Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRUE/FALSE
1. Personality helps explain why a particular behavior provides great value to one consumer but none to
another.
ANS: F
Personality traits are relatively stable and interact with situations to influence behavior.
ANS: F
The psychoanalytic approach to personality was proposed by Sigmund Freud.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
PTS: 1 DIF: Difficulty: Easy OBJ: LO: 6-1
NAT: BUSPROG: Analytic STA: DISC: Customer
TOP: A-head: Personality and Consumer Behavior KEY: Bloom's: Knowledge
6. According to the psychoanalytic approach, the id differs from the ego in that the id focuses on
utilitarian value.
ANS: F
The id focuses on hedonic value.
ANS: F
The id operates on a pleasure principle that motivates a person to focus on maximizing pleasure and
minimizing pain.
8. The superego focuses on resolving the conflicts between the id and ego.
ANS: F
The superego works against the id by motivating behavior that matches societal norms and
expectations, much like the consumer’s conscience. The ego focuses on resolving the conflicts
between the id and the superego.
ANS: F
A trait is defined as a distinguishable characteristic that describes one’s tendency to act in a relatively
consistent manner.
10. The goal of the nomothetic perspective is to find common personality traits that can be studied across
people.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
11. The idiographic approach in trait research focuses on individual traits.
ANS: F
The idiographic perspective focuses on the total person and the uniqueness of his or her psychological
makeup. Attention is not placed on individual traits or how they can be studied across multiple
consumers.
ANS: F
The trait approach takes a nomothetic approach to personality. That is, the trait approach assumes that
the human personality can be described as a combination of traits that can be studied across
consumers.
13. The prediction of individual behavior tends to be weaker with the multiple-trait approach.
ANS: F
The prediction of individual behavior tends to be stronger with the multiple-trait approach.
14. Kate always buys low-priced items regardless of quality. This consumer behavior trait signifies value
consciousness.
ANS: F
Value consciousness represents the tendency for consumers to focus on maximizing what is received
from a transaction as compared to what is given.
15. Symbolism refers to the extent to which material goods are important in a consumer’s life.
ANS: F
Materialism refers to the extent to which material goods are important in a consumer’s life.
16. Lower materialism scores are typically found among younger consumers.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
ANS: F
Materialism tends to differ among generations, with lower materialism scores typically found among
older consumers.
17. John gives away his old furniture to the poor and the needy whenever he buys new ones. Hence, it can
be safely concluded that John is a highly materialistic consumer.
ANS: F
Highly materialistic consumers tend to be possessive, nongenerous, and envious of other’s
possessions.
20. Consumers with a high degree of innovativeness tend to engage in effortful cognitive information
processing; they also tend to think carefully about products, problems, and even marketing messages.
ANS: F
Consumers with a high need for cognition tend to exhibit these behaviors.
21. The competitiveness trait can be defined as an enduring tendency to strive to be better than others.
22. Sara is married to an English media baron. She drives an expensive Lexus, wears designer clothing,
and sends her children to an exclusive private school to display her family’s social class to others.
Sara's tendency to flaunt her material possessions as a way of displaying her social class can be
described as conspicuous consumption.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
ANS: T PTS: 1 DIF: Difficulty: Moderate
OBJ: LO: 6-2 NAT: BUSPROG: Reflective Thinking STA: DISC: Customer
TOP: A-head: Major Traits Examined in Consumer Research KEY: Bloom's: Application
23. Conspicuous consumption represents the tendency of a consumer to engage in bargaining behaviors
when making purchases.
ANS: F
This is bargaining proneness. Conspicuous consumption describes the tendency of the wealthy to
flaunt their material possessions as a way of displaying their social class.
ANS: F
High self-monitors care deeply about what others think and say about their behaviors and they care
much about how they present themselves in social situations.
ANS: F
Even though the FFM has proved useful for presenting an integrative approach to personality, the
model is not universally accepted by all researchers. In fact, there have been some lively debates
regarding its usefulness.
26. Hierarchical approaches begin with the assumption that all personality traits are specific.
ANS: F
Hierarchical approaches begin with the assumption that personality traits exist at varying levels of
abstraction. That is, some traits are specific (bargaining proneness), and others are more broad
(extroversion).
27. Broad traits tend to be better predictors of individual behaviors than specific traits.
ANS: F
As a general statement, specific traits tend to be better predictors of individual behaviors than broad
traits.
©2014 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Another document from Scribd.com that is
random and unrelated content:
are not influenced by the light of the sun and moon, and can therefore be
studied to greater advantage than auroras. We have already pointed out
that it is only the aurora of the radial, streamer type which exerts this
magnetic influence (compare Figs. 42 and 43).
