BITTANGA, JV LAVERYL D.

GETHCS1_EBA4

ACTIVITY
MORAL COURAGE

INSTRUCTION: Answer the following questions briefly.

Virtue ethics has much to command to the extent that morality tell us how to live. It also tells us what
kind of people we should be, not merely what we should do. Certainly, the virtuous man is better than
the merely strong willed one, However, there are some problems:

1. How do I act courageously in particular cases, i.e. when (1) family/or any loved one/s are involved
and when (2) strangers are involved?

(1.) Family/ any loved one/s

• When it comes to family or loved ones, it's important to be there for them. Listen to their concerns,
talk openly about the situation, and offer your support. Sometimes, you might need to make sacrifices to
help them out. We should also listen and emphathize, communicate openly, and take action. whether it's
practical assistance or emotional support, and be willing to make sacrifices when necessary.

(2.) Strangers
• When dealing with strangers, it's all about being kind and empathetic. If you see someone in need,
assess the situation and, if it's safe, lend a hand or offer assistance. Treat them with respect, like you
would want to be treated. We assess the situation, we need to show compassion, and even also offer
assistance.

2. Aristotle would tell us to do what the virtuous does. What would you say about acts
that bring about evils in the world, e.g., abortion, euthanasia, etc.? Would you have the
courage to challenge these acts? If YES, what would you do? If NO, why?

• Yes, I would have the courage to challenge acts that bring about evils in the world, such as abortion
and euthanasia. According to Aristotle's philosophy, it is important to follow the virtuous path. These
acts contradict the respect for human life, a fundamental principle in Aristotle's philosophy. Challenging
them would demonstrate the virtues like compassion, justice, and courage, contributing to the
betterment of society. And also to embodying these virtues, it is our ethical responsibility to oppose
actions that harm others. By standing against these acts, I would advocate for the well-being and dignity
of all individuals, families, and communities, promoting the common good.

REASON AND IMPARTIALITY

INSTRUCTION: Provide what is being asked.

1. What were your responses to moral dilemmas?

• In moral dilemmas, my responses were based on a combination of reason and personal values. I
would carefully analyze the situation, consider the potential consequences of different actions, and
evaluate them against my own ethical principles.

2. Differentiate responses based on reason and those based on

feelings.
• The difference is that responses are based on reason were logical and objective, guided by
principles of fairness, justice, and the greater good. On the other hand, responses based on feelings were
more subjective and influenced by emotions such as empathy, compassion, or personal attachment to
individuals involved in the dilemma.

Reason provides a rational framework for decision-making, ensuring consistency and minimizing biases.
However, feelings play a crucial role in moral judgments, as they can bring us an understanding of the
human experience and the emotional impact of our actions. Balancing reason and feelings allows for a
more comprehensive and well-rounded response to moral dilemmas.