Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Learn the Signs. Act
Early. program, funded the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) to convene
abstract
an expert working group to revise its developmental surveillance checklists.
The goals of the group were to identify evidence-informed milestones to a
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental
include in CDC checklists, clarify when most children can be expected to reach Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
a milestone (to discourage a wait-and-see approach), and support clinical Atlanta, Georgia; bEagle Global Scientific, LLC, San Antonio,
Texas; cDivision of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics,
judgment regarding screening between recommended ages. Subject matter Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South
experts identified by the AAP established 11 criteria for CDC milestone Carolina; dDivision of Developmental Pediatrics,
Department of Pediatrics, The University of Tennessee
checklists, including using milestones most children ($75%) would be Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee; eVermont
expected to achieve by specific health supervision visit ages and those that are Child Health Improvement Program, Department of
Pediatrics, Larner College of Medicine, The University of
easily observed in natural settings. A database of normative data for individual Vermont, Burlington, Vermont; fCenter on Human
milestones, common screening and evaluation tools, and published clinical Development (Professor Emerita), University of Oregon,
Eugene, Oregon; gMetroHealth Medical Center, Case
opinion was created to inform revisions. Application of the criteria established Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; hAmerican
by the AAP working group and adding milestones for the 15- and 30-month Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, Illinois; iKennedy Krieger
health supervision visits resulted in a 26.4% reduction and 40.9% replacement Institute, Baltimore, Maryland; jJohns Hopkins School of
Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and kNational Center on
of previous CDC milestones. One third of the retained milestones were Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (retired),
transferred to different ages; 67.7% of those transferred were moved to older Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*Contributed equally as co-senior authors.
ages. Approximately 80% of the final milestones had normative data from $1
sources. Social-emotional and cognitive milestones had the least normative Drs Zubler and Wiggins conceptualized and designed the
study, collected data and performed the initial analyses,
data. These criteria and revised checklists can be used to support drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised
the manuscript; Drs Lipkin, Macias, Whitaker, Squires,
developmental surveillance, clinical judgment regarding additional Pajek and Shaw critically reviewed and revised the
developmental screening, and research in developmental surveillance manuscript for important intellectual content; Ms Wolf,
Ms Slaughter, Ms Broughton, Ms Gerndt, and Ms
processes. Gaps in developmental data were identified particularly for social- Mlodoch planned and performed the research and
reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors
emotional and cognitive milestones. approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree
to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
The contents are those of the author(s) and do not
The American Academy of child, and applying clinical necessarily represent the official views of, nor an
Pediatrics (AAP) recommends judgment during health endorsement by American Academy of Pediatrics,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/US
developmental surveillance and supervision visits (HSVs). Department of Health and Human Services, or the US
screening to identify children with Developmental screening involves government.
disabilities (DDs) early, help to at specific ages or when Accepted for publication Dec 9, 2021
ensure timely interventions, and surveillance reveals a concern.1 Address correspondence to Jennifer M. Zubler, MD,
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental
improve outcomes.1 Developmental Diagnostic evaluations are Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
surveillance is a longitudinal conducted, typically by 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS S106-4, Atlanta, GA 30341. E-mail:
wyv4@cdc.gov
process that involves eliciting developmental specialists, to
concerns, taking a developmental further evaluate and diagnose DDs
history based on milestone in children deemed at risk through To cite: Zubler JM, Wiggins LD, Macias MM, et al.
Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental
attainment, observing milestones surveillance and screening Surveillance Tools. Pediatrics. 2022;149(3):e2021052138
and other behaviors, examining the processes.
2 ZUBLER et al
Downloaded from http://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/149/3/e2021052138/1272354/peds_2021052138.pdf
by guest
TABLE 1 Criteria for Developmental Milestones and Surveillance Tools.
1. Milestones are included at the age most ($75%) children would be expected to demonstrate the milestone
2. Eliminate “warning signs”a
3. Are easy for families of different social, cultural, and ethnic backgrounds to observe and use
4. Are able to be answered with yes, not yet, or not sure
5. Use plain language, avoiding vague terms like may, can, and begins
6. Are organized in developmental domains
7. Show progression of skills with age, when possible
8. Milestones are not repeated across checklists
9. Include open-ended questions
10. Include information for developmental promotion
11. Include information on how to act early if there are concerns
Criteria developed by SMEs.
a
Milestones listed separately within CDC materials with parent messaging to act early if child has not attained them.
depth surveillance and consideration by a specific age, and limited to Milestone Evaluation
for developmental screening. children aged #5 years. Articles The following data were extracted
were excluded if evidence was from existing CDC milestones,
Milestone Identification limited to special populations (eg, articles selected for review, and
Milestones for possible inclusion in preterm infants) or risk factors. developmental resources: individual
CDC surveillance materials were Non–peer-reviewed articles, milestones, supporting references,
identified by the SMEs. Existing CDC dissertations, and books were also and any normative data or
milestones were automatically excluded. published clinical opinion for the
included for evaluation and were milestone. Milestones with
the foundation for the revised Articles were evaluated by the first
conflicting data (eg, age at which
checklists. Other milestones were 2 authors to determine if they met
most children should achieve the
identified by a literature review and inclusion criteria. Articles chosen by
milestone) were flagged for
commonly used developmental both authors, either on initial review
additional discussion.
resources. or after additional discussion and
agreement between these 2 authors, 4A comprehensive database was
Literature Review had milestone data extracted for created with information extracted
A broad literature search was review by the SME group. from CDC milestones and resources
conducted in March 2019 using for individual milestones from ages
Developmental Resources
MEDLINE, PsychInfo, and ERIC 2 months to 5 years, aligned with
databases. Search terms were SMEs nominated several additional AAP HSV ages, and shared with the
developed in collaboration with the resources for evaluation, including SME group. Original data sources,
CDC librarian after discussion of the parent resources, professional such as articles that met inclusion
objective of the literature review teaching resources, and commonly criteria and nominated
and comprised the following: (1) used screening and diagnostic developmental resources, were
milestone, normative (data, table, evaluation tools (Table 2). also shared with the SME group.
range, value) or age (range, Inclusion criteria for these SMEs collaborated through an in-
appropriate) AND (2) child resources were availability in person meeting, 6 virtual meetings,
development or infant development English and contained evidence and e-mail reviews of decision
AND (3) percentile, psychometrics, that supported at least one summaries from January to
predictive values, red flags, warning individual developmental milestone September 2019.