Fig. 43.—Curve of horizontal intensity at Kew on November 15 and 16, 1905. On November
15 a magnificent aurora was observed in Galicia, Germany, France, Norway, England,
Ireland, and Nova Scotia, with a maximum at 9 p.m. The polar light was unusually
brilliant as early as 6 p.m.
We see that the maxima and minima years of the two phenomena very
nearly coincide. The accord is so evident that we may calculate the
diurnal variation as proportional to the increase in the number of sun-
spots. This is shown by the two last lines of the table.
The yearly variation is again exactly the same as that of polar lights, as
the following table indicates, in which the disturbances of magnetic
declination, horizontal intensity, and vertical intensity are compiled for
Toronto, Canada; for comparison the means of these three magnitudes
are added for Greenwich. The unit of this table is the average annual
variation:
TORONTO
Jan. Feb. Mar. April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Declination 0.57 0.84 1.11 1.42 0.98 0.53 0.94 1.16 1.62 1.31 0.78 0.76
Horizontal 0.56 0.94 0.94 1.50 0.90 0.36 0.61 0.75 1.71 1.48 0.98 0.58
Vertical 0.57 0.74 1.08 1.49 1.12 0.50 0.71 1.08 1.61 1.29 0.75 0.61
GREENWICH
Jan. Feb. Mar. April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
Means 0.93 1.23 1.22 1.09 0.81 0.71 0.81 0.90 1.15 1.18 1.02 0.83
Fig. 47.—Spiral nebula in the Canes Venatici. Messier 51. Taken at the
Yerkes Observatory on June 3, 1902. Scale, 1 mm. = 13.2 sec. of arc
This spiral form (Figs. 47 and 48) of the outer portions of the nebulæ
has for a long time excited the greatest attention. In almost all the
investigated instances it has been observed that two spiral branches are
coiling about the central body. This would indicate that the matter is in a
revolving movement about the central axis of the spiral, and that it has
streamed away from the axis in two opposite directions. Sometimes the
matter appears arranged as in a coil; of this type the great nebula of
Andromeda is the best-known example (Fig. 49). A closer inspection of
this nebula with more powerful instruments indicates, however, that it is
also spiral and that it appears coiled, because we are looking at it from
the side. The late famous American astronomer Keeler, who has studied
these nebulæ with greater success than any one else, has catalogued a
great many of them in all the divisions of the heavens which were
accessible to his instruments, and he has found that these formations are
predominatingly of a spiral nature.
Fig. 51.—Central portion of the great nebula in Orion. Taken at the Yerkes Observatory.
Scale, 1 mm. = 12 sec. of arc
Some nebulæ, like the so-called planetary nebulæ, offer rather the
appearance of luminous spheres. We may assume in these cases that the
explosions were less violent, and that the spirals, therefore, are situated
so closely together that they seem to merge into one another. Possibly the
inequalities in their development have become equalized in the course of
time. A few nebulæ are ring-shaped, as the well-known nebula of Lyra
(see Fig. 50). These rings may, again, have been formed out of spiral
nebulæ, and the spirals may have gradually been obliterated by rotation,
while the central nebulous matter may have been concentrated on the
planets travelling round the central star. Schaeberle, an eminent
American astronomer, has discovered traces of spiral shape also in the
Lyra nebula.
Another kind of nebula is the ordinary nebula of vast extension and
irregular shape, evidently formed out of most extremely attenuated
matter; well-known characteristic examples are found in Orion, about the
Pleiades, and in the Swan (Figs. 51, 52, and 53). In these nebulæ portions
of a spiral structure have likewise often been discerned.
Fig. 52.—Nebular striæ in the stars of the Pleiades. Taken at the Yerkes Observatory on
October 19, 1901. Scale, 1 mm. = 42.2 sec. of arc
We have said that the collision between two celestial bodies would
result in the formation of a spiral with two wings. If the impact is such
that the two centres of the celestial bodies move straight towards each
other, a disk will arise, and not a spiral; or if one star is much smaller
than the other, possibly a cone, because the gases will uniformly be
spread in all directions about the line of impact. A perfectly central
impact is obviously very rare; but there may be cases which approach
this limiting condition more or less, especially when the relative velocity
of the two bodies is small. By slow diffusion a feebly developed spiral
may also be converted into a rotating disklike structure. The extension of
these nebular structures will depend upon the ratio between the mass of
the system and the velocity of ejection of the gases. If, for example, two
extinct suns of nearly equal dimensions and mass, like our sun, should
collide, some gas masses would travel into infinite space, being hurled
out with a velocity of more than 900 km. (550 miles) per second; while
other particles, moving at a slower rate, would remain in the
neighborhood of the central body. The nearer to that body, the smaller
was their velocity. From their position they might fall back into the
central body, to be reincorporated in it, if two circumstances did not
prevent this. The one circumstance is the enormous radiation pressure of
the glowing central mass. That pressure keeps masses of dust particles
floating, which by friction will carry the surrounding masses of gas with
them. Owing to the absorption of the radiation by the dust particles, only
the finer particles will be supported farther outside, and at the extreme
margin of the nebula even the very finest dust will no longer be
maintained in suspension by the greatly weakened radiation pressure.
