Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mechanism
Shyh-Jiann Hwang
NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY
Outline
◼ Shear Transfer without Stirrup
I II III
wL wL
2 2
L
Shear Transfer in Uncracked Section
C. L.
VQ
v=
I
Ib
b
M + dM M
vertical
disa
he
Horizontal
jangan
Section Transformed Horizontal shear induced by
Section unbalanced normal stresses
Shear Transfer in Cracked Section (1/2)
C. L.
II ari
sugada
-
↳9
Karendcrach
↑
b M + dM M dia
Stresses in v1
v1 v2
compression d
zone:
v2 Vertical
Section Horizontal Shear Shear
Shear Transfer in Cracked Section (2/2)
daerahtar
↳
C. L.
b v4
D
T + dT T
↓
II d verbedaanselich-sebelah
kanand v4
v3 hiri
T + dT T v3
Notes for
Vertical
tension zone: Section Horizontal Shear Shear
1. Constant shear
2. Cracked concrete → no variation of normal stresses
→ no shear stress variation in concrete
3. Vertical shear can be transferred by aggregate
interlocking
Shear Transfer Through Shear Cracking Zone
serision
zone
C. L.
vc
Mat
va
-
agregat
inter
III
T + dT T
vd
vc = Shear resistance from concrete in compression
va = Shear resistance from aggregate interlocking
dM dM d (Ts jd )
V= V= = action
dx dx dx i Auch Gewarct
↑Konsta
d d
( ) ( )
↑
M = Ts jd C
=
↓
jd
dxIt
Ts +·Ts
dx
jd
servarasi
Beam
accio Konstan variab separang
gaya
,
arch
dentang
penden
-> ,
* endapatmana Momen
pada
tegangan
momen n
constanti
jd sehingga
, -
jd pada
case
49
momen arias
farunya
aamu
ricebaruan
deru
c an***""ig
jd = constant Ts = constant idevariat
d d
V = jd (Ts ) V = Ts ( jd )
dx dx
Beam Action
M + dM
dM M
V=
dx V V + dV
- Horizontal shear stress vh induced by the unbalanced
normal stresses + d
vh
- Vertical shear stress vv accompanied accordingly:
vv
vh
Beam Action in RC Beam
Flexural
N. A. cracking zone
V
T + dT T v=
bd
V V
Cc
T
V
Beam Action versus Arch Action
d ( jd )
-harena
-nare an
dTs ↑
Fidau
constan
=0 0
dx dx
Beam ◼Fixed neutral axis ◼Bond is still effective
Action ◼Elastic flexural behavior ◼Less slip
◼Less cracks
d ( jd ) dTs
0 =0
dx dx
Arch ◼Shifting neutral axis ◼Bond is destroyed
Action ◼Plastic flexural behavior ◼Large slip
tersadisti .
Vs
Nodal Equilibrium:
Cd
Cd Vs
T
T
Function of Shear Reinforcement
Ts
9
s angan
menahan
-u - -
ou and
7
d -act
.
Cd Cd Ts
senge
addre T
T
• The concrete cantilevers, which are the principal
elements of the beam mechanism, will act as tied
cantilevers
• Another bond force, T can be sustained by what
is traditionally termed as “truss action”
◼ Roleof the web reinforcement to
contribute the shear strength dimanc
↳can
ins
·
ge Funge
transfer
1. transfer shear directly-> men ada
umum
sengbang
inn
2. limiting width of diagonal crack, thus
preserving shear resistance from
aggregate interlocking
3. holding stirrup, thus enhancing
contribution of dowel action
Ts
Cd
T
Truss Analogy
V
C
T ↓engkang
T
T
C T
T
C
V
- pevietaban
C
bedan
C
transferhe W
Abawah
dan compression
ralimandgn tauk
Truss Analogy
Shyh-Jiann Hwang
NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY
Outline
◼ Truss Model for Shear
Av f s
Note: Cd
•Shift in steel tension
V
•Shear is a mechanism, in which:
1. concrete carries all shear
2. steel carries all shear
Truss Model
Ts 3. bond carries all shear
Flexure
Cc Model •Failure of either one is failure of
the entire mechanism
Concrete Carries All Shear
A V
A
a
compres
A V
E
Compression:
All shear carried by
fc concrete
A
Steel Carries All Shear
B V
B
B V
Vs Tension:
All shear
carried by steel
B
Bond Carries All Shear
V
D D
D D Joint:
T + T T
All shear carried by
Vs bond and anchorage
Diagonal
mechanism
strut force
Shear Mechanism
A B V
D D Compression: all shear
carried by concrete
A V
A B
ear beton?