signs, assessment, monitor, delay, or or included published clinical
reference (standard, values). opinion (ie, consensus milestones) During meetings, the SMEs
that children exhibit the milestone discussed categorizing milestones
An article was included for by a specific age. All nominations into 4 developmental domains: (1)
evaluation if it was written in were accepted for additional social emotional, (2) language/
English, contained evidence that review. communication, (3) cognitive, and
supported at least one normed (4) motor. These domains were
individual developmental milestone CDC Milestones previously used in CDC materials
or included published clinical Existing CDC milestones served as a and could help parents to learn
opinion (ie, consensus milestones) foundation for identifying milestones about different areas of child
that children exhibit the milestone and were automatically evaluated. development (eg, social-emotional
skills in addition to language/ If there was disagreement across simplified the milestones and added
communication skills). Because sources or lack of evidence examples to try to improve
milestones often represent skills supporting a milestone for a specific understanding. The CDC team then
across several domains, they were age, additional research was reviewed milestones from a cultural
placed in the domain in which the conducted, and additional evidence and health communication
SME group believed that parents was then evaluated by the SMEs perspective (eg, family friendly,
would most likely identify them. For according to the developed criteria. fifth- to sixth-grade reading level),
example, reciprocal play skills This included reviewing diagnostic and SMEs reviewed those changes
involving other people were evaluation tools (Table 2) and/or again to ensure that the milestone
categorized as social-emotional, and conducting a separate PubMed still represented the developmental
other play skills were categorized as search for a specific milestone or a construct being assessed.
cognitive. related skill. For example, additional
evidence was sought for age-specific With the use of back-translation
Milestones were reviewed for 2 to development of gestures like lifting methods, the milestones were
3 ages at a time (eg, 2, 4, and 6 arms to be picked up, waving bye- translated into Spanish by CDC
months) so that skill progression Multilingual Services and reviewed
bye, and blowing a kiss.
could be considered. Milestones by 2 native Spanish-speaking
were reviewed by the SME group SMEs used the available evidence pediatricians. Cognitive testing with
on the basis of the criteria outlined base and their clinical experience to a diverse sample of parents located
in Table 1. First, SMEs considered determine if and at what age a in different regions of the United
milestones with normative data milestone would be included in the States provided feedback on
that supported achievement by revised checklists. Only milestones relatability and clarity, which led the
$75% of children at a particular with unanimous agreement were SMEs to make additional changes to
age. Next, they considered included. wording. Results of cognitive testing
milestones from screening and will be published separately.
diagnostic tools. Finally, SMEs During the evaluation process, SMEs
considered milestones that were denoted milestones they included RESULTS
based on published clinical for surveillance but believed that Of the 1027 articles generated from
opinion. Each of these data sources additional research could improve the literature review, 34 met
was cross referenced with the age placement, quality, and/or inclusion criteria. Of those, 24
others to get a sense of the quantity of supporting evidence or contained normative data, and 10
evidence base available to support better capture the underlying contained published clinical opinion
inclusion of a milestone in revised developmental construct of the for $1 milestones. Six additional
CDC checklists. milestone. Finally, the SMEs articles were found through
4 ZUBLER et al
Downloaded from http://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/149/3/e2021052138/1272354/peds_2021052138.pdf
by guest
independent searches to evaluate different ages. For example, Tries to Of the final 159 milestones, 127
individual milestones when SMEs use things the right way, like a (79.9%) were retained or added on
determined that the milestone was phone, cup, or book” was on both the basis of normative data, whereas
appropriate but insufficient or the 12- and 18-month checklists; 32 (20.1%) milestones were
conflicting evidence supported its this milestone was placed only at 15 included on the basis of screening
use at a specific HSV age. Of the months on the basis of supporting and evaluation tools, published
articles with normative data, 14 evidence. Additionally, eliminating clinical opinion, and SME opinion. Of
(58.3%) described populations vague terms, such as may or begins, milestones with normative data, 32
within non–English-speaking resulted in moving and changing had normative data from only 1
countries. milestones; for example, “Begins to resource. The SMEs believed that 22
pass things from one hand to anoth- (13.8%) of the final milestones were
Tables 3 to 6 list the milestones that er” was removed from the list of candidates for additional research,
SMEs included in CDC checklists milestones at age 6 months and was as noted in Tables 3–6; this subset
after critical evaluation and included as “Moves things from one includes the milestone “Sings,
unanimous decision. They are hand to her other hand” at age 9 dances, or acts for you,” the only
presented by domain with HSV age, milestone included or retained
months.
references that support the without supporting evidence on the
inclusion of the milestone at that The 1-, 2-, and 3-year-old checklists basis of SME opinion.
age, and whether the milestone was had the greatest decrease in the
an existing or new CDC milestone. number of milestones, with a $50% Of the 77 developmental warning
Supporting references are divided reduction. Approximately half of the signs listed on the old CDC
into normative data, developmental aggregate loss for these ages was checklists, 59 (76.6%) had a
screening and evaluation tools, and due to moving milestones to the corresponding milestone on the new
published clinical opinions. new 15- and 30-month checklists. checklists.
When combining all new and
Previously, CDC had 216 milestones
revised checklists for 1 to 3 years, DISCUSSION
across 10 checklists. With the
the number of milestones was The CDC checklists support
addition of 15- and 30-month
reduced by 25.7%, consistent with developmental surveillance and
checklists and the evidence review
the 26.4% reduction of milestones other important components of the
process, 159 milestones were
included across 12 checklists. This across the other age ranges. early identification process by
represented a reduction of 57 pediatricians and other ECPs,
All 4 domains had a reduction in including developmental promotion,
(26.4%) CDC milestones, with the
number of milestones. Cognitive parent education and engagement,
average number of milestones per
milestones decreased by 34 communication of developmental
checklist decreasing from 22 to 13.
