Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(a)
P
Kinematic Indeterminacy. Once the elements and nodes have
9 4 1 7 been identified, and the global coordinate system has been established, the
8 5 2 6 degrees of freedom for the beam and its kinematic determinacy can be
determined. If we consider the effects of both bending and shear, then each
1 2 3 3 4 node on a beam can have two degrees of freedom, namely, a vertical
1 2 3
displacement and a rotation. As in the case of trusses, these linear and
(a) rotational displacements will be identified by code numbers. The lowest
code numbers will be used to identify the unknown displacements
D4 D1
D5 (unconstrained degrees of freedom), and the highest numbers are used to
identify the known displacements (constrained degrees of freedom). Recall
D2 D3 that the reason for choosing this method of identification has to do with the
(b) convenience of later partitioning the structure stiffness matrix, so that the
Fig. 15–2 unknown displacements can be found in the most direct manner.
To show an example of code-number labeling, consider again the con-
tinuous beam in Fig. 15–1a. Here the beam is kinematically indeterminate
to the fourth degree. There are eight degrees of freedom, for which code
numbers 1 through 4 represent the unknown displacements, and numbers
5 through 8 represent the known displacements, which in this case are all
zero. As another example, the beam in Fig. 15–2a can be subdivided into
three elements and four nodes. In particular, notice that the internal hinge
P at node 3 deflects the same for both elements 2 and 3; however, the
8 12 4 6
rotation at the end of each element is different. For this reason three code
9 3 5 7
numbers are used to show these deflections. Here there are nine degrees
1 2 3 4 of freedom, five of which are unknown, as shown in Fig. 15–2b, and four
1 2 3
known; again they are all zero. Finally, consider the slider mechanism
(a) used on the beam in Fig. 15–3a. Here the deflection of the beam is shown
in Fig. 15–3b, and so there are five unknown deflection components
D1
labeled with the lowest code numbers. The beam is kinematically
D2 D4
D3 indeterminate to the fifth degree.
D3 D5 Development of the stiffness method for beams follows a similar
procedure as that used for trusses. First we must establish the stiffness
(b)
matrix for each element, and then these matrices are combined to
Fig. 15–3 form the beam or structure stiffness matrix. Using the structure
15.2 BEAM-MEMBER STIFFNESS MATRIX 577
Fig. 15–4
œ
y Displacements. When a positive displacement dNy¿ is imposed
while other possible displacements are prevented, the resulting shear
forces and bending moments that are created are shown in Fig. 15–5a.
In particular, the moment has been developed in Sec. 11–2 as Eq. 11–5.
Likewise, when dFy¿ is imposed, the required shear forces and bending
moments are given in Fig. 15–5b.
y¿ y¿
12EI d
qFy¿ _____ Fy¿
12EI d L3
qNy¿ _____ Ny¿
6EI d
qFz¿ ____ Ny¿
6EI d
qNz¿ ____
L3 L2 L2
Fy¿
dNy¿ dFy¿
x¿ x¿
6EI d
qNz¿ ____ 12EI d
qFy¿ _____ 12EI d
qNy¿ _____ 6EI d
L2
Ny¿
Ny¿ Fy¿ qFz¿ ____ Fy¿
L3 L3 L2
y¿ displacements
(a) (b)
Fig. 15–5
578 CHAPTER 15 B E A M A N A LY S I S U S I N G THE STIFFNESS METHOD
y¿ y¿
6EI d
6EI d qFy¿ ____
qNy¿ ____ 6EI d Fz¿
Nz¿
dNz¿
2EI d qNy¿ ____ Fz¿ L2
L2 qFz¿ ____ L2
L Nz¿
x¿ x¿
4EI d 2EI d
qNz¿ ____ 6EI d
qFy¿ ____ qNz¿ ____ 4EI d
qFz¿ ____
L Nz¿ Nz¿ L Fz¿ dFz¿ L Fz¿
L2
(a)
Fig. 15–6
Here Q and D are column matrices that represent both the known and
unknown loads and displacements. Partitioning the stiffness matrix into
the known and unknown elements of load and displacement, we have
c d = c 11 dc d
Qk K K12 Du
Qu K21 K22 Dk
ⴝ
L
actual loading
(a)
wL
___ wL
___
2 2 wL
___ w wL
___
2 2
ⴙ
2 2 2 2
wL
____ wL
____ wL
____ wL
____
12 12 12 12
15 fixed-end actual loading and
element loading reactions on fixed-
on joints supported element
(b) (c)
Fig. 15–7
Member Forces. The shear and moment at the ends of each beam
element can be determined using Eq. 15–2 and adding on any fixed-end
reactions q0 if the element is subjected to an intermediate loading.
