Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rulebook
&
Moot Proposition
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 3
3. Definitions....................................................................................................................... 3
8. Plagiarism ....................................................................................................................... 7
BACKOUT ................................................................................................................................ 8
2|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
INTRODUCTION
1. Short Title
1. These shall be called as the Rules for the 6th HPNLU Intra Moot Court Competition,
2023 (hereinafter referred to as “Competition”).
2. General Information
3. Definitions
3|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
4|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
3. Anonymity of Participants
1. The participants must be identified only by the Team code that will be allotted to them
after registration.
4. Memorial Submission
1. Each team must prepare memorials for both the parties, i.e., the
petitioner/appellant/applicant and the respondent.
2. The deadline for submission of the Soft copies of the memorials is on or before, 28th
March, 2023 11:59 P.M.
3. If the teams fail to submit the memorials by 28th March, 2023, 11:59 PM IST, 1 mark
shall be deducted for each hour.
4. If any team fail to submit their Memorials before 29th March 2023 11:59 PM, such
team shall stand ‘disqualified’ from the Competition.
5. The soft copies of the memorials shall be submitted through Google form only;
memorials submitted through any other medium shall not be entertained.
6. Each team must submit 2 (two) Hard copies of the memorials from each side by, 29th
March, 2023.
7. Memorials must contain the following:
5|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
11. A uniform citation of bluebook 20th edition shall be followed throughout the memorial,
with font size 10 & 1 line spacing.
12. The Cover Page of the Memorial must follow the following colour scheme, Blue for
the Applicant and Red for the Respondent. The cover page shall contain the following:
a. Team Code (Top right corner)
b. Name of the Court
c. Case Title
d. Identification (as to respondent/appellant).
6. Oral Rounds
1. The matchup of the teams shall be determined based on the draw of lots.
2. The teams shall be informed prior to the oral rounds, the side (i.e., Petitioner or
Respondent) for which the teams shall be presenting the arguments.
3. All the three speakers will be presenting their arguments.
4. Each team will be provided 25 minutes including rebuttal/sur-rebuttal in the oral
rounds.
5. Each speaker will argue not less than 6 minutes. One speaker will argue only one issue.
6. Each Team will be provided two minutes for rebuttal and one minute for sur-rebuttal
for their issues.
6|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
7. The ranks of the teams and individual score shall be determined on basis of the
aggregate score of pleadings and memorial marking.
8. In case of a tie in the aggregate speaker scores, then the team with a higher memorial
score shall be considered for higher rank.
8. Plagiarism
1. Plagiarism beyond 20% may lead to disqualification of the team from the competition.
2. If similar memorials are submitted by two or more than two teams, it will lead to
disqualification of such teams.
7|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
2. The participants shall adhere to the court decorum and maintain silence while a speaker
is presenting his/her arguments. Any interruption during the same would lead to
disqualification.
3. If there is any situation that is not contemplated in the rules, the organizer's decision on
the same shall be final.
BACKOUT
1. The last date for backing out is 25th March, 2023 (11:59 P.M.)
2. After that, the participants cannot back out from the competition and if they fail to
participate then it shall attract appropriate actions from the MCC, HPNLU, Shimla and
they shall be debarred in representing the University in any moot court competition for
the whole academic year.
8|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
CONTACT DETAILS
Any queries related to the Intra Moot Court Competition’ shall be directed to mcc@hpnlu.ac.in
or the below mentioned MCC Student Members:
9|Page
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
IMPORTANT DATES
10 | P a g e
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
MOOT PROPOSITION
Facts:
1. The Republic of Dakshin Pradesh is a country in South Asia. In terms of land mass, it
is the world’s fifth-largest country. However, it is the second most populous country
with more than 60% of its population working in the agriculture sector with reliance on
traditional methods of agriculture. Bound by sea on three sides i.e. east, west, south,
and the highest mountain range on its north, the country enjoys unique geographical
and ecological benefits.
2. Dakshin Pradesh gained independence from Maritania around 70 years back. The
Constitution of Dakshin Pradesh (“Constitution”) declares Dakshin Pradesh to be a
sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic, assuring its citizens of justice,
equality, and liberty. Dakshin Pradesh takes great pride in the Constitution which draws
inspiration from various countries and some international conventions.
