To,

The Registrar/Director/Principal/Convener

Dear Sir/Ma’am

Amity Law School Lucknow takes a great honour in extending an invitation to your revered
institution to participate in its annual mooting event, the 11th Amity National Moot Court
Competition 2018, to be held from March 22 till March 24, 2018.

The competition aims at providing a first hand exposure to the practical aspects of the
legal profession to the students participating in the event.

We request you for an active participation of your institution in the competition. Please
find enclosed herewith the requisite details of the event.

Thanking you,

Yours Sincerely,

Prof. Balraj Chauhan Mudra Singh

Director Convener
Th
Amity Law School 11 Amity National Moot
Lucknow Court Competition
 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE 11TH AMITY NATIONAL MOOT
COURT COMPETITION, 2018

1. Definition

a. Administrator/Organizers Committee/Moot Court Committee mean Amity Law School,

Lucknow Campus.
b. Participating team means the team which has registered itself for the competition as per the
rules of registration given below.
c. Participating College/University/Institution shall be presumed as the parent institution of the
participating team.
d. All the rules are only inclusive and not exhaustive for the competition.
e. Rules should be strictly adhered to. Any deviation wherefrom would attract disqualification.
f. All decisions by the organizers in case of any disputes/doubts, etc. will be final. The
organizers may make such rules and procedures or chance any such rules and procedure at
any point of time, as it deems fit.
g. Imposition of penalties including disqualification rests solely with the organizers in case of
failure to comply with the rule(s) and deadline(s).
h. All the E-Mails shall be sent to contact.amitynational@gmail.com. No alternate address
shall be used for any communication, whatsoever.

2. Registration

a. The Institutions/teams should register themselves by sending an email to:

contact.amitynational@gmail.com latest by February 02, 2018.
b. Reporting at registration desk Timing: 9:00 am to 10:00 am on March 22, 2018 at the
venue of the Competition.

Note: 8 hard copies (4 copies for Petition and 4 copies for Respondent) of the Memorials shall be
submitted to the organizers at the time of reporting to the venue.

3. Payment

Institutions/teams must send (via Courier/ Speed Post/ Registered Post) the filled in Registration Form,
Travel Forms and Demand Draft of ₹ 4500 (per team) in favour of Amity University Uttar Pradesh,
payable at Lucknow latest by February 16 , 2018.
 4. Address of the Venue

The Hard Copies of filled in Registration Form, Travel Plan, Demand Draft (DD) and each Memorials
has to be sent at the following address latest by.

Ms. Mudra Singh

Assistant Professor
Amity Law School

Amity University, Mango Orchard Campus

Near Malhaur Railway Station, Gomti Nagar Extension,
Lucknow–226028 (Uttar Pradesh)

5. Accommodation, Food and Transport

a. Accommodation, food and transport to the participating teams will be provided by the
Organizer in the college campus itself. No other place of stay shall be provided from the
st
afternoon of March 21 till the forenoon (12:00 Noon) of March 25, 2018. The teams
must bring along a maximum of three (3) members. Any additional member shall not be
entertained during the competition.
b. The participants must abide by the rules and regulation observed in the campus and the
hostel, non-compliance with which may lead to disqualification.

Note: Intake/use/mere possession of any prohibited substance (e.g. cigarette/alcohol/narcotic substance)

is strictly prohibited during the stay throughout the competition, non-compliance with which may lead to
immediate disqualification.

6. Dress Code

The team should adhere to the Dress Code of the competition:

Female(s): Black Western or Indian Formals (Black and White).

Male(s): Black Western Formals.

7. Language
The official language is English.
 8. Team Composition & Eligibility

a. Student pursuing 3 years or 5 years of LL.B. Degree in the academic year 2015-16 from
any recognized Law School/College/University in the territorial boundaries of India are
eligible to participate.
b. Any recognized Law School/College/University in India shall be entitled to send only one
team to the competition.
c. Each team shall consist of a minimum of two (2) and maximum of three (3) members.
Team comprises of two speakers and one researcher. Teams shall identify such speakers
and researcher during the on campus registration. In case of a two-member team, single
person act as a Speakers and the researcher.
d. No additional team member other than the above three shall be entertained.
e. Each team will have a team code (designated during draw of lots). Each Team shall be
assigned a Team Number selected by the Organizing Committee shall use their Team
Numbers for identification purposes. Names of participants or their colleges may not
appear on or within the Written Submissions. Signature pages are prohibited.
f. Teams shall not disclose their identity or that of their institution. However, the speakers
can disclose their names only to the bench during the oral arguments.

