GRIHA v.2019 DD2 - Manipal University Jaipur

GRIHA V.
2019 – Due Diligence II Site Visit Report
Project Name: Manipal University Jaipur - Academic Block 3.

Project Code: 22GR0118
Location: Jaipur, Rajasthan

Status: Internal finishing work was in progress.
Date of Site Visit: 15 June 2023
GRIHA representatives: Mr. Ahmad Saud and Ms. Srishti Gaur
Executive Summary:
The project was non-compliant with following appraisals of the criteria under GRIHA
Version 2019 that were checked at this stage.
• Criterion 1 - Green Infrastructure
• Criterion 4 - Air and Soil Pollution Control
•
Please note:
1. All the observations and actions to be taken were communicated to the project management team
during the site visit.
2. Compliance with Criteria 4, 5, 6, 23 (partly) and 26 (partly) will be evaluated based on the site visit,
compliance reports and documents submitted after the Due Diligence (DD) I and II site visits. There
will be no further submission for these criteria during the final evaluation stage.
3. The document-based compliance will be verified upon submission of relevant documents as per
GRIHA V.2019, at the time of preliminary and final evaluations.
4. Non-compliance with any mandatory criteria under GRIHA V.2019 shall render the project ineligible
for award of GRIHA Rating.
5. The compliance on site status has the following interpretation:
• Yes – On site observation was found to be compliant. However, periodic date-stamped photographs
must be recorded by the project team for the entire course of construction. In addition, supporting
documents will be verified after submission of relevant documents during the evaluation stage.
• No – On site observation was found to be non-compliant. Project team must submit date-stamped
contextual photographs for compliance. In addition, supporting documents will be verified after
submission of relevant documents during the evaluation stage.
• Partly – Appraisal requirement was partly being met. Project team must submit date-stamped
contextual photographs for compliance. In addition, supporting documents will be verified after
submission of relevant documents during the evaluation stage.
• To be verified – Appraisal requirements will be verified after submission of relevant documents. In
addition, supporting documents will be verified after submission of relevant documents during the
evaluation stage.
Due Diligence II Site Visit Report
I. SUSTAINABLE SITE PLANNING
Criteria Compliance Observations

on Site
C-01 Green Infrastructure
PARTLY MANDATORY
Appraisal 1.1.2: Demonstrate that the project team implements tree preservation measures as
per the alternatives mentioned in the manual.
Trees on site have been To be verified All existing mature trees were preserved on site.
preserved / transplanted However, number of trees could not be verified as
within the site site survey plan was not available during the site
visit.
(Mandatory)
Trees on site have been Partly Most of the preserved trees were found to be
protected. adequately barricaded. However, some trees were
(Mandatory) left unprotected and construction materials were
stored near them.
Refer Images:
Action to be taken:
Project team must ensure all mature trees within
the site boundary are protected. After taking the
aforementioned measure, submit date stamped.
photographs of the same to demonstrate
compliance.
Reference Image for Criterion 1
Image 1: Existing trees was observed to be protected on site.
©GRIHA Council Page 2 of 47

Image 2: Existing trees was observed to be protected on site.
Image 3: A few existing trees were found to be unbarricaded and construction materials were
stored near them.


on Site
C-03 Design to mitigate UHIE
Appraisal 3.1.1 Demonstrate the temperature reduction (in °C) from the GRIHA base case as per
the alternatives mentioned in the manual. Measures observed on site.
Application of grass To be verified Application of high SRI paints will be done on
pavers/shaded sections of the rooftop of the project. Most of the
paving/paving with SRI / exposed surface area has been provided with hard
paving with local stones.
Solar PV panels for
reduction of UHIE. Refer Images:
Image 4: Certain sections of the roof were treated with SRI paints.

Image 5: Exposed surface areas were finished with local stones.
Image 6: Exposed surface areas were finished with local stones.

II. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

on Site
C-04 Air and Soil Pollution Control
PARTLY MANDATORY
Appraisal 4.1.1 Adopt at least six measures to minimize air and soil pollution during construction,
with the first three strategies being mandatory.
Provision of 3-meter Partly Permanent compound wall was constructed along
high continuous the site periphery. Barricading with geotextile sheet
barricading along the was observed near the entrance and site office
site boundary/ virtual areas. However, Geotextile sheets barricading was
boundary. not continuous.
(Mandatory)
Refer Images:
Provision of wheel Partly Wheel washing pit and gravel bed was observed at
washing facility/ gravel entrance and exit of the site. However, both the
bed at all vehicular strategies were inappropriately implemented. The
entrances and exits of width of the wheel washing pit was inadequate and
the site. gravel bed were not being maintained on the site.
(Mandatory) As per Due Diligence 1 report and its subsequent
compliance report, manual wheel washing facility
was provided in the project.
Action to be taken:
Project team must ensure to provide wheel washing
facility on all vehicular entrances and exits of the
site. Submit date stamped photographs of the same
to demonstrate compliance.
DG sets have an exhaust Not applicable Project team stated that DG sets were not used on
with stack height of at site. The demand is being met though the campus
least 2-meter from the level facility.
top of the generator with
a cowl.
(Mandatory)
At least 3 additional Yes Following measures were observed to be adopted
measures adopted on during the site visit:
site to control air • Speed limit on site has been restricted to
pollution from the list 10km/hr. Signages for the same were
below: observed during the visit.
• DGs are in compliance • Fine aggregates on site were covered with
with CPCB norms tarpaulin sheets.
• Adoption of spill • Vehicles carrying construction materials are
prevention measures covered.
• Covering of fine As per due diligence I report, the following
aggregates on site observations were made:
• Sprinkling of water on • Spill prevention measures were
unpaved pathways on implemented on site.
the site with non- • Fine aggregates were covered and sprinkled
potable water with water on site.
• Limit vehicular speed
to 10 kmph on site Refer Image:
• Covering of vehicles
carrying waste
(Mandatory)
Appraisal 4.1.2 Ensure that the soil erosion channels are constructed, and they are connected to a
sedimentation tank in order to reduce movement of soil outside the site throughout the
construction phase of the project.
Soil erosion channels are Partly Due to the advanced stage of the project, this could
constructed on site, and not be observed during the site visit.
they are connected to a As per the due diligence I compliance report,
sedimentation tank. permanent trenches for storm water were used as
soil erosion channels which is further connected to
a centralised sedimentation / recharge pit for the
project.
Reference Images for Criterion 4
Image 7: Temporary barricading made of Geo textile sheets was observed in the project.

Image 8: Barricading around the project was not continuous.
Image 9: Permanent boundary wall was constructed along the site periphery.

Image 10: Speed limit signages were put around the site.
Image 11: Fine aggregates were covered by tarpaulin sheets.


on Site
C-05 Topsoil Preservation
Appraisal 5.1.1 Ensure that topsoil from disturbed areas on the site is preserved, stabilized, and its
fertility is maintained throughout the construction period. Additionally ensure that 100% of the
soil requirement for landscaping including roof garden is met through this preserved soil.
Topsoil has been To be verified Project team stated that the preserved topsoil was
preserved and stabilized. reused on site for landscaping purposes. As per due
diligence I site visit report, topsoil was preserved
on site and reused in the campus.
However, soil fertility test report was could not be
verified during the site visit.
Image 2: Topsoil was reused for landscaping.


on Site
C-06 Construction Management Practices
PARTLY MANDATORY
Appraisal 6.1.1: Adopt construction management practices (e.g., stacking and storage of
construction materials at different stages of construction) and ensure safe disposal of waste
generated during construction.
Segregation and storage Yes Staging was observed to be adopted on site.
of construction waste Dedicated areas were provided on site to segregate
materials on site and store construction materials.
Refer Images: 7 to 9
On-site/off-site recycling To be verified Project Team stated that recyclable steel scrap was
of construction waste is being sold off the site. Trolleys carrying waste
developed and material from the site were observed during the
implemented visit. However, challans of construction wastes
were not available during the site visit.
Refer Image: 10
Appraisal 6.1.2: Adopt at least two strategies from the list, as given in GRIHA V.2019, to minimize
water consumption during construction, with the first strategy being mandatory.
Use gunny bags, ponding Yes Due to the advanced stage of the project, this could
technique or curing not be verified. However as per compliance report
compound. received against due diligence I site visit report,
(Mandatory, if gunny bags and ponding technique was used for
attempted) curing of columns and slabs respectively.
At least 1 other strategy To be verified Due to the advanced stage of the project, this could
has been adopted to not be verified. However, as per compliance report
minimize water received against due diligence I site visit report, use
consumption during of water reducing admixtures (CHRYSO
construction. Superplasticizer) was done in concrete.
Additionally, batch mix reports of M-25, M-30, M-45
grade concrete was shared in the compliance
report.