(50.7%), social emotional decreased progress and concerns, and
Of the final 159 milestones that met by 16 (27.5%), language decreased developmental screening.7,5,9,72–75
the evaluation criteria, 94 (59.1%) by 4 (9.1%), and motor decreased However, variability across
were based on CDC original by 3 (6.4%). Social-emotional and surveillance resources, including the
milestones and 65 (40.9%) were cognitive domain milestones were CDC’s, can create confusion
added on the basis of the milestone the least likely to have normative regarding what constitutes a
identification and evaluation data available. The social-emotional concern and when developmental
process. One third of the 94 retained domain had 25 (59.5%) milestones screening between recommended
CDC milestones were moved to a with 0 to 1 normed references and ages might be warranted.3,4,38,76
different age on the basis of the 8 (19.0%) with $3 normed
criterion that $75% of children references. The cognitive domain An expert working group convened
would be expected to achieve the had 19 (57.6%) milestones with 0 to by AAP sought to improve CDC
milestone by that age. When moved, 1 normed references and 8 (24.2%) surveillance tools by enhancing
21 of those 31 milestones were with $3 references. In contrast, conversations among pediatricians,
transferred to an older age. More language and motor domains had 11 ECPs, and families regarding
than half (56.5%) of the original 216 (27.5%) and 10 (22.7%) milestones childhood development and guiding
milestones were eliminated with 0 to 1 normed references and clinical judgment on when to
(Supplemental Table 7) on the basis 21 (52.5%) and 30 (68.1%) conduct developmental screening
of SME criteria, including 25 that milestones, respectively, with $3 between recommended ages. These
were duplicated across checklists at normed references. tools are not intended to replace
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Social-Emotional Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Calms down when spoken to or 2 mo New Ertem et al (35) — ASHA (11), Bright
picked upd Futures (36),
Dosman et al (8),
Sharp et al (37)
Looks at your face 2 mo CDC Ertem et al (35), Sheldrick — Bright Futures (36),
and Perrin (38) Dosman et al (8),
Scharf et al (18)
Seems happy to see you when 2 mo New Ertem et al (35), Sheldrick — —
you walk up to her and Perrin (38), Thalagala
(39)
Smiles when you talk to or 2 mo CDC Bhave et al (40), Ertem et al ASQ-3 (22), PEDS-DM ASHA (11)
smile at her (35), Lejarraga et al (41), (25)
Thalagala (39)
Smiles on his own to get your 4 mo CDC Ertem et al (35) ASQ-3, PEDS-DM Bright Futures (36)
attention
Chuckles (not yet a full laugh) 4 mo New Accardo and Capute (30), ASQ-3, PEDS-DM ASHA (11), Bellman
when you try to make her Bhave et al (40), Ertem et al (42), Bright
laugh et al (35), Sheldrick and Futures (36)
Perrin (38)
Looks at you, moves, or makes 4 mo New Ertem et al (35) PEDS-DM —
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 3 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Social-Emotional Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
Reacts when you leave (looks, 9 mo CDC Ertem et al (43) — Dosman et al (8),
reaches for you, or cries)d Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
Smiles or laughs when you 9 mo CDC Ertem et al (35), Lejarraga PEDS-DM Bellman et al (42),
play peek-a-boo et al (41), Sheldrick and Bright Futures
Perrin (38), Thalagala (39) (36), Dosman et al
(8), Gerber et al
7
by guest
8
TABLE 3 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Social-Emotional Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
(20), Scharf et al
(18)
Puts hands out for you to wash 18 mo New Gladstone et al (46) — —
them
Looks at a few pages in a book 18 mo New Ertem et al (35) ASQ-SE-2 Behrman et al (50),
with youd Colson and
Dworkin (16),
Vaughan (17)
Helps you dress him by 18 mo CDC — ASQ-3, PEDS-DM Bright Futures (36),
pushing arm through sleeve Dosman et al (8),
or lifting up foot Johnson and
Blasco (15)
Notices when others are hurt 24 mo New — PEDS-DM Dosman et al (8),
or upset, like pausing or Scharf et al (18)
looking sad when someone
is crying
Looks at your face to see how 24 mo New — ASQ-SE-2, MCHAT-R, Bright Futures (36),
to react in a new situation PEDS-DM Dosman et al (8),
Johnson and
Blasco (15)
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 3 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Social-Emotional Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Pretends to be something else Behrman et al (50),
during play (teacher, Bright Futures
superhero, dog) (36), Dosman et al
(8)
Asks to go play with children if 4y CDC Gladstone et al (46) — —
none are around, like “Can I
play with Alex?”d
Comforts others who are hurt 4y CDC — ASQ-3, PEDS-DM Dosman et al (8)
or sad, like hugging a crying
9
validated screening tools but instead recommended that most children may identify those types of
to promote optimal child ($75%) should be expected to concerns. For example, the act early
development and encourage achieve milestones by a given age. message was retained, and new
professionals to act early through open-ended questions were added
surveillance and screening as SMEs believed that using 50th to encourage parents to ask about
outlined in the AAP’s clinical percentile milestones for other concerns.
report.1 Results indicate substantial surveillance would not support
changes were made developing and clinical decision-making for Use of this same strategy is intended
applying criteria for surveillance developmental screening because to discourage the wait-and-see
milestones and tools, adding 15- and only half of children would be approach and could prevent worry
30-month checklists, and expected to achieve an individual for children older than the average
incorporating evidence-informed milestone by a given age. Using age of attainment of a milestone but
milestones. milestones that 85% or 90% of not likely to be at risk for delays.1,5
children would be expected to It could also eliminate the confusion
Clinicians have used attainment of achieve may limit opportunities for families had with milestones and
developmental milestones for almost additional screening for too many warning signs on the same checklist
a century77 to determine if a child is children at risk for developmental and repetition of milestones across
developing typically. Pediatricians delays. A $75% criterion was thus checklists.
have reported increasing use of agreed upon to balance informed
milestone checklists from 53.0% in clinical decision-making regarding The application of additional criteria
2002 to 89.6% in 2016, in addition developmental screening and (Table 1) to improve clarity in the
to their report of increased provide opportunities to identify revised milestones may help
developmental screening.78 children at risk for delays as soon as parents, pediatricians, and other
However, these surveillance possible. Pediatricians are ECPs to recognize when missing
milestone checklists are likely based encouraged to follow AAP milestones might indicate the need
on published clinical opinion due to recommendations to screen a child, for developmental screening.
the lack of published normative using validated screening tools, Although milestones typically span
milestone data and the lack of when surveillance reveals a concern several developmental domains,
citations of original sources on or anytime a concern is raised, to SMEs believed that keeping domain
checklists. The domain tables identify and refine the risk for labels could improve awareness of
generated from this work linking developmental delays.1 the less commonly known social-
developmental milestones to emotional and cognitive
empirically informed evidence and The criterion (Table 1) for development milestones of young
published clinical opinion could milestones representing those that children. Showing progression of a
improve training of professionals most children ($75%) would be skill, like walking, could
and methods for surveillance,4,7,8 expected to achieve eliminated the demonstrate how earlier milestones
such as incorporation of the CDC’s need for the CDC’s previous warning lay the foundation for later ones.
open access milestones/checklists signs because most are now Adding the open-ended question, “Is
into electronic health records. represented as milestones. Using there anything your child is doing or
this strategy, SMEs agreed that a is not doing that concerns you?”
