Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Guadalupe Tuff
UP Geological Society
·
Follow
Published in
·
10 min read
·
Feb 18, 2021
522
By Walter Brown
Note: This article was first published in the January 1960 issue of
Bedrock.
“As one goes from Manila along the Pasig river, there appears in a
short time a brown tufflike Pozzuolan ( trass ) or pumice tuff. This
material can be separated into one-part rich in crystal fragments and
fairly clastic pumacious material and another which is a pumice
conglomerate with fragments of volcanic rock mixed with it.”
Adams also refers to the formation and reports that “occasionally a log
of wood has been encountered in drilling and plant remains, fish teeth
and one mammalian tooth have been round in the beds.”
“… tectites are certain glassy bodies found in various parts of the world
in Ouaternary and Tertiary deposits. These bodies, apparently
irregularly shaped, and their form seems to imply an origin through
solidification from a viscous melt.”
The undertaking was a class project. The class was divided into five
groups each composed of four students. Students with previous field
experience were designated as party chiefs and each group was
assigned a definite area. Each group was held responsible for the
mapping of the area assigned to it and for the measurement of the
individual sections. Subsequently, correlation, examination, and
evaluation of gathered data was undertaken in order to gain a regional
picture of the formation and in general to collect as much information
as possible about the Guadalupe tuff in order to be able find reliable
criteria for interformational correlation and also to gain an idea as to
genesis of the formation.
GEOGRAPHY
Field party №1 was responsible for the geology of the type section
situated at Guadalupe, Rizal. Field party №2 worked the area to the
northwest within the jurisdiction of the town of Pasig. Field party №3
covered the along Ortigas Avenue from Ugong to Highway 54. Field
parties №4 and 5 worked the area to the West and southwest Of the
University site respectively.
Lithology
Teves made reference to two distinct members of the Guadalupe tuff, a
lower Alat conglomerate and a younger member which he called the
Diliman member.
“The other member, a truly volcanic tuff, is called the Diliman member
as proposed. Three main types have been recognized. The first type is
fairly well lithified. It is hard, usually of light gray color and fine-
grained, although coarse-grained phases have been noted. In some
places, dark prismatic minerals apparently hornblende, may be seen.
This gives it the appearance of andesite. Tiny white specks which are
bits of weathered pumice may also be seen. This is the most
widespread in the area.
The third type, volcanic breccia, is fairly abundant in the area. This
consists of coarse volcanic material, pumice. scoria and sometimes
even fragments of basalt consolidated with fine grains in between. The
color of the rock depends upon the fragments that make up the rock
but varies from purple to light brown. The Diliman member is water
laid and bedded or stratified. Sometimes a layer of clay separates the
beds from one another or may separate strata in the same kind of tuff.”
In the course of investigations, three dominant rock types were noted
which conform quite closely to the three described by Teves.
The third distinct type is noted at the upper of the type section exposed
at the quarry site on the south bank of the Pasig River. At this point
may be observed two beds of fine-grained tuff which can be
distinguished from the concretionary tuff not only due to the absence
of said concretions but also by the presence of abundant pumice
fragments with sizes ranging from half a centimeter to more than two
centimeters. The lower bed shows a pitted weathering surface, and the
upper bed shows abundant channel deposits. The matrix of tuffaceous
material ranging from fine silt to fine sand in size. Some prismatic
minerals, dark blue glassy fragments, round concentrical “mud balls”
and, in the lower beds, fossil leaves and twigs may be distinguished.
The outcrops are not continuous in the sense that the beds cannot be
actually walked out because of the large amount of excavation going on
in the area, but because the relative nearness of the exposures,
projection is quite satisfactory. Thus, the tying area of individual
exposures within the type area does not present any great difficulty.
CORRELATION
However, the fact that there are several of such horizons at frequent
intervals in the sequence necessitated the taking into account the
relative positions of the various lithologic units with respect to both to
the buff horizons and to each other. The problem was further
complicated by the fact that at least one of the buff horizons was seen
not to maintain the same level but to bevel underlying formations, and
that in most of the areas, faulting was widespread. Another
complication encountered was lateral variations in lithology (facies
changes).
Factors, however, like the persistence of some thick beds such as the
pebble pumice encountered in Areas 2, 3 and 5 and the presence of
concretions and cross bedding in some units in the sequence, when
taken together with position in sequence and relative position with
respect to the buff horizons, made correlation possible. It should be
emphasized that correlation was not attempted on the basis of any one
of the given criteria but upon a combination of as many of the observed
facts as possible. Any attempt to place reliance on a single factor such
as lithologic appearance would be extremely hazardous considering
possible repetition of beds of similar lithologic appearance due either
to cyclic deposition or to faulting and also considering that several
facies changes seen to occur in the area under study.
CONCLUSION