Image 3: Dedicated spaces were provided on site to store construction materials.

Image 10: Recyclable waste was observed to be taken away from the site.

III. ENERGY OPTIMIZATION

on Site
C-7 Energy Optimization
PARTLY MANDATORY
Appraisal 7.1.1 Ensure that the project demonstrates compliance with the mandatory
requirements of ECBC 2017 as per Table 7.5c, Details to Appraisals, Volume 3.
Project meets the
mandatory requirements
Please refer Annexure I for this part of the criterion.
of ECBC 2017.
(Mandatory)
Appraisal 7.1.3 Demonstrate that 100% of exterior lighting fixtures (lamp + ballast) meet the
luminous efficacy of 80lm/W.
100% of outdoor lighting To be verified External lights were yet to be installed. Project team
fixtures (lamps + ballast) stated that LED based lighting fixtures will be
meet the luminous installed for outdoor lighting in the project.
efficacy of 80 lm/W.
Appraisal 7.1.5 Ensure that the equipment installed within the project (whichever applicable as
per Table 7.4c) is either BEE star labelled or of equivalent performance.
BEE star-labelled To be verified Project team stated that BEE star-labelled
equipment installed in equipment will be installed in the project. However,
the project. details of equipment with purchase orders and
specification sheets could not be observed during
(Mandatory)
the visit.
Refer Image: 11

Image 11: Fans were observed to be installed during the visit.


on Site
C-8 Renewable Energy Utilization
Appraisal 8.1.1. Ensure installation of on-site and off-site RE system to offset a part of the annual
energy consumption of internal artificial lighting, HVAC, and domestic hot water systems as
mentioned in Table 8.1c.
Renewable energy To be verified
system has been
installed on site/ off site Project team stated that Solar PV systems will be
(specifying the sizing of installed in the project. However, capacity of the
the systems). system has not been finalised yet.
(Mandatory)

C-9 Low ODP & GWP materials

Appraisal 9.1.1 Ensure that all the insulation used in the building envelope and for HVAC systems
are CFC and HCFC free.
All the insulation used in To be verified Project team stated that nitrile rubber and EPS
the building envelope insulation has been used for ducting and piping
and for HVAC systems insulation in the project. Additionally, EPS and XPS
were being used as external walling and underdeck
insulation in the project.
(Mandatory) However, the purchase order and technical
specification sheet mentioning that the insulation is
CFC and HCFC free have not been submitted.
Refer Image: 12 to 14
Appraisal 9.1.2 Ensure that the refrigerant used in the HVAC systems and refrigeration
equipment is CFC and HCFC free.
The refrigerant used in Yes R-410a and R-1343a refrigerant were used in the in
the HVAC and the Split air conditioning system and air-cooled
refrigeration equipment chillers installed in the project.
Refer Image: 15 & 16
(Mandatory)
Appraisal 9.1.3 Ensure that the fire suppression systems and fire extinguishers installed in the
project are halon free.
The fire suppression To be verified This could not be observed during the site visit as
system and fire this work was yet to be initiated on site.
extinguishers installed
on site is halon free.
(Mandatory)
Appraisal 9.1.4 Ensure that all the insulation used in the building envelope and for HVAC systems.
refrigerant used in the HVAC systems and refrigeration equipment are HFC free.
All the insulation used in To be verified This will be verified during the final documentation.
the building envelope
and for HVAC systems,
the refrigerant used in
the HVAC and
refrigeration equipment
are HFC free.

Image12: Nitrile rubber was used for ducting insulation.
Image13: EPS was used for piping insulation.

Image14: XPS was used as Overdeck insulation.
Image 155: R410A refrigerant was used in the Split Air condition units installed in the project.

Image 16: R 134a refrigerant was used in the chillers installed in the project.

IV. OCCUPANT COMFORT

on Site
C-10 Visual Comfort (compliance for Alternative 2)
Appraisal 10.1.1. Ensure that WWR12 does not exceed 60% and the vertical fenestration complies
with minimum visual light transmittance (VLT) of 0.27.
WWR and vertical To be verified Project team stated that SGU’s and DGU’s were used
fenestration complies in the exterior windows. However, the technical
with the minimum VLT specification sheet and purchase order of the glass
of 0.27 was not available during the site visit.
(Mandatory)
SRR not exceeding 5% Not applicable Sky light was not provided in the project.
and SHGC not exceeding
0.35
(Mandatory)
Artificial lighting design To be verified LED lights were installed in the project. However,
(Mandatory) technical specification sheet and purchase order
were shared during the site visit.
Refer Images:
Image 17: DGUs were installed in the project.

