GROUP ASSIGNMENT

DIPLOMA IN LAW ENFORCEMENT MANAGEMENT

INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW (DLE 2053)
TERM 0323

Team Members:

Student Name I/D No Group

Year/Semester: Year 2/Semester 4

Date:

Title:

Lecturer’s Name: Ms. Norshafikah Shazlin binti Halmi

1
 DIPLOMA IN LAW ENFORCEMENT MANAGEMENT
INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW (DLE 2053)
TERM 0323
EVALUATION FORM
GROUP PRESENTATION (MOOT COURT)
TITILE : DEFENCE IN CRIMINAL CASE (15%)

NAME OF STUDENTS : ________________________________

I.C./PASSPORT NO : ______________________________ SEMESTER : _________

GROUP : ______________________________ DATE SUBMITTED : ________

AREA MAXIMUM POINTS POINTS AWARDED

FORMAT
1. Cover page (1m)
2. Introduction of group members (1m)
3. Table of contents (1m)
4. Assignment format (1m)
a. Font and font size
b. Title 4
c. Justification and alignment
CONTENTS
1. Introduction To Case
i) Criminal background 5
ii) Who the victims? 5
iii) Type of Crime 5
iv) Chronology of Case 15
v) Defence Applied in Your Chosen Cases 5

2
 vi) Is the Defence applied in Your Chosen 10
Case?

SCRIPTS
1. Magistrate 3
2. Public presecution 3
3. Defendant 3
4. Defendant lawyer 3
5. Moderator/ witness 3

CONCLUSION
1. Your Understanding about The Defence in 3
this case (at least 3)

REFERENCES
1. Minimum 3 references using APA format 3

TOTAL POINTS 70

TOTAL MARKS ALLOCATED FOR ASSIGNMENT (AFTER DEDUCTION FOR LATE SUBMISSION)

PLAGIARISM WILL RESULT IN AN AUTOMATIC FAILURE

Marks Characteristics
Above 80 % Outstanding work which demonstrates that the student has a good grasp of
the content appropriate to the topic
70-79 % The student demonstrates above average understanding and clear grasp of
the topic.
50-69 % The student is able to cover basic subject matter but may display some
weakness, limitations in understanding and interpretation.
40-49 % The student’s performance is only just acceptable revealing some
inadequacies, weak organizing ability and limited communication skills.
<39 % The student’s performance is inadequate, has poor organizing ability and
weak communication skills.
*(Note that 5% of the total is deducted per day of delay from the due date of submission)

3
1. PRESENTATION FORMAT:
a) The presentation should be prepared using the following details:
i. Cover of the slides:
a. Goon International College’s Logo
b. Subject’s code and name
c. Title of the presentation
d. Name of the lecturer
e. Group number
f. Name of the group members
ii. Contents: as stated in Instruction.

2. LIST OF CRIMINAL CASES:

i. Muhammad Yusof bin Haji Ahmad v PP (1983) (Durres)
– https://www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-malaya/criminal-
law/mohamed-yusof-bin-haji-ahmad-v-public-prosecutor-case/22390640
– https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sjls25&div=3
5&id=&page=
– https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/sjls25&div=5
&id=&page=

ii. PP v Shalima Bi (2016) (Insanity)

- http://malaccabar.org/archives/23134
- https://www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-teknologi-mara/islamic-
evidence-law/case-review/42708006
- https://www.studypool.com/documents/11042261/criminal-law-unsound-of-
mind-public-prosecutor-v-shalima-bi-case-review
- https://bulletin.cljprime.com/?CLJBulletin;2016;7;e;

iii. Hoo Ah Tee v PP (2013) (insanity)

- https://www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-malaya/criminal-
law/abdul-razak-bin-dalek-v-pendakwa-raya-hoo-ah-tee-v-pp/21168033
- https://www.academia.edu/8676789/Defences_in_Criminal_Law_Malaysia

iv. Sulong bin Naim v PP (1947) (mistake of fact)

- https://www.scribd.com/document/329969874/CASE-STUDY-SULONG-
BIN-NAIN-v-PUBLIC-PROSECUTOR#
- https://www.powtoon.com/online-presentation/eXhTWMMOsgq/sulong-bin-
nain-v-public-prosecutor-1947-mlj-138/?mode=movie

4
 v. Abdul Razak bin Dalek v Pendakwa Raya (2011) ( Insanity)
- https://www.studocu.com/my/document/universiti-malaya/criminal-
law/abdul-razak-bin-dalek-v-pendakwa-raya-hoo-ah-tee-v-pp/21168033

vi. PP v Ali bin Umar (1982) (necessity)

- https://www.scribd.com/document/247057124/Public-Prosecutor-v-Ali-Bin-
Umar-Ors-19
- https://www.studocu.com/my/document/kolej-universiti-islam-antarabangsa-
selangor/shariah-and-law/public-prosecutor-v-ali-bin-umar/21416264

vii. Labuan Ferry Corporation Sdn Bhd v Chin Mui Kien & Ors & Another Appeal
[2017] 1 LNS 497 (necessity)
- https://www.skrine.com/insights/newsletter/december-2017/the-doctrine-of-
prime-necessity

viii. James Raj s/o Arokiasamy v Public Prosecutor [2014] (Insanity)

- https://www.elitigation.sg/gdviewer/s/2014_SGHC_10

3. ONLINE/ PHYSICAL PRESENTATION (ALL MEMBERS)

i. Presentation: Between 10 minutes and 5 member for each group
ii. Attire: formal (MAN: Tie, and formal shirt; WOMAN: Baju kurung/blouse,
proper hijab (for Muslim), tie the hair properly (for non-Muslim)
iii. Posture: you can stand or sit down during presenting your parts.

4. DATE OF PRESENTATION AND SUBMISSION:

Start on 9th November 2023 until 17th November 2023.