Doc. Ref. No.

: UTP-ACA-CDO-SIP-10
Issue Version: V1 2022
Date: September 2022

GUIDELINES FOR
STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT
(SIP) IDB/IEB/IFB3047

CAREER DEVELOPMENT OFFICE

(CDO)

Open
 Doc. Ref. No.: UTP-ACA-CDO-SIP-10
Issue Version: V1 2022
Date: September 2022

Electronic File
UTP GUIDELINES FOR STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT-VER.1 2022
Name:
Prepared by CDO Programme

Release Date
Owned by: CDO Programme

Approved by:

AMENDMENT SHEET
Version
Date Author Summary of Changes

5 September
v1.2019 MIA & MKN Overall Updates
2019

V1
March 2021 MIA, NMR & WNK Overall Updates
2021

V1 September
MBI & RNA Update on logbook submission requirement
2022 2022

Open
S
This Guideline for Student Industrial Project (SIP) is only
available to UTP students and companies participating in
the practical training programme of UTP students.

The guidelines shall be kept in a secure place, where access

is available only to those authorized to see them.

Reproduction by any means, including storage on an

electronic system, is prohibited.

© Career Development Office (CDO)

Open
CAREER DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI PETRONAS
32610 Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan
Tel : +6 (05) 3688380 /8381/8385/8387/8389/8395 Fax : +6 (05) 368 8386
 Table of Contents
GUIDELINES FOR STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT ( SIP )

AMENDMENT SHEET S
1 COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES 1
2 TRAINING APPROACH 1
3 STUDENT ELIGIBILITY 1
4 STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT PROCESS 1
4.1 DURING INTERNSHIP 1
4.2 POST-INTERNSHIP 2
ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE FOR STUDENT INDUSTRIAL INTERNSHIP
5 2
PROGRAMME
5.1 LEAVE 2
5.2 CHANGE OF INTERNSHIP PLACEMENT 2
5.3 INSURANCE 2
5.4 TRAINING ALLOWANCE 3
6 RESPONSIBILITIES 3
6.1 HOST COMPANY 3
6.2 UTP (CDO, COORDINATOR, UTP SV & STUDENT) 3
7 OFFENCES AND PENALTIES DURING STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 5
8 ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT 7
9 LOGBOOK 7
10 STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT (SIP) PRESENTATION 7
11 STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT (SIP) REPORT 8
12 GENERAL WRITING FORMAT 8
13 STUDENT’S FINAL GRADING 9
14 APPENDIX 10

Open

ii
1. COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES

At the end of the industrial internship, student will be able to:

1.1. Analyse industry problems/improvements and opportunities related to the discipline or

area of specialization
1.2. Design and develop solutions to industry problems utilizing appropriate techniques,
models, resources and/or modern (scientific) tools
1.3. Evaluate sustainability practices and impact delivered in the industry
1.4. Demonstrate ability to engage in independent and life-long learning

2. TRAINING APPROACH

SIP should have the following features:

2.1. Hands-on training

2.2. Real project-based assignments
2.3. Research-based activities
2.4. Team-work activities
2.5. Leadership and management skills
2.6. Safety awareness

3. STUDENT ELIGIBILITY

Student is eligible to register Student Industrial Project upon obtained a PASS for
IDB/IEB/IFB3047.

4. STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT PROCESS

4.1. During Student Industrial Project

4.1.1. Students are to perform course registration for SIP in UCampus. CDO will
follow the official academic add & drop deadline.
4.1.2. Students that have changed to new host company shall submit Report Duty
Confirmation during the first week of SIP.
4.1.3. Students to submit progress report for Logbook in ULearn fortnightly.
4.1.4. Students to submit SIP Report in ULearn by Week TWELVE (12).
4.1.5. UTP SV shall conduct assessment with the students & HC SV between Week
TWELVE (12) and THIRTEEN (13).
4.1.6. UTP SV can obtain the SIP Report from ULearn.
4.1.7. UTP SV to collect assessment forms from HC SV immediately after completion
of evaluation. For assessment, the following methods shall be applied:
4.1.7.1. Physical visit (as per UTP Travelling Policy) OR
4.1.7.2. Virtual

Open

1
 4.1.7.2.1. Microsoft Teams OR
4.1.7.2.2. Any video conference software OR
4.1.7.2.3. Conference call OR
4.1.7.2.4. Video Recording (Last option)
4.1.8. Students are to submit A COPY of the Summary Logbook Weekly Report
Scores form to UTP SV via Ulearn.

5. ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE FOR STUDENT INDUSTRIAL INTERNSHIP

PROGRAMME

5.1. Leave
Entitlement of annual leave/MC (if any) is based on the host company policy. In the case
of prolonged leave (exceeding 5 days) due to hospitalization, student shall notify CDO,
coordinator and host company in writing and provides necessary documents as evidence.
Please note that the minimum duration of SIP is 14 weeks, therefore students are required
to replace any leave taken other than the annual leave given by host company (if any).

5.2. Change of Internship Placement

Students are NOT ALLOWED to change to another Host Company unless with strong
justifications. For any application to transfer, the following procedures shall be followed:
5.2.1. Students to officially request to CDO and/or Department to change Host
Company.
5.2.2. CDO and Department to investigate on the students’ request with HC SV and/or
HRM.
5.2.3. Upon investigation, if the request is justified, CDO shall forward the Form SIIP-
05: Requisition to Change Host Company (Appendix I) to students
5.2.4. Students to get endorsement from Coordinator/UTP SV and HC SV consent of
leaving from current host company.
5.2.5. Submission also shall include offer letter from new host company.
5.2.6. Students can only change Host Company after getting approval from CDO.

5.3. Insurance
Students are covered by group personal insurance throughout internship (Please refer to
Center for Student Experience, Student Support & Advocacy).

5.4. Internship Allowance

Internship allowance entitlement is based on the host company’s discretion.

Open

2
6. RESPONSIBILITIES

6.1. Host Company Supervisor (HC SV)

6.1.1. Host Companies plays an important role in ensuring the success of the industrial
internship programme. They are expected to provide the following support:
6.1.2. Plan and schedule the overall internship programme to ensure that it provides
maximum opportunity for students to obtain useful experience related to their field
of study
6.1.3. Host Company Supervisor is a qualified engineering/technology staff.
6.1.4. Provide briefing on the background of the organization/company.
6.1.5. Discuss the details of the internship programme’s expected outcomes with the
students.
6.1.6. Supervise and guide students during industrial training.
6.1.7. Provides the necessary facilities, equipment and tools for students.
6.1.8. Provides necessary recommendations to improve the programme.
6.1.9. Assess logbook (Appendix II) fortnightly and checks their detailed of logbook
reports.
6.1.10. Provides weekly report scores using Summary of the Weekly Report Scores
(Logbook) Form (Appendix III).
6.1.11. Evaluates students’ oral presentation during assessment visit using Form SIP-A
(Appendix IV).

6.2. Responsibilities of UTP

6.2.1. Career Development Office (CDO)
6.2.1.1. Facilitate the internship programme so that it can complement the
learning outcomes.
6.2.1.2. Provides list of placements in UCampus to students for selection.
6.2.1.3. Assist coordinators in providing list of students with placement details.
6.2.1.4. Assist students, HC SV, UTP SV and coordinator on the industrial
internship matters.
6.2.1.5. Compile and consolidate students’ scores submitted by UTP SV.
6.2.1.6. Finalize students’ grading with department and faculty.

6.2.2. Department Internship Coordinator

6.2.2.1. Mitigate internship matters during industrial training.
6.2.2.2. Consolidate students’ scores and grading at department and faculty.
6.2.2.3. Promotes and establishes UTP-Industry relationship via internship.
6.2.2.4. Assign UTP SVs for supervision and evaluation.
6.2.2.5. Review and endorse student’s placement details including HC suitability.
6.2.2.6. Encourages contribution of industrial projects towards final year project.

Open

3
 6.2.3. UTP Supervisors
6.2.3.1. Establish and maintain communication with students and Host Company
Supervisor throughout the duration of the internship period.
6.2.3.2. Develop and maintain good rapport with the Host Companies.
6.2.3.3. Review and endorse the project for SIP course.
6.2.3.4. Evaluate the students’ oral presentation at the Host Company using Form
SIP-A-UTP (Appendix IV)
6.2.3.5. Evaluate Industrial Training Report using Form SIP-B-UTP. (Appendix
V)
6.2.3.6. Complete and collect all the assessment forms from Host Company SV
at the end of the assessment.
6.2.3.7. Upload the student’s marks for both Host Company and UTP SV as
provided by CDO.
6.2.3.8. Inform CDO on any issues/suggestion based on HC SV feedback.

