1

EOC Situational Awareness Essentials

Student’s Name

Course

Instructor

Date
 2

Introduction

The County Executive has shown a deep dedication to defending the community from

emergencies in the wake of the historic Mid Term tornado, which presented substantial

difficulties and highlighted both the advantages and shortcomings of existing disaster

management capacities. The county leader set out on a quest to investigate the most effective

procedures in disaster preparedness after realizing the crucial role that the Emergency Operations

Center (EOC) plays in handling operations to such calamities. Following a recent convention

visit to the International City/County Managers Association (ICMA), a worldwide hub of

training and expertise in the management of local governments, one idea specific struck an

intense chord: "situational awareness." Situational awareness has become a crucial component of

sensible reaction plans in handling emergencies. It requires a complex, detailed perspective to

comprehend the mechanics of an emerging catastrophe. The team, motivated by the concepts

discovered at the ICMA event, was given the vital task of improving the situational awareness

capabilities of the County EOC. This study acts as a blueprint for this revolutionary project. In

this report, it will characterize situational awareness within the framework of the cutting-edge

EOC, look into the idea of "All Hazards," detail the essential tools, machinery, and data

requirements to accomplish situational awareness, suggest a thorough training program, and

painstakingly lay out a budget to realize this vision. By starting this path, we hope to improve not

just the ability to deal with emergencies but also the community's endurance when confronted

with of a wide range of ever-changing difficulties.

Meaning of Situational Awareness in a Modern EOC

In terms of the disaster response operations, situational awareness entails the knowledge

about a disaster, which includes the latest information regarding hazards or other dynamics. In a
 3

contemporary Emergency Operations Center (EOC), situational awareness relates to the capacity

to acquire, interpret, and transmit real-time data regarding an incident, permitting knowledgeable

decision-making and efficient handling of catastrophes. Conditional alertness represents a mix of

high-level aptitude of present situation awareness and interpretation of longer-term important

objectives. It encompasses both knowing what has happened in the external world as perceived

by oneself and comprehending it immediately (Hoggard, 2021; Kedia et al., 2022). Situation

awareness, according to The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), is the capacity

to recognize, take in, and grasp the essential details of a disaster. Additionally, situational

awareness necessitates constant observation of pertinent information streams on current

occurrences and emerging dangers, with information's importance being underlined.

Furthermore, situational awareness in a contemporary EOC includes real-time data gathering,

data integration and assessment, dissemination of information and continuous assessment

(Sederholm et al., 2021).

Real-Time Data Gathering

Disaster response efforts necessitate quick, concerted actions that reflect situational

realities. The important players in responding to disasters must have access to timely and reliable

data. To acquire a complete picture of the occurrence, this entails collecting information from a

variety of reports, such as meteorological surveillance detectors, social networking sites,

emergency responders, and offsite surveillance cameras (Seppänen & Virrantaus, 2015). Real-

time information collecting can offer insightful information on the spot and help to prevent

certain cognitive distortions. In order to build situational awareness (SA) and a common

operating picture (COP), it would be more competent to record data close to real-time (Steen-

Tveit et al., 2020). The capacity of the EOC to gather real-time data aids in deciding of making
 4

decisions that directs all actions and improves the openness and credibility of the procedures

used to manage an emergency. By utilizing real-time facts and coordinating intelligence from

many agencies, the EOC has the capacity to modify operational tactics almost immediately and

can also give individuals situational awareness of both disaster and non-emergency situations

(Mbuh et al., 2018).

Data Integration and Assessment

Integrating information from a variety of sources and evaluating it to produce an easily

understood and precise depiction of the incident's condition involves taking into account its

magnitude, seriousness, and possible repercussions. According to Presa Reyes et al. (2018), the

reliability and comprehension of disaster-related large-scale information are crucial for EOC to

increase situation awareness in emergency circumstances. Current advancements in multifaceted

information collecting, processing, and interpretation have significantly improved disaster

management platforms. For example, crowdsourcing techniques enable users of well-known

social networking platforms like Twitter and Facebook to actively participate in providing data

pertinent to crisis occurrences on a worldwide scale. Reyes et al. (2018) additionally mentioned

that good data integration and multifaceted information analysis methodologies are crucial for

gaining meaningful insights for better comprehension of a catastrophe since multiple kinds of

information in the management of disasters may originate from diverse sources. The integration

of various multimodal varieties of data may also be represented using representation in a way

that is simpler to comprehend and interpret.

Dissemination of Information

It is crucial to communicate important data to relevant parties, such as governmental

organizations, emergency responders, and the general public, utilizing a variety of information
 5

methods. Xia et al. (2011) declared that the EOC's personnel's use of proper exchange of

information procedures in accordance with the degree of such emergency preparation duties'

complexities may be substantially credited for the success of the operation. According to Fromm

et al. (2021), to gain situational awareness and arrive at the most appropriate judgments

necessary in emergency circumstances, rescue personnel need immediate data access.

Administrators in emergency command centers ought to be cognizant of their own status as well

as that of their colleagues and others. This underlines the significance of achieving mutual

comprehension of the data subsets that are important for everyone to achieve their objectives.

For an effective disaster administration, personnel in EOC must collaborate and attain

comprehensive situational awareness, much like emergency assistance staff in the field (Fromm

et al., 2021).