,
enguangni
and gt
bondan
an
dan argam fc
I
&
Joint: all shear carried by bond A
and anchorage mechanism
D D mentator
·engtang
V s
B V
T + T T
Tension: all shear
Diagonal Vs carried by steel
strut force B
Classical Truss
Analogy
Classical Truss Analogy
A B A B
MA MB
A B V 450 d-d’
V
s s B
A
bw : web width
A B
FUA
Forces in D V
MB
z=d-d’
Concrete N
fD 45 0
V
FLA
A B
F (→ + ) = 0 Combine (2) and (3):
D cos 45 − FUA − FLA = 0 ..( 1 )
-
proyectizerhadap horizontal V
D= = f d bw z cos 45
E Akallha
D = f d bw z cos 45 ..( 2 )
sin 45
F ( + ) = 0 arpage Las ->
komponen
48° at
da
norizontally
fd =
V
.. ( 4 )
D sin 45 − V = 0 .. ( 3 ) bw z cos 45 sin 45
Forces in Stirrups (1/2)
A B
MA Fv = force per stirrup
H FUB
Fv n = no. of stirrups
Fv z
Fv s = stirrup spacing
V G
FLA z cot 45
M A + FUB z + Fv n = 0
F ( + ) = 0
2
M A Fv n cot 45
z cot 45 FUB = − −
V − nFv = 0, but n = z 2
s
Fv z cot 45 but V = n Fv
V= .. ( 5 )
s
M A V cot 45
M G (c.w. + ) = 0 FUB =−
z
−
2
..( 6 )
Forces in Stirrups (2/2)
M H (c.w. + ) = 0
A B
MA H F UB
Fv
Fv n z cot 45
Fv z M A − F LA z+ =0
V G Fv 2
FLA
M A V cot 45
FLA = + ..( 7 )
From Eq. (1): z 2
MA V
V
FLA
FUA = − + cot 45 ..( 8 )
A B
z 2
A B M A V cot 45
MA H FUB
FLA = + ..( 7 )
Fv
z 2
Fv z
V G
Fv Fv z cot 45
FLA V= ..( 5 )
s
The Use of Complete Truss Mechanism
◼ The use of complete truss mechanism :
Advantage : (1) simple and rational.
(2) takes most failure
mechanisms into account.
Disadvantage : (1) conservative. It assumes
that the complete truss mechanism has
formed. Until that happens, some
resistance can come from the concrete
itself.
Truss Analogy versus ACI 318 Code
analoge
meng ado o ↳any a
Fv z cot 450
V=
s
Vn = Vc + Vs
z d
assume Fv = Av fy V = Av f y Vs = Av f y
s s
MA V MA
FUA = − + cot 450
z 2
FUA −
z MA
M A V cot 45 0 FLA
FLA =
z
+
2
z
V
fd = 0 0 Vs 0.67 f c bw d
bw z sin 45 cos 45
Comments
=X
◼ ACI → Vn = Vc + Vs
◼ ACI modified truss analogy is an incomplete truss
mechanism. ACI believes some resistance can come
from the concrete itself
◼ ACI Chapter 21 → Vc = 0 if Ve 1 Vu , and
- 2
↓
hareno gemp Ag f c
gay"jesar Pu
20
◼ Design yield strength of shear reinforcement shall not
exceed 400 MPa to : (a) control diagonal crack width, (b)
C
an
& lapanganesh
dani 400 Mpa tapi diperhitungan tidal
Both pasang 400 MPG
,
lesin dai -
◼ ACI practice neglects the effect of shear on
moment. Instead, a “shift” in the moment
diagram due to shear is implicitly considered in
ACI cut-off provisions.
