SUBJECT: SEMINAR ON PROJECT STUDY/IMMERSION

Prof. Gerard Boz Tungol

Title Author Problem Hypotheses Methodology Used Conclusion Remarks Year Journal
published Name
1. Researching Muhammad The problem of High quality Quantitative, No research 2010 National
Inclusive Mahbubur this study is research qualitative and mixed methodology is Academy for
Education: A Rahaman, how do practices methodology imperfect, even Educational
Critical Review K.M. researchers in contribute to though, all of them Management
of Different Kowsar Ali, inclusive the have some (NAEM)
Methodologies Shikha education methodological weaknesses and Journal
to Explore Chakrararty, construct their decision for strength (Yin,
Knowledge Md. Arifur methodological inclusive 1994), each
Rahman preference. education approach is
appropriate for
certain research
goals (Hara, 1995).

1
2. Inclusion in Lloyd Daniel The study Hypothesis of The articles and other The research 2023 Inclusion in
Education Tlale identifies the the study is not relevant material were findings suggest Southern
Policy as an problem of the explicitly reviewed, and 32 that there has African
Enabler: limited stated. studies were identified been a focus, on Education
Lessons from participation of in the review and to be access and
South Africa children with included, a text had to placement in
disabilities in apply one or more of education, which
education, the selected Inclusive has overshadowed
despite the Education words and the need to
right of children phrases. enhance
to have access pedagogical
to inclusive quality.
education Consequently, in
being widely order to effectively
supported in implement
international education it is
human rights crucial, to
law, systematically and
international empirically
conventions enhance teachers
ratified by its competencies.
members and
the majority of
human rights
instruments.
3. Research Claes Lack of Inclusion is a Case study approach The research 2020 European
about inclusive Nilholm theories that complex papers findings Journal of
education in have phenomenon suggest that Special
2020 – How empirically that has to be although there Needs
can we been shown to analyzed at have been Education.
improve our be successful several levels. advancements, in
theories in tools in the understanding
order to development education there
of more remains a dearth
2
 change inclusive of theories on
practice? school fostering
systems, inclusivity in
schools, and schools and
classrooms. classrooms, for all
students.
4. Understanding Anna The problem of The authors The methodology used The research 2021 International
inclusive Cecilia this study is to hypothesize in this study is not findings indicate Journal of
education – a Rapp & understand the that the explicitly mentioned in that exploring Inclusive
theoretical Anabel meaning of the theoretical the abstract or the education is a task Education
contribution Corral- term ‘inclusion’ framework paper. However, the both, in terms of
from system Granados and how it is suggested in authors have used research and
theory and the challenging to this study, empirical research to practical
constructionist explore in which stems explore inclusive implementation,
perspective research and from sociology education. within educational
achieve in in system contexts.
educational theory as well
situations. as social-
constructionist
theory, is
useful for
understanding
how to
determine the
boundaries of
inclusion and
exclusion at
different levels
and in different
situations
concerning all
students in the
educational
system
3
5. Methods and Yihan Sun, The problem The study does Qualitative research. The study found 2023 International
Ethics in Claire mentioned in not have a The study examined 58 that interview was Journal of
Qualitative Blewitt & the study is the hypothesis, but studies that sought to the most common Qualitative
Research Helen need to further rather aims to capture young strategy used to Methods, Vol.
Exploring Skouteris promote provide a children’s (3–6 years) capture young 22.
Young children’s comprehensive voice in ECEC settings. children’s voice,
Children’s agency and the overview of the often coupled with
Voice: A inclusion of methods and other child-friendly
Systematic assent-seeking ethics used in methods. The
Review as an ongoing qualitative authors suggest
process, and research that that there is a need
gaps in elicit young to further promote
methods children’s children’s agency
supporting the voice in ECEC and the inclusion
inclusion of settings. of assent-seeking
children with as an ongoing
additional process.
needs and The study also
Indigenous identified gaps in
children. methods
supporting the
inclusion of
children with
additional needs
and Indigenous
children. In
addition,
advancing non-
permanent
methods of
meaning making to
support children’s
participation
appears ripe for
4
 methodological
innovation.
6. Impact of Venkata sai The study does The study’s The study was The study 2020
Sports and saketh & not explicitly hypothesis was conducted using a concluded that
Fitness on Gopal mention any that sports questionnaire with 11 sports and fitness
Students Life Krishna problem or activities questions, focusing on activities can have
limitation of the develop the hourly involvement a positive impact
research. humans both in sports or fitness on students’ lives
mentally and activity, the by improving their
physically, requirement of parental physical and
teaching support, and the mental well-being,
students development of academic
harmony and leadership skills. performance,
cooperative leadership skills,
behavior, and and overall quality
helping them of life
achieve
success in life.
7. Parenting Sofie Impact of The parenting The methodology used The study 2018 Journal of
Styles: A Kuppens & parenting styles have in the study is concludes that Child and
Closer Look at Eva styles on child impact on child a quantitative accounting for Family
a Well-Known Ceulemans development. development. research approach. The parental Studies.
Concept study used a cross- psychological
sectional design to control did not
collect data from a yield additional
sample of 600 Flemish parenting styles
families raising an 8-to- but enhanced our
10-year-old child. understanding of
The study used the pattern among
a questionnaire with 30 the three parenting
items to measure dimensions within
parenting styles, each parenting
parental support, style and their

