Professional Documents
Culture Documents
the trade;
2. The provision of deductible
facilities must be voluntarily
accepted in writing by the
employee;
3. The facilities must be
charged at reasonable value.
(Our Haus Realty Development Supplements constitute remuneration or special
Corporation v. Alexander Parian, et al., privileges received by the employees over and
G.R. No. 204651, August 06, 2014) above their ordinary earnings.
CITIES COVERED UNDER NCR MINIMUM WAGE RATES FOR DOMESTIC WORKER IN NCR
Caloocan, Las Pinas, Makati, Malabon, Mandaluyong, Manila, Marikina, Muntinlupa,
Paranaque, Pasay, Pasig, Quezon, San Juan, Taguig, Valenzuela, Navotas and
Municipality of Pateros.
2. PINEDA-CRUZ FORMULA
1. Pineda Formula
4. PHILIPPINE
CONSTRUCTION
SUPPLY FORMULA
5. BAGTAS APPROACH
5. WIREROPE FORMULA
LEGAL BASIS-PROHIBITION AGAINST ELIMINATION In Eastern Telecommunications
OR DIMINUTION OF BENEFITS In 2010 in Central Azucarera de Tarlac v.
Philippines. Inc. v. Eastern Telecoms
Central Azucarera de Tarlac Labor Union-
Article 100. Nothing in this Book shall be construed Employees Union, 681 Phil. 519, 535
NLU, 639 Phil. 633, 641 (2010), the SC
to eliminate or in any way diminish supplements, or (2012); Tiangco, et al. v. Hon.
ruled, Clearly, the non-diminution rule
other employee benefits being enjoyed at the time of Leonardo. Jr., et al., 207 Phil. 235
(1983), these benefits cannot be applies only if the benefit is based on an
promulgation of this Code. express policy, a written contract, or has
reduced, diminished, discontinued or
eliminated consistent with the ripened into a practice.
In University of the East v. University of the East
constitutional mandate in Art. II, Sec.
Employees' Association, 673 Phil. 273, 286 (2011),
18 and Art. XIII. Sec. 3 1987
the court ruled, Generally, employees have a vested
Constitution to protect the rights of
right over existing benefits that the employer In this case, Rollette's claim that the car plan was
workers and promote their welfare.
voluntarily granted them. part of her hiring package was unsubstantiated.
Admittedly, Home Credit has no existing car plan at
In Arco Metal Products, Co., Inc. v. Samahan ng the time Rollette was hired. Rollette's employment
mga Manggagawa sa Arco Metal-NAFLU (SAMARM- contract does not even contain any express provision
NAFLU, et al.), 577 Phil. 1 (2008), the principle of on her entitlement to a service vehicle at full
non-diminution of benefits is founded on the company cost.
constitutional mandate to "protect the rights of
workers and promote their welfare" and "to afford
labor full protection."
WORKERS PAID BY RESULT CAN BE GROUPED INTO TASK WORK DISTINGUISH FROM PIECE WORK
TWO CATEGORY:
Article 101 of the Labor Code provides that LEGAL BASIS-FORMS OF PAYMENT
All workers paid by result, including "the Secretary of Labor shall regulate the
those who are paid on piecework, takay, payment of wages by results, Article 102. Forms of payment. No employer
pakyao or task basis, shall receive not including pakya[w], piecework and other non- shall pay the wages of an employee by means
less than the prescribed wage rates per time work." The same statutory provision also of promissory notes, vouchers, coupons,
eight (8) hours of work a day, or a Payment of wages by check or money order
states that the wage rates should be based, tokens, tickets, chits, or any object other than
proportion thereof for working less than shall be allowed when such manner of
preferably, on time and motion studies, or legal tender, even when expressly requested
eight (8) hours. payment is customary on the date of
those arrived at in consultation with by the employee.
effectivity of this Code, or is necessary
representatives of workers' and employers'
because of special circumstances as
organizations. In the absence of such
specified in appropriate regulations to be
prescribed wage rates for piece-rate workers,
issued by the Secretary of Labor and
the ordinary minimum wage rates prescribed
Employment or as stipulated in a collective
by the Regional Tripartite Wages and
bargaining agreement.
Productivity Boards should apply.
RETALIATORY MEASURES
PROPOSED BILL
WHISTLEBLOWER ACT OF 2008
LEGAL BASIS-RETALIATORY MEASURES
2 WAGES
MARILYN B. ASENTISTA, PETITIONER, VS. JUPP & COMPANY, INC., AND/OR MR. JOSEPH V. ASCUTIA, RESPONDENTS. G.R. No. 229404. January 24, 2018
4 PAID BY RESULT
ARIEL L. DAVID v. JOHN G. MACASIO, GR No. 195466, July 2, 2014