Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Chapter three
Fracture
A fracture is any planar or sub-planar discontinuity that is very narrow in one dimension compared
to the other two and forms as a result of external (tectonic) or internal (thermal or residual) stress.
Fractures are discontinuities in displacement and mechanical properties where rocks or minerals
are broken, and reduction or loss of cohesion characterizes most fractures. They are often described
as surfaces, but at some scale there is always a thickness involved. Fractures can be separated into
shear fractures (slip surfaces) and opening or extension.
FIGURE 1 Types of brittle deformation. (a) Orientation of the remote principal stress directions with respect
to an intact rock body. (b) A tensile crack, forming parallel to σ1 and perpendicular to σ3 (which may be
tensile). (c) A shear fracture, forming at an angle of about 30° to the σ1 direction. (d) A tensile crack that
has been reoriented with respect to the remote stresses and becomes a fault by undergoing frictional sliding.
(e) A tensile crack which has been reactivated as a cataclastic shear zone. (f) A shear fracture that has evolved
into a fault. (g) A shear fracture that has evolved into a cataclastic shear zone
A shear fracture or slip surface is a fracture along which the relative movement is parallel to the
fracture. The term shear fracture is used for fractures with small (mm- to dm-scale) displacements,
while the term fault is more commonly restricted to discontinuities with larger offset. The term
slip surface is used for fractures with fracture-parallel movements regardless of the amount of
displacement and is consistent with the traditional use of the term fault.
1
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Extension fractures (tensile fractures) are fractures that show extension perpendicular to the
walls. Joints have little or no macroscopically detectable displacement, but close examination
reveals that most joints have a minute extensional displacement across the joint surfaces, and
therefore they are classified as true extension fractures.
Extension fractures are filled with gas, fluids, magma or minerals. When filled with air or fluid we
use the term fissure. Mineral-filled extension fractures are called veins, while magma-filled
fractures are classified as dikes. Joints, veins and fissures are all referred to as extension fractures.
Contractional planar features (anti cracks) have contractional displacements across them and are
filled with immobile residue from the host rock. Stylolites are compactional structures characterized
by very irregular, rather than planar, surfaces. Some geologists now regard stylolites as contraction
fractures or closing fractures, as they nicely define one of three end-members in a complete
kinematic fracture framework together with shear and extension fractures. Such structures are
known as anti-cracks in the engineering-oriented literature.
Rock mechanics experiments carried out at various differential stresses and confining pressures set
a convenient stage for studying aspects of fracture formation.
Figure 2 Experimental deformation structures that develop under extension and contraction. Initial
elastic deformation is seen for all cases, while ductility increases with temperature (T) and confining
pressure (Pc). YP, yield point.
2
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Joints
Tensile fractures
Joints (also termed extensional fractures) are planes of separation on which no shear displacement
has taken place. The two walls of the resulting opening typically remain in tight (matching) contact.
Joints may result from regional tectonics (i.e. the compressive stresses in front of a mountain belt),
folding (due to curvature of bedding), faulting, or internal stress release during uplift or cooling.
They often form under high fluid pressure ( low effective stress), perpendicular to the smallest
principal stress.
Tensile cracking
Stress Concentration
A crack in rock on the atomic scale. One way to create such a crack would be for all the chemical
bonds across the crack surface to break at once. In this case, the tensile stress necessary for this to
occur is equal to the strength of each chemical bond multiplied by all the bonds that had once
crossed the area of the crack.
FIGURE Stress concentration adjacent to a hole in an elastic sheet. If the sheet is subjected to a remote
tensile stress at its ends (σr), then stress magnitudes at the sides of the holes are equal to Cσr, where C, the
stress concentration factor, is (2b/a) + 1. (a) For a circular hole, C = 3. (b) For an elliptical hole, C > 3
3
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
If you know the strength of a single chemical bond, then you can calculate the stress necessary to
break all the bonds simply by multiplying the bond strength by the number of bonds. Using realistic
values for the elasticity (Young’s modulus, E) and small strain (<10%), Equation 5.3 results in a
theoretical strength of rock that is thousands of megapascals. Measurement of rock strength in the
Earth’s crust shows that tensile cracking occurs at crack-normal tensile stresses of less than about
10 MPa, when the confining pressure is low,1 a value that is hundreds of times less than the
theoretical strength of rock.