Actual Moment Diagram
including the effect of
inclined cracks (ACI
12.10.3)
Theoritical Moment
Diagram
4 . VC .
Effect of Shear on Flexural Behavior
V V
x2
M2
M1 x1
o
C
jd
T1
V
Effect of Shear on Flexural Behavior
x2
x1 Take moment about “o”:
o
C T1 jd = Vx2 = M 2
jd
hatsig
I M2 varenc
-
T1 Nis
V
T1@ x = due crach
shear
1
jd as N8 ·
d
Mn diagram Theoritical
cut-off point
Mu/f diagram
ACI 318 Code - Development of
flexural reinforcement
Mu
Mn d
f Theoritical
(d ,12d b ) cut-off point
Desain Geser
Konsep Kuat Geser
fVn Vu
Vn = Vc + Vs
Vn adalah kuat geser (shear strength)
Vu adalah gaya geser ultimit
Vc adalah kuat geser yang disumbang oleh beton
Vs adalah kuat geser yang disumbang oleh tulangan
sengkang (stirrups)
f adalah faktor reduksi untuk geser = 0.75
Kuat Geser Kontribusi Beton, Vc
Vc = Vcz + Vi + Vd
Vc = 0
Kuat Geser Kontribusi Beton, Vc
1
Vc = f cbw d
6
s 600mm
d
s
2
1 bw s bw s
Av ,min = f c
16 f yt 3 f yt
Tulangan Geser Maksimum
Vc = 0.17 f cbw d
Lokasi Penentuan Gaya Geser
Maksimum
Lokasi Penentuan Gaya Geser
Maksimum
Lokasi Penentuan Gaya Geser
Maksimum
Lokasi Penentuan Gaya Geser
Maksimum
SI 5114 – PERILAKU STRUKTUR BETON
1
Pre Test
Pmax Material Properties
f c = 20,21MPa
- f y ( D13) = 412MPa
f y ( D16) = 370,81MPa
> a
f yt ( D10) = 564,15MPa
Geometry:
b h = 250mm 420mm
d = 336mm
s = 175mm (stirrup spacing)
Question:
Can you guess what the
maximum capacity (Pmax)
of the beam is?
HINTS – sectional analysis approach
1. Calculate flexural strength, Mn = .......... kN Methars another
2. Shear corresponding to Mn, Vmn = ........ kN
- -
3. Pmax,1 corresponding to flexural strength = ...... kN
entry
,
Pmax
Vmn = Mn/525 mm
-
Pmax,1 = 2 x Vmn
525 mm 525 mm
525 mm 525 mm
-
7. Pmax,2 correspinding to shear strength = 2x Vn = 465.92 kN
Pmax = min { Pmax,1; Pmax,2 } = 465,92 kN (failed in shear) nari re
TEST RESULTS in ITB
CH13 CH14 CH15 CH16
CH17 Load Deflection Curve (B-1,5-2-0) CH18
800
700
600
Load (kN)
500
400
CH10 CH12 CH11
300 CH5 (Tulangan
CH2 (Tulangan
200 Geser 1 Leleh), Lentur 2 Leleh),
P=510.24 kN P=619.13 kN
100
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Deflection (mm)
CH2 CH3
CH6
CH4 CH5
las
pada haal besar
namon ·
ebin
1
-
e
member, sectional
analysis (Vc + Vs)
doesn’t work
are t
on
D-region B-region
controls controls
Introduction to
Strut-and-Tie Model (STM)
D Region
B Region warus menggunau
strut
A T
units
are
ri
e
Ida
D:Discontinuity, Disturbed
B:Beam, Bernoulli
Truss
Analogy
Slender Beam
• a/jd > 2.0:D and B regions
a
L
C
B Region
jd
h h
D Region D Region
D B Region in ACI
• D Region and B Region In Beam Elements
h D B D
h
D B D
We can identify:
D region (Disturbed): Load carried by arch action
B region (Beam): Load carried by truss action
Discontinuity
Geometry Disc. Force Disc.
