Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The compost of
recuperation
Fabricating social ties in
the interstices
Marcos Farias Ferreira and
Francisco Martínez
Social bricolage
This chapter develops a framework for understanding the experience
of recuperation through political composting – meant to represent a
society’s capacity for self-building through practices of public repairing
and social bricolage, thus paying attention to the relationship between
the medium and the form of recuperation. We argue that recuperation
is characterised by a practice of recombination that goes hand in hand
‘in a haptic space in the middle of things’ (Stewart, 2008: 71) and with
‘all sorts of cross-cutting and contradictory personal commitments’
(Marcus, 1995: 113) that resemble more a form of complicity than of
rapport (Holmes and Marcus, 2012).
The factory had been turned into a warehouse in those days, one
full of old furniture and toys, waiting for the mortgage to be paid.
From September onwards, Marcos’ camera would witness the
transformation of the factory, from a mass of leftovers into a bubble
of alternative activities meant to recuperate and provide shelter from
the growing commodification of society. At a general PAA meeting in
late October, it was decided to accept the symbolic rent asked by the
proprietor and start the makeover of the space. Henceforth, it would
be known as the ‘Factory of Alternatives’. The first collective endeavour
spanned several weeks and involved dealing with the leftovers from
previous textile activity and making the space of the former Materna
textile factory free and clean. People from different backgrounds
started gathering at weekends, after PAA meetings, moving stuff,
sorting out and registering textile leftovers, cleaning and getting rid of
rubbish, mending the floor and engaging in different kinds of
restorative acts and, bit by bit, the space opened up to collective
action. It was not uncommon, though, that the leftover items had
been returned to the same place over the weekend, perhaps due to
some whim of the proprietor, and so the cleaning and the moving
would start again, but not where they had left off the week before.
Material relations are central to the process of recuperation, and
for the PAA the reuse of remains played an important role in keeping
the factory open to multiple spatial imaginaries and practices. If the
first step was to clear the ground floor of the weaving machines
and materials, often reusing them as well as any existing material,
then the next step was to correlate the space design with the social
initiatives that the factory was starting to host. Also, as a result
of different voluntary initiatives, the walls became decorated with
artistic works and collected stuff that had been thrown away and
donations, such as books from a public library. As the members of
the PAA explained, learning and doing politics were intertwined. The
learning opportunities were not limited to books and seminars, but
also extended to such initiatives as yoga, sewing, drawing, recycling
workshops, theatre, dance classes, cinema and so forth, filling in the
gap left by the retreat of public services and infrastructures. Until
the middle of December, the factory functioned with a list of weekly
alternative activities supervised by social organs through regular
meetings. This narrative must not forget, however, that since the very
In this sense, the PAA, together with its interstitial spaces, does
not merely illustrate a collective response to the economic difficulties
afflicting large sectors of Portuguese society at that particular juncture.
Rather, it can be seen as a deeper movement in search of radical
recuperation and community rebuilding (see, Farias Ferreira and
Terrenas, 2017), and as a site whereby social bricolage and political
engineering could encounter one another. By working through
society’s interstices, the factory brought about grassroots forms of
resistance and transformation, creating a platform for different forms
of being together and alternative arrangements of urban life at large
(Corsín Jiménez and Estalella, 2013). Different people, from different
backgrounds and from different generations, mobilised to foster new
spaces of hope, solidarity and meaning-making in collaborative ways,
showing how recuperation is an experience that reconstructs the
identity of people, too. Paradoxically, the openly politicised activities
were given less attention, in favour of the communitarian activities
organised at the factory.
Concluding remarks
Compost is simultaneously a space and a technique for recuperation.
Accordingly, the term ‘composting’ is proposed in relation to social
sustainability and with the aim of conceptualising a process of
recuperation that includes many heterogeneous elements, factors and
actors and which differs from recovery – understood as a restitution of
whole systems (Guyer, 2017). The factory itself was an intrinsic part
of this compost – as a form of intervention from within (Altés and
Lieberman, 2013), and as ‘living proof that other ways of thinking and
acting are possible’ (Rosol and Schweizer, 2012: 713).
In Lisbon, the financial crisis deepened the tension between those
who conceive of the city as a space of capital accumulation and those
who live in it as a place of daily practice (Brenner, Marcuse and Mayer,
2011). Since May 2013, the PAA and the factory had been established
as spaces for contesting the actual ordering of things and as spaces
to sustain acts of recuperation. Hence, these spaces were created,
not beyond or at the margins of the political system, but in tension
with the official spheres of legality, economy and order. In fact, that
very ordering was perceived as the source of crisis itself and justified
the setting-up of spaces, where alternative social interactions could
be discussed and put into practice. Arguably, and as part of the
politicisation at both the park and factory in Algés, individuals
reclaimed the right to gain access to these areas and as a means of
creating a civic bond with the city, turned them into spaces of society-
making. This act of insubordination was potentially transgressive, in
that it instantiated an alternative spatial community that did not
renounce the desire for open and fluid interactions (no formal
membership in the factory was instituted).