Continuous Assessment and Monitoring

EOC situation awareness is associated to immediate tactical goals that involve scenario

assessments that results in being aware of the situation to permanent advantageous goals

involving comprehending and foreseeing upcoming emergency preparedness operations. George

and Kumar (2022) observed that essential components of emergency preparedness are

strengthening capacities and the assessment of response capabilities. It is preferable to measure

response capability using minimal indications since crises necessitate speedy responses. This is

staying aware of how conditions are changing, keeping tabs on the responses, and adapting

techniques as necessary. According to Horita et al. (2018), an essential way to boost the

effectiveness of responding to disasters and readiness is through monitoring of risks associated

with disasters and early notification activities. Early warning systems (EWS) must be properly

monitored in order to function effectively and to deliver timely, accurate alerts of impending
 6

occurrences. EOC control spaces are crucial to assisting with these activities. This is due to the

fact that they are operated by administrators who are in charge of assessing the surrounding

environment, recognizing possible risks and shortcomings, and transmitting alerts to a reaction

team (Horita et al., 2018).

Meaning of “All Hazards”

An approach known as "All Hazards" acknowledges the possibility for a variety of

dangers or catastrophes, regardless of their cause, to have a profound effect on a society. All-

hazards is defined by the United States Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services as a

comprehensive strategy to emergency readiness structuring centered on functions and strengths

that are essential to willingness for every type of catastrophic events or emergencies (Bodas et

al., 2020). This strategy concentrates on being ready for and reacting to any kind of emergency,

irrespective of where it came from, encompassing but not restricted to technical failures, health-

related emergencies, natural catastrophes, and terrorist attacks. For more than four decades, the

"All-Hazards" concept has served as a cornerstone of both scientific study and legislation (Bodas

et al., 2020; Penta et al., 2021). Preparedness for "all hazards" places an emphasis on the

activities that needs to be completed in all scenarios. The contrast underlying agent-generated

and response-generated requirements provides a theoretical rationale for "All-Hazards" thinking.

Responsibilities or supplies required to address the unique qualities of a catastrophe agent—a

storms, a tornado, or an earthquake—are known as agent-generated needs. Contrarily, response-

generated needs encompass those that are necessary for sustaining responsive activities; they are

frequently communications, administrative, and logistics capabilities (Penta et al., 2021).

EOC Equipment, Tools, and Data to Become Situationally Aware

 7

The synchronization and communications amongst entities needed for disaster response

activities typically happens during regular business hours. Additionally, it is important to provide

a shared functional perspective for the respondents working in such heterogeneous contexts to

assist group decision-making. The ability of the emergency personnel to assess the situation can

also have an impact on how well they handle it (Steen-Tveit & Radianti, 2019). A variety of

thoughtfully designed and coordinated apparatus, equipment, and data streams are required in an

All Hazards EOC to establish situational awareness. These elements act as the EOC's hearing

and sight, offering crucial information about the changing surroundings of any disaster or

catastrophe circumstance. They help to coordinate personnel and response activities by providing

those making decisions with current data as well as useful insight (Steen-Tveit & Radianti, 2019;

Pavkovic et al., 2014). Understanding the complex network of technology and educational

materials that supports an All Hazards EOC's situational awareness skills is crucial. When these

factors are successfully integrated, they provide the backbone of the capacity to traverse the

complexity of situations of emergency, assuring the protection and wellness of everyone living in

the community (Kedia et al., 2022; Huggins & Prasanna, 2020). Regular utilization of EOCs

throughout times of emergencies helps maintain technical capability for analyzing and

interpreting data, as well as the use of graphical representation tools and equipment. An EOC

depends on information to function. Depending on the responsibilities and operations, the EOC

has particular data demands and needs different kinds of data. EOC must also gather and analyze

facts and figures for operations (Ding et al., 2021). Various tools, resources, and equipment are

crucial for achieving situational awareness in an All Hazards EOC.

Communication Systems
 8

In the high-stakes environment of emergency management, effective communication

stands as the linchpin of success. It is the vital artery through which information flows, enabling

a rapid and coordinated response to crises. In practice, disruptions in communication and a lack

of access to necessary information in emergencies often cause problems in communication and

coordination, and consequently affects the effectiveness of the network (Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek

& Owczarek, 2020). Two-way radios, satellite navigation equipment, and robust Internet of

Emergency Services (IoES) are the lifelines that link the EOC with a vast network of

stakeholders, including EOC personnel, first responders, and external agencies (Mohammed et

al., 2017; Hascicek et al., 2014; Damaševičius et al., 2023).

GIS (Geographic Information System) Software

In order to map event sites, determine impacted areas, and visualize critical facilities,

geographic information system (GIS) tools are employed. A computer-generated depiction of

geography enabling interactive study of numerous data in the manner of algorithms or scenarios

has been made possible by automation and the creation of GIS. The 21st century's advancements

in science and technology, particularly the newly developed GIS technology, present novel and

previously unheard-of chances to mitigate the effects of disasters and catastrophes (Goniewicz et

al., 2021). The most often used GIS solutions for responding to disasters are layered spatial

representations including national geoportals, localized administration spatial reference

infrastructure, operational guidance systems, danger maps and comparable technologies. They

are founded on data from satellites, traditional maps, computer-generated spreadsheets, and

aerial images (Hernaiz, 2020; Goniewicz et al., 2021).