9. Structure

The competition oral rounds shall be held over a period of 3 days i.e. March 22 to March 24, 2018. The
competition shall consist of four (4) rounds: The Preliminary rounds, the Quarterfinal rounds, the Semi
Final rounds and the Final rounds.

a. Draw of lots

The Draw of lots for determining the site for which the teams shall be arguing shall be conducted on
March 22, 2018. Each team will be provided with a Team Code randomly by picking chits once they
report at the venue. Also, each team shall be assigned a side (petitioner/respondent) based on the chit it
picks during the draw of lots. Fixtures of the teams will be predetermined based on the team codes.

b. Preliminary Rounds

Each team shall represent both the sides as Petitioner and Respondent consecutively in the preliminary
round.
Top eight (8) scoring teams of the preliminary round shall proceed to the quarterfinals. Quarterfinal rounds
will be the knock out rounds. The sides of the teams and the fixtures shall be determined by draw of lots. The
winners will be decided on the basis of courtroom win among the teams participating in this round.

d. Semi Finals

The winners of each courtroom fixture (four teams) of the quarterfinal rounds shall proceed to the semi-
finals. The Semi-finals will again follow the knock out fashion.

e. Final Round

The winner of each courtroom fixtures (two teams) at the semi-final rounds shall be the finalists.

f. Tie Breaking Procedure

If at any point during the conduct of competition there is a tie, then the team with the higher memorial
score shall be taken into consideration for qualifying into the next round; and in case of any further tie the
researcher test score or preliminary rounds score will be taken into consideration.

10. Format of Written Submissions

a. All Written Submissions (also referred to as memo/memorandum/memorial) must conform

to the general requirements laid down herein. Individuals will be penalized for failure to
abide by these requirements.
b. Written Submissions must be typed and reproduced on white standard A4 paper (21 x
29 3/4 centimetres).
c. The font and size of the text of all parts of the Written Submission (except the cover
page), must be in Times New Roman 12-point. Footnotes shall be in Font size 10.
d. Teams shall cite authorities in the Memorial using footnotes following the Harvard
Bluebook 19th Edition. Explanatory or illustrative footnotes are not allowed.
e. The line spacing of the text for all parts of the Written submission must be set at 1.5
spacing, except that:

i. The text of footnotes and two separate footnotes may be single-spaced (1.0
spacing), but there must be double-spacing between each heading and the body-text
of the Memorial.
 a. Parts of the Written Submission

The Written Submission shall consist of the following parts:

1. Cover Page
2. Table of Contents
3. List of Abbreviations
4. Index of Authorities (with page number where the authority has been cited)
5. Statement of Jurisdiction
6. Statement of Facts (not exceeding 2 pages)
7. Statement of Issues
8. Summary of Arguments (not exceeding 2 pages)
9. Arguments Advanced (not exceeding 23 pages)
10. Prayer (not exceeding 1 page)

b. Cover Page

Each Memorial shall have the following and only the following on its cover page:

1. The team code on the upper right hand corner of the cover page
2. The name and place of the forum
3. The relevant legal provision under which it is filed
4. Name of parties and their status
5. Memorial Filed on Behalf of
It is further clarified that. The Organizing Committee reserves the right to refuse acceptance of any
memorial which is in violation of any of the norms. Further, the cover page should be printed in the same
paper used to print the remainder of the memorial. Participating team shall not include their name or
their institution’s name anywhere in the memorial so prepared for the competition.
Colour of the cover page must be:
Blue in case of Petitioner/Applicant
&
Red in case of Defendant/Respondent

The colour of the cover page shall compulsorily be Red and Blue (as the case may be) and no other variant
of the colour shall be used.

c. Index of Authorities

Each Written Submission shall include an “Index of Authorities.” The Index of Authorities shall contain a
list of all legal authorities cited in any section of the Written Submission.
This list shall include a description of each authority adequate to allow a reasonable reader to identify and
 d. Statement of the Facts

Each Written Submission shall include a full “Statement of the Facts.” The Statement of the Facts shall be
limited to the stipulated facts and necessary inferences from the problem and any clarifications to the same.
The Statement of the Facts must not include unsupported facts, distortions of stated facts, argumentative
statements, or legal conclusions.