Thus we arrive at an outer limit for the nebula. The other circumstance is
the violent rotation which is set up by the impact of the central bodies.
The rotation and the centrifugal forces will produce a disk-shaped
expansion of the whole central mass. Owing to molecular collisions and
to tidal effects, the angular velocity will in the denser portions tend to
become uniform, so that the whole will rotate like a flattened-out ball
filled with gas, and the spiral structure will gradually disappear in those
parts. In the more remote particles the velocity will only increase to such
an extent as to equal that of a planet moving at the same distance—that is
to say, the gravitation towards the central body will be balanced by the
centrifugal force, and at the very greatest distances the molecular
bombardments, as well as gravitation towards the centre, will become so
insignificant that any masses collected there will retain their shape for an
almost unlimited space of time.
In the centre of this system the main bulk of the matter would be
concentrated in a sun of extreme brightness, whose light intensity would,
however, owing to strong radiation, diminish with comparative rapidity.
Fig. 53.—Nebular striæ in the Swan. New General Catalogue, 6992. Taken at the Yerkes
Observatory on October 5, 1901. Scale, 1 mm. = 41 sec. of arc
Such an extensive nebular system, in which gravitation, on account of
the enormous distances, would act feebly and very slowly, would yet, in
spite of the extraordinary attenuation of matter in its outer portions, and
just on account of its vast extension, be able to stop the movement of the
particles of dust penetrating into it. If the gases of the nebula are not to
escape into space, notwithstanding the infinitesimal gravitation, their
molecules must be assumed to be almost at a stand-still, and their
temperature must not rise by more than 50° or 60° Cent. above absolute
zero. At such low temperatures the so-called adsorption plays an
enormously important part (Dewar). The small dust particles form
centres about which the gases are condensed to a remarkable degree. The
extremely low density of these gases does not prevent their
condensation; for the adsorption phenomenon follows a law according to
which the mass of condensed gas will only be reduced by about one-
tenth when the density of the surrounding gas has been decreased by
one-ten-thousandth. The mass of dust particles or dust grains will thus be
augmented, and when they collide they will be cemented together by the
semiliquid films condensed upon them. There must, hence, be a
relatively energetic formation of meteorites in the nebulæ, and especially
in their interiors. Then stars and their satellites, migrating through space,
will stray into these swarms of gases and meteorites within the nebulæ.
The larger and more rapidly moving celestial bodies will crush through
this relatively less dense matter; but thousands of years may yet be
occupied in their passing through nebulæ of vast dimensions.
Fig. 54.—Nebula and star rift in the Swan, in the Milky Way. Taken by M. Wolf,
Königstuhl, near Heidelberg
Fig. 56.—Star cluster in Hercules. Messier 13. Taken at the Yerkes Observatory. Scale, 1
mm. = 9.22 sec. of arc
The smaller and more slowly moving immigrants, on the other hand,
are stopped by the particles of the nebulæ. We therefore see the stars
more sparsely distributed in the immediate neighborhood of the nebulæ,
while in the nebulæ themselves they appear more densely crowded. This
fact had struck Herschel in his observations of nebulæ; in recent days it
has been investigated by Courvoisier and M. Wolf. In this way several
centres of attraction are created in a nebula; they condense the gases
surrounding the nebula, and catch, so to say, any stray meteorites and
collect them especially in the inner portions of the nebula. We frequently
observe, further, how the nebular matter appears attenuated at a certain
distance from the luminous bright stars (compare Figs. 52 and 55).
Finally, the nebulæ change into star clusters which still retain the
characteristic shapes of the nebulæ; of these the spiral is the most usual,
while we also meet with conical shapes, originating from conical nebulæ,
and spherical shapes (compare Figs. 56, 57, and 58).
This is, broadly, the type of evolution through which Herschel, relying
upon his observations, presumed a nebula to pass. He was, however,
under the impression that the nebulous matter would directly be
condensed into star clusters without the aid of strange celestial
immigrants.
Fig. 57.—Star cluster in Pegasus. Messier 15. Taken at the Yerkes Observatory. Scale, 1
mm. = 6.4 sec. of arc