Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cim Sim 2012
Cim Sim 2012
net/publication/261272791
CITATIONS READS
6 2,900
4 authors:
All content following this page was uploaded by Hana Abdull Halim on 09 December 2014.
Abstract—This project present analysis and implementation of the system can cause the unnecessary tripping. In fact, the
cross blocking feature as the solution for overcoming the mal- relaying task is not easy too [4].
operation of the transformer differential relay in sympathetic In this project, the objectives to be achieved are to
inrush phenomena. The sympathetic inrush phenomena will investigate the sympathetic inrush current that occur on the
occur to the transformers that connected in parallel. The power system and to design the cross blocking feature in the
inrush current will flow to the transformer that is already system in order to overcome this sympathetic inrush current
energized when energizing the second transformer on the phenomena.
power system. It will effect a voltage drop and this voltage In the differential scheme, the power transformer in
drop caused the saturation to the already transformer in the
parallel will be protected. The differential relay protection
negative direction. These phenomena caused the mal-operation
should be designed in a way that it does not cause the mal-
of the relay that the main point of this project is to overcome it.
The results obtained after designing 100MVA, 33/ 11kV three
operate during sympathetic inrush current condition [4]. In
phase transformer by using PSCAD/ EMTDC simulation. As this project, the cross blocking method will be implement in
results, cross blocking method will operate as a block tripping the system by using transformer differential relay. The
and this method is useful to eliminate mal-operations that transformer differential relay will be operated to measure
occur during the energization of the transformer due of the and check all the phases of current that thorough the
failure of harmonic restraint function in transformer protected area. The blocking method will be implementing
differential relays. These analyses solve the problem of by tripping of the relay. In fact, the transformer differential
sympathetic inrush current phenomena. relay only starts operate to tripping when any one of phase
detected experience higher than 2nd harmonics [1].
When the transformer is closed without load, it will
Keywords-sympathetic; inrush; cross blocking; transformer cause to the mal-operation of protection relay. This is
differential relay happened when the transformer is being closed, that produce
an excitation current that will pass to the system resistance
I. INTRODUCTION that resulting in saturations that will generate a sympathetic
inrush current phenomenon [4]. The differential current in
A. Background of Project sympathetic inrush of the operating transformer increases to
maximum first and then decays gradually could cause the
The energization of a transformer connected to a mal-operation of the transformer differential protection [5].
network in the presence of other transformers which are However, the most severe case of inrush is caused by the
already in operation leads to the phenomena of sympathetic initial magnetizing due to switching-in a transformer.
inrush current [1]. This phenomenon has been pointed out as During a transformer is de-energized, the magnetizing
one of the reasons for false operation of transformer current will goes to zero while the flux will follows the
differential relays and prolonged temporary harmonic hysteresis loop of the core. This results in certain remanent
overvoltages on power systems [2]. flux left in the core [1].
In a system, the protection and security become the main Furthermore, when the transformer is re-energized by an
points especially during energization of the system. Any alternating voltage, the flux becomes also sinusoidal but
mal- operation or damages should be avoided in the system. biased by the remanance. It also may be high as around
Several of power system elements need the specific 80%-90% of rated flux. This condition will cause in both
protection system such as the power transformer in order to large peak values and heavy distortions of magnetizing
protect the system and equipment from any hazard. Power current [4]. Furthermore, a lot of simulation and research
transformers are also one of the important components in have been carried out to solving this problem in power
power system for which various protective schemes have system.
been developed [3]. Besides that, it is also the expensive
component in a power system. In fact, the fault presence in
289
the system. Design process and simulations are done by Fig. 3.1 shows the simulated power system schematic
using PSCAD software. which is the transformer connected in parallel to produce the
sympathetic inrush current. Also, a typical sympathetic and
inrush current that shows in Fig. 3.2 and 3.3. In normal
B. Relay Design condition, the differential current is almost near to zero.
Besides that, the positive, negative and zero sequence value
do not strongly affected.