e. Summary of the Arguments

Each Written Submission shall include a “Summary of the argument.” The Summary of the Pleadings shall
consist of a substantive summary of the “arguments” section of the Written Submission in paragraph form,
rather than a simple reproduction of the headings contained in the argument section.

f. Pleadings & Prayer

The pleadings shall contain the substantive arguments with appropriate citations. The teams must endeavor to
follow a uniform method of citation. The prayer shall be the effective remedies requested in the pleadings.

g. Compendium

All participating teams have the option of making compendium other than memorials. The compendium
may contain all relevant provisions of law and photocopies of important judgments cited if any. There can
be no arguments/argumentative interpretation of facts/judgments in the compendium. Any such arguments
will be disregarded and shall result in penalization of points. The compendium may be presented to the
judges for further reference and clarity of argument presented by the speaker.

h. Length

The “Pleadings” section include: Summary of arguments, Written Submission (Detailed Arguments),
including footnotes and the Prayer may have no exceed more than 26 pages. Exceeding the stated limit shall
attract a penalty of marks for every page exceeded.

i. Margins

Each page of the Written Submissions (regardless of content) shall have margins of at least one inch (1”), or
two point five four centimetres (2.45 cm), on all sides, excluding page numbers.

j. Binding
As Amity promotes eco – friendliness, written submissions must be fastened by stapling or stitched on the
left hand side of the pages. No other type of binding is permitted.

k. Plagiarism

Participants must refrain from using same language or copying from other’s memorials and other sources.
Even use of publicly available information must be accompanied by proper citations. These rules shall apply
to all parts of the memorial and not just the Pleadings and Prayer. A failure to comply with this rule may
result in the guilty participants being debarred from mooting in this academic year. The Organizing
Committee in consultation with the memorial judges will take a final decision regarding determination of
cases of plagiarism and penal measures for such action.

l. Changes in Soft Copy

An attempt at sending a different version or shortened or corrected version of your pleadings as soft copy will
result in disqualification from the selection process for the academic year. The Organizing Committee shall only
take all decisions of disqualification after providing a hearing to the participants concerned. Hearing may be
allowed in case of deduction of marks also if demanded by the affected participant(s) in writing.

m. Condonation of Delay

Delay in submission of memorials will not be condoned on grounds like failure of printer, traffic jams, etc.
However, the Moot Court Committee shall have final discretion in case of application for condonation of
delay. The MCC shall act as the sole decision making body in this regard and no single decision will have
precedent value and shall not bind the Society. Decisions could range from full condonation, to reduction of
penalty and also refusal to condone the delay.

12. Team Members

During each Oral Round, one additional Team member may sit at the counsel table with the two Speakers.
The person sitting shall be one of the Team members registered.

13. Competition Communications

Oral communications during the Oral Round shall be strictly limited to the following. Any Team which
engages in communications not listed in this Rule shall be penalized.

14. Competition Scoring

 a. Evaluation of Rounds

Scoring of Rounds shall be solely based on the oral argumentation skills of the designated speakers of
a particular team. Each Oral Round will be scored by a panel of two or more judges.

b. Evaluation of Memorial

Every Memorial will be marked on scale of 100.

c. Criteria for Evaluation

The Memorial & speakers would be evaluated according to the following criteria

Knowledge of Law and Facts 20 Marks

Proper and Articulate Analysis 15 Marks
Depth and Use of Research 15 Marks
Organization and Presentation 15 Marks
Grammar and Language 10 Marks
Novelty of Arguments 15 Marks
Clarity of Thought and Originality 10 Marks
Grand Total 100 Marks

15. Researchers’ Test

a. The Researchers’ Test shall be conducted on Day 1 of the Competition.

b. The test shall be for duration of thirty (30) minutes only. The test will be based on MCQs
(Multiple Choice Questions).
c. If a team comprises of three (3) members, then ONLY the Researcher is eligible to take the
test. Researcher test marks will NOT be added up in the marking criteria.
d. If a team comprises of two members then one of the two members shall be eligible to take the
test. However, the team must notify the organizers as to which of the two team members shall
take the test.
NOTE: Participants are not allowed to carry/use any study material during the researcher’s test.