We have
q = kd + q0 (15–5)
If the results are negative, it indicates that the loading acts in the opposite
direction to that shown in Fig. 15–4.
15.4 APPLICATION OF THE STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAM ANALYSIS 581
Notation
• Divide the beam into finite elements and arbitrarily identify each
element and its nodes. Use a number written in a circle for a node
and a number written in a square for a member. Usually an element
extends between points of support, points of concentrated loads,
and joints, or to points where internal loadings or displacements are 15
to be determined. Also, E and I for the elements must be constants.
• Specify the near and far ends of each element symbolically by
directing an arrow along the element, with the head directed
toward the far end.
• At each nodal point specify numerically the y and z code
numbers. In all cases use the lowest code numbers to identify all
the unconstrained degrees of freedom, followed by the remaining
or highest numbers to identify the degrees of freedom that are
constrained.
• From the problem, establish the known displacements Dk and
known external loads Qk. Include any reversed fixed-end loadings
if an element supports an intermediate load.
EXAMPLE 15.1
Determine the reactions at the supports of the beam shown in
Fig. 15–8a. EI is constant.
5 kN
2m 2m
(a)
Fig. 15–8
15
SOLUTION
Notation. The beam has two elements and three nodes, which are
identified in Fig. 15–8b. The code numbers 1 through 6 are indicated
such that the lowest numbers 1–4 identify the unconstrained degrees of
freedom.
The known load and displacement matrices are
0 1
-5
Dk = c d
2 0 5
Qk = D T
0 3 0 6
0 4
5 kN
6 5 2
4 3 1
1
1 2 2 3
(b)
6 4 5 3 5 3 2 1
1.5 1.5 -1.5 1.5 6 1.5 1.5 -1.5 1.5 5
k1 = EI 1.5 2 -1.5 1 4 k2 = EI 1.5 2 -1.5 1 3
D T D T
-1.5 -1.5 1.5 - 1.5 5 - 1.5 -1.5 1.5 - 1.5 2
1.5 1 -1.5 2 3 1.5 1 - 1.5 2 1
15.4 APPLICATION OF THE STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAM ANALYSIS 583
0 = 2D1 - 1.5D2 + D3 + 0
5
- = - 1.5D1 + 1.5D2 - 1.5D3 + 0
EI
0 = D1 - 1.5D2 + 4D3 + D4
0 = 0 + 0 + D3 + 2D4
Solving,
16.67
D1 = -
EI
26.67
D2 = -
EI
6.67
D3 = -
EI
3.33
D4 =
EI
Using these results, and multiplying the last two rows, gives
Q6 = 0 + 0 + 1.5EI a - b + 1.5EI a b
6.67 3.33
EI EI
= - 5 kN Ans.
584 CHAPTER 15 B E A M A N A LY S I S U S I N G THE STIFFNESS METHOD
EXAMPLE 15.2
Determine the internal shear and moment in member 1 of the
M0
compound beam shown in Fig. 15–9a. EI is constant.
1 2
L L SOLUTION
(a)
Notation. When the beam deflects, the internal pin will allow a
single deflection, however, the slope of each connected member will
be different. Also, a slope at the roller will occur. These four unknown
degrees of freedom are labeled with the code numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4,
Fig. 15–9b.
