Part 1.

d/m t^2/s^2 t/s Δt^2

0.551 41.57026 6.4475 #NAME?
0.451 34.13481 5.8425 #NAME? 0.6
0.351 26.5225 5.15 #NAME?
0.251 18.70563 4.325 #NAME?
0.5

Δd = 0,001m
Δt = 0,01 (stopwatch) + 0,3 (human reflex) = 0,3 0.4
Δt^2 = (2*0,3/𝑡) ∗ 𝑡^2

(𝑦2−𝑦1)/(𝑥2−𝑥1)=(0,5−0,3)/(37,5−22,5)=0,013333
slope: "≈" 0,013 d/mi 0.3

slope from the equation on the graph = 0,0131

0.2
(0,5−0,15)/(35−15)=0,35/20=0,0175
max slope:
0.1
(0,55−0,25)/(45−15)=0,3/30=0,01
min slope:

Δa = (max slope - min slope)/2 = (0,0175-0,01)/2 = 0,00375 ≈0,004 0

10 15

acceleration = ( 0,013 ± 0,004) m/s^2

Part 2.

h/m t/s t^2 d/t^2 h/L Δt^2

0.101 8.6775 75.29901 #NAME? 0.162903 #NAME?
0.126 7.09 50.2681 #NAME? 0.203226 #NAME?
0.146 6.4475 41.57026 #NAME? 0.235484 #NAME?
0.162 6.1125 37.36266 #NAME? 0.26129 #NAME?

d/m = 0.551
L/m = 0.62

Δh/m= 0.001
ΔL/m = 0.001
Δd/m = 0.001

Hypothesis: acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp.

Proportional relation is a relation with a constant ratio between

quantities, which means that graph of such relation would be linear. My
graph of acceleration (d/t^2) vs. incline (h/L) is a linear graph. It means
that acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp, which shows that my
data supports the hypothesis.
Hypothesis: acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp.

Proportional relation is a relation with a constant ratio between

quantities, which means that graph of such relation would be linear. My
graph of acceleration (d/t^2) vs. incline (h/L) is a linear graph. It means
that acceleration is proportional to incline of ramp, which shows that my
data supports the hypothesis.
 d/t^2
0.6

f(x) = 0.0131206466775102 x + 0.00431959380685276

0.5 R² = 0.999874624835675

0.4

d/mi 0.3

0.2

0.1

0
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

t^2 / s^2

f(x) = NaN x + NaN

R² = 0
d/t^2 vs h/L
12

10

d/t^2 6

0
0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

h/L
0
0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.2 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28

h/L