6.2.4. Student’s Responsibilities

6.2.4.1. Adhere to UTP and Host Company’s rules and regulation.
6.2.4.2. Adhere to the company’s working hours and breaks. To notify your HC
SV if you are late or absent.
6.2.4.3. Regularly check UTP email, to respond email and/or phone
communication from UTP and company on a timely manner.
6.2.4.4. Discuss with supervisor on the training schedule (if necessary)
6.2.4.5. Update logbook regularly and present it to the Host Company Supervisor
for weekly review and endorsement.
6.2.4.6. Follow the Host Company’s safety procedures.
6.2.4.7. Maintain good discipline and personal conduct.
6.2.4.8. Listen to and follow supervisor’s instruction.
6.2.4.9. Meet work schedules on time.
6.2.4.10. Be responsible and committed in acquiring as much knowledge and skills
as possible during the internship
6.2.4.11. Complete all assessments as per SIP requirements
6.2.4.12. Notify CDO on any issues faced during SIP.

Open

4
7. OFFENCES & PENALTIES DURING STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT

Students undergoing Industrial Internship Programme must adhere to the rules and regulations,
as specified by the respective host company/industry and also comply with the Students’
Disciplinary Rules & Regulations of Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS and Academic
Policies and Procedures.
Internship students committing inappropriate conduct during the course of soliciting internship
placement and during the period of undergoing industrial internship programme will be
subjected to the following penalties as per Table 1.

Table 1: Types of Offence and Penalty on Final Internship Grade (SIP)

ACT OFFENCE PENALTY/ ACTION

ACADEMIC Termination by host i. F Grade and/or
and/or company/institution due to the ii. Submission of report to SDC for
DISCIPLINARY following offence: further action
MISCONDUCT a. Poor work performance iii. If found guilty, student can be
and attitude imposed any one or more appropriate
b. Poor attendance punishment concurrently or
c. Missing in action consecutively as follows :
d. Cause damage or misuse a. Reprimand
any properties or assets b. A fine not exceeding one
belonging to and/or thousand ringgit
controlled by host (RM1000.00)
company c. Suspension from one or more
e. Violation of facilities of the University for
confidentiality, e.g. a specific period
selling, distributing, d. Exclusion from any part of the
social media posting, or University for a specific
publishing confidential period
documents, project e. Academic suspension for a
and/or other information specific period
provided by host f. Expulsion from the
company without University.
permission
f. Altered medical
certificate (MC).
g. Not adhere to host
company/institution rules
and regulations.
Non-submission of following F Grade
document:
a) SIP Logbook
b) SIP report within the
duration of assessment
period.

Open

5
 1. Forgery of supervisor’s i. Submission of report to SDC for
signature and/or using official further action
stamp without permission ii. If found guilty, student can be
2. Submitting an altered mark to imposed any one or more appropriate
UTP supervisor punishment concurrently or
3. Submitting an altered consecutively as follows :
transcript of grades to a. Reprimand
employer (during application) b. A fine not exceeding one
4. Use of intellectual material thousand ringgit
produced by another person (RM1000.00)
without acknowledging its c. Suspension from one or more
source eg. Copying of facilities of the University for
passages, use of the views, a specific period
opinions, or insights of others d. Exclusion from any part of the
into internship report and University for a specific
claim it to be own work period
5. Copying or attempting to e. Academic suspension for a
copy internship report or specific period
logbook from others. f. Expulsion from the
6. Allowing others to do an University.
assignment for the intern.
7. Undergo internship “at home”
8. Conduct and/or kind of
conduct which are prohibited
by Malaysia Syariah and Civil
Law such as the use of drugs,
liquor, pornography, damage,
to public and/or personal
properties, gambling,
prostitution, stealing, physical
harm, arson, robbery, sexual
harassment, murder, etc.
9. Conduct of any kind, which
may cause detrimental to the
reputation of the University
and/or its studies.
10. Not adhere to host
company/institution rules and
regulations

