in this way, the applicants reply to
every assertion by beating, as at first, and saying, ‘I hear.’ They carefully
abstain from saying whether he is right or wrong; but when he
approaches the truth, the simple creatures testify their joy by beating and
replying with increased vigor.
“The prophet’s simulated vision is not a series of guesses, in which he
may possibly hit upon the truth, but a systematic enumeration of
particulars, in which he can scarcely miss it. Thus, he may begin by
saying that the thing which the applicants wish to know relates to some
animal with hair, and, going through each division of that class, suggests
whatever may be likely to occur to a cow, a calf, a dog. If he find no
indication that the matter relates to one of this class, he takes another, as
human beings, and proceeds through it in the same manner. It is obvious
that a tolerably clever practitioner may, in this way, discover from the
applicants whatever may have happened to them, and send them away
with a deep impression of his prophetic abilities, especially if he have
any previous knowledge of their circumstances. The following sketch
will give the reader a general idea of the prophet’s manner of proceeding.
A few particulars only, as being sufficient for illustration, are given:—
“‘Beat and hear, my people.’
“They snap their fingers, and say, ‘I hear.’
“‘Attend, my people.’
“They beat, and say, ‘I hear.’
“‘I don’t know what you want; you want to know something about an
animal with hair. A cow is sick; what’s the matter with her? I see a
wound on her side—no; I’m wrong. A cow is lost; I see a cow in the
bush. Nay, don’t beat, my people; I’m wrong. It’s a dog; a dog has
ascended a hut.[1] Nay, that’s not it, I see now; beat vigorously; the thing
relates to people. Somebody is ill—a man is ill—he is an old man. No; I
see a woman—she has been married a year: where is she? I’m wrong; I
don’t see yet.’
[1] This, it will be remembered, is one of the evil omens which a Kaffir fears.