Weather Forecasting and Early Warning Systems

 9

Improvement in meteorological forecasting technology and early warning systems (EWS)

constitutes one of the greatest popular adjustment techniques utilized internationally to prevent

or decrease fatalities and injuries that can be incurred by these climate-related dangers. These

include apparatus for communicating and engaging in risk of disasters evaluation, forecasting,

and prognosis as well as unified systems for catastrophe surveillance. They also include

procedures that let people, populations, EOC entities, and others to act promptly to lower

catastrophe risks before disaster occur (Coughlan de Perez et al., 2022). These systems make it

possible to create predicting and EWS, which are crucial expenditures in defending lives,

property, and way of life. The fundamentals of lowering disaster risk include projections, early

warning, and the supply of quick communication about disaster risks (Merz et al, 2020). These

components emphasize physiological occurrence features including event amplitude,

geographical degree, and duration. Impact projections added to EWS by the EOC have two

benefits. It gives those making decisions more detailed insights so they can decide on immediate

actions intelligently and it focuses the focused effort of several disciplines on a single goal (Merz

et al, 2020).

Emergency Notification Systems

Communicating and notifying the general population as well as stakeholders throughout

emergencies quickly and efficiently is a key requirement in the field of emergency management.

Tools for sending out mass notifications are a necessary and effective means of reaching a large

population with pertinent details, guidelines, and warnings at the right moment (Raja et al.,

2015). These digital spaces provide the neighborhood not simply with ease but also with a

lifeline. Speedy information dissemination may be what separates protection and injury, calm

and disorder in emergency situations, whether they include a natural catastrophe, an epidemic of
 10

public health, or another unanticipated incident. According to Pelfrey (2020), the goal of a mass

notification system (MNS) is to spread the word as widely as feasible through a number of

communication methods. These systems link users to supplies, communicate crisis information,

offer advice, and have the benefit of speed. They have the ability to deliver warnings by texting

message, emails, calling, social networking sites, and other channels, making sure that the alert

touches people in the manner in which they are most inclined to notice it and take action. Such

platforms also provide users the freedom to focus on particular geographic locations, population

categories, or other groups, allowing them to adapt their messaging to the circumstances

(Pelfrey, 2020). The county's dedication to the protection and good health of the community is

demonstrated by its expenditure in advancing EOC and situational awareness operations and the

establishment of a strong MNS.

Data Analytics Software

A vital advantage for an EOC in the digital era is the capacity to manage while making

sense of massive amounts of data. Data analytics software is the key to obtaining useful findings

from a variety of avenues, such as social networking sites, gadgets, and field reports.

Information analysis is utilized in a variety of sectors to help businesses and organizations make

better commercial choices, as well as in the disciplines to support or refute preexisting models or

ideas. The initial stage in any large-scale information arrangement is to collect a lot of electronic

data since superior analytical work results in better conclusions (Mujawar & Joshi, 2015). These

technologies act as the intellectual cognitive capacity in emergency management, turning raw

data into defensible decisions. Social networks are progressively being utilized for appeals for

aid during emergencies. Such urgent demands need to be gleaned from the huge data stream

during crisis circumstances in order to deliver aid promptly. The attitude of individuals impacted
 11

immediately following the crisis impacts the efficacy of the response to disasters and

rehabilitation procedure, even while authorities and emergency personnel collaborate via their

unique national disaster management frameworks (Ragini et al., 2018; Oladapo, 2018). By

purchasing sophisticated data analytics tools for the EOC, the county will increase technology-

driven emergency preparedness while also enhancing analytical skills.

Real-time Incident Reporting Software

The capacity to acquire immediate time event reports is analogous to maintaining a touch

on the action of the local population in the ever-evolving context of responding to emergencies.

An essential part of the EOC toolset, real-time event reporting software enables the quick

gathering of crucial data from both the general public and emergency response personnel.

According to Murtagh et al (2021), incident management software (IMS) is a collection of

mobile-friendly equipment that gathers necessary data about incidents from planned or

unplanned sources in a real-time interactive setting so that situational standing, priority of

responses, and the allocation of resources are integrated into an agreed-upon functioning picture.

IMS combines various data kinds in a complex manner, giving first responders and emergency

administrators accessibility to the details necessary for handling both modest and substantial no-

notice occurrences. These data forms include map viewpoints, property details, information from

sensors, resource monitoring, computer-assisted communication, and others (Murtagh et al.,

2021). By making investments in actual time incident tracking software, the county adopts not

just a technological but also a community-based disaster preparedness mindset. This program

acts as a virtual link between the EOC, emergency responders, and the general population,

strengthening the community's ability to handle challenges with resiliency and harmony.