6 3 5
15 7 1 2 4
1 2 2 3 M0 0 1
1 0 5
Qk = ≥ ¥
0 2
L L Dk = C 0 S 6
0 3
0 7
(b) - M0 4
Fig. 15–9
6 7 3 1 3 2 5 4
12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6
- 3 6 - 3 3
L3 L2 L L2 L3 L2 L L2
6 4 6 2 6 4 6 2
- 2 7 - 2 2
L2 L L L L2 L L L
k1 = EI H X k2 = EI H X
12 6 12 6 12 6 12 6
- 3 - 2 - 2 3 - 3 - 2 - 2 5
L L L3 L L L L3 L
6 2 6 4 6 2 6 4
- 2 1 - 2 4
L2 L L L L2 L L L
Q = KD
15.4 APPLICATION OF THE STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAM ANALYSIS 585
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
⎡ ⎤ ⎡ 4 6 6 2 ⎤ ⎡ ⎤
1 ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ L 0 - 2 0 0 D 1
L L2 L ⎪⎪ 1 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪
2 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ D ⎪
4 6 2 6
0 - 0 0 2
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ L L2 L L2 ⎪⎪ 2 ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪
3 ⎪ 0 ⎪ ⎪ - 6 6 24 6 12
- 3 -
12 6 ⎪⎪
- 2 D3 ⎪ 3
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ L2 L2 L3 L2 L L3 L ⎪⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 2 6 4 6 ⎪⎪ ⎪
4 ⎪ -M0 ⎪ = EI ⎪ 0 - 2 0 0 ⎪ ⎪ D4 ⎪ 4
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ L L2 L L ⎪⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 6 12 6 12 ⎪⎪ ⎪
5 ⎪ Q5 ⎪ ⎪ 0 - 2 - 3 - 2 0 0 ⎪⎪ 0 ⎪ 5
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ L L L L3 ⎪⎪ ⎪
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 6 12 12 6 ⎪⎪ ⎪ 15
6 ⎪ Q6 ⎪ ⎪ L2 0 - 3 0 0 2 ⎪⎪
0 ⎪ 6
L L3 L
⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎪ ⎪
7 ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ 2 4 ⎪⎪
0 ⎪
6 6
Q7 0 - 2 0 0 7
⎣ ⎦ ⎣ L L L2 L ⎦ ⎣ ⎦
Multiplying the first four rows to determine the displacement yields
4 6
0 = D1 - 2 D3
L L
4 6 2
0 = D2 + 2 D3 + D4
L L L
6 6 24 6
0 = - 2 D1 + 2 D2 + 3 D3 + 2 D4
L L L L
2 6 4
-M0 = D2 + 2 D3 + D4
L L L
So that
M0L
D1 =
2EI
M0L
D2 = -
6EI
M0L2
D3 =
3EI
2M0L
D4 = -
3EI
Using these results, the reaction Q5 is obtained from the multiplication
of the fifth row.
12EI M0L2
a- b a b - a- b
6EI M0L 6EI 2M0L
Q5 = - 2
- 3 2
L 6EI L 3EI L 3EI
M0
Q5 = Ans.
L
This result can be easily checked by statics applied to member 2 .
586 CHAPTER 15 B E A M A N A LY S I S U S I N G THE STIFFNESS METHOD
EXAMPLE 15.3
The beam in Fig. 15–10a is subjected to the two couple moments. If
the center support ② settles 1.5 mm, determine the reactions at the
supports. Assume the roller supports at ➀ and ③ can pull down or
push up on the beam. Take E = 200 GPa and I = 22110-62 m4.
4 kN m 4 kN m
1
1 2 2
3
2m 2m
15
(a)
Fig. 15–10
SOLUTION
Notation. The beam has two elements and three unknown degrees of
freedom. These are labeled with the lowest code numbers, Fig. 15–10b.
Here the known load and displacement matrices are
4 1 0 4
Qk = C 0 S 2 Dk = C - 0.0015 S 5
-4 3 0 6
6 5 4
3 4 kN m 2 4 kN m 1
1
1 2 2
3
2m 2m
(b)
6 3 5 2
1.5 1.5 -1.5 1.5 6
k1 = EI 1.5 2 -1.5 1 3
D T
-1.5 - 1.5 1.5 - 1.5 5
1.5 1 -1.5 2 2
5 2 4 1
1.5 1.5 -1.5 1.5 5
k2 = EI 1.5 2 -1.5 1 2
D T
-1.5 -1.5 1.5 - 1.5 4
1.5 1 -1.5 2 1
15
Displacements and Loads. Assembling the structure stiffness
matrix and writing the stiffness equation for the structure, yields
1 2 3 4 5 6
4 2 1 0 -1.5 1.5 0 D1
0 1 4 1 -1.5 0 1.5 D2
-4 -1.5
F V = EI F
0 1 2 0 1.5 D3
VF V
Q4 -1.5 -1.5 0 1.5 - 1.5 0 0
Q5 1.5 0 -1.5 -1.5 3 - 1.5 -0.0015
Q6 0 1.5 1.5 0 -1.5 1.5 0
4
= 2D1 + D2 + 0D3 - 1.5102 + 1.51- 0.00152 + 0
EI
0 = 1D1 + 4D2 + 1D3 - 1.5102 + 0 + 0
-4
= 0D1 + 1D2 + 2D3 + 0 - 1.51-0.00152 + 0
EI
EXAMPLE 15.4
Determine the moment developed at support A of the beam shown in
Fig. 15–11a. Assume the roller supports can pull down or push up on
the beam. Take E = 2911032 ksi, I = 510 in4.