Open

6
8. ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT

The students will be evaluated on following aspects:

8.1. Analyse industry problems/improvements and opportunities related to the discipline or

area of specialization
8.2. Design and develop solutions to industry problems utilizing appropriate techniques,
models, resources and/or modern (scientific) tools
8.3. Evaluate sustainability practices and impact delivered in the industry
8.4. Demonstrate ability to engage in independent and life-long learning

Percentage (%)
No. Item Host Company
UTP Supervisor
Supervisor
1. SIP Report - 40
2. Logbook 20 -
3. Presentation 10 30
Total 30 70

9. LOGBOOK

The logbook contains daily or weekly reports/progress prepared by the students and endorsed
by the Host Company Supervisor. The students should describe the tasks that they are
undertaking, how these tasks contribute towards achieving the Host Company's objectives, the
problems and challenges they face, the lessons learnt from the experience, and provide any
comments or recommendations they wish to make. The logbook should also record any points
discussed with the Host Company Supervisor in relation to the industrial training. The Logbook
is to be evaluated by HC SV fortnightly. The Logbook Weekly Evaluation by Host Company
and Summary of Weekly Scores Form from week one (1) to week fourteen (14) are to be filled,
signed, and stamped by HC SV. Non submission of logbook will result in F grade.

10. STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT (SIP) PRESENTATION

Students are required to present an oral presentation describing the gist of their industrial
training, experience gained during the training and significant contribution that they have
given to the host company. The UTP and Host Company Supervisor will jointly evaluate the
oral presentation. The evaluation will be based on the following criteria:
10.1. Background of Study, Problem Statement, Objective & Scope of Study
10.2. Critical analysis, relevancy & recentness of the literature
10.3. Methodology
10.4. Project Activities & Key Project Milestones
10.5. Result and Discussion
10.6. Discussion on Sustainability

Open

7
11. STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT REPORT
The purpose of the report is to record all the relevant activities that contribute towards
developing the students' cognitive and practical skills. Students will have the opportunity to
exercise their writing skills and to clearly communicate their ideas and experience. It is
compulsory for students to prepare and submit the Industrial Project Report. It must be
submitted in softcopy format to UTP SV in Week TWELVE (12) for assessment process via
Ulearn.

Students are required to submit SIT Report through plagiarism software to check on the
similarity percentage (maximum 25%).

11.1. Industrial Training Report Outline

11.1.1. Host Company’s Verification Statement (Appendix VI)
11.1.2. Non-Confidentiality Statement (if required)
11.1.3. Abstract
11.1.4. Introduction
11.1.5. Objective
11.1.6. Literature Review
11.1.7. Methodology
11.1.8. Results and Discussion
11.1.9. References and Citations

12. GENERAL WRITING FORMAT

12.1. Language
The Industrial project report must be written in acceptable and formal English.
12.2. Font and Spacing
All text should be 1.5 lines spacing between paragraphs (Times New Roman regular
font-style, size 12) written on white A4 paper on one side of each sheet.
12.3. Length
The minimum length of the report, excluding appendices is 40 pages.
12.4. Pagination
All pages must be numbered in proper sequences from Introduction to the end of the
report including pages on figures, tables and appendices. All front materials are
numbered in small Roman Numerals (e.g. i, ii, iii). Page numbers appear by
themselves and are not to be enclosed in parenthesis, hyphens or other decorative
symbols. Page number must be positioned at the bottom and centered.
12.5. Mathematical Equations
Mathematical equations must be spaced out; superscript and subscript must be clearly
shown and numbered.
12.6. Documenting Sources

Open

8
 Students are required to cite the sources from which ideas they are using. Please refer
the documentation system to be used is American Psychological Association (APA).
12.7. Margin
The top, bottom and right margin are 25 mm except the left margin which is 40 mm.
All paragraphs should start from the left margin.