16. Scouting

Scouting shall be deemed to have happened if the speakers, researcher or any other person affiliated with
a team is found:

a. Witnessing, hearing, observing, etc. The oral submissions in a Round, except where the
Round is one in which the team to which he/she is affiliated is participating in; or
 b. Reading a Memorial of a team except where: it is of the team to which he/she is affiliated; or
the Memorials have been obtained on account of an exchange of Memorials prior to a
Round of the team to which he/she is affiliated.

17. Disclaimer

The Material in the competition case study is not intended to and does not attempt to resemble any incident
or any person living or dead. All material in the case study is fictitious and any resemblance to any incident
or person, if any, is not intended, but merely coincidental.

18. Awards*

a. The team with the maximum score in the final round will be declared as the “Winning Team”
and the team with the second highest score in the final round will be declared as the
“Runners up Team”.
b. The speaker with the maximum scores in the Preliminary Rounds will be declared the “Best
Mooter”.
c. The team with the maximum Memorial scores will be awarded “The Best Memorial”.
d. The researcher scoring the highest marks in the researcher test will be awarded “Best
Researcher”.

*Certificates shall be issued to all the participants.

19. Contacts

The following persons can be contacted in the event of any query or clarification relating to any information
released in the brochure or any detail related to the competition or email us to
contact.amitynational@gmail.com.

Student Convener.

Nalin Mishra – (+91 8052851111)

(+91 8416821111)
Medha Singh – (+91 9565596691)
XI AMITY NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018

AMITY LAW SCHOOL, LUCKNOW

MOOT PROPOSITION

Disclaimer: The contents of this moot problem are entirely fictional and do not in any way aim to
hurt the sentiments or degrade the values and ideologies of any group of people, religion or
individual. This problem is drafted for the purpose of National Moot Court Competition to be held
at the Amity Law School, Lucknow Campus of Amity University Uttar Pradesh.

MOOT PROPOSITION

1. The Union of Indiana is located in the South Asian Region of Asia which is one of the ancient
nations in the world. It is a democratic country with a written Constitution and having 29 States
including the State of Uttam Pradesh and 7 Union Territories.

2. Earlier, in Indiana, various identity proofs were required for access to government benefits,
subsidies and services, such as a ration card, driving license or voter id. However, as these
proofs could be easily duplicated or forged, there was leakage of benefits and subsidies to
ineligible beneficiaries. The Janaadhaar project was initiated in 2009 to address these
problems. It was envisaged as a biometric-based unique identity number that could help in
identifying eligible citizens. It was thought to be a more reliable identity proof, because it
 sought to authenticate a citizen’s identity based on his unique biometrics, like fingerprints and
iris scans.

3. In 2016, Parliament enacted the Janaadhaar Act, 2016 to provide legislative backing to the
project. This Act allowed Janaadhaar to be used for authentication purposes by the central and
state governments, as well as by private bodies and citizens, it was also made mandatory for
everyone to register himself under the Act and possess Janaadhaar number. Under its provisions
Janaadhaar was made mandatory for government services and to avail benefits of various
government welfare schemes including LPG subsidies. In addition to it, Parliament has recently
passed the Finance Act to amend the Income Tax Act, 1961, and made Janaadhaar mandatory
for filing of income tax returns, and applying for PAN. The main aim of this policy was to
check the leakage in government schemes and to prevent corruption happening in PDS and
other subsidy providing schemes of the government and diversion of public resources to those
who are ineligible. Basically, the philosophy behind this policy is ‘Zero Tolerance for
Corruption’.

4. The process of collecting the information for identification, citizens of Indiana are required to
submit their biometric information (photograph, 10 fingerprints, scans of both irises), and
demographic information (name, date of birth, gender, residential address) to the Unique
Identification Authority of Indiana (UIDAI). The Janaadhaar number, the demographic and
biometric information (called identity information) are stored together in the Central Identities
Data Repository. In addition, every time a citizen’s identity is authenticated using Janaadhaar,
information related to the authentication request is also recorded.

5. The UIDAI has been made responsible for the operation and maintenance of the Janaadhaar
database and for laying down the security protocols for its protection.