Image 18: SGUs were installed in the project.
Image 19: LED based lights were installed in the project.

Image 20: LED based lights were installed in the project.

on Site
C-12 Indoor Air Quality
Appraisal 12.1.3. Ensure continuous monitoring of CO, CO2, temperature, and RH levels such that
they meet the permissible thresholds as ISHRAE standard 10001:2016, Table 6, for all habitable
areas either at space level or at AHUs by installation of sensor(s) deployed with feedback system as
per the alternatives mentioned in Table 12.1 c and 12.2c.
Installation of sensors/ To be verified Project team stated that CO2, temperature and R.H.
monitoring devices & censors will be installed at AHU levels.
display for maintaining
good IAQ
Appraisal 12.1.4 Ensure that all interior wall and ceiling finishes (including, but not limited to,
primers and paints) have low volatile organic compound (VOC) content as per Table 12.3c and are
lead-free.
Use of low VOC and lead- To be verified Project team stated that low VOC and lead-free
free paints paints are used in the project. However, technical
specification sheets and purchase order of paints

Appraisal 12.1.5 Ensure that all adhesives and sealants used have low VOC content as per Tables
12.4c and 12.5c and that interior composite wood products do not have urea–formaldehyde as a
bonding resin.
Use of low VOC To be verified Project team stated that low VOC adhesives and
adhesives and sealants sealants have been used in the project. Sealant
(make: MCCOY) was seen during the site visit.
However, technical specification sheets and
purchase order of adhesives and sealants were not
available during the site visit.
Refer Image: 21
Use of interior composite To be verified Project team stated that composite wood products
wood products with no used in the project did not use urea–formaldehyde
urea–formaldehyde as a as a bonding resin.
bonding resin.
Refer Image: 22

Image 21: Sealant for windows was observed during the site visit.
Image 22: Composite wood products used in interiors were observed during the site visit.

VII. SUSTAINABLE BUILDING MATERIALS

on Site
C-19 Utilization of Alternate Materials in Building
Appraisal 19.1.1: Ensure minimum replacement of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) with the
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) recommended waste materials by weight of cement used in
structural concrete as per Table 19.1c in GRIHA V.2019 manual.
Replacement of OPC with To be verified Project team stated that Ordinary Portland Cement
BIS recommended waste (OPC) with Fly ash was used in all grades of
materials in structural structural concrete. As per the compliance report
received against the due diligence I site visit report
concrete.
prepared by the GRIHA Council officials, design mix
report of M-25, M-30 and M-35 grade concrete was
shared.
Design mix and batch mix reports of the other
grades of structural concrete used in the project
Appraisal 19.1.2: Ensure minimum 5% replacement of natural aggregate with recycled concrete
aggregate (RCA)/recycled aggregate (RA) by weight of that category of aggregate in structural
concrete.
Use of natural aggregate No Project team stated that recycled aggregate has not
with recycled concrete been used in the project.
aggregate/recycled
aggregate in structural
concrete.
Appraisal 19.1.3: Ensure that all internal and external, load-bearing, non-load-bearing and
partition walls are constructed with any, or combination of the GRIHA V.2019 listed, alternative
materials.
Use of alternate building To be verified Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks, Thermal
materials in all internal, Insulated Blocks, Solid concrete blocks and
external, load bearing, Drywalls were used for the construction of internal
and external walls in the project.
non-load bearing and
partition walls. Refer Image: 23
Appraisal 19.1.4: Ensure minimum 30% replacement of OPC with BIS recommended waste by
weight of cement used in masonry mortar and plaster.
Replacement of OPC with To be verified Project team stated that OPC was used for masonry
BIS recommended waste mortar and gypsum plaster was used in the project.
in masonry mortar and Purchase order and technical specification sheet of
the same could not be observed during the visit.
plaster.