13. STUDENTS’ FINAL GRADING

CDO and respective department Internship Coordinators will verify and certify the status of
the SIP undertaken by the students prior deliberating at department and/or Faculty level. The
final grades will be given as per Table 4 below:
Table 4: Grading Scheme

Score Grade Point

85.0 - 100 A 4.0
80.0 – 84.9 A- 3.75
75.0 – 79.9 B+ 3.5
65.0 – 74.9 B 3.0
55.0 – 64.9 C+ 2.5
50.0 – 54.9 C 2.0
45.0 – 49.9 D+ 1.5
40.0 – 44.9 D 1.0
00.0 – 39.9 F 0.0

Open

9
 Appendix I
SIIP-05: Requisition to Change Host
Company

Open

10
 SIIP-05

REQUISITION TO CHANGE HOST COMPANY (HC)

Student’s Name: __________________________ Student’s ID no: _________________

Programme: _____________________ _______ Period of Training: ________________

Part A : TO BE COMPLETED BY STUDENT

Secure New HC
Current HC (If yes please state HC name & Yes / No
enclose offer letter)

Recommendation by
UTP Supervisor / Yes / No
Coordinator Program

Reason(s)
Justification by UTP
Supervisor /
Coordinator Program

Signature & Official

Signature
Stamp

Date Date

Part B : TO BE COMPLETED BY HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR / REPRESENTATIVE FROM HOST COMPANY

Request approve/
Not approve
(please justify)

Name

Signature& Stamp Date

Part C : TO BE COMPLETED BY CDO

Decision Approve Not Approve

CDO Manager
Signature &
Official Stamp
Date
Note : - The form must be completed and approved two weeks before transfer internship placement

Open

11
 Appendix II
Logbook Weekly Evaluation

Open

12
 Logbook Weekly Evaluation by HOST COMPANY SUPERVISOR
Instruction to Host Company Supervisor
Please refer to the student’s Logbook Report to assess his/her performance.
Please award the scores based on the range below:

Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary

Student’s Score Score
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25) (3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)

Tasks
Partially accomplished Accomplished given Accomplished given tasks
Accomplishment & Accomplished given tasks
given tasks despite full tasks but with some with very minimum /5
Commitment but with full supervision
supervision supervision supervision
(CLO4)

Attendance & Frequently absent and Never absent and

Sometimes absent and Never absent and always on /5
Punctuality always late almost always on time
sometimes late time
(CLO4)
Occasionally Sometimes
Unable to demonstrate
demonstrated positive demonstrated positive Consistently demonstrated
Attitude & Self positive attitude and
attitude and occasionally attitude and positive attitude and /5
Control hardly maintained self-
maintained self-control maintained self- consistently maintained self-
(CLO4) control under pressure
under pressure control under pressure control under pressure

Total Score /15

Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name & Designation:

Date:

Open

13
 Appendix III
Summary of the Weekly Report Scores
(Logbook)

Open

14
SIP SUMMARY OF WEEKLY REPORT SCORES (LOG BOOK) FORM

Student’s Name: ________________________ Student no: _______ Programme: _____

Place of Training : _______________________ Period of Training: ___________

WEEK SCORE

1-2 /15

3-4 /15

5-6 /15

7-8 /15

9 – 10 /15

11 - 12 /15

13 - 14 /15

TOTAL SCORE /105

𝑻𝑶𝑻𝑨𝑳 𝑺𝑪𝑶𝑹𝑬
FINAL SCORE = × 𝟏𝟎𝟎 /100
𝟏𝟎𝟓

KINDLY SUBMIT THIS FORM WITH COMPLETE SCORES* IN ULEARN DURING WEEK 13-14.

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Name:
Designation:
Host Company’s name:
Date:
*Note: The logbook scores for all weeks will be provided by Host Supervisor. UTP Supervisor should ensure student to submit
complete logbook in Ulearn with scores up to Week 13-14 for mark entry purposes.