Milestone checklists used in child not meeting a milestone may encourage parents to discuss
surveillance are intended to prompt should be considered for screening the quality with which a child
conversations, review similar to children demonstrating exhibits a milestone, milestones not
developmental history and progress, warning signs. Less than a quarter listed within the sample, and
and elicit concerns. The CDC of warning signs could not be atypical behaviors difficult to
checklists should not replace replaced with an evidence-informed capture through a list.42 Finally,
universal developmental screening, milestone. Examples not including information on
provide a risk categorization, or represented as new milestones developmental promotion and acting
diagnose DDs. To determine if include subjective items such as early may empower families to
concerns about milestones should “shows extreme behavior (unusually support their child’s development
prompt a more in-depth fearful, aggressive, shy or sad)” and and to ask about screening if they
developmental history, observation, items that may be better recognized have concerns.
and examination along with during a physical examination, such
consideration for assessing actual as “stiff or tight muscles.” Additional Surveillance of social-emotional
risk by screening, the SMEs features of the surveillance tools and cognitive milestones supports
10 ZUBLER et al
Downloaded from http://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/149/3/e2021052138/1272354/peds_2021052138.pdf
by guest
by guest
TABLE 4 Language and Communication Milestones With Supporting Normative Data, Evaluation Tools, and Published Clinical Opinion References
Source
Language/ Developmental
Communication Screening and
Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Published Clinical Opinionc
d
Makes sounds other 2 mo CDC Dosman et al (8), ASQ-3 (22), PEDS-DM Blackwell and Baker (53),
than crying Sheldrick and Perrin (25) Bright Futures (36),
(38) Gerber et al (20), Scharf
et al (18)
Reacts to loud 2 mo New — — Accardo and Capute (30),
soundse ASHA (11), Bellman et al
(42), Bright Futures (36)
Makes sounds like 4 mo CDC Accardo and Capute ASQ-3 ASHA (11), Bright Futures
“oooo” and “aahh” (30), Ertem et al (36), Dosman et al (8),
11
by guest
12
TABLE 4 Continued
Source
Language/ Developmental
Communication Screening and
Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Published Clinical Opinionc
Waves “bye-bye” 12 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — ASHA (11), Bright Futures
(30), Crais et al (48), (36), First Words (14),
Den Ouden et al Gerber et al (20), Scharf
(54), Ertem et al et al (18)
(35), Fenson et al
(47), Kwon et al (49)
Calls a parent 12 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — AAP (12), Bright Futures
“mama” or “dada” (30), Crais et al (48), (36), Gerber et al (20),
or another special Sheldrick and Perrin Scharf et al (18)
name (38)
Understands “no” 12 mo CDC Accardo and Capute Bayley III (27) Blackwell and Baker (53),
(pauses briefly or (30), Ertem et al Dosman et al (8), Gerber
stops when you (35), Gladstone et al et al (20), Scharf et al
say it) (46), Lancaster et al (18)
(45), Lejarraga et al
(41), Thalagala (39)
Tries to say 1 or 2 15 mo New Gladstone et al (46), ASQ-3, PEDS DM Bright Futures (36), Johnson
words besides Lancaster et al (45), and Blasco (15), Sharp
mama or dada, Tamis-Lemonda et al and Hillenbrand (37)
like “ba” for ball (55)
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 4 Continued
Source
Language/ Developmental
Communication Screening and
Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Published Clinical Opinionc
(45), Sheldrick and
Perrin (38)
Follows 1-step 18 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — ASHA (11), Dosman et al (8),
directions without (30), Ertem et al Gerber et al (20), Scharf
any gestures, like (35), Gladstone et al et al (18)
giving you the toy (46), Lancaster et al
when you say, (45), Sheldrick and
“Give it to me.” Perrin (38)
Points to things in a 24 mo CDC Accardo and Capute ASQ-3 ASHA (11), Bellman et al
13
by guest
14
TABLE 4 Continued
Source
Language/ Developmental
Communication Screening and
Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Published Clinical Opinionc
Says words like I, me, 30 mo CDC Accardo and Capute ASQ-3, Bayley III Bright Futures (36), Colson
or we (30), Ertem et al and Dworkin (16), Gerber
(35), Lancaster et al et al (20), Johnson and
(45), Sheldrick and Blasco (15), Scharf et al
Perrin (38) (18)
Talks with you in 3y CDC — Bayley III —
conversation using
at least 2 back-
and-forth
exchangese
Asks who, what, 3y New Ertem et al (43), Nair — ASHA (11), Colson and
where, or why and Russell (57), Dworkin (16)
questions, like Sheldrick and Perrin
“Where is mommy/ (38)
daddy?”
Says what action is 3y New Gladstone et al (46) ASQ-3, Bayley III Gerber et al (20), Knobloch
happening in a et al (58), Scharf et al
picture when (18)
asked, like
running, eating, or
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 4 Continued
Source
Language/ Developmental
Communication Screening and
Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Published Clinical Opinionc
his day, like “I
played soccer.”e
Answers simple 4y New Ertem et al (43), ASQ-3 ASHA (11), Gerber et al (20),
questions, like Gladstone et al (46), Scharf et al (18)
“What is a coat Lejarraga et al (41),
for,” or “What is a Nair and Russell
crayon for?” (57), Sheldrick and
Perrin (38)
Tells a story she 5y CDC McCabe and Rollins — Gerber et al (20), Scharf
15
early identification of children with Regardless of supporting data type, confidence to assess concerns
intellectual and social-emotional all revised milestones had raised.
disorders, including autism unanimous SME support for their
spectrum disorder. In our review, inclusion in a surveillance tool. CONCLUSIONS
milestones included in the social- When normative data existed, Early identification and
emotional domain had the fewest limitations remained in the intervention for the 1 in 6 children
normed references per milestone, availability of milestones that met with DDs have been shown to
followed by the cognitive domain, other criteria. For example, improve outcomes.79–83 However,
language domain, and motor sometimes it was difficult to find less than a quarter of children with
domain. When social-emotional naturally observable milestones DDs receive early intervention
milestones were available, they compared with milestones services before age 3 years,84,85
were often self-help rather than demonstrated during standardized and most children with emotional,
social engagement and emotional testing. Although the milestones behavioral, and developmental
regulation skills. These results are evidence-informed using conditions, other than autism
highlight the need for additional international sources and cognitive spectrum disorder, do not receive
research on social-emotional testing with parents was done, services before age 5 years.86
milestones. For example, can there is no certainty that these Developmental surveillance is an
social-emotional function be new milestones will resonate with important part of early
assessed using milestones during
all families or that they are the identification1,87 and facilitates
developmental surveillance at
most relevant milestones for education, communication, and
HSVs, and what factors influence
developmental surveillance. These relationship building among
the timing and development of
checklists and others have not parents, pediatricians, and ECPs.