Resource Management Software

 12

Authorities everywhere have a crucial responsibility for overseeing crises in order to

maintain the survival and proper operation of society as well as the health and safety of its

inhabitants (Bricka et al., 2022). The administration of numerous resources to promote efforts to

respond to emergencies is one of the key elements of responding to emergencies. In a nutshell

resource management software acts as an intangible hand that coordinates the use of resources in

emergency situations. It gives administrators the ability to be both responsive and adaptable,

enabling them to change the distribution of resources plans in response to an incident's changing

circumstances (Du et al., 2016). Resources that may be used in an emergency include tangible

possessions like machinery and supplies, personnel task teams, and ability to do certain jobs like

transportation and communications. The structure of the system must thus make it easier to

manage resources managed by many entities and agencies and interact with immediate

situational awareness systems for emergency response and administration. (Wang, 2021; Du et

al., 2016). Acknowledging that proper utilization of resources is at the core of successful disaster

response, county officials underline their dedication to the security and happiness of the local

population as they make investments in this technology.

EOC Training Plan

The methodical acquisition of information and skills with the aim of establishing the

competences required for successful functioning in work situations is known as training. The

actions taken to anticipate and counteract can also be referred to as training. Participants also get

the chance to contact with other knowledgeable administrators and discuss, exchange ideas,

encounters, and expertise with them throughout the training (Nazli et al., 2014). Emergency

management training is designed to improve the readiness and reaction times at all stages prior to

and following catastrophes by enhancing the skills of contributors and emergency assistance
 13

personnel. By sharing information through symposiums, conferences, forums, and training, the

level of community engagement and awareness in the preventative and preparedness program

may be expanded (Nazli et al., 2014).

A key step in achieving the goal of enhancing the EOC's capabilities and preparing the

staff to use the new, cutting-edge tools and technology efficiently is developing a training

strategy. Additionally, the suggested training regimen represents a continuing engagement to

growth and continual learning rather than an isolated attempt. It will be upgraded often to reflect

new standard procedures, technical developments, and insights discovered from actual situations.

In a nutshell this instructional expenditure is an investment in the capacity and preparedness of

the EOC personnel. It is indicative of the dedication to upholding the community's safety and

guaranteeing that the response actions are marked by competence, assurance, and a dedication to

outstanding.

The extensive training program will include numerous crucial elements. It will primarily

consist of a number of organized training sessions that will cover important topics such

as apparatus operations, analyzing data, ways to communicate, and handling incidents processes.

The strategy will also place a high priority on routine rehearsals and exercises, giving the EOC

team the chance to participate in simulated situations that replicate diverse threats, thereby

improving cooperation among teammates and response effectiveness. The strategy will also

provide an obvious route for employees to obtain pertinent certifications, such as those provided

by FEMA's Emergency Management Institute, guaranteeing that personnel retain an advanced

level of experience in disaster preparedness procedures. Finally, it is important to emphasize

ongoing education by encouraging staff members to attend seminars and conferences. This will
 14

help them keep up to date on the newest innovations and cutting-edge emergency management

techniques.

Proposed EOC Training Plan

TRAINING PLAN FOR EOC STAFF

I. Orientation and Basic Training (1 week)
a. Module 1: Overview of EOC Operations
i. EOC framework and function breakdown - this session will give a general
introduction of the EOC architecture and functions to make sure that the team
is aware of its makeup and their individual duties within it.
ii. Comprehension of EOC hardware and resources - this component will
concentrate on acquainting the participants with the EOC's infrastructure and
equipment so they are ready to work in that setting and make use of the
resources available to them.
b. Module 2: Foundations of Managing Emergencies
i. ICS (Incident Command System) comprehension - this session will be
dedicated to ensuring a thorough understanding of the ICS, a critical
framework that guides our emergency response efforts, enhancing
coordination and efficiency during crises.
ii. EOC staff members' obligations throughout the ICS paradigm - the particular
tasks and obligations of EOC staff inside the ICS paradigm will be covered in
detail in this session, including their critical commitments to efficient
handling of incidents and emergency synchronization.
c. Module 3: Mechanisms for Communication
i. Correct utilization of telephones, radios with two-way capability, and other
instruments for communication - this training program will concentrate on the
appropriate utilization of crucial connectivity technologies such two-way
radios, mobile devices, and other systems for communicating, allowing
efficient and trustworthy data flow throughout disasters between the EOC and
other interested parties.
 15

ii. Notification systems for emergencies - during this training course, staff
members will get a thorough grasp of emergency warning processes, giving
them the skills and practices needed to properly and promptly communicate
important notifications to the public and important parties during crisis
circumstances.
d. Module 4: Resource Administration

i. Monitoring and recording resources - in order to effectively handle

capabilities throughout emergencies, this workshop highlights the significance
of monitoring and registering resources. It equips professionals with the
ability to keep an orderly and current documentation of the staff members,
equipment, and supplies that are accessible.
ii. Techniques for allocating resources - personnel will learn how to allocate
personnel throughout this training session, enabling them to make well-
informed recommendations about how to apply resources to fulfill specific
requirements throughout diverse situations of emergency and maximizing
response effectiveness.
II. Advanced Training (2 weeks)
a. Module 5: GIS and Mapping
i. Using GIS tools for incident mapping - the course will focus on using GIS
software for event tracking, giving the team the tools they need to use it to
produce evolving, educational maps that help people see and comprehend the
geospatial components of emergencies.
ii. Pinpointing dangerous locations and vital infrastructure - this session will
teach learners how to use GIS technology to locate hazardous regions and
vital facilities, giving them invaluable information for preemptive disaster
preparedness and response.
b. Module 6: Risk Forecasting and Meteorological Observation
i. Analysis of meteorological data - this section of training will focus on the
analysis of meteorological statistics, giving personnel the understanding and
abilities to effectively assess weather data and enable prompt reactions to
weather-related threats.
 16