Reference images for Criterion 19
Image23: Thermal insulated blocks were observed during the site visit.

on Site
C-20 Reduction in GWP through LCA
Appraisal 20.1.1 Demonstrate reduction in the GWP value of the building superstructure as per
the LCA benchmarks mentioned in Table 20.1c.
Structural System
Frame To be verified Project team stated that conventional Reinforced
Cement Concrete (RCC) framed structure has been
constructed.
Slab To be verified Conventional RCC slab has been constructed.
Roof Structure To be verified Project team stated that Post tensioning of slabs
were done for roof structure.

Roof Covering To be verified Information regarding this was not available during
the site visit.
External Walling To be verified AAC blocks and Thermal insulated blocks were used
in the construction of external walls.
External Wall Finish To be verified Texture paints were used in external wall finishes
of the project.
External Window To be verified SGU and DGU were installed in the project.
Appraisal 20.1.2 Demonstrate reduction in the GWP value of the building interiors and finishes as
per the LCA benchmarks mentioned in Table 20.2c
Interior Materials
Internal Wall and To be verified Project team stated that AAC blocks, Drywalls and
Partitions High-Pressure Laminates, were used in all the
internal walls and partitions of the project.
Refer Images: 24
Wall Finish To be verified The following types of internal wall finishes were
observed in the project:
• MDF paneling,
• Paints,
• Acoustic paneling,
• Engineered marble,
• Ceramic tiles
Floor Finish To be verified The following types of floor finishes were observed
in the project:
• Vitrified tiles
• Granite
• Italian marble
• Ceramic tiles
• Kota stone
Ceiling Finish To be verified The following types of ceiling finishes were
observed on site:
• Gypsum False ceiling with paint
• Acoustic panels
• Perforated metal false ceiling
• Open cell aluminum false ceiling
Internal door and frame To be verified The following types of internal doors and frames
were observed:
• Flush Doors with wooden frames
• Glass doors with aluminium frames
• Metallic fire doors

Image 24: HPL partitions were provided in toilets areas.
Image 25: MDF board paneling was done in the project.

Image 26: Acoustic paneling was done in the project.
Image 27: Ceramic tile paneling was done in toilets of the project.

Image 28: Granite was used in staircases of the project.
Image 29: Italian Marble was used in entrance and common area of the project.

Image 30: Kota stone was used in service staff resting areas.
Image 31: Ceramic tiles were used in toilets and washrooms.

Image 32: Vitrified tiles were used in classrooms and staffrooms.
Image 33: Perforated metal false ceiling was installed in the project.

Image 34: Perforated metal false ceiling was installed in the project.
Image 35: Open cell aluminium false ceiling was done in the project.

Image 36: Flush doors with Wooden frames were installed in the project.
Image 37: Glass doors with aluminium frames were installed in the project.


on Site
C-21 Alternate Materials for External Site Development
Appraisal 21.1.1 Ensure that at least 70% of all roads and vehicular pathways within site
premises are constructed with one, or any combination of strategies enlisted in the Manual.
At least 70% of all roads To be verified Project team stated that C & D waste and waste
and vehicular pathways steel rebars were used filling of payment and road
within site premises are of the project.
constructed with
recycled content or low
impact materials.
Appraisal 21.1.2 Ensure that 100% of the pavement/footpath including kerb stone constructed
on-site are constructed with one, or any combination of strategies enlisted in the Manual.
100% of the pavement/ No Project team stated that paver blocks with recycled
footpath including kerb content were not used in the pavements / footpaths
stone are constructed of the project.
with recycled content or
low impact materials.

IX. SOCIO ECONOMIC STRATEGIES

on Site
C-23 Safety and Sanitization of Construction Workers
PARTLY MANDATORY
Appraisal 23.1.1: Ensure compliance with the requirements of NBC 2016 for all of the following:
Provision of necessary Yes The following observations were made during the
safety equipment and site visit:
safety measures for • Construction workers working on site were
construction workers. wearing hard-hats and safety jackets.
• Safety signage in local languages was
(Mandatory)
displayed at multiple locations on site.
• First aid facilities were provided on site.
Due to the advanced stage of the project, other
measures could not be observed during the site
visit. However as per due diligence I site visit
report, critical/accident-prone areas were
barricaded, staircases were provided with
temporary railing and safety nets were provided in
the project.
Refer Images:
Provision of clean Yes The following observations were made during the
drinking water, hygienic site visit:
working and living • Drinking water facilities were provided in
conditions, and the site area and labour accommodation
area.
sanitation facilities for
• Clean and hygienic toilets for construction
the workers. workers were provided in the site and
(Mandatory) labour accommodation area.
• A clean and hygienic bathing area was
provided at the labour accommodation area.
• Clean and hygienic labour accommodation
was provided for the construction workers.
The hutments had provision for daylight and
ventilation. Waste bins were provided for
the collection of food waste. General
cleanliness was maintained in the area
surrounding the labour accommodation.
Refer Images:
Drinking water test Yes The drinking water test report was not observed
report was available during the site visit. However, drinking water report
during the site visit. was submitted along the compliance report
(Mandatory) received against due diligence I site visit report
conforming to IS 10500 standards.
Provision of crèche Yes Creche facility was provided near the labour
facility for children of accommodation.
construction workers in
case their families are