SOLUTION
Notation. Here the beam has two unconstrained degrees of
freedom, identified by the code numbers 1 and 2.
The matrix analysis requires that the external loading be applied at
the nodes, and therefore the distributed and concentrated loads are
replaced by their equivalent fixed-end moments, which are determined
from the table on the inside back cover. (See Example 11–2.) Note that
15 no external loads are placed at ① and no external vertical forces are
placed at ② since the reactions at code numbers 3, 4 and 5 are to be
12 k
2 k/ft
unknowns in the load matrix. Using superposition, the results of the
matrix analysis for the loading in Fig. 15–11b will later be modified
by the loads shown in Fig. 15–11c. From Fig. 15–11b, the known
C
A B displacement and load matrices are
0 4
Qk = c d
24 ft 144 1
4 ft 4 ft Dk = C 0 S 5
1008 2
(a) 0 6
Member Stiffness Matrices. Each of the two member stiffness
matrices is determined from Eq. 15–1.
Member 1:
12EI 1212921103215102
4 5 6 = = 7.430
2 L3 [241122]3
3 1 6EI 612921103215102
1 1 2 = = 1069.9
2 2 3 L2 [241122]2
96 k ft 12 kft 1008 k in.
412921103215102
12 k ft 144 k in.
4EI
beam to be analyzed by stiffness method = = 205 417
L 241122
212921103215102
(b)
2EI
= = 102 708
L 241122
4 3 5 2
7.430 1069.9 -7.430 1069.9 4
k1 = 1069.9 205 417 -1069.9 102 708 3
24 k
2 k/ft
24 k
6 k 12 k 6 k D T
-7.430 - 1069.9 7.430 -1069.9 5
1069.9 102 708 - 1069.9 205 417 2
C
A 96 k ft 1152 k in. B Member 2:
12 k ft 144 k in.
12EI 1212921103215102
beam subjected to actual load and = = 200.602
fixed-supported reactions L3 [81122]3
(c) 6EI 612921103215102
= = 9628.91
Fig. 15–11 L2 [81122]2
15.4 APPLICATION OF THE STIFFNESS METHOD FOR BEAM ANALYSIS 589
4EI 412921103215102
= = 616 250
L 81122
2EI 212921103215102
= = 308 125
L 81122
5 2 6 1
200.602 9628.91 -200.602 9628.91 5
k2 = 9628.91 616 250 -9628.91 308 125 2
D T
-200.602 -9628.91 200.602 -9628.91 6
9628.91 308 125 -9628.91 616 250 1
Displacements and Loads. We require
15
Q = KD
1 2 3 4 5 6
144 616 250 308 125 0 0 9628.91 - 9628.91 D1
1008 308 125 821 667 102 708 1069.9 8559.01 - 9628.91 D2
Q3 0 102 708 205 417 1069.9 - 1069.9 0 0
F V = F V F V
Q4 0 1069.9 1069.9 7.430 - 7.430 0 0
Q5 9628.91 8559.01 - 1069.9 -7.430 208.03 - 200.602 0
Q6 -9628.91 -9628.91 0 0 - 200.602 200.602 0
Solving in the usual manner,
144 = 616 250D1 + 308 125D2
1008 = 308 125D1 + 821 667D2
D1 = - 0.4673110-32 in.
D2 = 1.40203110-32 in.
Thus,
Q3 = 0 + 102 70811.402032110-32 = 144 k # in. = 12 k # ft
The actual moment at A must include the fixed-supported reaction of
+96 k # ft shown in Fig. 15–11c, along with the calculated result for Q3.
Thus,
MAB = 12 k # ft + 96 k # ft = 108 k # ftg Ans.
This result compares with that determined in Example 11–2.
Although not required here, we can determine the internal moment
and shear at B by considering, for example, member 1, node 2,
Fig. 15–11b. The result requires expanding
q1 = k1d + 1q021
4 3 5 2
q4 7.430 1069.9 -7.430 1069.9 0 24
T 110 2 + D
q 1069.9 205 417 -1069.9 102 708 0 -3 1152
D 3T = D T D T
q5 -7.430 -1069.9 7.430 -1069.9 0 24
q2 1069.9 102 708 -1069.9 205 417 1.40203 - 1152
590 CHAPTER 15 B E A M A N A LY S I S U S I N G THE STIFFNESS METHOD
EXAMPLE 15.5
Determine the deflection at ① and the reactions on the beam shown
in Fig. 15–12a. EI is constant.