ii. Forecasting threats associated to the weather - attendees will learn about the
crucial duty of forecasting weather-related risks in this part of the course,
developing the capacity to foresee and get ready for adverse weather
occurrences to lessen their influence on emergency response operations.
c. Module 7: Assessment and Visualization of Data
i. Modern data analytics methods and tools - by learning about sophisticated
data insights tools and methodologies, staff members will be able to use data
to make better decisions and have better situational awareness when
responding to emergencies.
ii. Instantaneous incident dashboard creation - the expertise they acquire in the
course will enable them to generate visual illustrations of crucial facts for
quick and thorough situational awareness in crises. Learners will discover
how to design immediate time event dashboards.
d. Module 8: Reporting Observations and Occurrences
i. Watching and using surveillance cameras - this lesson will emphasize
operating and maintaining surveillance cameras, giving personnel the
knowledge to use them efficiently for disaster evaluation and continuous
surveillance, while improving situational awareness within the EOC.
ii. Examining and confirming event reports received from multiple sources -
Learners will develop their analysis and verification skills in this training
session, assuring the quality and dependability of data that arrives for sound
decision-making in circumstances of emergency.
III. Regular Drills and Exercises (Monthly)
a. Tabletop drills
i. Simulated situations to assess the EOC staff's capacity for communication and
making decisions - this part of the training program will involve running
scenarios that serve to assess decision-making and teamwork amongst EOC
personnel, ensuring that they are prepared to act quickly and productively in a
range of emergency circumstances.
ii. Examination and assessment of performance - this training segment will
include a review and evaluation of performance following each modeled
 17

incident, providing employees with important chances to evaluate their

decisions, pinpoint areas for development, and increase their capacity for
responding to emergencies.
b. Functional Drills
i. Exercises that require the utilization of equipment and tools – EOC staff will
participate in scenarios that mimic actual emergency scenarios as part of this
element of the training program, giving them the chance to put their
theoretical understandings and concrete skills in use by using equipment and
instruments for hands-on practice.
ii. Concentrate on certain risks or action steps - these hands-on activities will be
planned to concentrate on certain dangers or response techniques, allowing
personnel to gain specialized knowledge and self-assurance in dealing with
certain emergency scenarios successfully.
c. Exercises on a Large Scale
i. Simulations that are plausible, extensive, and include several agencies - in
order to evaluate interagency collaboration and responsiveness capacities
throughout complex disaster situations, this component of the training plan
will entail performing genuine, large-scale models that require the
participation of several agencies.
ii. The EOC's capacity to handle complicated crises should be evaluated - the
training strategy will strive to objectively appraise the EOC's capacity for
handling complicated circumstances via these large-scale scenarios
encompassing several agencies, finding points of effectiveness and areas for
development in the disaster of emergency coordinating and implementation.
IV. Certifications
a. FEMA Emergency Management Institute Courses
i. IS-100: Introduction to the Incident Command System (ICS) - the Incident
Command System's background, characteristics, fundamental ideals, and
organizational framework are all covered in this FEMA course.
 18

ii. IS-200: ICS for Single Resources and Initial Action Incidents - this training
program is a component of an assortment of ICS courses created to satisfy the
operations personnel's all-hazards, all-agency NIMS ICS certification.
iii. IS-700: National Incident Management System (NIMS) An Introduction - An
introduction of the National Incident Management System (NIMS) is provided
in this course. The course gives trainees a fundamental comprehension of
NIMS ideas, tenets and elements.
iv. IS-800: National Response Framework, An Introduction - The objective is to
offer direction to the entire neighborhood. It focuses especially on those who
are involved in delivering and applying the response core capabilities
b. Certification in GIS
i. Give GIS experts the chance to get credentials from reputable companies
including Esri.
c. Certified Emergency Management Recognition
i. Support employees to get disaster management specialist certification from
agencies including the International Association of Emergency Managers
(IAEM).
V. Continuous Learning
a. Seminars and workshops
i. For the latest information on cutting-edge technology and handling
emergencies best practices, EOC staff members ought to attend pertinent
seminars and conventions.
b. Occupational Training
i. Promote cross-teaching between staff members to increase skill and
understanding redundancies.
VI. Evaluation and Assessment
a. Consistently evaluate the knowledge and abilities of the workforce through tests,
hands-on training, and performance reviews.
b. Drilling and exercise evaluations may be used to pinpoint areas that need
improvements and modify the training program correspondingly.
 19

The EOC team will be well-prepared to manage a variety of dangers, make wise

judgments, and efficiently use the instruments and resources at their disposal owing to this

extensive training program. Additionally, it encourages the team's continued skill improvement.

EOC Budget

Financial administration following disasters must be competent for the recovery and

response process to be successful. It boosts the effectiveness of recovery operations, assists

governments in securing the funding required to sustain their regions, and lowers the danger of

audits and monetary sanctions for the jurisdiction (FEMA, 2020). It is crucial that all authorities

have strong versatile, adaptive, and agile disaster financial administration procedures and

strategies in place prior to a catastrophe for all sorts of disasters since budgetary and grant

requirements are severe and pertain to all regions, regardless of their size (FEMA, 2020).