allowed to work/live at
the construction site.
(Mandatory)
Appraisal 23.1.2: Adopt one alternative out of the following for the construction workers on-site.
Provision of grocery To be verified Project team stated that they had conducted two
store/canteen within awareness programmes with construction workers.
site/labour However, documents w.r.t. same were submitted
during the site visit.
accommodation OR
organization of at least
2 events during the
entire construction
phase to create
environmental
awareness among
construction workers.
C-26 Positive Social Impact
PARTLY MANDATORY
Appraisal 26.1.4 Ensure that tobacco smoking is prohibited on-site during the entire construction
phase.
Measures have been Yes ‘No smoking’ signage were displayed at multiple
taken to ensure no locations on site.
smoking on site during
Refer Image:
construction.
(Mandatory)

Reference images for Criterion 23
Image 38: Workers were seen wearing safety shoes and safety helmets during the site visit.
Image 39: First aid box was provided on site.

Image 40: Drinking water facility was provided on site for the workers.
Image 41: Clean and hygienic toilets were provided on site for the workers.

Image 6: Clean bathing area was provided for workers in the hutment area.
Image 43: Clean and hygienic labour accommodation was provided near the site.

Image 44: Clean and hygienic labour accommodation was provided near the site.
Image 45: No smoking signages were displayed at multiple locations on site.

ANNEXURE 1
Component Requirements as per ECBC Compliance & Observations

2017
Section 1: Comfort Systems and Controls
Is your building 100% non-AC?
If yes, Section 1 is not applicable except Service water heating.
Installed HVAC system in the Project team stated Split AC AND Chiller
Minimum space
project, comply with the units were installed on the roof of the
conditioning minimum COP (minimum building. However, details with respect to
equipment IPLV), as mentioned in ECBC its capacity were not available during the
efficiencies 2017- 5.2.2 (Chiller, VRV, Split, site visit.
and any other equipment)
Controls • Time clock has been Project team stated that thermostat was
installed as per ECBC 2017- proposed to be installed for temperature
5.2.3.1 control. Additionally, the entire building
• Temperature controls have will be controlled through a BMS system.
been installed as per ECBC
2017- 5.2.3.2
• Occupancy controls have
been installed as per ECBC
2017- 5.2.3.3
• Two-speed motors/pony
motors/variable speed
drives have been installed
as per ECBC 2017- 5.2.3.4
Piping Piping insulation is compliant EPS was used for piping insulation.
Insulation with ECBC 2017- 5.2.6.1
Refer Image: 12
Ductwork and Ductwork insulation is Nitrile rubber was used as ducting
plenum compliant with ECBC 2017- insulation in the project.
Insulation 5.2.6.2
Refer Image: 13
System System Balancing is compliant The work was yet to be initiated. It will be
Balancing with ECBC 2017- 5.2.7 verified in the next visit.
• Solar Water heating is Solar water heaters are not proposed to be
complaint with ECBC 2017- installed in the project.
5.2.9.1.
Service water
• Heating Equipment
heating
Efficiency is complaint with
ECBC 2017- 5.2.9.2.
• Piping Insulation is
complaint with ECBC 2017-
5.2.9.4.
Section 2: Lighting and controls
Lighting • Automatic lighting shutoff is • Project team stated that occupancy
controls complaint with ECBC 2017- sensors were proposed in the
6.2.1.1. project.
• Space control is complaint • Manual switches were used for

