Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Seeing Through Statistics 4th Edition Utts Test Bank 1
Seeing Through Statistics 4th Edition Utts Test Bank 1
CHAPTER 6
SECTION 6.1
FINAL QUESTIONS
4. Suppose you are reading a newspaper article discussing the results of the latest medical study but
the information is incomplete (as in many cases with the media). What should you do?
a. Disregard the results because they can’t be checked out fully.
b. Be suspicious of the results; if some information is missing, perhaps there is a reason they
don’t want you to know.
c. See if you can find the original source of the report or contact the authors for the missing
information.
d. Assume that the results are valid because they appeared in a newspaper.
ANSWER: C
5. {Case study 6.1 narrative} One of your classmates argues that test scores are expected to improve
in sequential testing scenarios. The argument asserts that the first test serves somewhat as a “test
preparation course” for the second test. If this is true, the study may say more about the negative
effect of the nutrition class than it does about the positive effect of the meditation class. How can
the experiment be redesigned to control for this lurking factor?
ANSWER: ANY REASONABLE ANSWER OK. EXAMPLE: CREATE A THIRD
RANDOMLY-SELECTED GROUP THAT RECEIVES NEITHER THE MEDITATION
TRAINING NOR THE NUTRITION CLASS.
6. {Case study 6.1 narrative} Is there a possible experimenter effect in this study? Explain.
ANSWER: NO. THE NUTRITION GROUP SERVES AS A CONTROL FOR THE
HAWTHORNE EFFECT. SINCE THE NUTRITION GROUP SCORES WERE
UNCHANGED, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR AN EXPERIMENTER EFFECT.
7. {Case study 6.1 narrative} Is this study ecologically valid? Explain why or why not.
ANSWER: THE STUDY IS PROBABLY VALID ECOLOGICALLY. THE STUDY’S
ENVIRONMENT DOES NOT INVOLVE ANY ROLE-PLAYING OR RELAXATION OF
SOCIAL PRESSURE.
9. {Case study 6.1 narrative} Which of the following describes a possible difficulty with this study?
a. Confounding variables
b. Interacting variables
c. Ecological validity
d. All of the above
ANSWER: B
10. {Case study 6.2 narrative} What is one possible confounding factor in this experiment?
ANSWER: ANY REASONABLE ANSWER OK. EXAMPLES: OVERALL DIET;
EXERCISE; PARENTAL ATTITUDES TOWARDS HEALTH AND FITNESS, ETC.
11. {Case study 6.2 narrative} Based on this study, can a cause and effect relationship between cereal
consumption and obesity be made?
ANSWER: NO; THIS WAS AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; SUBJECTS WERE NOT
RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO EITHER CONSUME CEREAL OR NOT; POTENTIAL
CONFOUNDING VARIABLES ARE UINCONTROLLED.
13. {Case study 6.2 narrative} Which of the following describes a possible difficulty with this study?
a. Hawthorne effect
b. Confounding variables
c. Ecological validity
d. All of the above
ANSWER: B
14. {Case study 6.3 narrative} What is one possible confounding factor in the study represented by the
first data set?
ANSWER: ANY REASONABLE ANSWER OK. EXAMPLES: DRIVING HABITS OF
MEN VS. WOMEN; AMOUNT OF DRIVING BY MEN VS. WOMEN AGED 18-21 IN
OKLAHOMA AT THE TIME; NUMBER OF TIMES STOPPED BY POLICE, ETC.
15. {Case study 6.3 narrative} Evaluate the sample used to obtain the second data set.
ANSWER: THIS WAS NOT A RANDOM SAMPLE AND MAY NOT REPRESENT THE
POPULATION OF ALL DRIVERS IN THIS AGE GROUP.
16. {Case study 6.3 narrative} Assuming the Supreme Court did take these data sets into account to
make their decision, why did they determine the law to be unconstitutional when each data set
appears to favor those defending the law? Discuss each data set separately.
ANSWER: THE FIRST DATA SET CONTAINS TOO MANY CONFOUNDING
VARIABLES TO BE HELPFUL, IN PARTICULAR THE FACT THAT MORE MEN
THAN WOMEN AGED 18-21 WERE PROBABLY DRIVING AT THAT TIME, AND
WERE STOPPED MORE OFTEN. THE SECOND DATA SET DOES NOT CONTAIN A
RANDOM SAMPLE SO IT MAY NOT REPRESENT THE POPULATION; EVEN IF IT
DID, THE TWO PERCENTAGES ARE STATISTICALLY INDISTINGUISHABLE.
18. {Case study 6.3 narrative} Which of the following describes difficulties with one or both of the
studies in this case?
a. Generalizability
b. Confounding variables
c. Sampling problems
d. All of the above
ANSWER: D
19. {Case study 6.4 narrative} What is one possible confounding variable that may or may not have
been controlled for in this study?
ANSWER: ANY REASONABLE ANSWER OK. EXAMPLES: SOCIO-ECONOMIC
STATUS; EXPOSURE TO SECONDHAND SMOKE; MOTHERS’ DIET, EDUCATION,
AGE, DRUG USE; PARENTS’ IQ; PRENATAL CARE; DURATION OF
BREASTFEEDING, ETC.
20. {Case study 6.4 narrative} Based on this study, can a cause and effect relationship between
smoking during pregnancy and child’s IQ be established?
ANSWER: MOST LIKELY NOT. THIS WAS AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY - PEOPLE
WERE NOT RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO EITHER SMOKE OR NOT; MANY
CONFOUNDING VARIABLES COULD EXIST. HOWEVER, A CAUSE AND EFFECT
RELATIONSHIP CANNOT BE RULED OUT AT THIS POINT EITHER!