Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • AUMC - Fall 22 - MBA Non-Business - A-3

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Hamza Rehan
    17 views1 page
    This document compares the organizational culture of KFC and Fri-Chicks across 7 dimensions. KFC has a strong culture with attention to detail, outcome orientation, people orientation, team orientation, aggressiveness, stability, and innovation. In contrast, Fri-Chicks has a weaker culture with less focus on these dimensions, including poor attention to detail in food quality, weak people orientation with high employee turnover, and lack of innovation in their menu.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    223665_AUMC_Fall 22_MBA Non-Business_A-3

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document compares the organizational culture of KFC and Fri-Chicks across 7 dimensions. KFC has a strong culture with attention to detail, outcome orientation, people orientation, team orientation, aggressiveness, stability, and innovation. In contrast, Fri-Chicks has a weaker culture with less focus on these dimensions, including poor attention to detail in food quality, weak people orientation with high employee turnover, and lack of innovation in their menu.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    17 views1 page

    AUMC - Fall 22 - MBA Non-Business - A-3

    Uploaded by

    Muhammad Hamza Rehan
    This document compares the organizational culture of KFC and Fri-Chicks across 7 dimensions. KFC has a strong culture with attention to detail, outcome orientation, people orientation, team orientation, aggressiveness, stability, and innovation. In contrast, Fri-Chicks has a weaker culture with less focus on these dimensions, including poor attention to detail in food quality, weak people orientation with high employee turnover, and lack of innovation in their menu.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Course Name: Principles of Management Dated :17-Nov-22

    Course Instructor: Mr. Usama Najam


    Task: Assignment No # 3

    Q # Contrast the culture of any two organization of your choice on the basis of 7 dimension discussed in
    the class.

    Dimensions of Organizational Company 1: KFC Company 2: Fri-Chicks


    Culture

    Strong: This brand and its employees Weak: This brand is not much focused
    have a very sound sense of attention to on attention to detail which is visible
    Attention to detail detail e.g., branding, logos, food quality. through their food quality and
    Branding.

    Strong: This brand is very focused on Weak: This brand just focuses on the
    outcome because their employees work cash flows running rather than putting
    Outcome Orientation according to set SOP’s which help them effort for positive outcome and Growth.
    a lot for desired outcomes.

    Strong: This brand is focused on people Weak: This brand is also weak on
    and development culture giving equal people’s orientation and caring for
    People Orientation opportunities regardless of gender, them as their employees come and go
    physical deficiencies etc. very fast

    Strong: Every outlet of this company has Weak: This brand is not team oriented
    a proper team from Security guard till rather their employees just look for
    Team Orientation the manager so that their team working their own benefits following survival of
    motives are in line. the fittest strategy.

    Strong: This company is aggressive Weak: This brand is not aggressive for
    towards retaining customers and business and just captures the audience
    Aggressiveness attracting new customers through new who has little knowledge of the market
    products and different modes of and are left from other brands.
    marketing.
    Strong: This company was founded in Weak: This brand hasn’t taken any
    1952 and is the second largest fast-food steps so that the brand can be made
    Stability chain in the world and is still growing stable to survive over time rather it’s
    and stabilizing continuously because of outlets are reviewed badly and
    Strong Values. ultimately closed.
    Strong: This company continuously adds Weak: This brand is not innovative and
    new food items in their menu with has been serving almost same menu
    Innovation and Risk Taking changing trends and since its founding which makes harder
    to retain & attract new customers.

    You might also like