Since we started taking part in and documenting PAA activities,
we felt that a greater reflexivity and vocabulary were needed that
would help us reconsider how knowledge is created and incorporated
through makeshift practices. The factory became the centre of
collective mobilisation itself – an interstitial space with a particular
potency and capacity as the somewhere of social relationships and
as a distributed agency (Corsín Jiménez, 2003).4 The continual
porosity of the PAA was visible in the way eclectic cultural expressions
found their space in the factory, but also in the assumption that
transgression could become the accepted normality of a space
freed from conventional morality and fixed practices and hierarchies.
The dynamics at the factory illustrate how grassroots recuperation
worked in a patchwork manner – as always evolving readaptations
and infrastructures and overlapping relations, services and provisions.
However, much recuperation proved to be an active choice made by
a group of Algés dwellers. What we could attest is that it developed
as a complex process, taking place mostly without a detailed design
or conscious planning. Rather, it was a reconstitutive process of
composting, turning the old and deteriorated into something new
and fertile (Saltzman, 2005).
The refurbishing of the former factory generated affects beyond
the physical dimension of the intervention, enabling, in turn, a living
laboratory where social relationships could be recreated. Indeed, the
second life of the factory meant a new beginning for many people. In
this sense, recuperation was the product of a process of negotiation
among subjectivities and interests that interpreted in disparate ways
the interstitial character of the process and strived to organise it
according to particular views on, for instance, how the relationship
garden, to its roots, for associates wanted to show, with pride, the
achievements of grassroots mobilisation, resistance and solidarity in
times of crisis. Moreover, they showed how this mobilisation effort
can move beyond the strictly utopian dimension and become effective
in the reconstitution of the public sphere.
That was the last day of Marcos filming at the factory. He would
go back there months later, with a group of students from an
international master’s degree programme, and was told about the
mounting problems with the proprietor. Eventually, they were evicted
because the latter was offered better proposals on how to make
more profitable use of the space it would seem. Without the space,
a downturn in the PAA quickly followed, even if for some time the
municipality provided a small apartment in downtown Algés for
activities to be continued. As with similar movements emerging in
the Lisbon area in those years, sustaining activities and keeping them
in line with the original goals proved extremely difficult. Among the
reasons for the difficulty, one can count the change in the political
landscape from 2015 onwards, the public perception that crisis was
waning when a left-wing government took over that very year and,
last but not least, the harsh touristification that has hit Lisbon since
then. But this would already be another story and another research
project.
Notes
1 Afflicted by mounting fiscal imbalances that were the product both
of the expansive policies of previous decades and European-backed
policies for the immediate post-crisis period, the Portuguese
government ended up asking for a bailout from the European
institutions and the IMF – the so-called Troika – which, in turn,
exposed society to deep fiscal cuts in all sectors of an already fragile
welfare state. The need for an external bailout and the subsequent
austerity policies were a way of tinkering with the cycles of instability
intrinsic to capitalism and which in society were perceived as a case
of systemic brokenness, as a public disjunction that needs to be
repaired (Pina Cabral, 2018; Martínez, Introduction in this volume).
2 The French word bricoleur describes a handyman who makes use of
the tools available to complete a task. Some connotations of a
bricoleur attitude involve trickery, but also new ways of seeing and
References
Altés, A. and O. Lieberman (2013) Intravention, Durations, Effects:
Notes of Expansive Sites, Baunach: Spurbuchverlag.
Barker, S. (2014) ‘Playing by whose rules? Social life as an
interdisciplinary playground’, Journal of Political Power, 7 (2):
318–25.
Bear, L. (2015) Navigating Austerity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University
Press.
Brenner, N., P. Marcuse and M. Mayer (eds) (2011) Cities for People, Not
for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City, London:
Routledge.
Corsín Jiménez, A. (2003) ‘On space as capacity’, Journal of the Royal
Anthropological Institute, 9 (1): 137–53.
Corsín Jiménez, A. and A. Estalella (2013) ‘The atmospheric person:
Value, experiment, and “making neighbors” in Madrid’s Popular
Assemblies’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 3 (2): 119–39.
De Boeck, F. and M.-F. Plissart (2004) Kinshasa: Tales of the Invisible
City, Ghent: Ludion.
Estalella, A. and T. Sánchez Criado (in press, 2019) ‘DIY anthropology:
Disciplinary knowledge in crisis’, in F. Martínez (ed.), ‘Changing
Margins and Relations within European Anthropology’, ANUAC:
Journal of the Italian Association of Cultural Anthropology, Special
Issue.
Färber, A. (2014) ‘Low-budget Berlin: Towards an understanding of
low-budget urbanity as assemblage’, Cambridge Journal of Regions,
Economy and Society, 7 (1): 119–36.
Farias Ferreira, M. and J. Terrenas (2017) ‘The People’s Assembly of
Algés: Heterotopia and radical democracy in crisis-stricken Portugal’,
in I. David (ed.), Crisis, Austerity and Transformation, Lanham:
Lexington, pp. 91–108.
Guyer, J. I. (2017) ‘Aftermaths and recuperation in anthropology’, Hau:
Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7 (1): 81–103.