Open

15
 Appendix IV
FORM SIP-A-UTP & SIP-A-HC
Oral Presentation Evaluation Form

Open

16
 ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION

Student’s Name: Student ID: Programme:

Place of Training: _______________________ Period of Training: ___________

Please award the correspondent mark to each category in the box provided
CATEGORY

Score
Elements
Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary

Irrelevant project with unclear problem A sufficiently relevant project with Substantially relevant project with Extremely relevant project with
statement and brief background of sufficiently clear and concise substantially clear and concise extremely clear and concise
Background of Study, Problem Statement, Objective study. Project objectives that are background of study and problem background of study and problem background of study and relevant
& Scope of Study insufficient, immeasurable, irrelevant statement. Project objectives are statement. Project objectives are problem statement. Project objectives /10
(CLO1) and unachievable within the time sufficient, measurable, relevant and substantial, measurable, relevant and are significant, measurable, relevant
frame achievable within the time frame achievable within the time frame and achievable within the time frame
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10)
Critical analysis, relevancy & recentness of the Carried out an in-depth and up-to-date Carried out a comprehensive and up-
Content Carried out insufficient literature Carried out sufficient literature review
literature literature review and has done to-date literature review and has done
(CLO1)
review and inadequate analysis and adequate analysis
substantial analysis critical analysis
/10
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5)
(6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10)
Methodology and project activities are Methodology and project activities are Methodology and project activities are Methodology and project activities are
Methodology
insufficient, unachievable with sufficient, moderately achievable with comprehensive, achievable with comprehensive, highly achievable with
(CLO2)
inadequate methods adequate methods suitable methods extremely appropriate methods
/10
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10)
Identified milestones are sufficiently Identified milestones are mostly Identified milestones are highly
Identified milestones are unachievable
Project Activities & Key Project Milestones achievable and adequately relevant to achievable and relevant to the achievable, very satisfactory and
(CLO2)
and irrelevant to the objectives
the objectives objectives extremely relevant to the objectives
/10
(< 4)
(4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10)
Data presented is not sufficient to Sufficient data presented to meet Data presented is sufficient to meet
meet objectives, lack professional objectives but problems with objectives, presented professionally,
Major problems with presentation in presentation, significant figures are presentation, majority of significant significant figures are consistent,
content, data is poorly organized, inconsistent, figure captions are not as figures are consistent, effective figure effective figure captions used,
figures and tables are included but not effective in summarizing key results, captions used, presentation is presentation is thorough and complete
Result and Discussion
described in text, limited discussion of material is not presented in thorough, only important data with important data presented in the
Result and Discussion (CLO1)
theory or relevance of results, appropriate place, data is not critically presented, data is analyzed but does text, data is critically analyzed with
/10
deviations from literature not analyzed with respect to the theory, not link to the theory, significance of respect to the theory, significance of
discussed significance is not clear, deviations results mentioned but not clearly results is clear and deviations from
(< 4) from literature mentioned but not described, deviation from literature literature are discussed in detail
analyzed thoroughly discussed but not in sufficient detail (8 to 10)
(4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8)
Sustainability (CLO3)
Comprehensive discussion on
Discussion on • Environmental No discussion on sustainability Little discussion on sustainability Sufficient discussion on sustainability
Sustainability • Economy (<8.0) (8.0 to <13.0) (13.0 to <16.0)
sustainability /20
(16.0 to 20.0)
• Social
• Some of the conclusions are logical • Conclusions are logical, attempt to
• Conclusions are not logical or are
but are not necessarily related to relate them to objectives, attempt to • Conclusions are logical and related
completely unrelated to the
the originally stated objectives, evaluate significance and quality of to the objectives, clearly evaluate
Conclusions and Conclusions and Recommendations objectives, limited evaluation of
limited evaluation of significance results significance and quality of results
Recommendations (CLO1) significance and quality of results
and quality of results • Recommendations are clearly stated • Recommendations for future work
/10
• Recommendations are missing or
• Recommendations attempted but not justified are clearly stated and justified
irrelevant
(4 to < 6.5) (6.5 to < 8) (8 to 10)
(< 4)

Fair understanding of the subject Average understanding of the subject Good understanding of the subject Impressive understanding of the
Technical and factual accuracy; Grasp of subject
matter and answered some questions matter and answered most questions matter and answered all questions subject matter and answered all
Questions and Answers (CLO1)
with uncertainty with certainty satisfactory questions fluently and confidently
/10
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (4 to < 6.5) (8 to 10)

Open

17
 Ability to respond to questions related to industry Fair understanding of the subject Average understanding of the subject Good understanding of the subject Impressive understanding of the
sustainability matter and answered some questions matter and answered most questions matter and answered all questions subject matter and answered all
(CLO3) with uncertainty with certainty satisfactory questions fluently and confidently
/10
(< 4) (4 to < 6.5) (4 to < 6.5) (8 to 10)