We can also write elastic behavior in terms of the shear stress, σs:
σs = G ⋅ γ Eq. 5.4
where G is another constant of proportionality, called the shear modulus or the rigidity, and γ is the
shear strain. The corresponding constant of proportionality in volume change (dilation) is called the
bulk modulus, K:
σ = K ⋅ [(V – Vo)/Vo] Eq. 5.5
Perhaps more intuitive than the bulk modulus is its inverse, 1/K, which is the compressibility of a
material. Representative values for bulk and shear moduli are listed in Table 5.2.
It is quite common to use an alternative to the bulk modulus that expresses the relationship between
volume change and stress, called Poisson’s ratio, represented by the symbol ν. This elastic constant
4
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
is defined as the ratio of the elongation perpendicular to the compressive stress and the elongation
parallel to the compressive stress:
ν = eperpendicular/eparallel Eq. 5.6
Poisson’s ratio describes the ability of a material to shorten parallel to the compression direction
without corresponding thickening in a perpendicular direction. Therefore, the ratio ranges from 0
to 0.5, for fully compressible to fully incompressible materials, respectively.
Incompressible materials maintain constant volume irrespective of the stress. A sponge has a very
low Poisson’s ratio, while a metal cylinder has a relatively high value. A low Poisson’s ratio also
implies that a lot of potential energy is stored when a material is compressed; indeed, if we remove
the stress from a sponge it will jump right back to its original shape. Values for Poisson’s ratio in
natural rocks typically lie in the range 0.25–0.35 (Table 5.3).
5
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
A central characteristic of elastic behavior is its reversibility: once you remove the stress, the
material returns to its original shape. Reversibility implies that the energy introduced remains
available for returning the system to its original state. This energy, which is a form of potential
energy, is called the internal strain energy. Because the material is undistorted after the stress is
removed, we therefore say that strain is recoverable. Thus, elastic behavior is characterized by
recoverable strain. A second characteristic of elastic behavior is the instantaneous response to
stress: finite strain is achieved immediately. Releasing the stress results in an instantaneous return
to a state of no strain
6
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
FIGURE 6.8 Development of a throughgoing crack in a block under tension. (a) When tensile stress (σt) is
applied, Griffith cracks open up. (b) The largest, properly oriented cracks propagate to form a throughgoing
crack.
We can also induce tensile fracturing by subjecting a rock cylinder to axial compression, under
conditions of low confining pressure. Under such stress conditions, mesoscopic tensile fractures
develop parallel to the cylinder axis (Figure 6.9a), a process known as longitudinal splitting.
Longitudinal splitting is similar to tensile cracking except that, in uniaxial compression, the cracks
that are not parallel to the σ1 direction are closed, whereas cracks that are parallel to the
compression direction can open up.
In rocks, as the compressive stress increases, the tensile stress at the tips of cracks exceeds the
strength of the rock, and the crack propagates parallel to the compressive stress direction.
In the compressive stress environment illustrated in Figure 6.9, the confining pressure required is
very small; but tensile cracks can also be generated in a rock cylinder when the remote stress is
compressive under higher confining pressure when adding fluid pressure in pores and cracks of the
sample (i.e., the pore pressure; Figure 6.10). The uniform, outward push of a fluid in a microcrack
can have the effect of creating a local tensile stress at crack tips, and thus can cause a crack to
propagate. We call this process hydraulic fracturing. As soon as the crack begins to grow, the
volume of the crack increases, so if no additional fluid enters the crack, the fluid pressure decreases.
Crack propagation ceases when pore pressure drops below the value necessary to create a
sufficiently large tensile stress at the crack tip, and does not begin again until the pore pressure
builds up sufficiently.
7
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
FIGURE 6.9 (a) A cross section showing a rock cylinder with mesoscopic cracks formed by the process of
longitudinal splitting. (b) An “envelope” model of longitudinal splitting. If you push down on the top of an
envelope (whose ends have been cut off), the sides of the envelope will move apart.
