You are on page 1of 3

UPV-CAS-ProfEd.

(MEd Program)
Finals Paper Presentation Rubric for EDFD 202. Socio-cultural Foundations of Education. Part 1. Quantitative

NAME OF PRESENTER: JESEL LOVE P. VALENCIA


Criterion Range of Minimum and Maximum Points POINTS
Organization 10-12 13-15 16-19 18-20
Peers cannot understand The presentation has a The presentation is successful in using
The presentation has episodes of
presentation because there is no framework, flow, and logic a logical sequence and organization
organizational and logical 20
apparent or logical sequence of that allows the paper to that allows the main insights of the
inconsistency that could
information. generally make sense project to become apparent
Content 14-16 17-19 20-22 23-25
Knowledge The presentation is able to
The presentation, while having
The presentation, though relevant, show vital insights that The presentation is able to show a rich
some strong points, did not
misses the opportunity of extend and/or support the and thick description and explanation,
optimize its opportunities to 25
highlighting key insights about the currently accepted and an incisive and novel insight about
present the major insights about
topic or issue understanding of the topic or the topic or issue
the topic or issue
issue
Analysis 14-16 17-19 20-22 23-25
The presentation makes a notable
The presentation was not able to The presentation is able to The presentation is successful in
attempt to examine the data
demonstrate the basic analytical demonstrate an acceptable dissecting and revealing the most vital
collected but misses the key points 25
rigor at a manner and degree level of critical examination insights that can be derived from the
which could have had resulted
expected in the field of the data gathered collection and analysis of data
onto an effective analysis
Language 3-4 5-6 7-8 9-10
and Form The presentation’s inability to The presentation
The presentation, while largely
effectively demonstrate the basic demonstrates a generally The presentation’s success in using the
comprehensible, was not able to
use of the academic language that acceptable use of the academic language that scholars and
substantially use the academic
scholars and practitioners of this academic language that practitioners of this field are using
language that scholars and 10
field are using when engaged in the scholars and practitioners of when engaged in the creation of such
practitioners of this field are using
creation of such products or this field are using when products or activities, has contributed
when engaged in the creation of
activities has largely jeopardized the engaged in the creation of to the overall quality of the work
such products or activities
quality of the work such products or activities
Insight and 10-12 13-15 16-19 18-20
Impact The presentation missed the The presentation was able to use The presentation was able to
The presentation was able to
opportunity to appropriately use socio-cultural concepts and use socio-cultural concepts
effectively, creatively, and
socio-cultural concepts and frameworks at an acceptable and frameworks at a
innovatively use socio-cultural
frameworks and thus came short in manner to offer workable satisfactory manner to thresh
concepts and frameworks to generate 20
offering convincing account after descriptions after exploring and out viable insights from
quality insights from exploring and
exploring and analyzing a particular analyzing a particular exploring and analyzing a
analyzing a particular phenomenon in
phenomenon in a learning phenomenon in a learning particular phenomenon in a
a learning organization
organization organization learning organization
UPV-CAS-ProfEd. (MEd Program)
Finals Paper Presentation Rubric for EDFD 202. Socio-cultural Foundations of Education. Part 2. Qualitative Feedback

NAME OF PRESENTER: JESEL LOVE P. VALENCIA


Criterion Extended Qualitative Assessment (Given the main aim of the project…)
Organization As a postgraduate student of education To further achieve its, objectives,
In my understanding, this paper
and education practitioner, I appreciate This paper has done well by… this paper presentation needs work
aims to…
that this paper presentation… on…
… deliver a well-structured … flows well, making it simple to follow … facilitating readers' understanding of … giving a detailed review of the
presentation with a concise and comprehend. the writers' results and making it simple subject and structuring the research
introduction. for them to follow the authors' question.
argument.
Content As a postgraduate student of education To further achieve its, objectives,
In my understanding, this paper
Knowledge and education practitioner, I appreciate This paper has done well by… this paper presentation needs work
aims to…
that this paper presentation… on…
… exhibit a strong awareness of the … was properly planned and carried out, … offering a full information of the … a comprehensive assessment of
issue of the culture within a and the knowledge was presented in an social dynamics within the wardroom the literature and the usage of
wardroom at regional training organized manner. of the Regional Training Center of relevant sources.
facilities. Philippine Coast Guard.
Analysis As a postgraduate student of education To further achieve its, objectives,
In my understanding, this paper
and education practitioner, I appreciate This paper has done well by… this paper presentation needs work
aims to…
that this paper presentation… on…
… offer a careful and informative … stresses the value of rank and … an excellent job of integrating their … giving a meaningful
review of the data collected. seniority, camaraderie, and work-life results into the accumulated texts on interpretation of the results that is
balance in influencing the social organizational culture and social well-supported by the evidence
dynamics within the wardroom. dynamics. available.

Language and As a postgraduate student of education To further achieve its, objectives,


In my understanding, this paper
Form and education practitioner, I appreciate This paper has done well by… this paper presentation needs work
aims to…
that this paper presentation… on…
… deliver a document that is … uses simple, plain language that is … the paper's language and format … the use of suitable vocabulary to
properly formatted, well-written, simple to grasp. since they increase its professionalism effectively characterize the social
and error-free. and make it understandable to a broad dynamics in the wardroom.
variety of readers.
Insight and As a postgraduate student of education To further achieve its, objectives,
In my understanding, this paper
Impact and education practitioner, I appreciate This paper has done well by… this paper presentation needs work
aims to…
that this paper presentation… on…
… highlights the social dynamics in … results are applicable to the institution … an important addition to … showing the effectiveness of
the wardroom of the Regional and its members since they provide organizational culture and social ethnography for comprehending
Training Center of the Philippine suggestions for improving the dynamics since it offers a thorough intricate social processes in
Coast Guard and offers innovative management of seniority, camaraderie, examination of a distinctive workplace organizational contexts, this adds
and insightful perspectives on the and the work-life balance in the inside the Philippine Coast Guard to the literature on ethnographic
subject. wardroom. training center. approaches in organizational
research.

You might also like