Emergency finance oversight is fundamentally about acquiring the resources required to assist

the community throughout its direst times. Utilizing a strong financial oversight system in place

is the key to enabling the county to quickly obtain and deploy these crucial supplies, whether it is

finance for urgent disaster response efforts, the reconstruction of amenities or the delivery of

necessary services (OECD, 2015).

State and municipal public health sections, disaster recovery organizations, as well as

public and private health care establishments are responsible for responding to catastrophe risks.

Local government administrators, governors of individual states, and tribal representatives are

among the first to take action to any crisis, thus emergency planning and response begin there.

The ability to swiftly marshal technological and financial resources depends on implementing

established processes and capacities rather than necessary on the creation of entirely novel

governmental coordinating bodies (Katz et al., 2017). Ex ante budgeting for catastrophes can
 20

improve saving money, encourage greater efficiency in mitigation measures, and enable

restrained pre-commitment to following a disaster assistance and rebuilding in the context of

disastrous uncertainties. It is necessary to develop beforehand budget-sharing procedures for

recovery and involving local and federal administrations (Anderson, n.d.; Macaskill & Guthrie,

2018). In summary, catastrophe budgeting goes beyond mere statistics and expenditures; it is an

expression of the commitment to preserving the overall health of community members,

guaranteeing that financial assets are used effectively, and providing a quick and painless road to

recovery. The budgetary commitment shown here is a deliberate investment in bolstering the

EOC to make sure it runs as effectively and at the greatest level of preparedness throughout

crises and catastrophes. Each line component on this budget list is essential to improving our

capacity for responding to emergencies, and taken as a whole, they provide a thorough strategy

for updating the EOC.

Proposed EOC Budget

Item Quantity Unit Cost ($) Total Cost ($)

Communication Systems 10 2,500 25,000

GIS Application and Licensing 1 5,000 5,000

Weather Monitoring Systems 2 7,500 15,000

Surveillance Cameras 5 1,200 6,000

Emergency Notification Systems 1 3,000 3,000

Data Analytics Software 1 4,000 4,000

Real-time Incident Reporting Software 1 2,500 2,500

Resource Management Software 1 3,500 3,500

Integrated Communication Platforms 1 6,000 6,000

 21

Training and Certification Costs

 Staff Training (In-house) 20,000

 GIS Certification (Optional) 5 1,000 5,000

 Emergency Management 5 2,000 10,000

Professional Certification
Miscellaneous Costs 10,000

Total Budget 110,000

Communication Systems

The EOC administration will give priority on streamlined and effective connectivity

among EOC staff, emergency responders, and outside organizations via ten gadgets for

communication, apiece costing $2,500. The open flow of vital data will be ensured by this

expenditure, enabling rapid choice-making and integrated actions.

GIS Application and Licensing

For geospatial data administration and disaster visualization, the EOC's $5,000

standalone GIS application and licensing cost will be crucial. The ability to view and evaluate

geographic data will be crucial for equipping the staff to make wise decisions and allocate

resources in emergency situations.

Weather Monitoring Systems

The EOC's capacity for tracking and foresee meteorological-related threats will be

improved through the deployment of two weather surveillance devices, each costing $7,500.

These devices offer meteorological information in instantaneously, which helps with beforehand

notification and reaction preparation.

Surveillance Cameras
 22

The purchase of five surveillance cameras at a cost of $1,200 each will allow in-and-

around the EOC continuous observation and occurrence evaluation. The situational information

provided by these monitoring devices will facilitate efficient responding synchronization.

Emergency Notification Systems

This device, which costs $3,000, is crucial for correctly and promptly notifying the

general public and parties throughout emergencies. It will guarantee quick notification of the

neighborhood, improving public safety.

Data Analytics Software

Purchasing software for data analytics for $4,000 enables the EOC staff to analyze and

decipher a variety different information sources, including social networking sites, sensors, and

field observations. The procedure for making choices will benefit from this analytical skill.

Real-time Incident Reporting Software

This tool, whose price tag is $2,500, allows it to be simpler to collect information about

occurrences from emergency services personnel and the broader public in real-time. It will be

simpler to obtain prompt, precise data, which will support effective response activities.

Resource Management Software

The effective monitoring and control of workers, machinery, and supplies will be made

possible by spending $3,500 on resource management software. Throughout crises, resource

efficiency is crucial.

Integrated Communication Platforms

The capacity of EOC employees for coordinating emergency actions and keep in touch

with other organizations and stakeholders will be improved because to the $6000 expenditure on

integrated communication tools.

 23

The suggested spending plan includes $20,000 for internal training for employees in

alongside the technology purchases, to guarantee the EOC team is competent in using the new

tools and systems. The staff's competence is considerably increased through certifications like

the GIS Certification and Emergency Management Professional Certification, which each get

$5,000 and $10,000. In order to cover unanticipated costs, the recommended budget includes

$10,000 for additional charges. In conclusion, this financial plan demonstrates the dedication to

updating the EOC, improving situational awareness, and strengthening the capacity to efficiently

handle a variety of situations. These improvements are a calculated approach towards assuring

the community's welfare and resiliency in the midst of changing threats.