5
 behavioral control, and association with
psychological control. child outcomes.
8. The Effect of Purva D. To understand The study does Literature review. Good parenting is 2022 National
Parenting and Lanjekar, how parenting not have a how parenting Library of
the Parent- Shiv H. and the parent- hypothesis as it meets the Medicine,
Child Joshi, Puja child is a literature children's needs National
Relationship D. Lanjekar relationship review. according to the Center for
on a Child's & Vasant affect a child’s cultural standards Biotechnology
Cognitive Wagh cognitive that change from Information.
Development: development. generation to
A Literature generation.
Review Cognitive
development
starts in the first
year of life and
then progresses
gradually. child.
Proper emotional
management is
required for proper
emotional
regulation. Positive
parenting helps
the child face non-
social or social
problems.
Children require
positive parenting
in painful and
different
situations.
Parenting gives a
child the
confidence to face
6
crucial,
challenging
problems.
Sensitive parenting
and caregiving are
required for the
child's maturity
and cognitive
development.
Sensitive parenting
is required for the
proper cognitive
development of a
child. Proper
emotional
management is
required for proper
emotional
regulation. Positive
parenting helps
the child face non-
social or social
problems.
Positive parenting
is required for
early cognitive
development,
emotional
balance, and the
maturation of
thought. While
negative, hostile
parenting leads to
depression and
7
 social and cultural
problems.
Parenting styles
(authoritative,
authoritarian,
permissive, and
uninvolved
parenting) have a
psychological
effect on a child's
behavior.
9. Parents’ J. Butler, L. The problem The study does The study used a The research 2019
Perceptions Gregg, R. being not have a systematic approach to findings suggest Clinical Child
and Calam, & A. addressed by hypothesis as it identify relevant that programs and Family
Experiences of Wittkowski this study is to is a literature qualitative studies from aimed at Psychology
Parenting identify the key review. six key electronic supporting parents Review.
Programmes: aspects that databases. The can have an
A Systematic make eligibility for inclusion impact, on
Review and interventions was established, and a children’s
Metasynthesis meaningful and thematic synthesis was outcomes.
of the helpful to undertaken. The study However further
Qualitative families. included 26 studies studies are
Literature spanning 17 years of necessary to
parenting research and determine the
involving 822 parents strategies and
ensure that these
programs are
accessible and
acceptable, to all
parents.
10. Current Judith G. The research It does not Review article that The article comes 2027 Current
research on Smetana paper not present a summarizes the to the conclusion Opinion in
parenting explicitly hypothesis or current state of that parenting has Psychology.
styles, mention any report on a research on parenting been categorized
8
dimensions, problem being specific styles, dimensions, and into styles with
and beliefs addressed by study. Instead, beliefs. authoritative
the study. it synthesizes parenting being
However, the the findings considered the
article from various most beneficial,
describes the studies to for children’s
evolution of provide a development.
parenting comprehensive However recent
research from overview of the studies have
global styles to topic. focused on
discrete aspects of
dimensions parenting providing
and domain- a detailed
specific understanding of
models. its effects. New
research
introduces
"domain models
that describe
parents as
adapting their
practices based on
their objectives
their children’s
needs and the
behaviors they are
addressing. The
article also
emphasizes how
parenting beliefs
play a role in
influencing the
connection,

9
 between parenting
and adjustment.

Rahaman, M., Ali, K., Chakrararty, S., & Rahman, A (2010). Researching Inclusive Education: A Critical Review of Different Methodologies to
Explore Knowledge. National Academy for Educational Management Journal, 106-118.
Tiale, L. (2023). Inclusion in Education Policy as an Enabler: Lesson from South Africa, Inclusion in Southern African Education, 145-163.
Nilholm, C. (2020). Research about inclusive education in 2020 – How can we improve our theories in order to change practice? European
Journal of Special Needs Education, Vol 36, Issue 3, 358-370.
Rapp, A. & Granados, A. (2021). Understanding inclusive education – a theoretical contribution from system theory and the constructionist
perspective, International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-18.
Sun, Y., Blewitt, C., Edwards, S., Fraser, A., Newman, S., Cornelius, J., & Skouteris, H. (2023). Methods and Ethics in Qualitative Research
Exploring Young Children’s Voice: A Systematic Review, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, Vol. 22, 1-15.
Venkata, S., & Krishna, G., (2020) Impact of Sports and Fitness on Students Life.
Kuppens, S., & Ceulemans, E., (2018). Parenting Styles: A Closer Look at a Well-Known Concept, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 168-181.
Lanjekar, P., Joshi, S., Lanjekar, P., & Wagh, V., (2022). The Effect of Parenting and the Parent-Child Relationship on a Child's Cognitive
Development: A Literature Review, National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information.
Butler, J., Gregg, L., Calam, R., & Wittkowski, A (2019). Parents’ Perceptions and Experiences of Parenting Programmes: A Systematic Review and
Metasynthesis of the Qualitative Literature, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 176-204.
Smetana, J., (2017) Current research on parenting styles, dimensions and beliefs, Current Opinion in Psychology 2017, 15:19–25.

GROUP II

Submitted By:

Faith Alleda
Jayme J. Mariño
Kathleen Adrienne B. Delgado-Sancho
Patrick Atienza

10