Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Describe the nature vs. nurture debate. Which do you think has
a greater influence on humans—nature or nurture?
The nature argument suggests that our behavior and personality are largely
determined by genetics, meaning that we are born with certain traits that
shape who we are. This view argues that our genes determine everything
from our intelligence and temperament to our physical characteristics and
predisposition to certain illnesses.
On the other hand, the nurture argument asserts that our behavior and
personality are shaped by our environment and experiences. This view
argues that we are born as a blank slate, and our personality, behavior, and
cognitive abilities are largely influenced by our upbringing, social
interactions, and other environmental factors.
In reality, the nature vs. nurture debate is not a clear-cut dichotomy, but
rather a complex interplay between our genetics and environment. Both
nature and nurture play a role in shaping who we are, and it can be difficult
to disentangle their relative contributions.
Overall, it's important to recognize that both nature and nurture play
important roles in shaping who we are as individuals, and that
understanding the complex interplay between the two can help us better
understand human behavior and development.
This is because the family is the primary agent of socialization for children,
and it is typically where individuals first learn the norms, values, beliefs,
and behaviors of their culture. From a very young age, children learn the
language, customs, traditions, and beliefs of their family and community
through interactions with their parents, siblings, and other family members.
The family is also responsible for teaching children basic skills such as how
to communicate, how to interact with others, and how to behave in
different social situations. In addition, the family provides emotional and
psychological support, which is crucial for the development of a child's self-
esteem, confidence, and overall well-being.
Over time, these cultural norms and values become a natural part of my
behavior and thinking. I come to understand the importance of respect for
elders and the value of family values. I internalize these norms and values,
which helps me to navigate my social environment and maintain a sense of
belonging within my cultural community.
I think that Cooley's theory has some validity because our self-image is
indeed shaped by our social interactions and feedback from others. We
learn about ourselves and develop our sense of identity through our
interactions with family members, peers, and other members of society.
For example, if we receive positive feedback from others about our abilities
or personality traits, we may develop a sense of confidence and self-
esteem. On the other hand, if we receive negative feedback, we may
experience feelings of self-doubt or insecurity.
Moreover, our perceptions of how others see us can influence our behavior
and self-image. For instance, if we perceive that others view us as
intelligent, we may behave in ways that reinforce this perception, and this
can further strengthen our self-image.
In summary, while Cooley's theory has some validity, it is just one aspect of
the complex process of self-development and does not account for all
factors that contribute to the formation of our self-concept.