social-emotional skills? Despite
been tested to see whether they Research in early identification has
relatively more evidence in the
indeed lead to appropriate focused primarily on
language domain, SMEs believed
developmental screening between developmental screening, not
that more research is needed in
recommended ages and improve surveillance. Improvements in
the intersection of the social-
early identification. surveillance tools and processes
emotional and language domains to
recognize and monitor the could help to identify concerns and
There are other gaps in support clinical judgment
development of social language in
developmental surveillance regarding developmental screening
young children.
research. Best practices for to allow more timely referral to
Limitations conducting the recommended 6 early intervention services and
components1 of surveillance are additional evaluation. The methods
There were limitations with the
not available. There are described herein led to substantial
revision process. SMEs’ opinions
determined which HSV was most limitations in the use of revisions of CDC resources to
appropriate for a milestone, given milestones, even evidence- better support developmental
existing evidence and the goal that informed ones, as the sole surveillance. Best practices for
most children ($75%) would be component of developmental surveillance and improvements in
expected to achieve it by that age. surveillance. Milestones/milestone surveillance tools could be
For example, if there was evidence checklists can support some supported by additional research
that 50% of children reach a components, such as taking a on individual normed milestones,
milestone at 11 months and 90% developmental history and particularly social-emotional and
reach it at 16 months, it was eliciting concerns, but surveillance cognitive milestones; how parents,
placed on the 15-month checklist. also involves observation, pediatricians, and ECPs learn and
Eighty percent of the revised examination, education, understand milestones; which
milestones had normative data to communication, and clinical milestones are most likely to lead
support their inclusion on a decision-making. Moreover, to appropriate screening; whether
specific HSV age checklist. trusting relationships may develop the use of milestones that most
However, it was necessary to use through the longitudinal process children ($75%) would be
data such as published clinical of surveillance and improve expected to achieve is appropriate
opinion to represent milestones in parents’ confidence in sharing for surveillance; whether
all domains across all ages. concerns and pediatricians’ categorizing milestones into
16 ZUBLER et al
Downloaded from http://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/149/3/e2021052138/1272354/peds_2021052138.pdf
by guest
by guest
TABLE 5 Cognitive Milestones With Supporting Normative Data, Evaluation Tools, and Published Clinical Opinion References
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Cognitive Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Watches you as you 2 mo CDC Accardo and Capute ASQ-3 (22) —
move (30), Atkinson et al
(60), Bhave et al
(40), Ertem et al
(35), Sheldrick and
Perrin (38)
Looks at a toy for 2 mo New Kumar et al (44) — Accardo and Capute
several seconds (30), Bellman et al
(42)
17
by guest
18
TABLE 5 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Cognitive Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Puts something in a (46), Lancaster et al Bright Futures (36),
container, like a (45), Thalagala (39) Gerber et al (20),
block in a cup Scharf et al (18)
Looks for things he 12 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — Bright Futures (36),
sees you hide, like (30), Ertem et al Gerber et al (20),
a toy under a (35), Gladstone et al Scharf et al (18)
blanket (46)
Tries to use things 15 mo CDC — — Dosman et al (8),
the right way, like Johnson and
a phone, cup, or Blasco (15)
bookd
Stacks at least 2 15 mo New — Beery VMI (28) —
small objects, like
blocks
Copies you doing 18 mo CDC Den Ouden et al (54), ASQ-3, PEDS-DM Bellman et al (42),
chores, like Fenson et al (47) Dosman et al (8),
sweeping with a Gerber et al (20),
broom Scharf et al (18)
Plays with toys in a 18 mo CDC Ertem et al (43), ASQ-3 Bellman et al (42),
simple way, like Gladstone et al (46) Dosman et al (8),
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 5 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Cognitive Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Uses things to Bright Futures (36),
pretend, like Dosman et al (8),
feeding a block to Gerber et al (20),
a doll as if it were Scharf et al (18)
food
Shows simple 30 mo New Lancaster et al (45) ASQ-3 —
problem-solving
skills, like standing
on a small stool to
19
by guest
20
TABLE 5 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Cognitive Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Draws a person with Bright Futures (36),
$3 body parts Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
Counts to 10 5y CDC — ASQ-3 Dosman et al (8),
Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
Names some 5y CDC Williams and Lerner PEDS-DM ASHA (11), Gerber
numbers between (64) et al (20), Scharf
1 and 5 when you et al (18)
point to them
Uses words about 5y CDC Sheldrick and Perrin PEDS-DM Colson and Dworkin
time, like (38) (16), Gerber et al
yesterday, (20), Scharf et al
tomorrow, (18)
morning, or night
Pays attention for 5y New — ASQ-SE —
5–10 min during
activities, for
example, during
story time or
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 6 Motor Milestones With Supporting Normative Data, Evaluation Tools, and Published Clinical Opinion References
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Motor Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Holds head up when 2 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — Bright Futures (36),
on tummy (30), Carruth and Dosman et al (8),
Skinner (61), Den Gerber et al (20),
Ouden et al (54) Scharf et al (18)
Moves both arms and 2 mo New — ASQ-3 (22) Bright Futures (36)
both legs
Opens hands briefly 2 mo New Accardo and Capute ASQ-3 Bright Futures (36)
(30), Ertem et al
(35), Lejarraga et al
21
by guest
22
TABLE 6 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Motor Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Dosman et al (8),
Ertem et al (35),
Kitsao-Wekulo et al
(65), Lejarraga et al
(41)
Gets to a sitting 9 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — Gerber et al (20),