FIGURE 6.10 (a) Cross-sectional sketch illustrating a rock cylinder in a triaxial loading experiment. Fluid
has access to the rock cylinder and fills the cracks. (b) A fluid-filled crack that is being pushed apart from
within by pore-fluid pressure.
8
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
FIGURE 6.11 Block diagrams illustrating the three modes of crack surface displacement: (a) Mode I, (b)
Mode II, (c) Mode III. Mode I is a tensile crack, and Mode II and Mode III are shear-mode cracks
Joints in rocks
Joint growth is controlled by the mechanical layer thickness of the deforming rock. The
aperture of a joint is the space between its two walls measured perpendicularly to the mean
plane.
Apertures can be open (resulting in permeability enhancement) or filled by mineral cement
(resulting in permeability reduction).
A joint with a large aperture (> few mm) is a fissure. If present in sufficient number, open
joints may provide adequate porosity and permeability such that an otherwise impermeable
rock may become a productive fractured reservoir.
9
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Joint patterns
There are five main arrangements:
- Parallel sets are curved or straight
- Fans sets along fold or intrusion crests
- Radiate sets around intrusion centers
-Concentric sets around intrusion and collapse centers (cone, ring, cylindrical).
- Polygonal sets as columnar or prismatic.
Master joints
Joints that have dimensions ranging from tens of centimetres to hundreds of meters and repeat
distances of several centimetres to tens of meters are called master joints. In addition, most rocks
contain numerous inconspicuous joints of smaller size and closer spacing, some of them, the micro
joints or microfractures, visible only in thin section under the microscope.
10
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
11
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
2-Twist Hackle
Features such as bedding planes and pre-existing fractures locally modify the orientation of
principal stresses because they approximate free surfaces. If a growing joint enters a region where
it no longer parallels a principal plane of stress (for example, as occurs when the crack tip of a joint
in a sedimentary bed approaches the bedding plane), the crack axes to a new orientation.
(Hackles diverge sharply at angles of about 30° from the central axis, gradually curving to
angles of about 70° near the margins of the joint surface. The scale of plumose patterns seems
to depend on the grain size of the rock).
the joint splits into a series of small en echelon joints, because a joint surface cannot twist and still
remain a single continuous surface. The resulting array of fractures is called twist hackle, and the
edge of the fracture plane where twist hackle occurs is called the hackle fringe (Figure 7.3a).
Joint arrays
1- Systematic versus Non-systematic Joints
Systematic joints are planar joints that comprise a family in which all the joints are parallel or sub
parallel to one another, and maintain roughly the same average spacing over the region of
observation. Systematic joints may cut through many layers of strata, or be confined to a single
layer.
Non-systematic joints have an irregular spatial distribution, they do not parallel neighbouring
joints, and they tend to be non-planar. Non-systematic joints may terminate at other joints. You will
often find both systematic and non-systematic joints in the same outcrop.
12
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
13
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
14
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Experimental work suggests that joints form in sequence; that is, first joint 1, then joint 2, then joint
3, and so on. When a new joint forms, it is at some distance greater than a minimum distance from
a preexisting joint. Formation of a joint relieves tensile stress for a critical distance .
The zone on either side of a joint in which there has been a decrease in tensile stress is called the
joint stress shadow. Stresses sufficient to create the next joint are only achieved outside of this
shadow and are created by traction between the bed and beds above and below it, as well as by
stress transmitted within the bed beyond the fracture front of the preexisting joint. The spacing
between joints is determined by the width of the joint stress shadow; so, because the shadow is
about the same width for all joints in the bed, the spacing ends up being constant.
Joint spacing depends on four parameters: bed thickness, stiffness, tensile strength, and strain. All
other parameters being equal, joints are more closely spaced in thinner beds, and are more widely
spaced in thicker beds. The relationship is a reflection of joint-stress shadow width, because the
greater the length of the joint (i.e., length of the joint trace in a plane perpendicular to bedding and
joint), the wider the stress shadow (Figure 7.9b and c).