Conclusion

In summary, the county's dedication to improving the community's readiness and

endurance in the aftermath of the recent Mid-Term tornado is greater than ever. The leadership

has started on a revolutionary path after deeply realizing the value of situational awareness in

disaster management. This process includes adopting a "All Hazards" strategy, defining

situational awareness broadly inside a contemporary EOC, and strategically allocating money to

buy crucial hardware, software, and data streams. Additionally, the county's commitment

includes providing the EOC personnel with the necessary training and education through a

carefully thought-out training program. The technical report has presented a comprehensive

spending plan, reiterating the administration's resolve to enhancing the EOC's capacities as it

traverses this route. This project is not only concerning equipment and technology; it is a

monument to the steadfast commitment to protecting community individuals and creating an

improved future despite the existence of a wide range of ever-evolving problems.

 24

References

Primary Sources

Coughlan de Perez, E., Berse, K. B., Depante, L. A. C., Easton-Calabria, E., Evidente, E. P. R.,

Ezike, T., Heinrich, D., Jack, C., Lagmay, A. M. F. A., Lendelvo, S., Marunye, J.,

Maxwell, D. G., Murshed, S. B., Orach, C. G., Pinto, M., Poole, L. B., Rathod, K.,

Shampa, & Van Sant, C. (2022). Learning from the past in moving to the future: Invest in

communication and response to weather early warnings to reduce death and damage.

Climate Risk Management, 38, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2022.100461

 25

Damaševičius, R., Bacanin, N., & Misra, S. (2023). From sensors to safety: Internet of

Emergency Services (IoES) for emergency response and disaster management. Journal

of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 12(3), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan12030041

Ding, F., Li, Q., & Jin, L.-M. (2021). Experience and practice of the Emergency Operations

Center, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention: A case study of response to

the H7N9 outbreak. Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 10(1), 1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-020-00789-x

Du, P., Chen, J., & Sun, Z. (2016). Resource management system for crisis response &

management. In Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2016 Conference – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

(pp.1-7). https://idl.iscram.org/files/pengdu/2016/1375_PengDu_etal2016.pdf

FEMA. (2020). Disaster financial management guide: Guidance for state, local, tribal &

territorial partners. Federal Emergency Management Agency.

https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/disaster-financial-management-

guide.pdf

Hernaiz, R. S. M. (2020). Enhancing geospatial preparedness for disaster management through

the work of development organizations (Doctoral Thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa).

https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/98700/1/D0055.pdf

Hoggard, T. A. S. (2021). Emergency managers' perspectives on social media use for situational

awareness during disasters (Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University).

https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11448&context=dissertatio

ns

Horita, F. E. A., de Albuquerque, J. P., & Marchezini, V. (2018). Understanding the decision-

making process in disaster risk monitoring and early-warning: A case study within a
 26

control room in Brazil. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 28, 22–31.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.01.034

Murtagh, C., Calhoun, E., Velasco-Lopez, B., Coleman, A., Ozanich, R. & Tagestad, J. (2021).

Incident management software for emergency response: Focus group report (pp.7-17).

National Urban Security Technology Laboratory (NUSTL), U.S. Department of

Homeland Security.

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/ims_focus_group_report_jan_2021.pdf

OECD. (2015). Disaster risk financing: A global survey of practices and challenges. OECD

Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264234246-en

Pavkovic, B., Berbakov, L., Vrane, S., & Milenkovic, M. (2014, September). Situation

awareness and decision support tools for response phase of emergency management: a

short survey. In 2014 25th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems

Applications (pp. 154-159). IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/DEXA.2014.43

Presa Reyes, M. E., Pouyanfar, S., Zheng, H. C., Ha, H. Y., & Chen, S. C. (2018). Multimedia

data management for disaster situation awareness. In Proceedings of International

Symposium on Sensor Networks, Systems and Security: Advances in Computing and

Networking with Applications (pp. 137-146). Springer International Publishing.

Seppänen, H., & Virrantaus, K. (2015). Shared situational awareness and information quality in

disaster management. Safety Science, 77, 112–122. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.018

Steen-Tveit, K., Radianti, J., & Munkvold, B. E. (2020). SMS-based real-time data collection for

evaluation of situational awareness and common operational picture: lessons learned

from a field exercise. In Amanda L. H., Fiona M. & Christopher Z. (Eds) Proceedings of
 27

the 17th ISCRAM Conference (pp. 276-284). https://idl.iscram.org/files/kristinesteen-

tveit/2020/2228_KristineSteen-Tveit_etal2020.pdf

Steen-Tveit, K., & Radianti, J. (2019). Analysis of common operational picture and situational

awareness during multiple emergency response scenarios. In Zeno F., José J. G. & José

H. C.(Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th ISCRAM Conference (pp. 199-208).

https://idl.iscram.org/files/kristinesteen-tveit/2019/1931_KristineSteen-

Tveit+JaziarRadianti2019.pdf

Secondary Sources

Anderson, B. (n.d.). Budgeting for disasters. OECD.

https://www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/42407562.pdf

Bodas, M., Kirsch, T. D., & Peleg, K. (2020). Top hazards approach – Rethinking the

appropriateness of the All-Hazards approach in disaster risk management. International

Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47, 1-5. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101559

Bricka, T. M., He, Y., & Schroeder, A. N. (2022). Difficult times, difficult decisions: Examining

the impact of perceived crisis response strategies during COVID-19. Journal of Business

and Psychology, 38, 1077–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09851-x

Fromm, J., Eyilmez, K., Baßfeld, M., Majchrzak, T. A., & Stieglitz, S. (2021). Social media data

in an augmented reality system for situation awareness support in emergency control

rooms. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10101-

George, S., & Kumar, P. P. A. (2022). Indicator-based assessment of capacity development for

disaster preparedness in the Indian context. Environment Systems and Decisions, 42(3),

417–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-022-09856-0
 28

Goniewicz, K., Magiera, M., Rucińska, D., Pawłowski, W., Burkle, F., Hertelendy, A., &

Goniewicz, M. (2021). Geographic information system technology: Review of the

challenges for its establishment as a major asset for disaster and emergency management

in Poland. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 15(5), 573-578.

doi:10.1017/dmp.2020.74

Hascicek, Y. S., Kose, S., & Koytak, E. (2014). An overview of the use of satellite navigation for

disaster management and emergency response. International Journal of Emergency

Management, 10(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijem.2014.061658

Huggins, T. J., & Prasanna, R. (2020). Information technologies supporting emergency

management controllers in New Zealand. Sustainability, 12(9), 1–16.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093716

Katz, R., Attal-Juncqua, A., & Fischer, J. E. (2017). Funding public health emergency

preparedness in the United States. American journal of public health, 107(S2), S148–

S152. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303956

Kedia, T., Ratcliff, J., O’Connor, M., Oluic, S., Rose, M., Freeman, J., & Rainwater-Lovett, K.

(2022). Technologies enabling situational awareness during disaster response: A

systematic review. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 16(1), 341-359.

doi:10.1017/dmp.2020.196

Macaskill, K., & Guthrie, P. (2018). Funding mechanisms for disaster recovery: can we afford to

build back better? Procedia Engineering, 212, 451–458.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.058

Mbuh, M., Metzger, P., Brandt, P., Fika, K., & Slinkey, M. (2018). Application of real-time GIS

analytics to support spatial intelligent decision-making in the era of big data for smart
 29

cities. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Smart Cities, 4(9), 1–15.

https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-6-2018.162219

Merz, B., Kuhlicke, C., Kunz, M., Pittore, M., Babeyko, A., Bresch, D. N., Domeisen, D. I. V.,

Feser, F., Koszalka, I., Kreibich, H., Pantillon, F., Parolai, S., Pinto, J. G., Punge, H. J.,

Rivalta, E., Schröter, K., Strehlow, K., Weisse, R., & Wurpts, A. (2020). Impact

forecasting to support emergency management of natural hazards. Reviews of

Geophysics, 58(4), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020rg000704

Mohammed, A. A., Saeed, R., & Awouda, A. E. (2017). Public safety telecommunication

interoperability two-way radio systems. International Journal of Innovative Research in

Electronics and Communications, 4(2), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-

4050.0402005

Mujawar, S., & Joshi, A. (2015). Data analytics types, tools and their comparison. International

Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(2), 488-

491. https://ijarcce.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/IJARCCE-110.pdf

Nazli, N. N. N. N., Sipon, S., & Radzi, H. M. (2014). Analysis of training needs in disaster

preparedness. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 576–580.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.473

Oladapo, K. A. (2018). An overview of data analytics in emergency management. International

Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), 63(1), 35-40.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328391791

Pelfrey, W. V. (2020). Emergency manager perceptions of the effectiveness and limitations of

mass notification systems: A mixed method study. Journal of Homeland Security and

Emergency Management, 18(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2019-0070

 30

Penta, S., Kendra, J., Marlowe, V., & Gill, K. (2021). A disaster by any other name?: COVID-19

and support for an All-Hazards approach. Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy, 12(3),

240–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12213

Ragini, J. R., Anand, P. M. R., & Bhaskar, V. (2018). Big data analytics for disaster response

and recovery through sentiment analysis. International Journal of Information

Management, 42, 13–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.0

Raja, M. G., Samuel, B. J., & Kirubanandarasathy, N. (2015). Disaster alert notification and

rescue management through smart phones using GPS. International Journal of Applied

Engineering Research, 10(55), 2282-2287.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284592944

Sederholm, T., Ekman, S., Paakkonen, H., & Huhtinen, A. M. (2021). Inter-organisational

communication and situational awareness in an emergency operation centre during major

incidents. International Journal of Emergency Management, 17(1), 47-64.

https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1504/IJEM.2021.118771

Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K., & Owczarek, T. (2020). Complementarity of communication and

coordination in ensuring effectiveness of emergency management networks.

Sustainability, 13(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010221

Wang, Y. (2021). Multiperiod optimal allocation of emergency resources in support of cross-

regional disaster sustainable rescue. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science,

12(3), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00347-5

 31

Xia, W., Becerra-Fernandez, I., Gudi, A., & Rocha, J. (2011). Emergency management task

complexity and knowledge-sharing strategies. Cutter IT Journal, 24(1), 20-25.

https://www3.nd.edu/~veoc/resources/Papers/Paper-1.pdf