The document outlines five criteria that will be used for quality assessment of video interviews and feedback reports: 1) Video quality checks candidate visibility and audio/video clarity. 2) Feedback report quality checks include correctly filled scoring rubrics and appropriate comments. 3) Hygiene checks for delays, noise and infrastructure. 4) Candidate handling checks for professionalism and bias. 5) Proctoring checks for suspicious apps or lip-sync issues.
The document outlines five criteria that will be used for quality assessment of video interviews and feedback reports: 1) Video quality checks candidate visibility and audio/video clarity. 2) Feedback report quality checks include correctly filled scoring rubrics and appropriate comments. 3) Hygiene checks for delays, noise and infrastructure. 4) Candidate handling checks for professionalism and bias. 5) Proctoring checks for suspicious apps or lip-sync issues.
The document outlines five criteria that will be used for quality assessment of video interviews and feedback reports: 1) Video quality checks candidate visibility and audio/video clarity. 2) Feedback report quality checks include correctly filled scoring rubrics and appropriate comments. 3) Hygiene checks for delays, noise and infrastructure. 4) Candidate handling checks for professionalism and bias. 5) Proctoring checks for suspicious apps or lip-sync issues.
Following criteria/guidelines will be referred to for Quality Assessment:
1. Video Quality Check
Whether hands-on coding is present Whether candidate video is clearly visible Clarity in Interviewer’s communication Whether video duration is sufficient Is the interview properly structured 2. Feedback Report Quality Check Whether scoring rubrics is filled correctly Whether questions are filled with timeline Whether appropriate/fitting comments are filled Whether appropriate meeting and interview status are filled Relevance of the questions asked 3. Hygiene Delay in resuming an interview Background Noise Poor interviewer infrastructure 4. Candidate Handling Poor handling of candidate’s queries Asking personal questions or making personal remarks Getting into arguments Biased View Not letting candidate speak 5. Proctoring Suspicious app found Lip-sync issue noticed