St. Venant’s Principle
can
DH Sanders (2007)
D-Regions
D : Discontinuity, Disturbed
• An abrupt change in
geometry or loading
• Stress Disturbed
B-Regions
B : Beam, Bernoulli
• Stress Uniformly Distributed
• Plane sections assumption of
flexural theory can be applied
• Plane sections remain plane is
valid
Stress Trajectories
Review on Stress Trajectories
Stress Trajectories
Non-linear Strain Distribution
Effect of a/d ratio
1. Shear (a/d = 1.14)
2. Shear (a/d= 4.81)
Effect of a/d ratio
Effect of a/d ratio
C-C-C n = 1 .0 C-C-T n = 0 .8
Model Physical Model Physical
C-T-T n = 0 .6 T-T-T n = 0 .6
Struts
Three Types of Struts
s = 1 .0
s = 0 .75 or 0 .60
s = 0 .75 or 0 .60
Value of s
s Requirement
1.0 Uniform cross section
Asi
0.75 Satisfy: sin i 0.003 and f c 6000 psi
bs si
Asi
0.60l Not satisfy: sin i 0.003and f c 6000 psi
bs si
0.40 in tension member
Strut Boundary
Axis of Strut
γ1 As1
s2
γ2
As2
s1
Role of horizontal (web) reinf.
and vertical (stirrups) reinf.
Asi
sin i
bs si
Tie
Types of Ties
Tension ties can come from:
1. Reinforcing Steel
2. Prestressed tendons
Strut-and-Tie Model
for Deep Beam Strength
Prediction
Modeling of Deep Beam
Transfer
Beam
Test of Deep Beam in Lab
• Foster and Gilbert (1998) – NZS
b
B Fu,BC C
,AB F
d F u ↳ Strut u,
CD
Fu,AD
A Ts D
b ↓ Yes
n b
roculture
Peter
:
Art
geseinge Iwas
10 , ↓ anting
pastas konfigurat
=
erg
stressf -
va allowable coeft
~ strut :
Als toP 8
(top)
-
an
↳ Ustrut atas Acs
bot top ,
bawan (b0t)-
Acn ,
fi'l Br
↳ vstrut 10 ,05
.
at as
.
=
↳ Wood ,
Strut-and-Tie Model (STM)
ap ap
b
ws
d
jd h − ws 2 − wt 2
= tan −1 = tan −1
a
b 2 + a + a p 2
wt
b a
L
C
Solve for wt ap
fcu = 0.85 s fc
(wt = 2(h-d)) a p sin
ws C
ws cos
jd
Solve for ws wt cos Bottle-shaped
(T = C) wt b sin strut
T = As f y
b
jd = h-0.5ws-0.5wt
(b) Illustration on Acs,top (ACI 318-11)
Failure Mode 1 and 2: Crushing of Diagonal Strut
b
Vns Vns
B C
d
A D
Vns Vns
a p sin
ws C Acs ,top = a s ,top b
ws cos
jd
wt cos Bottle-shaped
b sin strut
wt T
b
a p sin
ws C Acs ,bot = a s ,bot b
ws cos
jd
wt cos Bottle-shaped
b sin strut
wt T
b
V ns = ( f ce Acs ) sin
f ce = 0 .85 s f c
Asi
bs si
sin i 0.003 s = 0 .75
Asi
bs s i
sin i 0.003 s = 0 .60
Failure Mode 3 : Yielding of Tie
b
B C
d
A D
As
V nt = ( As f y ) tan
Failure Mode 4 and 5: Crushing of Node
b
Vnn Vnn
B C
d
A D
Vnn Vnn
f ce = 0 .85 n f c
n = 1 .0
C-C-C Node
b
B C
d
A D
C-C-T Node
n = 0 .8
Controlling Shear Strength (Strut-and-Tie)
V n _ STM = min V ns ; V nt ; V nn
bottom
top bottom top
Flowchart
Experimental Verification - ACI