Total Score /100

Additional Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Open

18
 Appendix V
FORM SIP-B-UTP
Student Industrial Internship Project
Report
Evaluation

Open

19
 FORM SIP-B-UTP

STUDENT INDUSTRIAL PROJECT REPORT EVALUATION

Student’s Name: Student ID: Programme:

Place of Training: _______________________ Period of Training: ___________

Please award the correspondent mark to each category in the box provided

Marks
Total

(%)
CATEGORY Elements
Beginning Developing Accomplished Exemplary

• Introduction
• Problem statement
Only 2 or less elements are Only 3 elements are briefly Only 4 elements are briefly All 5 elements are briefly
Abstract • Objective
briefly elaborated elaborated elaborated elaborated /5
(CLO1) • Methodology
(<2.0) (2.0 to <3.25) (3.25 to <4.0) (4.0 to 5.0)
• Results and
conclusion
Background and problem Background and problem Background and problem Background and problem
• Background of Study
Introduction statement of the project are not statement of the project are not statement of the project are statement of the project are
• Problem Statement /15
(CLO1) stated clearly described fairly described clearly described
• Scope of Work
(<6.0) (6.0 to <9.75) (9.75 to <12.0) (12.0 to 15.0)
Objectives are clearly stated and
Objectives are irrelevant to Objectives are relevant to
Objectives Objectives are vaguely relevant highly relevant to problem
Objectives problem statement problem statement /10
(CLO1) (4.0 to <6.5) statement
(<4.0) (6.5 to <8.0)
(8.0 to 10.0)
None or irrelevant literature Provide literature review but
Provide literature review and Provide literature review and
review relevant to the needs vaguely relevant to the needs
Literature Review relevant to the needs and highly relevant to the needs and
Literature Review and development of current and development of current /10
(CLO1) development of current project development of current project
project project
(6.5 to <8.0) (8.0 to 10.0)
(<4.0) (4.0 to <6.5)
• Methods and Tools
Some of the elements are not All elements are stated but not All elements are stated and fairly All elements are stated and
Methodology • Project Activities
stated justified justified strongly justified /20
(CLO2) • Gantt Chart and
(<8.0) (8.0 to <13.0) (13.0 to <16.0) (16.0 to 20.0)
Milestone
• Results Results are available with
Result do not meet project Results are available with Results are critically analysed
Results and • Discussion analysis and adequately
objectives analysis but poorly discussed with thorough discussion /15
Discussion (CLO1) discussed
(<6.0) (6.0 to <9.75) (12.0 to 15.0)
(9.75 to <12.0)

Open

20
 Sustainability
• Environmental Sufficient discussion on Comprehensive discussion on
No discussion on sustainability Little discussion on sustainability
• Economy sustainability sustainability /10
(<4.0) (4.0 to <6.5)
• Social (6.5 to <8.0) (8.0 to 10.0)
(CLO3)
Comprehensive and recent
References and Insufficient relevant references Sufficient relevant references
References and Citations No reference references with comprehensive
Citations and inadequate citation and adequate citation /5
(<2.0) citation
(CLO4) (2.0 to <3.25) (3.25 to <4.0)
(4.0 to 5.0)
• SIP Format Comply to SIP Format Guidelines Comply to SIP Format Guidelines
Do not comply to SIP Format Comply to SIP Format Guidelines
Guidelines with good English and writing with excellent English and
Others Guidelines with poor English and with poor English and writing
• Writing Skills skills with some grammatical writing skills with minimum /10
(CLO4) writing skills skills
• Grammar errors grammatical errors
(<4.0) (4.0 to <6.5)
• Report Organization (6.5 to <8.0) (8.0 to 10.0)

Total Score /100

Additional Comments:

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature & stamp:

Open

21
 Appendix VI
Host Company’s Verification
Statement

Open

22
 VERIFICATON STATEMENT

I hereby verify that this report was written by

_______________________________________________________(Student’s Name)
and all information regarding this company and the projects involved are NOT
CONFIDENTIAL / CONFIDENTIAL (strikethrough not relevant).

Host Company Supervisor’s Signature &

Stamp

Name:

Designation:

Host Company’s:

Date:

Open

23