Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ly-Lz Ky-Kz

    Uploaded by

    Putra Cahya Ramadan
    8 views2 pages
    The document discusses assumptions made in calculating load values (LY, LZ, EFT) for structural beams and columns. It is assumed that secondary beams are connected to main beams, and that minor axis bending of beams is released at beam-column junctions. Load values are provided for various structural elements under these assumptions.

    Original Description:

    Ly-Lz

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses assumptions made in calculating load values (LY, LZ, EFT) for structural beams and columns. It is assumed that secondary beams are connected to main beams, and that minor axis bending of beams is released at beam-column junctions. Load values are provided for various structural elements under these assumptions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views2 pages

    Ly-Lz Ky-Kz

    Uploaded by

    Putra Cahya Ramadan
    The document discusses assumptions made in calculating load values (LY, LZ, EFT) for structural beams and columns. It is assumed that secondary beams are connected to main beams, and that minor axis bending of beams is released at beam-column junctions. Load values are provided for various structural elements under these assumptions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    DJ2 LY, LZ, EFT = 4.

    4 (provided UNL value for


    DJ1 DJ2 beams is based on assumption

    L
    UN
    DJ1 that the secondary beam is
    DJ1 connected to the main beam
    as per this snap, else LY = UNL)

    LY, UNL, EFT = 3

    LY
    L+
    UN
    DJ2
    DJ2
    DJ1 LY, EFT = 4.4
    DJ2
    DJ1

    LY
    it is effective to
    provide plan bracing
    to reduce LY

    T
    F
    +E
    LY
    L+
    UN
    DJ2

    DJ2
    DJ2
    LY, UNL, EFT = 4.4
    DJ1
    DJ2
    EFT = 5

    DJ1
    DJ1

    DJ1
    DJ2

    DJ1

    LY, UNL, EFT = 3


    Note. it is assumed that minor axis
    bending of beam (MY) is 'released'
    at the Beam-Column junctions
    DJ2
    DJ2
    LY, LZ, EFT = 9
    DJ2
    UNL, LZ = 7
    DJ1
    DJ2
    DJ2
    LZ = 4
    DJ2 DJ2
    LY = 7 DJ1 DJ2
    DJ2

    LY, EFT = 9

    EFT = 9.5

    DJ1

    DJ1
    DJ1
    DJ1
    DJ1

    EFT = 5
    DJ1

    DJ1

    LZ
    LY

    Note. it is assumed that minor axis


    bending of beam (MY) is 'released'
    at the Beam-Column junctions

    You might also like