6. The Petitioner, Ms. Medha Singh, filed a PIL challenging the policy of mandatory Janaadhaar
cards in the High Court of Uttam Pradesh, on following grounds with a request that it should be
struck down as unconstitutional:
a) The collection of identity data without adequate safeguards interferes with the fundamental
right to privacy and personal liberty protected under Article 21 of the Constitution which
guarantees right to life and personal liberty. The data collected by government is not safe
and it can be leaked to private entities very easily threatening the life and liberty of the
citizens. Recently one incident has been reported where data of 13 crore citizens has been
leaked from Janaadhaar database and now is in the hands of some private companies and is
being used for telemarketing.

b) Parliament enacted the Janaadhaar Act, 2016 and through various notifications made
thereunder Janaadhaar has been made mandatory for availing benefits of various
government schemes and services, which citizens are entitled to under law, and this makes
it questionable. Seriousness of the situation can be understood by the fact that in such a short
span of time many malpractices involving huge amount of money with regard to LPG
subsidies of ignorant citizens in blatant violation of UIDAI norms are coming into light.

c) In 2017, Janaadhaar was made mandatory for filing of tax returns and applying for PAN
under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and required that if a citizens failed to link his/her PAN
with the Janaadhaar number by a date notified by the central government, his/her PAN will
be invalidated. As per the justification of the government this will decrease the problem of
multiple PAN cards obtained under fictitious names and consequent tax fraud and tax
evasion, because Janaadhaar will ensure proper identification. However, this may interfere
with a citizen’s fundamental right to equality and their right to practice any profession, trade
or business which is enshrined in Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) respectively.

d) The Janaadhaar Act was passed as a Money Bill. A Money Bill only needs to be passed by
Lok Sabha, while Rajya Sabha may make non-binding recommendations on it. In case of the
 Janaadhaar Act, Rajya Sabha made some recommendations that were rejected by Lok
Sabha. Questions have been raised that Janaadhaar Act does not meet the constitutional
requirements of Money Bill mentioned in Article 110, because it contains provisions
unrelated to government taxation and expenditure. Hence, the manner in which it has been
passed attaches voice of unconstitutionality.

7. Matter was heard by the High Court of Uttam Pradesh and it was held that Janaadhaar scheme
and Act are invalid on the touchstone of constitutional provisions and ultimately gave the
verdict in favour of the petitioner stating that through linking up of Janaadhaar with bank
accounts, mobile connections and other day to day transactions will certainly improve
transparency but on the other hand there is no effective machinery to keep a close and strict
check to prevent the hacking and misuse of information given by the public.
8. The government moved to the Supreme Court challenging the Judgment of the High Court of
Uttam Pradesh. In the meanwhile, Nalin Mishra, a journalist associated with News Network 24,
conducted a sting operation on UIDAI in which he claimed that it was possible to obtain two
separate Janaadhaar enrollment numbers or even the Janaadhaar cards with the same set of
biometrics, questioning the authenticity of security system of UIDAI.

9. The report claimed that the system can be breached easily and ended with the statement that it
was not safe to link anything with Janaadhaar. UIDAI has served a defamation notice on the
aforesaid news agency stating the sting operation to be fake and also claimed that it was a trail
by media when the matter was already in the court. The agency on the other hand is arguing that
it only wanted the public to be aware and was doing their duty. The highest standard of
 protection of data and secrecy has not been put in place to ensure that there is no leakage. It is a
matter of great concern which many citizens and civil society groups have expressed.
10. While all this was going on, two students of Indiana University, Aman Srivastava and Tanya
Kumari hacked the UIDAI server and pulled out data from it for their own app. They gained
access to the data through the Digital India e-hospital initiative of the Ministry of Electronics
and Information Technology. FIR was lodged against them and during investigation it was
found that they hacked into the server of e-hospital system and used to send verification
requests to the UIDAI database for their own app. The UIDAI system gave permission to access
because the authentication requests were coming from the e-hospital system.
11. A case of cybercrime under the Information Technology Act was filed against them for leaking
the private data of more than 50,000 individuals. The students argued that the data was not
protected and was easily accessible and they did it just to prove that the UIDAI servers are not
fully equipped with security system to protect its data. There was outrage for such easy leak of
data in the public against the government and its policy of Janaadhaar as, after the introduction
of their scheme, the Janaadhaar related fraud cases have increased manifold.
12. The Supreme Court sensing the urgency of the matter suo moto took cognizance of all the cases
and clubbed them together and posted for a hearing on 23rd March, 2018.