Component Requirements as per ECBC Compliance & Observations

2017
with ECBC 2017- 6.2.1.2. internal lighting control.
• Control in Daylight Areas is • Project team stated that daylight
complaint with ECBC 2017- control was not proposed in the
6.2.1.3. project.
Refer Image: 48
• Exterior Lighting Control is The work was yet to be initiated. Project
complaint with ECBC 2017- team stated that automatic timer control
6.2.1.5. will be provided for controlling all the
external lighting fixtures.
• Exit signs is complaint with The work was yet to be initiated. It will be
ECBC 2017- 6.2.2. verified in the next visit.
Section 3: Electrical and Renewable Energy Systems
Transformers Transformers installed on site Existing transformers of 2.5 MVA capacity
meet ECBC 2017- 7.2.1.1 at were installed in the campus which will be
50% and 100% load rating used for the project.
Energy-efficient Energy-efficient motors is The motors installed in the existing STP of

motors complaint with ECBC 2017- the project were IE2 rated.
7.2.2.
Refer Images: 49
Check-Metering Metering and Monitoring is The work was yet to be initiated. It will be
and Monitoring complaint with ECBC 2017- verified in the next visit.
7.2.4.
Power Factor Power Factor Correction is Project team stated that a power Factor
Correction complaint with ECBC 2017- near unity will be maintained in the
7.2.5. project. It will be verified in the next visit.
Uninterruptible UPS is complaint with ECBC Installation work was yet to be initiated.
Power Supply 2017- 7.2.7. This will be verified during the next site
(UPS) visit.
GRIHA Logo was displayed on site: No

Action to be taken: Project team must display the GRIHA logo on site. Submit photographs of
the same.

Reference Images for Annexure 1
Image 46: Name plate of Split AC units as observed on site.
Image 47: Name plate of Chiller units as observed on site.

Image 48: Manual switches were installed in the project.
Image 49: Motors installed in the project were rated IE2.


GRIHA v.2019 DD2 - Manipal University Jaipur

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

GRIHA v.2019 DD2 - Manipal University Jaipur

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

GRIHA V.

2019 – Due Diligence II Site Visit Report

Project Name: Manipal University Jaipur - Academic Block 3.

Location: Jaipur, Rajasthan

I. SUSTAINABLE SITE PLANNING

Criteria Compliance Observations

Reference Image for Criterion 1

Image 1: Existing trees was observed to be protected on site.

©GRIHA Council Page 2 of 47

Image 2: Existing trees was observed to be protected on site.

©GRIHA Council Page 3 of 47

Criteria Compliance Observations

Reference Image for Criterion 3

©GRIHA Council Page 4 of 47

Image 5: Exposed surface areas were finished with local stones.

Image 6: Exposed surface areas were finished with local stones.

©GRIHA Council Page 5 of 47

II. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT

Criteria Compliance Observations

Reference Images for Criterion 4

©GRIHA Council Page 7 of 47

Image 8: Barricading around the project was not continuous.

©GRIHA Council Page 8 of 47

Image 11: Fine aggregates were covered by tarpaulin sheets.

©GRIHA Council Page 9 of 47

Criteria Compliance Observations

Reference Image for Criterion 5

Image 2: Topsoil was reused for landscaping.

©GRIHA Council Page 10 of 47

Criteria Compliance Observations

©GRIHA Council Page 11 of 47

Reference Images for Criterion 6

Image 3: Dedicated spaces were provided on site to store construction materials.

Image 8: Dedicated spaces were provided on site to store construction materials.

©GRIHA Council Page 12 of 47

Image 9: Dedicated spaces were provided on site to store construction materials.

©GRIHA Council Page 13 of 47

III. ENERGY OPTIMIZATION

Criteria Compliance Observations

©GRIHA Council Page 14 of 47

Reference Images for Criterion 7

Image 11: Fans were observed to be installed during the visit.

©GRIHA Council Page 15 of 47

Criteria Compliance Observations

©GRIHA Council Page 16 of 47

C-9 Low ODP & GWP materials

©GRIHA Council Page 17 of 47

Reference Images for Criterion 9

Image12: Nitrile rubber was used for ducting insulation.

Image13: EPS was used for piping insulation.

©GRIHA Council Page 18 of 47

Image14: XPS was used as Overdeck insulation.

©GRIHA Council Page 19 of 47

©GRIHA Council Page 20 of 47

IV. OCCUPANT COMFORT

Criteria Compliance Observations

Reference Images for Criterion 10

Image 17: DGUs were installed in the project.

©GRIHA Council Page 21 of 47

Image 18: SGUs were installed in the project.

Image 19: LED based lights were installed in the project.

©GRIHA Council Page 22 of 47

Image 20: LED based lights were installed in the project.