1
2m 2m
(a)
Fig. 15–12
15
SOLUTION
Notation. The beam is divided into two elements and the nodes and
members are identified along with the directions from the near to far
ends, Fig. 15–12b. The unknown deflections are shown in Fig. 15–12c.
In particular, notice that a rotational displacement D4 does not occur
because of the roller constraint.
P
3 1 5
4 2 6
1 2 2 3
1
(b)
Q = KD
1 2 3 4 5 6
-P 3 0 -1.5 -1.5 - 1.5 1.5 D1
0 0 4 1.5 1 - 1.5 1 D2
0 -1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 0 0 D
F V = EI F V F 3V
Q4 -1.5 1 1.5 2 0 0 0
Q5 -1.5 - 1.5 0 0 1.5 -1.5 0
Q6 1.5 1 0 0 - 1.5 2 0 15
P
- = 3D1 + 0D2 - 1.5D3
EI D1
0 = 0D1 + 4D2 + 1.5D3 D3
D2
Note that the signs of the results match the directions of the
deflections shown in Fig. 15–12c. Using these results, the reactions
therefore are
Q5 = - 1.5EI a - b - 1.5EI a b + 0a - b
1.667P P 2.667P
EI EI EI
= P Ans.
Q6 = 1.5EI a - b + 1EI a b + 0a - b
1.667P P 2.667P
EI EI EI
= - 1.5P Ans.
592 CHAPTER 15 B E A M A N A LY S I S U S I N G THE STIFFNESS METHOD
PROBLEMS
15–1. Determine the moments at ① and ③. Assume ② is a 15–5. Determine the support reactions. Assume ② and ③
roller and ① and ③ are fixed. EI is constant. are rollers and ① is a pin. EI is constant.
15–2. Determine the moments at ① and ③ if the support ②
moves upward 5 mm. Assume ② is a roller and ① and ③ are
fixed. EI = 60(106) N # m2.
5 4 6
6 15 kN/ m 5 4
25 kN/m 1
2 3
2 1 3
15 1 1 2 2 3
1 1 2 2 3
6m 8m
6m 4m
Prob. 15–5
Probs. 15–1/15–2
15–3. Determine the reactions at the supports. Assume 15–6. Determine the reactions at the supports. Assume ①
the rollers can either push or pull on the beam. EI is is fixed ➁ and ③ are rollers. EI is constant.
constant.
6 4 3 5 4 3
6 kN/m 10 kN/ m
5 20 kNm 1 6 1
2
2
1 2 1 2 2 3
1 2 3 1
12 m 8m 6m 8m
*15–4. Determine the reactions at the supports. Assume ① 15–7. Determine the reactions at the supports. Assume
is a pin and ② and ③ are rollers that can either push or pull ① and ③ are fixed and ② is a roller. EI is constant.
on the beam. EI is constant.
5 2 3
7 3k 9 kN/m
8 6 5
6 kN/m
1 2 3 4 6 1
4
1 1 2 2 3 3 4
1 2 2
3
1
10 ft 10 ft 10 ft 6m 4m
*15–8. Determine the reactions at the supports. EI is 15–11. Determine the reactions at the supports. There is a
constant. smooth slider at ①. EI is constant.
6 4 3 1
5
15 kN/m 30 kN/m
7 2 1
2
1 1 2
1 2 4
1 3 2 3
4m
4m 3m
Prob. 15–11
Prob. 15–8 15
15–9. Determine the moments at ② and ③. EI is constant. *15–12. Use a computer program to determine the reactions
Assume ①, ②, and ③ are rollers and ④ is pinned. on the beam. Assume A is fixed. EI is constant.
4 kN/ m 12 k
4 k/ ft
1 2 3 4
1 1 2 2 3 3 4 B C D
A
20 ft 15 ft 8 ft 8 ft
12 m 12 m 12 m
Prob. 15–12
Prob. 15–9
15–10. Determine the reactions at the supports. Assume ② 15–13. Use a computer program to determine the reactions
is pinned and ① and ③ are rollers. EI is constant. on the beam. Assume A and D are pins and B and C are
rollers. EI is constant.
4 5 3 k/ ft 6
3 k/ ft
1 2 3
1 1 2 2 3 A B C D
4 ft 8 ft 8 ft 4 ft 8 ft 20 ft 8 ft