Enclosure No.

7
SCORING CHECKLIST FOR APPRAISING ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSALS
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS (read me):
 Fill up the information requested completely.
 Rate the research paper based on the criteria and write your comments or suggestions if you have any.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Research Title: SPIRITUAL NEEDS AND CLASSROOM BEHAVIOR ON LEARNING PERFORMANCE SELECTED

GRADE 3 – LAUAN PUPILS

School: ITAAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Proponent: _MARY JEAN S. DALUGDUG

Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions

Main low high Score Comments or
Criteria Suggestions
sub-criteria
This action proposal The educational relevance The nature, extent and
presents a general and timeliness of the salience of the identified
description of the problem or issue are problem or issue are
topic or focus of shown. The need to comprehensively 13
inquiry (5 points) conduct action research as discussed. Different
a way to address or aspects of the action
improve the situation is research setting are
Context (15 Not explained (12 points) elaborated showing in
points) described depth and critical
(no points) analysis of the situation
(15 points)

Rationale of
the Action
Research The action research The proposal outlines The rationale, extent
(30 points) proposal mentions when and where the and limitation of the
an intervention, intervention, innovation intervention, innovation
innovation or or strategy will be or strategy are explained
Proposed strategy to be tried undertaken, and who will in detail, its plausibility 13
Intervention, out to address the be involved. Activities to as a way to address the
Innovation Not problem or issue (8 be undertaken are stated problem or issue is
Strategy (15 presented points) (12 points) given support (15
points) (no points) points)

The action research The research question(s) The research question(s) 25

proposal has a stated specify the action logically proceeds from
aim, objective, or research variable(s) or the the context of the
general research focus of inquiry. Key inquiry. It clearly relates
question(s) elements of the research to the identified
(5 points) question(s) are reflected problem or issue and
Action Research Questions Not stated in the title of the proposal conveys the desired
(30points) (no points) (25 points) change of improvement
(30 points)
Main Sub- Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions Score Comments or
Criteria criteria low high Suggestions
The action research 10
proposal states the
Participants target participants
Action and/or their and/or other source Details are provided about the target participants (ex:
Research Sources of Not stated of data and number, characteristics, sampling procedure, if any)
Methods (30 Data and (no points) information (ex; and/or other sources of data and information, Clear
points) information learners, teachers, rationale for their inclusion in the study is given. (10
(10) documents, realia, points)
learners’ products,
others) (5points)
Data Not The action research Details of the data The proposal explains 10
Gathering described proposal presents a gathering method(s) are why the selected data
Method(s) (no points) general description provided: the specific gathering method(s) is
(10) of the method(s) to kinds of data, how and suited to the nature and
be employed for when they will be purpose of the action
gathering data. (5 collected (ex: test, scale, research. The data
points) survey, questionnaire, gathering method(s) is
 checklist, interview guide, aligned with the
others) (8 points) research question(s),
Research instruments, if
any are appropriate for
obtaining the desired
kind of data/information
(10 points)
Data Analysis Not stated The action research Details of the method(s) The selected method of 10
Plan (10) (no points) proposal presents a of data analysis are given. data analysis is shown
general description Techniques (ex: to be appropriate to the
of how the gathered quantitative/statistical, nature of the
data/information qualitative, or both data/information to be
will be analyzed. (5 methods), gathered and for
points) addressing the research
question(s) (10 points)

The action research A detailed workplan is provided covering start to 5

proposal includes a completion of the action research. Timelines are
Action list of major items realistic and show concretely how the action research
Work Plan and their estimated will unfold over the allowed period. The overall plan
and Not included costs. reflects the proponent’s capacity to concretize ideas
Timelines (5 (no points) into clear and sequential steps to be undertaken. (5
points) points)

Cost Not included The action research A detailed breakdown of items with their 5
Estimates (no points) proposal includes a corresponding costs is furnished. The items and costs
list of major items reasonably reflect the funding needs of the action
and their estimated research and adhere to the BERF guidelines. The
costs. The total cost overall plan reflects the proponent’s capacity to
is shown. (3 points) project specific expenses that she of he be accountable
for. (5 points)

88

Evaluated by:

MRS. MARY ANN T. CID

Co-Chairman

ANTONIO C. GAGALA PhD

Principal III
Chairman

Note to secretariat:

Decision box

Score Decision
Less than 70% Disapproved
70% or higher Approved

1. Take note of the comments and suggestions of SRC from the above scoring checklist to be listed in
the 1st column of “Response to Suggestions and Comments of SRC Committee”.