TITLE:____________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GROUP MEMBERS: _________________________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION: _________________________________

Proposal Oral Presentation Grading Rubric

Unacceptable =
Criteria Excellent = 4 points Satisfactory = 3 points Marginal = 2 points Comments Score
0
1. Background Background and context Background and Background and Background not
of problem clearly stated context of problem context of problem included.
and discussed stated with some with minimal
discussion. discussion.
2. Problem Problem clearly stated and Problem stated with Problem stated with Problem
statement discussed. some discussion. minimal discussion. statement not
included.
3. Hypothesis The relationship between The relationship The relationship Variables are not
the variables is clearly and between the variables is between the variables included.
concisely established. not clearly and not is unclear.
concisely established.
4. Significance Significance clearly stated Significance stated with Significance implied but Significance not
and discussed. some discussion. minimal discussion. included.

5. Scope and The focus of the study The focus stated with The focus implied but The focus not
Limitation clearly stated and discussed. some discussion. minimal discussion. included.

Criteria Excellent = 4 points
6. Conceptual Conceptual framework
Framework comprehensively discussed
in relation to
purpose/aims/objectives.
7. Research Design • Project design
supports identified
problem.
• Project design is
comprehensive.
• Project design has
logical flow.
8. Variables and • Independent
Constants variable is clearly stated and the variables were
understood.
• Qualitative
dependent variable is
clearly stated.
• Minimum of 3
Quantitative dependent
variables are clearly
enumerated.
• Constants are clearly
stated.
Unacceptable =
Satisfactory = 3 points Marginal = 2 points Comments Score
0
Conceptual framework Conceptual framework Conceptual
identified. Congruency identified. Congruency framework not
between conceptual between conceptual identified.
framework framework
purpose/aims/ purpose/aims/
objectives adequately objectives poorly
articulated. articulated.
• Project design • Project design does • Project design
marginally supports not support identified not identified.
identified problem. problem.
• Project design is • Project design
sufficient but not has limited or no
comprehensive. logical flow.
• Logical flow is
inconsistent.
• Distinction between Only variables or only There was no
contants were mention of
unclear. mentioned. variables and
• Dependent variables constants.
were incomplete.
• Constants were
incomplete
 Unacceptable =
Criteria Excellent = 4 points Satisfactory = 3 points Marginal = 2 points Comments Score
0
9. Experimental • There is a clear • Distinction between Only experimental Experimental
Group VS Control distinction between the the experimental group groups are mentioned groups and
Group experimental group and and control group is or control group
control group. not very clear Only the control group were mentioned.
was mentioned.

10. Materials  Data collection tools • Data collection • Data • Data collection
comprehensively tools adequately collection tools not
described. described. tools described. described.
• Tools selected • Tools selected • Tools selected
appropriate to project relate to project poorly relate to
design. design. project design.

11. Statistical Analysis • Plan for data • Plan for data analysis • Plan for data • Plan for data
analysis appropriate appropriate to analysis analysis not
to methodology. methodology. inappropriate to included.
• Plan for data • Plan for data analysis methodology
analysis comprehensively described. • Plan for data
described. analysis poorly
described.
12. Presentation Presentation is well- Presentation is Presentation poorly Presentation
Design organized. somewhat organized. organized. disorganized.

13. Slides Slides are clear, succinct and Slides are generally clear, Slides are inconsistent Slides are unclear
demonstrate professional succinct and in clarity and quality. and poorly
quality. demonstrate adequate designed.
quality.

14. Oral Presentation Presenter has professional Presenter has Presenter has Presenter is
 Unacceptable =
Criteria Excellent = 4 points Satisfactory = 3 points Marginal = 2 points Comments Score
0
appearance and demeanor, professional appearance professional unprepared.
is well-prepared and and demeanor, is appearance and
answers questions skillfully. somewhat prepared; demeanor; is poorly
answers to questions are prepared and has
incomplete. difficulty answering
questions.
Total /56
Evaluated by: ______________________