5. In 2020, Armani Group crossed US$100 billion in market capitalization, and in 2022 it
crossed the $200 billion mark, in both cases becoming the third Dakshin Pradesh
11 | P a g e
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
conglomerate to do so, after Mandora Group and Trilient Industries. In December 2022,
it reached $280 billion (INR 24 trillion) surpassing Mandora Group. More than 60
percent of the Armani Group's revenue is derived from coal-related businesses. The
company's corporate debt totaled $30 billion in 2022.
6. In the first few weeks of 2023 there was a steep decline in the share price of the Armani
Group of companies. The decline in the share price was precipitated by a report
published by Turquoise Research on 1st January 2023.
7. This report inter alia alleges that the Armani Group of companies has manipulated its
share prices; failed to disclose transactions with related parties and other relevant
information concerning related parties in contravention of the regulations framed by
FEBDP (Financial Exchange Board of Dakshin Pradesh); and violated other provisions
of securities laws. The report also states that Turquoise Research has taken a short
position in the Armani Group companies through foreign traded bonds and non-
Dakshin Pradesh traded derivative instruments.
8. Armani subsequently lost more than $100 billion of market capitalization after alleged
fraud and market manipulation allegations by short-seller firm Turquoise Research. The
Armani Group has also attracted other controversies due to various reports of irregular
practices.
9. It was alleged in the Turquoise Research report that public money amounting to
thousands of crores is at risk because public institutions like the Federal Bank of
Dakshin Pradesh and the Jeevan Insurance Corporation of Dakshin Pradesh are exposed
to the Armani Group.
10. The Turquoise report also alleges that “the Armani Group has been in flagrant violation
of ... Rule 19A of the Securities (Regulation) Rules by surreptitiously controlling more
than 75% of the shares of public listed Armani group companies, thereby manipulating
the price of its shares in the market.” It inter alia seeks a court-monitored investigation
by a Special Investigation Team or by the Federal Bureau of Investigation into the
12 | P a g e
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
allegations of fraud and the role played by top officials of leading public sector banks
and other lender institutions.
11. On the basis of the allegations in Turquoise research report, several investor groups
filed petitions inter alia seeking the issuance of directions to the Union of Dakshin
Pradesh and the Union Ministry of Home Affairs to constitute a committee headed by
a retired judge of the Federal Court to investigate the allegations.
12. Another group of investors in a separate petition, have asked for the issuance of
directions to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs of Dakshin Pradesh to register an FIR
against Mr. Clive Loyd (the European founder of Turquoise Research) and his
associates for short selling, and for directions to recover the profits yielded by the short
selling to compensate investors.
13. FEBDP (Financial Exchange Board of Dakshin Pradesh) has placed on record a brief
note on the factual and legal aspects describing the existing statutory regime, regulatory
mechanisms and frameworks in place for the protection of investors. It has also laid out
the regulatory framework governing short selling and stated that:
a. It has adopted a disclosure based regulatory regime for both issuance of and trading
in securities. This is in line with the discontinuation of pricing control for capital issues
in favour of the principle of free discovery by the markets based on demand and supply
from informed investors; and
b. It is “strongly and adequately empowered to put in place regulatory frameworks for
effecting stable operations and development of the securities markets including
protection of investors.”
Issues:
After getting satisfied on the maintainability of the PIL, the Hon’ble Federal Court has issued
the notice to the parties and has fixed the matter for hearing on the following issues:
a. Whether the Turquoise Research Report amounts to a violation of the fundamental right of
freedom to carry on business, trade or profession of the Armani Group?
13 | P a g e
6th HPNLU INTRA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2023
b. Whether the Turquoise Research Report amounts to a violation of the national interests of
the country of Dakshin Pradesh?
c. Whether the State of Dakshin Pradesh has failed in its duty and obligation to protect and
safeguard the interests of investors of Dakshin Pradesh?
Notes:
A. The parties are allowed to raise and plead the additional issues incidental to the facts of the
moot proposition.
B. The Petitioner shall present arguments on behalf of investors and the Respondent shall
present arguments on behalf of the Union of Dakshin Pradesh.
C. The national and international laws, policies, obligations/ commitments (inter alia relating
to Constitution, Securities Laws, Banking Laws of Dakshin Pradesh are pari materia to that of
Republic of India. Parties are independent to cite case laws from Indian Courts as persuasive
precedent.
Disclaimer: This case is purely fictional. Any resemblance to names, properties and
associations is purely coincidental.
14 | P a g e