position by herself (30), Bhave et al Scharf et al (18)
(40), Gajewska et al
(66), Sheldrick and
Perrin (38)
Sits without support 9 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — Bellman et al (42),
(30), Bhave et al Gerber et al (20),
(40), Cox et al (67), Scharf et al (18)
Dosman et al (8),
Ertem et al (35),
Gladstone et al (46),
Lancaster et al (44),
Lejarraga et al (41)
Uses fingers to “rake” 9 mo New Accardo and Capute ASQ-3 Bright Futures (36),
food toward (30), Carruth and Gerber et al (20),
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 6 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Motor Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
(43), Gladstone et al
(46), Lancaster et al
(45), Lejarraga et al
(41), World Health
Organization (68)
Walks, holding onto 12 mo CDC Accardo and Capute — Bellman et al (42),
furniture (30), Ertem et al Gerber et al (20),
(43), Lejarraga et al Scharf et al (18)
(41), World Health
23
by guest
24
TABLE 6 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Motor Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
et al (45), Lansdown Blasco (15), Scharf
et al (51), Lejarraga et al (18)
et al (41)
Drinks from a cup 18 mo CDC Den Ouden et al (54), ASQ-3 Bright Futures (36),
without a lid and Ertem et al (43), Dosman et al (8),
may spill Gladstone et al (46), Gerber et al (20),
sometimes Lancaster et al (45) Johnson and
Blasco (15), Scharf
et al (18)
Feeds herself with 18 mo New Carruth and Skinner — Bright Futures (36),
her fingers (61), Dosman et al Gerber et al (20),
(8), Kumar et al Scharf et al (18)
(44), Lejarraga et al
(41)
Tries to use a spoon 18 mo New Ertem et al (43), ASQ-3 Bellman et al (42),
Gladstone et al (46) Bright Futures
(70), Dosman et al
(8), Gerber et al
(20), Johnson and
Blasco (15), Scharf
ZUBLER et al
by guest
TABLE 6 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Motor Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
Walks (not climbs) up 24 mo CDC Bhave et al (40), Ertem ASQ-3, PEDS-DM Bellman et al (42),
a few stairs with et al (43), Sheldrick Bright Futures
or without help and Perrin (38) (70), Colson and
Dworkin (16),
Dosman et al (8),
Gerber et al (20),
Johnson and
25
by guest
26
TABLE 6 Continued
Source
Developmental
Screening and Published Clinical
Motor Milestones Age CDC or New Normative Dataa Evaluation Toolsb Opinionc
(58), Scharf et al
(18)
Puts on some clothes 3y CDC Dosman et al (8), ASQ-3, PEDS-DM Bellman et al (42),
by himself, like Ertem et al (35) Bright Futures
loose pants or a (36), Gerber et al
jacket (20), Johnson and
Blasco (15), Scharf
et al (18)
Uses a fork 3y CDC Dosman et al (8) ASQ-3 Bellman et al (42),
Bright Futures (36)
Catches a large ball 4y CDC — ASQ-3 Bright Futures (36),
most of the time Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
Serves himself food 4y CDC — ASQ-3 Gerber et al (20),
or pours water, Scharf et al (18)
with adult
supervision
Unbuttons some 4y New Ohtoshi et al (71) — Bright Futures (36),
buttons Gerber et al (20),
Scharf et al (18)
ZUBLER et al
developmental domains is helpful; criteria agreed upon by SMEs. The
ABBREVIATIONS
and whether cultural differences CDC milestones and checklists can
exist in surveillance milestones be used in continued efforts to AAP: American Academy of
and processes.1,3–5,7 Nevertheless, improve developmental Pediatrics
based on review of milestone data surveillance. CDC: Centers for Disease Control
and clinical experience, the SMEs and Prevention
agreed that most typically ACKNOWLEDGMENTS DD: developmental delay or
developing children would achieve We thank Mary Cogswell, RN, DrPH, disability
the developmental constructs for her review of earlier versions of ECP: early childhood professional
represented. To our knowledge, the manuscript and pediatricians HSV: health supervision visit
this attempt is the first to align Natalia Benza, MD, and Jose O. SME: subject matter expert
empirically informed milestones on Rodriquez, MD, MBA, for their
parent-completed surveillance review of the Spanish milestone
tools with objectively defined translations.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES: Dr Squires is a developer of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires and receives royalties from Brookes Publishing, the company that publishes
this tool; the other authors have indicated they have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.
REFERENCES campaign. J Dev Behav Pediatr. [brochure]. Itasca, IL: American Academy
1. Lipkin PH, Macias MM; Council on Chil- 2015;36(8):575–585 of Pediatrics; 2005
dren With Disabilities, Section on Devel- 6. Shelov, SP, Altmann, T, Caring for Your 13. National Center on Birth Defects and
opmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. Baby and Young Child: Birth to Age 5, Developmental Disabilities, Centers
Promoting optimal development: identify- New and Revised 5th ed, American Acad- for Disease Control and Prevention.
ing infants and young children with emy of Pediatrics, Itasca, IL, 2009 Tools for Tracking Milestones. Avail-
developmental disorders through devel- able at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/
7. Sheldrick RC, Schlichting LE, Berger B,
opmental surveillance and screening. actearly/freematerials.html. Accessed
et al. Establishing new norms for devel-
Pediatrics. 2020;145(1):e20193449 August 26, 2021
opmental milestones. Pediatrics.
2. Foy JM, Green CM, Earls MF; Commit- 2019;144(6):e20190374 14. FIRST WORDS Project. 16 by 16.
tee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child Available at: https://firstwordsproject.com/
8. Dosman CF, Andrews D, Goulden KJ.
and Family Health, Mental Health about-16by16. Accessed August 26, 2021
Evidence-based milestone ages as a
Leadership Work Group. Mental
framework for developmental surveil- 15. Johnson CP, Blasco PA. Infant growth and
health competencies for pediatric
lance. Paediatr Child Health. development. Pediatr Rev. 1997;18(7):
practice. Pediatrics. 224–242
2012;17(10):561–568
2019;144(5):e20192757
9. Hagan JFSJ, Duncan PM, eds. Bright 16. Colson ER, Dworkin PH. Toddler develop-
3. Wilkinson CL, Wilkinson MJ, Lucarelli
Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervi- ment. Pediatr Rev. 1997;18(8):255–259
J, et al. Quantitative evaluation of
sion of Infants, Children, and Adoles- 17. Vaughan VC III. Assessment of
content and age concordance across
cents, 4th ed. Itasca, IL: American growth and development during
developmental milestone checklists. J
Academy of Pediatrics; 2017 infancy and early childhood.
Dev Behav Pediatr.