15
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
16
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Furthermore, as the overburden diminishes, rock expands (very slightly) in the vertical direction.
Therefore, because of the Poisson effect (Poisson's ratio is a measure of the Poisson effect, the
phenomenon in which a material tends to expand in directions perpendicular to the direction of
compression), it contracts in the horizontal direction.
17
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Hydraulic Fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing (informally known as hydrofracking, fracking,bor hydrofracturing) is a
process that typically involves injecting water, sand, and chemicals under high pressure into a
bedrock formation via a well. This process is intended to create new fractures in the rock as well as
increase the size, extent, and connectivity of existing fractures in order to extract trapped oil and
gas.
Hydraulic fracturing is a well-stimulation technique used commonly in low-permeability rocks like
tight sandstone, shale, and some coal beds to increase oil and/or gas flow to a well from petroleum-
bearing rock formations.
A similar technique is used to create improved permeability in underground geothermal reservoirs.
Frac sand is a specialized type of sand that is added to fracking fluids that are injected into
unconventional oil and gas wells during hydraulic fracturing. Frac sand keep induced fractures open
and extend the time and flow rate of oil and gas from a well.
18
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Mechanics of jointing
A genetic classification of joints has been based on the size of inferred, imperceptible displacement
related to the three principal stress axes of a region. If the total displacement is normal to the fracture
surface, it is an extension or dilatant joint (mode 1 fracture). If the shear component has some finite,
yet negligible value, the fracture called a shear joint is really a fault (modes 2 and 3 fracture),
keeping in mind that the shear component may have accumulated after formation of a former
extension (dilatant) joint.
1- Extension joints
Linear elastic fracture mechanics predicts that the orientation of extension joints in a relatively
isotropic rock is controlled by the remote stress field at the time of fracture propagation:
joints are gaping planes parallel to the maximum compressive stress σ1 and perpendicular to the
direction of the least principal stress σ3.
In other words, they form in the plane containing σ1 and σ2. Otherwise, there would be a shearing
stress and a corresponding finite shear displacement on the joint plane.
The pattern of extension joints is commonly T-shaped, the younger joint abutting the older one.
Given suitable anisotropy of the tensile strength, it is however possible to get joints normal to σ2
or even σ1.
2- Hybrid joints
Hybrid joints show components of both extension and shear components. They are interpreted as
failure surfaces initiated in the transition from tensile to shear failure.
3- Shear joints
This term is unfortunate and ambiguous because shear joints are small faults. Conjugate “shear
joints” generally define X, Y or V shapes. The acute bisector of these shapes is parallel to σ1, unless
these patterns represent unrelated crosscutting or abutting fractures.
19
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
20
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Classification
Naturally fractured reservoirs can be classified in different types, depending on the storage
capacities or porosity and permeability of the matrix and the fractures. Different definitions for
these types can be found in literature.
Aguilera classified the naturally fractured reservoirs in types A, B and C (see Figure 1). In
reservoirs of type A most fluid is stored in the matrix; the fractures provide only a very small storage
capacity. Typically the matrix rock tends to have a low permeability, whereas the fractures exhibit
a much larger permeability. In type B reservoirs approximately half of the hydrocarbon storage is
in the matrix and half in the fractures. The fractures provide the storage capacity of type C
reservoirs, without contribution of the matrix
21
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
In Type 1 reservoirs, fractures provide both the porosity and permeability elements.
Type 2 reservoirs have low porosity and low permeability in the matrix, and fractures provide the
essential permeability for productivity.
Type 3 reservoirs have high porosity and may produce without fractures, so fractures in these
reservoirs provide added permeability.
Type M reservoirs have high matrix porosity and permeability, so open fractures can enhance
permeability, but natural fractures often complicate fluid flow in these reservoirs by forming
barriers.
Fractures add no significant additional porosity and permeability to Type 4 reservoirs, but instead
are usually barriers to flow.
Another reservoir class, Type G, has been created for unconventional fractured gas reservoirs.
Type 1 reservoirs, with fractures providing both primary porosity and primary permeability,
typically have large drainage areas per well, and require fewer wells for development. These
reservoirs show high initial production rates. They are also subject to rapid production decline, early
water breakthrough and difficulties in determining reserves.