NOTE: All the Laws of Union of Indiana are same as that of India. The participants can raise
any other issue relevant and mandatory to this issue of Janaadhaar cards of Indiana in the
light of Aadhar cards in India.
 IMPORTANT DATES

EVENT DEADLINES
Release of Proposition and Registration Begins 05th January 2018

Soft Copy Submission of Registration Form, DD and 02nd February 2018.

Traveling Plans
Hard Copy Submission of Registration Form, DD and 09th February 2018
Traveling Plans.
Soft Copy Submission of Memorials 02nd March 2018.

09th March 2018

Hard Copy submission of Memorials.

Registration ,Inaugural, Draw of Lots, Memorial 22ndMarch 2018

Exchange.
23rd March 2018
First & Second Prelims Round.

Quarter Finals, Semi-Final Rounds & Final Round. 23rd & 24th March 2018
Valedictory Ceremony.

All hard copies of registration form, DD, travel plan should be sent to :
Ms. Mudra Singh
Assistant Professor
Amity Law School
Amity University, Mango Orchard Campus
Near Malhaur Railway Station, Gomti Nagar
Extension Lucknow – 226028 (Uttar Pradesh)
 REGISTRATION FORM
Name of the College: _______________________________________________

________________________________________________________
Email id of Moot Court Committee_______________________________
Speaker 1:
Name____________________________________________
Self-Attested
Year, Course: _________________ Gender: _____________
Photograph
Email Id: ____________________________________
Contact No: _______________________________________

Speaker 2:
Name____________________________________________
Year, Course: _________________ Gender: _____________
Self-Attested
Email Id: _________________________________________ Photograph
Contact No: ______________________________________

Researcher:
Name____________________________________________
Year, Course: _________________ Gender: _____________
Email Id: _________________________________________
Self-Attested
Contact No: _______________________________________ Photograph

THE SPEAKER AND THE RESEARCHER ARE THE BONAFIDE STUDENTS

OF THE COLLEGE. (BY SENDING THIS REGISTRATION FORM, THE
PARTICIPANTS AGREE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULES OF THE
COMPETITION)

Signature & Seal of the Head of the

Institution
 TRAVEL PLAN- ARRIVAL
Name of the College:

Speaker 1:

Date of Arrival
Mode (Train/Airways/Bus)
(Train/Airways/Bus) Number
Time of arrival of Train/Airways/Bus
Other Details (e.g. Name of Airline, Bus Service Etc.)
Speaker 2:

Date of Arrival

Mode (Train/Airways/Bus)

(Train/Airways/Bus) Number

Time of arrival of Train/Airways/Bus

Other Details (e.g. Name of Airline, Bus Service Etc.)

Researcher:

Date of Arrival
Mode (Train/Airways/Bus)
(Train/Airways/Bus) Number
Time of arrival of Train/Airways/Bus
Other Details (e.g. Name of Airline, Bus Service Etc.)
 TRAVEL PLAN- DEPARTURE
Name of the College:

Speaker 1:

Date of Departure
Mode (Train/Airways/Bus)
(Train/Airways/Bus) Number
Time of departure of Train/Airways/Bus
Other Details (e.g. Name of Airline, Bus Service Etc.)
Speaker 2:

Date of Departure

Mode (Train/Airways/Bus)

(Train/Airways/Bus) Number

Time of Departure of Train/Airways/Bus

Other Details (e.g. Name of Airline, Bus Service Etc.)

Researcher:

Date of Departure
Mode (Train/Airways/Bus)
(Train/Airways/Bus) Number
Time of Departure of Train/Airways/Bus
Other Details (e.g. Name of Airline, Bus Service Etc.)
Chief Patron

Mr. Aseem Chauhan

Chancellor AUR
Chairman Amity University - Lucknow Campus

Patron

o Major General K.K. Ohri AVSM (Retd.)

Pro Vice Chancellor, Amity University – Lucknow Campus

o Prof. Balraj Chauhan

Director, Amity Law School
Amity University- Lucknow Campus

o Mr. Naresh Chandra

Mentor, Amity Law School
Amity Universirty- Lucknow Campus

o Prof. Balraj Chauhan

Dy. Director, Amity Law School, Lucknow Campus

Organizing Committee

o Faculty

Ms. Mudra Singh -Convener

Assistant Professor

Mr.Ashutosh Shukla -Member

Assistant Professor

Mr.Ankit Srivastava - Member

Assistant Professor

Ms. Taru Mishra -Member

Assistant Professor