2019;40(7):511–518 10. Shaw J, Hagan JJ, Shepard M, et al. Pediatr Rev. 1992;13(3):88–97
Bright Futures Tool and Resource Kit. 18. Scharf RJ, Scharf GJ, Stroustrup
4. Sices L. Use of developmental milestones
in pediatric residency training and prac- Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediat- A. Developmental milestones.
tice: time to rethink the meaning of the rics; 2019 Pediatr Rev. 2016;37(1):25–37, quiz
mean. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 11. American Speech-Language-Hearing Asso- 38, 47
2007;28(1):47–52 ciation. How Does Your Child Hear and 19. Gerber RJ, Wilks T, Erdie-Lalena C. Devel-
5. Raspa M, Levis DM, Kish-Doto J, et al. Talk? Available at: https://www.asha.org/ opmental milestones 3: social-emotional
Examining parents’ experiences and infor- public/speech/development/chart. development. Pediatr Rev. 2011;32(12):
mation needs regarding early identifica- Accessed August 26, 2021 533–536
tion of developmental delays: qualitative 12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Is Your 20. Gerber RJ, Wilks T, Erdie-Lalena C. Devel-
research to inform a public health One-Year-Old Communicating With You? opmental milestones: motor
22. Squires J, Bricker D. Ages & Stages Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, 48. Crais ER, Watson LR, Baranek GT. Use of
Children, and Adolescents. 4th ed. Itasca, IL: gesture development in profiling child-
Questionnaires. Baltimore, MD: Brookes
American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017 ren’s prelinguistic communication skills.
Publishing; 2009
37. Sharp HM, Hillenbrand K. Speech and lan- Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
23. Squires J, Bricker D, Twombly E. Ages & 2009;18(1):95–108
guage development and disorders in chil-
Stages Questionnaires: Social-Emotional.
dren. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008;55(5): 49. Kwon AY, Vallotton CD, Kiegelmann M, Wil-
Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing; 2002
1159–1173, viii helm KH. Cultural diversification of com-
24. Robins M, Fein D, Barton M. The Modified municative gestures through early
38. Sheldrick RC, Perrin EC. Evidence-based
Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, childhood: a comparison of children in
milestones for surveillance of cognitive,
Revised With Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F). 2009 English-, German-, and Chinese-speaking
language, and motor development. Acad
25. Glascoe F, Robertshaw N. PEDS: Develop- Pediatr. 2013;13(6):577–586 families. Infant Behav Dev. 2018;50:328–339
mental Milestones. Nashville, TN: Ells- 50. Behrman R, Kiegelman R, Arvin A, et al.
39. Thalagala N. Windows of achievement for
worth & Vandermeer Press; 2018 Nelson’s Textbook of Pediatrics. Philadel-
development milestones of Sri Lankan
26. Tufts Medical Center. The Survey of Chil- infants and toddlers: estimation through phia, PA: WB Saunders; 1996
dren Well-being of Young Children. Avail- statistical modelling. Child Care Health 51. Lansdown RG, Goldstein H, Shah PM,
able at: https://www. Dev. 2015;41(6):1030–1039 et al. Culturally appropriate measures
tuftschildrenshospital.org/ for monitoring child development at fam-
40. Bhave A, Bhargava R, Kumar R. Develop-
the-survey-of-wellbeing-of-young-children/ ment and validation of a new Lucknow ily and community level: a WHO collabora-
overview. Accessed August 26, 2021 Development Screen for Indian children tive study. Bull World Health Organ.
27. Bayley N. The Bayley Scales of Infant and aged 6 months to 2 years. J Child Neurol. 1996;74(3):283–290
Toddler Development. 3rd ed. Minneapo- 2010;25(1):57–60 52. Haltiwanger J, Coster W. A Normative
lis, MN: Pearson; 2006 41. Lejarraga H, Pascucci MC, Krupitzky S, Study of Development in Context: Growth
28. Beery KE, Buktenica NA, Beery NA. The et al. Psychomotor development in Argen- toward Independence in Social Function
Beery–Buktenica Developmental Test of tinean children aged 0-5 years. Paediatr Skills of Young Children. Washington, DC:
Visual–Motor Integration: Administration, Perinat Epidemiol. 2002;16(1):47–60 National Institute on Disability and Reha-
Scoring, and Teaching Manual. Minneap- bilitation Research ED/OSERS; 1991:29
42. Bellman M, Byrne O, Sege R. Developmen-
olis, MN: Pearson; 2010 tal assessment of children. BMJ. 53. Blackwell PB, Baker BM. Estimating commu-
2013;346(7891):e8687 nication competence of infants and toddlers.
29. French B. BRIGANCE Early Childhood
J Pediatr Health Care. 2002;16(1):29–35
Screens III. North Billerica, MA: Curricu- 43. Ertem IO, Krishnamurthy V, Mulaudzi MC,
lum Associates; 2013 et al. Validation of the International Guide 54. Den Ouden L, Rijken M, Brand R, Verloove-
for Monitoring Child Development demon- Vanhorick SP, Ruys JH. Is it correct to cor-
30. Accardo P, Capute A. The Capute Scales:
strates good sensitivity and specificity in rect? Developmental milestones in 555
Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic
four diverse countries. Acta Paediatr. “normal” preterm infants compared with
and Auditory Milestone Scale. Baltimore,
2019;108(6):1074–1086 term infants. J Pediatr. 1991;118(3):399–404
MD: Brookes Publishing; 2005
44. Kumar R, Iyengar SD, Bhasin S, Gupta I, 55. Tamis-Lemonda CS, Bornstein MH,
31. Fenson LMV, Thal D, Dale P, Reznick JS,
Kumar V. A normative study of child Kahana-Kalman R, Baumwell L, Cyphers L.
Bates E. MacArthur-Bates Communicative
development using a culture-appropriate Predicting variation in the timing of lan-
Development Inventories Baltimore. Balti-
test battery in rural Haryana, India. J guage milestones in the second year: an
more, MD: Brookes Publishing; 2007
Trop Pediatr. 1995;41(1):38–42 events history approach. J Child Lang.
32. Mullen E. Mullen Scales of Early Learn- 1998;25(3):675–700
ing. Bloomington, MN: Pearson; 1995 45. Lancaster GA, McCray G, Kariger P, et al.
Creation of the WHO Indicators of Infant 56. Muluk NB, Bayoglu B, Konuşkan B, Anlar
33. Folio MR, Fewall RR. Peabody Developmen- B. Milestones of language development in
and Young Child Development (IYCD):
tal Motor Scales. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 2000 Turkish children. B-ENT. 2013;9(4):299–306
metadata synthesis across 10 countries.