Type 2 reservoirs can have surprisingly good initial production rates for a low-permeability matrix
but can have difficulties during secondary recovery if the communication between the fracture and
the matrix is poor.
Type 3 reservoirs are typically more continuous and have good sustained production rates but can
have complex directional permeability relationships, leading to difficulties during the secondary-
recovery phase.
Type M reservoirs have impressive matrix qualities but are sometimes compartmentalized, causing
them to underperform compared with early producibility estimates, and making secondary-recovery
effectiveness variable within the same field.
Type 4 reservoirs would plot near the origin because the fracture contribution to permeability in
Type 4 reservoirs is negative
22
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
expresses the ratio between the storage capacity of the fracture network and the total
storage capacity.
23
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
2. Permeability
The permeability of a porous rock is a measure of the ability to transmit fluids. A reservoir
can have primary and secondary permeability.
The primary permeability is referred to as matrix permeability; the secondary permeability
can be either called fracture permeability or solution vugs permeability.
Matrix- and fracture permeability are other important parameters that have to be known for
an estimate of the influence of the fractures on the overall reservoir performance.
Open fractures in Naturally Fractured Reservoirs generally have a higher permeability than
the matrix, building the flow channels of the system. The flow rate through a narrow
cleavage can be calculated by Lamb’s law:
Where W is the effective fracture aperture (fracture width). The fracture cross section A is
the product of the fracture width W and the breadth b:
A=W⋅b (1-3)
A fracture with 10-5 m width (i.e.: 0.1 mm) has a permeability of 844 Darcy. As a
consequence of Equation 1.2 and Equation 1.3, between two flat plates, the flow rate is
proportional to the cube of the aperture W.
This is naturally not valid for natural fractures because they are rough.
24
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Where
Note that as a consequence of the Equation 1.5 and Equation 1.6 the effective permeability
is proportional to the cube of the aperture W:
If the matrix is also permeable, then the overall effective permeability is:
The resultant intrinsic permeability of a fracture of 0.01 in. would be 5400 darcys. The
intrinsic permeability of Equation 1.11 is valid for a single point. The formulation can be
extended for the bulk properties of the system for one set of parallel fractures:
25
Asst Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
3. Compressibility
The stress on the reservoir rock is determined by the confining and the pore pressures. The
confining (or overburden) pressure, caused by the weight of overlying rock is partially
compensated by the pressure of the fluids in the pores.
The net confining pressure, pe, is the difference of the two pressures:
A number of investigations indicate that the effect of varying the confining and pore
pressure on porosity and permeability is mainly governed by the net confining pressure
and is not greatly dependent on the absolute values of either total confining pressure or
pore fluid pressure.
26
Asst. Prof. Dr. Mayssaa Al-Bidry
Note, that also if often pore collapse and compaction will be modelled by increased
compressibility factor, the following discussion is valid only for the elastic state of the
reservoir rocks. Dealing with deep carbonate reservoirs, the first step must always be
to estimate or better yet, to measure the yield point.
The isothermal compressibility factor, in general, is defined as the specific volume
change caused by change of pressure:
The volume V may refer to the bulk volume (Vb), the solid volume (Vs) or the fluid,
e.g. the oil volume (Vo).
where cs is the compressibility factor of the solid phase. The matrix block, tight or
porous, surrounded by fractures will expand towards the fractures, therefore the
compressibility of the fracture porosity is determined by the compressibility of the
matrix bulk volume:
Reference:
1-Natural Fractured Reservoir Engineering. Zoltán E. and Georg Mittermeir.2014
2-The Nature of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs. Tom Bratton, Dao Viet Canh, Nguyen
Van Que , Nguyen V. Duc, Paul Gillespie, David Hunt, Bingjian Li, Richard Marcinew, Satyaki
Ray, Bernard Montaron, Ron Nelson, David Schoderbek and Lars Sonneland. Article in
Oilfield Review. 2014
3-Ben A. Van Der Pluijm and Stephen Marshak . Earth Structure, Second edition.
2004.
27