290
Fig. 3.3: Inrush Current
Fig. 3.4: Sympathetic Inrush Current Interaction between Two
Transformers
From the results above shows the sympathetic inrush
current and inrush current that occurred during the parallel Fig. 3.4 shows sympathetic inrush current interaction
connection. From here, the characteristic both type of inrush between two transformers with transformer differential relay
will be analyzed. Time of decay become the main point of (TDR) for analyzes this problem is being done by using the
different between of the inrush current and sympathetic PSCAD in the simulation. Before adding the differential
inrush current. The sympathetic current of the energized relay protection with cross blocking method in it, it shows
transformer will decay slower than the inrush current of a the result of the sympathetic and inrush current that
single transformer. appeared in power system. The simulation result for the
Comparing Fig. 3.2 and 3.3, the sympathetic current and sympathetic magnetizing current (i1) after cross blocking
the inrush magnetizing current reach the peak value method is used is shown in Fig. 3.5 below.
alternately that is on alternate half cycle which sum current
of two transformers is almost symmetrical. The DC
component will be close to zero. The longer duration of
sympathetic inrush current in the power system becomes
one of the reasons that caused the mal-operation of the
transformer differential relay.
291
C. Effect of the Load
292
V. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION this research. We also wish to express my appreciation to all
School of Electrical Systems Engineering staffs for helping
us throughout the research project. Special thanks to the
Effect of these phenomena is hard to be detected by the
families for the constant encouragement. To all of them, the
differential relay. The relay will detect this current as the
success of this project is partly due to your support and
fault due of the unnecessary tripping. Since the problem of
blessings. Thank you.
unnecessary tripping that occur to relay, the cross blocking
features that implement in the differential relay will act to
blocking the sympathetic inrush current. REFERENCES
In this project, the simulation and modeling for the
analysis of sympathetic inrush current phenomena and the
[1] G. B. Kumbhar & S. V. Kulkarni (2007). “Analysis of Sympathetic
design of the cross blocking feature are being presented. Inrush Phenomena in Transformers using Coupled Field- Circuit
Using PSCAD/EMTDC, 100MVA in rate 33/11kV at Approach”, Power Engineering Society General Meeting, June 2007.
frequency 50 Hz in wye-delta connection is simulated. The 1-6.
results show a typical sympathetic and inrush current. Time [2] M. Sengul, B. Alboyaci, S. Ozturk, H.B. Cetinkaya, “Case Study of
of decay become the main point of different between of the Sympathetic Interaction between Transformers Caused by Inrush
inrush current and sympathetic inrush current. The Transients”, International Conference on Power Systems Transients
(IPTS05), Montreal, Canada, 2005. 19-23.
sympathetic current of the energized transformer will decay
slower than the inrush current of a single transformer. [3] M. E. Hamedani Golshan, M. Saghaian-nejad, A. Saha, H. Samet, “A
New Method for Recognizing Internal Faults from Inrush Current
Then, the simulation is continued with designing the Conditions in Digital Differential Protection of Power Transformers”,
network together with the differential relay. Based on the Electric Power Systems Research 71 , 2004, 61-71.
results, it shows the sympathetic inrush current can be [4] A. Mohd Zin, Hana Abdull Halim & S. P. Abdul Karim,
solved by using this cross blocking method. The circuit “Sympathetic Inrush Current Phenomenon Analysis and Solution for
before implement the differential relay shows the a Power Transformer”, International Review on Modelling and
Simulations (IREMOS), April 2011, 601-607.
sympathetic inrush current that appear in the system is
reduced significantly after using cross blocking method. [5] D. Shao, X. Yin, Z. Zhang, D. Chen, and K. Zhang, “Research on
Sympathetic Interaction between Transformers”, Universities Power
Based on the result shows the implementation of Engineering Conference, 2007. UPEC 2007. 42nd
differential relay is suitable for solving this problem. As International 2007, Sept 2007. 273-276.
proposed, the implementation of cross blocking is good [6] H.Bronzeado & R.Yacamini , “Phenomenon of Sympathetic
practice to solve the sympathetic inrush current phenomena. Interaction between Transformer Caused by Inrush Transients”, IEEE
It is solved the problem and has more advantages such as it Proceeding-Science, Measurement and Technology, vol.142, issue4,
is more suitable because not expensive and also easy way to 1995.323-329.
utility to implement. [7] G. Ziegler, Numerical Differential Protection – Principles and
Applications (Publicis Corporate Publishing, Erlnagen, March 2005).
[8] R.Hunt, J.Schaefer & B.Bentert (2007), “Practical Experience in
Setting Transformer Differential Inrush Restraint” (3rd ed.).
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
[9] (n.d). The Electronicmagnetic Transient .Power Quality in Electrical
The authors would like to thank Universiti Malaysia System. Received April 23, 2012, from
Perlis for providing the technical and financial support for http://www.powerqualityworld.com/2011/06/pscadpower-systems.
293