34. Zimmerman IL, Steiner VG, Pond RA. The BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(5):e000747 57. Nair MKC, Russell PS. Development and
Preschool Language Scale-5. San Antonio, normative validation of Developmental
46. Gladstone M, Lancaster GA, Umar E, et al.
TX: Pearson; 2011 The Malawi Developmental Assessment Assessment Tool for Anganwadis for 3-
35. Ertem IO, Krishnamurthy V, Mulaudzi MC, Tool (MDAT): the creation, validation, and to 4-year-old children (DATA-II). J Clin Epi-
et al. Similarities and differences in child reliability of a tool to assess child devel- demiol. 2013;66(1):23–29
development from birth to age 3 years opment in rural African settings. PLoS 58. Knobloch H, Stevens F, Malone A. Manual of
by sex and across four countries: a Med. 2010;7(5):e1000273 Developmental Diagnosis: The Administration
28 ZUBLER et al
Downloaded from http://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-pdf/149/3/e2021052138/1272354/peds_2021052138.pdf
by guest
and Interpretation of the Revised Gesell Motor Development Study: windows of developmental screening: 2002-2016.
and Amatruda Developmental Examination. achievement for six gross motor develop- Pediatrics. 2020;145(4):e20190851
Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row; 1980 ment milestones. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 79. Boyle CA, Boulet S, Schieve LA, et al.
59. McCabe A, Rollins PR. Assessment of pre- 2006;95(S450):86–95
Trends in the prevalence of developmen-
school narrative skills. Am J Speech 69. Noller K, Ingrisano D. Cross-sectional tal disabilities in US children, 1997-2008.
Lang Pathol. 1994;3(1):45–56 study of gross and fine motor develop- Pediatrics. 2011;127(6):1034–1042
60. Atkinson J, Anker S, Rae S, Hughes C, Brad- ment. Birth to 6 years of age. Phys Ther.
80. McManus BM, Richardson Z, Schenkman
dick O. A test battery of child development 1984;64(3):308–316
M, Murphy N, Morrato EH. Timing and
for examining functional vision (ABCDEFV). 70. American Academy of Pediatrics. Bright intensity of early intervention service use
Strabismus. 2002;10(4):245–269 Futures Pocket Guide, 4th ed. Itasca, IL: and outcomes among a safety-net popu-
61. Carruth BR, Skinner JD. Feeding behav- American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017 lation of children. JAMA Netw Open.
iors and other motor development in 71. Ohtoshi T, Muraki T, Takada S. Investiga- 2019;2(1):e187529
healthy children (2-24 months). J Am Coll tion of age-related developmental differ- 81. Richardson ZS, Scully EA, Dooling-Litfin
Nutr. 2002;21(2):88–96 ences of button ability. Pediatr Int. JK, et al. Early intervention service inten-
62. Kimmerle M, Ferre CL, Kotwica KA, Michel 2008;50(5):687–689
sity and change in children’s functional
GF. Development of role-differentiated 72. Eremita M, Semancik E, Lerer T, Dworkin capabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.
bimanual manipulation during the PH. Can we identify parents who do not 2020;101(5):815–821
infant’s first year. Dev Psychobiol. verbally share concerns for their child-
82. Shonkoff JP, Hauser-Cram P. Early inter-
2010;52(2):168–180 ren’s development? J Dev Behav Pediatr.
vention for disabled infants and their
63. Egan DF, Brown R. Developmental assessment: 2017;38(3):224–227
families: a quantitative analysis. Pediat-
18 months to 4 1/2 years. Performance tests. 73. Sices L, Egbert L, Mercer MB. Sugar- rics. 1987;80(5):650–658
Child Care Health Dev. 1986;12(5):339–349 coaters and straight talkers: communicat-
ing about developmental delays in 83. Guralnick MJ. Effectiveness of early inter-
64. Williams PG, Lerner MA; Council on Early vention for vulnerable children: a devel-
Childhood; Council on School Health. primary care. Pediatrics.
2009;124(4):e705–e713 opmental perspective. Am J Ment Retard.
School readiness. Pediatrics. 1998;102(4):319–345
2019;144(2):e20191766 74. Zuckerman KE, Sinche B, Mejia A, Cobian
M, Becker T, Nicolaidis C. Latino parents’ 84. Rosenberg SA, Zhang D, Robinson CC.
65. Kitsao-Wekulo P, Holding P, Abubakar A,
perspectives on barriers to autism diag- Prevalence of developmental delays
et al. Describing normal development in
nosis. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(3):301–308 and participation in early interven-
an African setting: The utility of the Kilifi
tion services for young children.
Developmental Inventory among young 75. Graybill E, Self-Brown S, Lai B, et al.
Pediatrics. 2008;121(6):e1503–e1509
children at the Kenyan coast. Learn Indi- Addressing disparities in parent educa-
vid Differ. 2016;46:3–10 tion: examining the effects of learn the 85. Rosenberg SA, Robinson CC, Shaw EF,
66. Gajewska E, Sobieska M, Moczko J, signs/act early parent education materi- Ellison MC. Part C early intervention
Kuklinska A, Laudanska-Krzeminska I, als on parent outcomes. Early Child Educ for infants and toddlers: percentage
Osinski W. Independent reaching of the J. 2016;44(1):31–38 eligible versus served. Pediatrics.
sitting position depends on the motor 76. Kelly Y, Sacker A, Schoon I, Nazroo J. 2013;131(1):38–46
performance in the 3rd month of life. Ethnic differences in achievement of 86. Kogan MD, Vladutiu CJ, Schieve LA, et al.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. developmental milestones by 9 The prevalence of parent-reported autism
2015;19(2):201–208 months of age: the Millennium Cohort spectrum disorder among US children.
67. Cox CA, Zinkin PM, Grimsley MF. Aspects Study. Dev Med Child Neurol. Pediatrics. 2018;142(6):e20174161
of the six-month developmental examina- 2006;48(10):825–830
87. Barger B, Rice C, Wolf R, Roach A. Better
tion in a longitudinal study. Dev Med 77. Gesell A. Infancy and Human Growth. together: developmental screening and
Child Neurol. 1977;19(2):149–159 New York, NY: Macmillan; 1928 monitoring best identify children who
68. World Health Organization Multicentre 78. Lipkin PH, Macias MM, Baer Chen B, need early intervention. Disabil Health J.
Growth Reference Study Group. WHO et al. Trends in pediatricians’ 2018;11(3):420–426