You are on page 1of 3

Reviewer A:

 In the method description section, the author should provide an overall architecture of the
system in the form of a block diagram.

FigXX: system structure

Vẽ lại ảnh này với nội dung tương tự rồi add lại vào trong bài , đánh số lại thứ tự các ảnh,
viết thêm vào bài là FigXX shows cấu trúc chung của hệ thống

 The data preprocessing section needs to be written more explicitly. For example, "the images
in the database were preprocessed with several steps," but the subsequent sentences do not
describe what these steps are.
Thêm vào sau đoạn này: For example, images will be randomly flipped at angles of 30, 60 90
degrees and increased and decreased by 50% brightness to serve for data augmentation.

 The meaning of the FID and SSIM metrics in Tables 1 and Table 2 should be explained to
make it easier for readers to follow.

Thêm đoạn này vào phần mũi tên chỉ

FID is primarily used to evaluate the quality and diversity of images generated by
generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Lower FID scores
indicate better image quality and diversity. A lower FID score means that the generated
images are closer in distribution to real images.

Nhớ sửa câu văn lại cho nó hợp lí tí nhé


 The author should provide some discussion on the significance of the results in Tables 1 and
2. Explain why this method is better than other methods.

Thêm phần explain tại sao tốt hơn: The method of using CycleGAN to generate images is not
new and is not as complex as the method used in the reference paper, so it can be flexibly
customized to achieve higher results. Also because of the simple model, cyclegan is not as
accurate as other liver methods such as MEDGAN, IDCGAN mentioned in this article.

M đọc đoạn này t viết thêm xem tiếng anh có bị ngu không thì sửa vào nhá

 If possible, the author can consider experimenting some deep learning models on the data
generated by the CycleGAN to demonstrate the effectiveness of this method.

Đây là dự tính trong tương lai trả lời là thêm vào sau ở phần kết luận

Recommendation: Accept Submission

------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer B:

Overall, the manuscript is well-organized and easy to follow.

A few minor things to be corrected:

1. typo in page 4: ranslated images.

2. extremely large symbol in equation 15.

3. log should be consistent in normal font.

4. Some notations seem incorrect; e.g., aii in (16)

Recommendation: Accept Submission

Mấy cái này m xem cái nào hợp lí thì sửa vào còn không thì kệ mẹ nó

You might also like